• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
21 region 7 stakeholder minutes-2010-08-18
 

21 region 7 stakeholder minutes-2010-08-18

on

  • 370 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
370
Views on SlideShare
370
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    21 region 7 stakeholder minutes-2010-08-18 21 region 7 stakeholder minutes-2010-08-18 Document Transcript

    • REGION 7 STAKEHOLDER MEETING NOTES Meeting Date: August 18, 2010 Meeting Time: 11:30am-2:30pm Meeting Location: Idaho Falls Meeting Facilitator: Sam Hulse, BHTWG Team Member Introduction of Sam Hulse and description of BHTWG by John Hathaway, Regional Director for Regions 5, 6 and 7. John encouraged questions and feedback from group. Sam: Overview of 2009 BHTWG creation after WICHE study and explanation of his appointment as a necessary law enforcement member on the BHTWG. Work Group needs assistance from stakeholders and consumers on how the plan should be executed. PowerPoint Presentation • Slide 9 – Emphasis by Sam on support of all judicial branches. • Slide 32 – Add accountability. Questions and Comments 1. Q: How influential can stakeholders be? A: Encouraged to give as much feedback as possible especially regarding execution of the plan since that’s where it has been weak on past attempts at transformation. Contact RSPR with additional comments, questions or concerns. 2. Q: Will the new electronic medical records system be integrated into the plan? A: That is an important question that should be addressed. We hope that there will be integration to prevent duplication of time and money already spent. Please address concerns on survey form. 3. Q: How will stakeholder feedback be collected and comprised by October 2010? A: Please make sure your voice is heard by giving input. RSPR was hired to ensure efficient, accurate and timely results that can be incorporated into the plan that is submitted to the Governor in October. 4. Q: Two people have recently been let go by Health & Welfare. Was this related to the new plan? A: There’s no indication that this is related.
    • John: Emphasis of integration that is already in place by uniform standards being enacted by the government. 5. Q: What is going to the Governor in October? Is it just the proposal or also an implementation strategy? A: Just the plan. The product will to the Governor but implementation will continue to evolve. The Transformation Champion will be appointed outside of any branch or agency and will enforce and follow guidelines and strategy inside of proposal. 6. Q: Will initial drafts of the plan be made public? A: Yes. Your input flushes out the rest of the proposal that is in draft format. The “things that we must do” are the areas that are not flexible to change. 7. Comment: Concern that institutional memory is limited due to high turnover rate - always starting over and making the same mistakes at improving system. 8. Comment: The majority of mental health services in the state are provided by private providers. They must be included in the Cooperative and acknowledged. We can’t ignore progress and take a different road. 9. Comment: Would like to acknowledge the myth about self-referral. Assessment and treatment do not need to be separated. A: This is not in the work of the proposal at this time. 10. Comment: PSR is a dirty word in this area. It is important and should not be left out. It’s looked at in a negative manner but that’s due to lack of oversight and tracking of outcomes. 11. Comment: Majority of services provided through Medicaid are reimbursed in 15-minute increments. Providers are focused on staying within time frame for reimbursement purposes and service effectiveness is lost. Capacity to serve is lost by 50%. A: Confirmation from other attendees that this is a problem. Martha Tanner: Medicaid does not acknowledge mentally ill people who drop out of the system. They should be looking at database, tracking outcomes and determining costs. Costs are greater for these individuals when they become incarcerated. A: We must inch forward and keep pushing. People that care and see deficits are key. John Hathaway: Is there some way to enforce or force individuals to take meds and stay compliant? Martha Tanner: PSR is key with necessary training. Comment: There are some really good PSR workers and some really bad PSR workers out there. This area should be strengthened and utilized for individuals that need it. PSR should not enable clients. Training and licensure for PSR workers is needed.
    • 12. Q: What happens if a new Governor is elected? How does the left and right communicate and listen to needs? A: This is one of our concerns. It’s an inherent problem in our government. We fear loss of momentum if this is put on the back burner. We will recommend that the Transformation Champion be elected for two-year terms to avoid being unseated – less bureaucracy and more accountability. There is legislative support for this. 13. Comment: There is a 43% increase in suicide in the last year. PSR workers and teachers are serving this population and they are made into bad guys when requesting more support. A: We can attempt to resolve this by accountability and data collection. Develop outcome documentation to show how positive results have come out of systems in place. 14. Comment: With the braided funding system, I fear that the lowest rate will be chosen when credentialing level dictates a different rate schedule. A. Different funding pots are braided together. We understand the concern that a lower standard of care rate is applied to a higher level of care. This is something that we will build as we go. 15. Comment: Payer must be different than the driver of service delivery. No balance and services become too micromanaged rather than the quality services that they should be. 16. Comment: Community Supports is a “clubhouse” model already created in Salt Lake City. It would fit perfectly in the core services pie chart. This was also done in WI. The challenge is that there is only 1 regional provider per area. 17. John Hathaway: Remember when the feds were going to help with nursing home care. Federal money started coming in and they had their own standards and surveyors. Money is a godsend but federal money is never free. There are multiple strings attached. Care becomes very owneress and cumbersome. Sometimes the payer forgets that it is our money and they lose sight of this when making rules. It is possible to influence change up front though. Your presence here today is critical. Please take the time to document your thoughts and complete the survey. 18. Comment: We must be working with the whole family of mentally ill patient. We need more studies on children in homes of mentally ill. PSR care should be focused on entire family. Longitudinal studies show the cycle repeats itself. 19. Comment: There is a lack of understanding of roles amongst PSR, law enforcement, etc. The conflict is destructive to the consumer. Cooperation is necessary.
    • Conclusion: We must all work together. It would be ideal to look back in 5 years and see improvement.