1. 1/16/2015 It’s Time to Solve the Long Standing Environment of Care Issues | Joint Commission
http://www.jointcommission.org/leadership_blog/its_time_to_solve_the_long_standing_environment_of_care_issues/ 1/2
Contact Us | Careers | JCR Web Store | Press Room
Search Go
Friday 6:08 CST, January 16, 2015
Home > About Us
Blog Detail Page
Archives
January 2015
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
show more...
RSS
Leadership Blog
By: Joint Commission Leaders
The Joint Commission’s monthly Leadership blog is written by leaders at The Joint Commission to
promote the sharing of knowledge and information, and to support and inspire health care professionals
in their efforts to improve health care for the future.
NOTE: Industry leaders are encouraged to submit guest blogs for the Leadership blog. Those interested should contact
Social Media Specialist Sean Ostruszka.
« Previous Blog Posting
It’s Time to Solve the Long Standing Environment of Care Issues
Jan 14, 2015 | 2004 Views
By Mark Pelletier, R.N., M.S., Chief Operating Officer, The Joint Commission
In looking over the standards noncompliance trends in the last few years, the environment of
care and life safety code issues continue to be the most often scored noncompliant standards
in hospitals.
With so many other challenges that hospitals and other health care organizations have to
overcome, to some extent from the accreditation viewpoint, they’re still stumbling over the
same issues with no real positive change in conquering these problems. Consistently
struggling with the same nonclinical standards is also alarming in that it’s disproportionate to
the clinical standards areas, where you would think more negative trends would exist since
caring for patients is the primary purpose of health care organizations as opposed to building
maintenance issues. Perhaps it’s good that organizations have more problems with environmental issues as opposed to
care giving, yet it’s a problem nonetheless.
It’s also a vicious cycle – faulty environment of care issues lead to infection control issues, so the environment, in fact,
harms humans. Who’s responsible to help break the cycle?
Many of the issues focus around aging buildings and campuses and lack of updating systems to stay in compliance with
safety issues. In 2014, 53 percent of surveys analyzed indicate that the most frequently cited finding was related to
improper air pressure relationships, air exchange rates and filtration. As organizations add or renovate buildings, older
systems are expected to continue to meet safety needs but frequently this issue is overlooked, leading to negative findings
during an accreditation survey.
Many of the issues in these areas are assigned to staff that are often not provided enough training and education on the
correlation of the physical plant and patient safety. We’ve found that many facilities leaders estimate that less than 15
percent of their management time is spent on compliance issues.
Another recurring issue is the discovery of holes in walls and door safety issues discovered during survey. When
organizations complain that their IT staff created physical plant issues while installing the electronic record system, that
probably wasn’t an expected result but its effect and potential harm can be prevented by reporting the damage to physical
plant personnel.
I talk to the health care Csuite folks frequently and from my viewpoint, 99 percent of them feel these noncompliance
issues rest with their engineering or facilities team. The engineering and facilities personnel point to the quality or
accreditation people and they in turn say it’s the individual floor personnel and facilities staff who need to be responsible.
So another circular argument ensues.
The problem in all of this is that the finger pointing doesn’t solve the problem. In reality, the responsibility for the
environment of care and life safety issues probably lies at the feet of many departments. There’s no one owner.
I suggest it’s not the tactical issues of just not doing something that is perpetuating these problems but instead a matter of
behavior – no one is owning the problem. Life safety code specialists indicate that funds are not allocated for education for
Accreditation Certification Standards Measurement Topics About Us Daily Update
Standards Information Standards Quick Links
About Our Standards
Field Reviews
National Patient Safety Goals
Online Question Form
Patient Safety Systems
Chapter
Prepublication Standards
R3 Reports
Standards FAQs
Universal Protocol
Comment on a Standard
Edition Electronic
Standards Manuals
Joint Commission
Requirements
Log In | Request Guest Access
Forgot password? | Log In Help