• Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
286
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. CHAPTER – V DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION Table 5.12 Gender classification of Customer S.No. Diseases affects in work environment Frequency Percentage 1 Male 38 76% 2 Female 12 24% Total 50 100 Chart 5.12 Diseases affect you in work environmentInference The above table shows that 76% of respondent are male and 24% of respondentare female.
  • 2. Table 5.1 Age wise classification of Respondents S.No. Age in Years No. of Respondents Percentage 1 20-30 35 35% 2 31-40 10 10% 3 41-50 3 3% 4 Above 50 year 2 2% Total 50 100 Chart 5.1 Age wise classification of RespondentsInference: The above table indicates 35 percentage of the respondents belong to 32-30 years of old,10 percentage of the respondents belongs to 31-40 of years, 3 percentage of the respondentsbelongs to 41-50 years of old, 2 percentage of the respondents belong to Above 50 years oldcategory
  • 3. Table 5.2 Timely in Customer Need S.No. Timely No. Of Respondents Percentage 1 Very Good 27 22% 2 Good 17 13% 3 Average 3 29% 4 Fair 1 14% 5 Poor 2 16% Total 50 100 Chart 5.2 Timely in Customer NeedInference: The above table shows that 22% of the respondents feel that they are very good in servingthe customers in a timely need,13% of the respondents feel that they are good in serving thecustomers in a timely need, 29% of the respondents feel that they are Average in serving thecustomers in a timely need, 14% of the respondents feel that they are Fair in serving thecustomers in a timely need, 16% of the respondents feel that they are Poor in serving thecustomers in a timely need.
  • 4. Table 5.3 Staff was friendly and cheerful throughout S.No. Respondents No. of Respondents Percentage 1 Good 8 16% 2 Average 39 78% 3 Fair 3 6% Total 50 100 Chart 5.3 Staff was friendly and cheerful throughoutInference: The above table shows that 16% of the respondents felt that the staff was friendly andcheerful throughout in a good manner, 78% of the respondents felt that the staff was friendly andcheerful throughout in average manner, 6% of the respondents felt that the staff was friendly andcheerful throughout in a Fair manner.
  • 5. Table 5.4 Response to customer queries In Company S.No. Respondents No. of Respondents Percentage 1 Very Good 15 30% 2 Good 8 16% 3 Average 27 54% Total 50 100 Chart 5.4 Response to customer queries In CompanyInference: The above table shows that 30% of the respondents said that the customer queries areresponded by the company in a very good way. 16% of the respondents said that the customerqueries are responded by the company in a good way, 54% of the respondents said that thecustomer queries are responded by the company in an average way. Table 5.5 Staff knowledge in organization
  • 6. S.No. Respondents No. of Respondents Percentage 1 Very good 4 8% 2 Good 10 20% 3 Average 25 50% 4 Fair 8 16% 5 Poor 3 6% Total 50 100 Chart 5.5 Staff knowledge in organizationInference: The above table shows that 8% of the respondents felt that the staff has a very goodknowledge, 20% of the respondents felt that the staff has a good knowledge, 50% of therespondents felt that the staff has a Average knowledge, 16% of the respondents felt that the staffhas a Fair knowledge and 6% of the respondents felt that the staff has a Poor knowledge in theorganization. Table 5.6 Staff offered pertinent advice
  • 7. S.No. Respondents No. of Respondents Percentage 1 Very good 3 6% 2 Good 23 46% 3 Average 13 26% 4 Fair 8 16% 5 Poor 3 6% Total 50 100 Chart 5.6 Staff offered pertinent adviceInference: The above table shows that 6% of the respondents felt that the staff has offered very goodpertinent advice, 46% of the respondents felt that the staff has offered good pertinent advice,26% of the respondents felt that the staff has offered average pertinent advice, 16% of therespondents felt that the staff has offered Fair pertinent advice and 6% of the respondents feltthat the staff has offered Poor pertinent advice regarding the products Table 5.7 Staff was courteous throughout.
  • 8. S.No Respondents No. of Respondents Percentage 1 Good 2 4% 2 Average 26 52% 3 Fair 13 26% 4 Poor 9 18% Total 50 100 Chart 5.7 Staff was courteous throughout.Inference: The above table shows that 4% of the respondents felt that the staff has good courteousthroughout, 52% of the respondents felt that the staff has average courteous throughout, 26% ofthe respondents felt that the staff has Fair courteous throughout and 18% of the respondents feltthat the staff has Poor courteous throughout
  • 9. Table 5.8 Staff carries the work as requested S.No. Respondents No. of Respondents Percentage 1 Very good 16 32% 2 Good 18 36% 3 Average 12 24% 4 Fair 2 4% 5 Poor 2 4% Total 50 100 Chart 5.8 Staff carries the work as requestedInference: The above table shows that 32% of the respondents felt that the staff carries the work asrequested in a very good way, 36% of the respondents felt that the staff carries the work asrequested in a good way, 24% of the respondents felt that the staff carries the work as requestedin a Average way, 4% of the respondents felt that the staff carries the work as requested in a Fairway and 4% of the respondents felt that the staff carries the work as requested in a very goodway
  • 10. Table 5.9 Recommendations based on Service experience S.No. Respondents No. of Respondents Percentage 1 Good 10 20% 2 Average 25 50% 3 Fair 12 24% 4 Poor 3 6% Total 50 100 Chart 5.9 Recommendations based on Service experienceIInference: The above table shows that 20% of the respondents said that they rate the service asgood, 50% of the respondents said that they rate the service as Average, 24% of the respondentssaid that they rate the service as Fair and 6% of the respondents said that they rate the service asPoor.
  • 11. Table 5.10 Impression about the Department visit for the first time S.No. Respondents No. of Respondent Percentage 1 Very good 5 10% 2 Good 12 24% 3 Average 20 40% 4 Fair 13 26% Total 50 100 Chart 5.10 Department visit in customer first timeInference: The above table shows that 10% of the respondents felt that impression created by thedepartment for the first time is very good, 24% of the respondents felt that impression created bythe department for the first time is good, 40% of the respondents felt that impression created bythe department for the first time is very Average and 26% of the respondents felt that impressioncreated by the department for the first time is Fair
  • 12. Table 5.11 Overall Opinion about the service S.No. Respondents No. of Respondents Percentage 1 Very good 15 30% 2 Good 22 44% 3 Average 10 20 4 Fair 3 6% Total 50 100 Chart 5.11 Overall Opinion about the serviceInference: The above table shows that 30% of the respondents said that their overallopinion about the service is very good, 44% of the respondents said that theiroverall opinion about the service is good, 20% of the respondents said that theiroverall opinion about the service is Average and 6% of the respondents said thattheir overall opinion about the service is very good