Social Media Reruns Are
Ratings Gold
The impact of reposting URLs on audience
engagement on Twitter
August 2014
www.rallyv...
In planning your social and
content marketing strategy,
we’re big believers in using
your Evergreen Content as
often as po...
That is, you should make sure
your content strategy has room
for your brand content that isn’t
tied to a particular time o...
But how much evergreen
content is too much
evergreen content?
That is,
if you continue to post the
same links to the same
pieces of content, will your
audience get bored and
stop click...
We pulled the data.
Specifically, we looked
at a single marketer with
more than 1,000
followers on Twitter who
posted 28 unique URLs
between 1...
That is, 8 URLs were posted once, two were posted twice, six were posted
three times, and so forth.
Looking at the data a slightly
different way, you can see
how many posts there were
by order of post:
As you can see, only three URLs made it all the way to elusive seventh spot,
while five made it to the sixth (three of whi...
With that data set, how
did the average clicks
per post change for
each spot in the order
of posting?
That is, was there a downside to
posting URLs more than once?
And, as you posted more
frequently, did your average clicks
...
Nope.
Not at all.
In terms of average clicks,
we don’t see a decline with
each successive post. Not
at all.
Here’s another look:
While the data is noisy
throughout, the overall trend line
is actually positive.
That is,
Posting URLs more than
once didn’t lead to fewer
clicks per post — it led to
more clicks per post.
Maybe a few posts were outliers and
were dragging the curve up and
down?
If you tease out each individual URLs
clicks vers...
So what gives?
Why are the results so
inconsistent?
Does post order matter at all?
The short answer is, probably not,
specifically because it’s very
unlikely that you’re holding
everything else equal when ...
That is, the URLs in the data set may
have been posted more than once,
but they weren’t posted the same
way.
There are ple...
Tweet copy/ accompanying text,
including use of hashtags
Use of images
Time of day, day of week of publishing
Relevance of...
Given the number of other factors
that impact the click performance
of a single Tweet, there doesn’t
appear to be any down...
If the exact same Tweet
was shared again and
again, well, yes, we
imagine the audience
might get a bit bored.
But, by varying the
presentation of those URLs,
and making sure that the copy
is relevant to the topics that
matter to the...
Rallyverse Confidential — Do Not
Distribute
28
So, go ahead, share it again. And
again. And one more time.
Oh, and if you’re looking
for a tool to help you
manage all of that owned
content and posting for
you?
Don’t worry:
Rallyverse can help .
Thank You
info@rallyverse.com
@rallyverse
Social Media Reruns Are Ratings Gold: The Impact Of Reposting Content On Twitter
Social Media Reruns Are Ratings Gold: The Impact Of Reposting Content On Twitter
Social Media Reruns Are Ratings Gold: The Impact Of Reposting Content On Twitter
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Social Media Reruns Are Ratings Gold: The Impact Of Reposting Content On Twitter

19,935

Published on

As proponents of using evergreen and owned content assets as part of your content marketing mix, we recommend that our clients liberally repost their most popular content (when it’s relevant and appropriate, of course).

And while many marketers embrace this strategy, others aren’t yet convinced. Won’t reposting the same piece of content bore my audience? Will I see fewer clicks and engagement on the content after the initial post? And, at worst, won’t it eventually drive my community away, especially if they see me as endlessly posting my own company’s content?

Fair questions, all. We decided to look at the data.

Published in: Social Media

Social Media Reruns Are Ratings Gold: The Impact Of Reposting Content On Twitter

  1. 1. Social Media Reruns Are Ratings Gold The impact of reposting URLs on audience engagement on Twitter August 2014 www.rallyverse.com @rallyverse
  2. 2. In planning your social and content marketing strategy, we’re big believers in using your Evergreen Content as often as possible.
  3. 3. That is, you should make sure your content strategy has room for your brand content that isn’t tied to a particular time or event: Product descriptions, explanatory videos, images, blog posts, how- to guides, etc.
  4. 4. But how much evergreen content is too much evergreen content?
  5. 5. That is, if you continue to post the same links to the same pieces of content, will your audience get bored and stop clicking?
  6. 6. We pulled the data.
  7. 7. Specifically, we looked at a single marketer with more than 1,000 followers on Twitter who posted 28 unique URLs between 1 and 7 times in June and July, 2014.
  8. 8. That is, 8 URLs were posted once, two were posted twice, six were posted three times, and so forth.
  9. 9. Looking at the data a slightly different way, you can see how many posts there were by order of post:
  10. 10. As you can see, only three URLs made it all the way to elusive seventh spot, while five made it to the sixth (three of which went on to become seventh posts).
  11. 11. With that data set, how did the average clicks per post change for each spot in the order of posting?
  12. 12. That is, was there a downside to posting URLs more than once? And, as you posted more frequently, did your average clicks decline?
  13. 13. Nope. Not at all.
  14. 14. In terms of average clicks, we don’t see a decline with each successive post. Not at all. Here’s another look:
  15. 15. While the data is noisy throughout, the overall trend line is actually positive.
  16. 16. That is, Posting URLs more than once didn’t lead to fewer clicks per post — it led to more clicks per post.
  17. 17. Maybe a few posts were outliers and were dragging the curve up and down? If you tease out each individual URLs clicks versus average by position, you see variance even on the individual URLs:
  18. 18. So what gives? Why are the results so inconsistent? Does post order matter at all?
  19. 19. The short answer is, probably not, specifically because it’s very unlikely that you’re holding everything else equal when you share your owned content more than once.
  20. 20. That is, the URLs in the data set may have been posted more than once, but they weren’t posted the same way. There are plenty of variables that can impact the performance of those posts:
  21. 21. Tweet copy/ accompanying text, including use of hashtags Use of images Time of day, day of week of publishing Relevance of the topic at time of publishing
  22. 22. Given the number of other factors that impact the click performance of a single Tweet, there doesn’t appear to be any downside to sharing a link to the same URL more than once.
  23. 23. If the exact same Tweet was shared again and again, well, yes, we imagine the audience might get a bit bored.
  24. 24. But, by varying the presentation of those URLs, and making sure that the copy is relevant to the topics that matter to the audience, marketers can earn clicks again and again — and deliver value to their audience.
  25. 25. Rallyverse Confidential — Do Not Distribute 28 So, go ahead, share it again. And again. And one more time.
  26. 26. Oh, and if you’re looking for a tool to help you manage all of that owned content and posting for you?
  27. 27. Don’t worry: Rallyverse can help .
  28. 28. Thank You info@rallyverse.com @rallyverse
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×