Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Chapters 1 3 pp
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Chapters 1 3 pp

283

Published on

Published in: Education, Spiritual, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
283
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Argument Based Research Eng 112
    May 24, 2011
  • 2. Chapter 1
  • 3. 1. “Argument requires writers or speakers to justify their claims”.
    2. “It is both a product and a process”.
    3. “It combines elements of truth seeking and persuasion” (Ramage et.al. 2).
    Three Defining Features of Argument
  • 4. Not:
    A fight or a quarrel (2)
    Is
    Often pleasurable (2)
    Entails a desire for truth (3)
    Aims to find the best solutions to complex problems (3)
    Argument
  • 5. Explicit
    Directly states its controversial claim and supports it with reasons and evidence (3)
    Implicit
    May not look like an argument at all (3)
    Explicit vs. Implicit
  • 6. Class Discussion Exercisespp.7-9
  • 7. 1. “A set of two or more conflicting assertions” (11)
    2. “The attempt to resolve the conflict through an appeal to reason” (11)
    Argument Requires:
  • 8. Justification of its claims
    “The arguer is obligated to clarify and support the reasons presented” (11). (Logically)
    ** Argue- “to clarify” (11)
    Three Defining Features:
  • 9. Process
    “Two or more parties seek the best solution to a question or problem” (12).
    Product
    “Each product [(argument) can be] any person’s contribution to the conversation at a given moment (12).
    Three Defining Features:
  • 10. Truth Seeking
    Exploratory— “lays out several alternative approaches to a problem and weighs the strengths and the weaknesses of each with no concern for persuasion” (13)
    According to the text “Truth seeking means taking responsibility for determining the ‘best answer’ or ‘best solution’ to the question for the good of the whole community when taking into consideration the interests of all stakeholders” (16).
    Tentative definition of truth seeking— “…you can not use argument to ‘prove’ your claim, but only to make a reasonable case for your claim” (16).
    Therefore “to seek truth…means to seek the best or most just solution to a problem while observing all available evidence, listening with an open mind to the views of all stakeholders, clarifying and attempting to justify your own values and assumptions, and taking responsibility for your argument” (16).
    Three Defining Features (Truth Seeking):
  • 11. Persuasion Can be:
    Propaganda (could use)
    Knowing use of bogus evidence
    Distorted assertions
    Lies
    Three Defining Features (Persuasion):
  • 12. Chapter 3
  • 13. Introduction
    Presentation of Writer’s Position
    Summary of Opposing Views
    Response to Opposing Views (Rebuttal)
    Conclusion
    Classical Structure of Argument
  • 14. Logos— (focus on) “the message”
    Ethos— (focus on) “writer’s or speaker’s character”
    Pathos— (focus on) “values and beliefs of the intended audience”
    *Kairos— “right time,” “season,” or “opportunity”
    Rhetorical Triangle—an effective argument pays close attention to all three appeals
    (62-63)
    Classical Appeals and the Rhetorical Triangle
  • 15. Information vs. Issue
    (Ramage et.al. 64)
    Information
    Relationship with audience is that of “teacher to learner”
    Audience “hopes to gain new information, knowledge, or understanding [the speaker/writer] possesses”
    Generally informs or explains
    Issue
    Relationship to audience is that of “advocate to decision maker”
    “Audience needs to make up its mind [about the issue/topic]”
    Is true argumentation—purpose is to change the audience’s mind
  • 16. Class Discussion Exercise p.65
  • 17. Genuine vs. Pseudo-Argument
    Assumes the possibility of growth and/or change
    Unmoving
    Genuine
    “Reasonable participants who operate within the conventions of reasonable behavior” (65)
    “Potentially sharable assumptions tat can serve as a starting place or foundation for the argument” (65)
    Pseudo
    Fanatic Believers
    “Believe their claims are true because they say so” (66)
    Fanatic Skeptic
    “Dismisses the possibility of proving anything” (66)
  • 18. Class Discussion Exercise p. 67
  • 19. Claim- “the position you want your audience to accept” (67)
    Reason—a claim used to support or provide evidence for another claim
    Usually stated as because clauses (67)
    Frame of an Argument
  • 20. Complete Journal Entry 1
    Finalize and turn in C.D. Exercises for chapters 1&3
    Graded Essay 1
    Develop an Issue Question
    Develop a claim
    Develop 3-4 reasons (because clauses)
    (due 11:55 p.m. Saturday, May 29, 2011)
    Develop an Introduction paragraph for Graded Essay 1
    (due by 11:55 p.m. Saturday, May 29, 2011)
    Assignments for next Week

×