Leif HinterbergerFrom:                                   noreply+feedproxy@google.com on behalf of The Urbanophile [the.ur...
Indiana’s Place-Based Clusters (Graphic by Luke Renn)To suggest that we think of clusters as place based as well as the mo...
Life sciences employment in Central IndianaOf course, there are key exceptions scattered throughout Indiana, such as the l...
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610                                                    4
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

-- Urbanophile - place based clusters - 1-26-10


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

-- Urbanophile - place based clusters - 1-26-10

  1. 1. Leif HinterbergerFrom: noreply+feedproxy@google.com on behalf of The Urbanophile [the.urbanophile@gmail.com]Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 8:46 PMTo: Leif@CarreauDesign.ComSubject: The Urbanophile: Drew Klacik: Place-Based Clusters The Urbanophile: Drew Klacik: Place-Based Clusters Drew Klacik: Place-Based Clusters Posted: 26 Jan 2010 01:16 PM PST Indiana’s Cities and Their Contributions to the State’s Economic and Fiscal Condition The Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute (IFPI) and the Ball State University Center for Business and Economic Research recently released a report that proves that in Indiana, as in most other states, when it comes to funding state government urban areas subsidize rural areas (Intrastate Distribution of State Government Revenues and Expenditures in Indiana, 2010). Civic leaders in Indianapolis and other urban areas often battle the perception that urban areas are net takers. But the fact that large urban areas are now documented as net givers rather than net takers may not be enough to change that perception and the entrenched anti-urban bias that accompanies it. The IFPI report does an excellent job of documenting the patterns of state revenue collection and distribution. However, focusing solely on state revenue ignores the locally subsidized contributions most of these urban counties make to their regions and the state. These contributions include investments in growing the state’s economy in the form of tax abatement and tax increment financing, as well as the provision of services to large, regionally important tax-exempt properties. For example, the city of Indianapolis provides both tax abatement and TIF to support the hotels, restaurants, and shopping facilities required to attract conventions, Big Ten and Final Four tournaments, and even the Super Bowl to the state. When these big events come to Indianapolis, it is primarily the taxpayers of Marion County who pay for the services, such as public safety, that visitors consume. Additionally, many of the facilities that attract visitors, including the convention center, football stadium, and basketball arena are tax exempt yet located on valuable property. In addition, core cities make contributions to regional and state economies that go well beyond the convention and tourism industry. In Indianapolis, TIF and tax abatement have been used to attract and retain firms in the life sciences, information technology, advanced manufacturing, and a wide variety of other professions. Indianapolis is home to 18 percent of all the jobs in Indiana and 24 percent of all wages earned. The fact that the share of wages is higher than the share of jobs suggests that the jobs located in Indianapolis are of high value. I suspect that this evidence is not going to result in an outpouring of support for Indianapolis or any other of Indiana’s urban counties. But what if we looked at the state’s economy spatially rather than from the now traditional industry cluster perspective? Virtually everyone accepts that the life sciences, transportation, distribution and logistics, advanced manufacturing, clean-energy, motor sports, and information technology are the competitively advantaged economic clusters that are essential to Indiana’s economic future. However, if we looked at the state’s economy geographically there are eight place-based clusters in Indiana that contain 48 percent of all the state’s jobs and 54 percent of all the wages earned in Indiana. Furthermore, when you add in their subsidiaries or places where employment and wages are attributable to the core industry, the share of Indiana’s employment increases to 66 percent and wages to 68 percent. Those eight place-based clusters are Indiana’s most populous and most urban counties—Allen, Elkhart, Lake, Marion, Monroe, St. Joseph, Tippecanoe, and Vanderburgh counties. All but Elkhart are net givers rather than takers. The subsidiaries are the suburban counties that comprise the metropolitan areas that surround these core counties and prosper due to their proximity. By definition, without a core city/county there cannot be an affluent suburban county. 1
  2. 2. Indiana’s Place-Based Clusters (Graphic by Luke Renn)To suggest that we think of clusters as place based as well as the more traditional industry perspective is not intended to diminish the importance of industry clusters, rather it seeksto acknowledge that many of our competitively advantaged industries are located in these urban counties and their surrounding metropolitan areas. For example, a study of the lifesciences industry in 2000 found that 48 percent of all life science industries in 30 central Indiana counties were located in Marion County (Indianapolis) and an additional 11percent of the Central Indiana life science firms were located in Monroe and Tippecanoe counties (two of the other core place-based clusters.* 2
  3. 3. Life sciences employment in Central IndianaOf course, there are key exceptions scattered throughout Indiana, such as the life science firms in and around Warsaw and advanced manufacturing facilities such as the new Hondaplant in Greensburg. More importantly, when we think about supporting the state’s economy, it does not have to be one cluster or the other, rather we should support both theindustry clusters and the places where many of those firms are located (the eight core counties). As the attraction and retention of human capital continues to emerge as animportant economic development strategy, making sure the place-based clusters are exciting and appealing is becoming an increasingly important strategy to assure that our clusterindustries can attract the creative class workers they need to thrive.These key urban counties have many economic and cultural assets, but not all is positive. Fifty percent of all individuals living in poverty in the state in 2007 resided in these eightcounties, average educational attainment levels trail the state average, and many of the urban counties have high crime rates. These issues and others threaten the ability of thesecounties to continue to be net givers supporting the state’s economy and generate the revenue necessary to invest in the future of our small towns and rural countiesAs Indiana and the nation seek to emerge from the most serious economic downturn since the Great Depression, it may make sense to turn to history and consider a notion firstespoused by the 1937 National Resources Committee’s report – Our Cities: Their Role in the National Economy. The report suggested that big cities are the drivers of thenation’s economy and that as go the cities so goes the nation. As Indiana begins to work its way out of the recession of 2008-09 perhaps it makes sense to recognize the economicand fiscal importance of Indiana’s place-based clusters and consider how Indiana might invest in our economic clusters (the key industries) and our place-based clusters (where thekey industries are located) to jump start our state’s economy. Perhaps most importantly, as the IFPI study suggests, without the tax revenue associated with these economically vitalurban areas there will not be any resources to invest in the future of the state’s small towns and rural counties.Thus investing in our urban areas is not taking resources away from small towns and rural counties, rather investing in our urban areas and making certain that they continue toremain economically competitive is actually a strategy that assures that we continue to have the resources to support the entire state. We cannot have a great Indiana without ahealthy core.* Wolcott, Susan. The Life Science Cluster in Central Indiana. The Center for Urban Policy and the Environment 2001.Drew Klacik is a Senior Policy Analyst at the Indiana University Public Policy Institute’s Center for Urban Policy and the Environment at IUPUI. Drew’s principal areasof work include economic development, state and local taxation, and community development policy. Much of his work is focused on trying to understand how these issuesinteract and affect the quality of life and economic vitality of regions. He can be contacted at dklacik@iupui.edu.You are subscribed to email updates from The Urbanophile Email delivery powered by GoogleTo stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. 3
  4. 4. Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 4