World's Worst Evaluators
Original Concept by:
Steve Howard, ACG
and
Mark D’Silva, ATM-S
Presented by:
ATM-G Raju Mandhyan
...
The Extra Terrestrial
 Does

not know what the speech
was all about.
 Has no idea whatsoever of the
objectives to be ach...
The Editor
 Is

an advanced, high-class Nit-Picker
 Evaluates only language, forgets the
whole package of the presentati...
The Critic

 Fault

finding machine for Substance,
Structure and Style
 Appreciates nothing, offers no STGOs.
 Effect (...
The Uni-Curist
 Has

one kind of cure/feedback for all
presentations
 Generally makes comments about
– Eye contact witho...
Mr. Nice Guy
 Has

nothing but praise for every
aspect of the presentation
 Omits STGO’s because emphasis is
on praise o...
The Star
Treats

Speaker’s performance
as secondary
Uses evaluation to promote Self
Overkills with personal skills
Use...
The Sleaze-ball
 Gushes

over appearance of speaker
 Hardly pays attention to what is said
because he/she is so captivat...
How To Be a Bad Evaluator
 Evaluate

as if you were E.T
 Edit as if you were Shakespeare
 Criticize speaker until he sh...
How Not to be a Bad Evaluator
 Have

fair knowledge of the principles of Public
Speaking
 Read and know objectives of sp...
Ultimate Purpose is to…

Coach
the Speaker
to Improve
11
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
World's Best Evaluators
Presented By:
ATM-G Raju Mandhyan
and
ATM-S Khris Albano

12
Presented by:Executive Toastmasters C...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

World's Worst Evaluators, Tagaytay, Toastmasters

401

Published on

1 Comment
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
401
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
13
Comments
1
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

World's Worst Evaluators, Tagaytay, Toastmasters

  1. 1. World's Worst Evaluators Original Concept by: Steve Howard, ACG and Mark D’Silva, ATM-S Presented by: ATM-G Raju Mandhyan and ATM-S Khris Albano 1 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  2. 2. The Extra Terrestrial  Does not know what the speech was all about.  Has no idea whatsoever of the objectives to be achieved  Talks about out of the world issues, gossip, etc.  Ends up using valuable time and space during a meeting.  Needs to be “beamed back by Scottie.” 2 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  3. 3. The Editor  Is an advanced, high-class Nit-Picker  Evaluates only language, forgets the whole package of the presentation  Primarily puts forward own literary views unknown to anyone  Speaker gets de-motivated because of the narrow perspective. 3 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  4. 4. The Critic  Fault finding machine for Substance, Structure and Style  Appreciates nothing, offers no STGOs.  Effect (not intent) Speaker’s selfesteem goes to the dogs  Critics are self-absorbed, they don’t realize they are being so negative 4 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  5. 5. The Uni-Curist  Has one kind of cure/feedback for all presentations  Generally makes comments about – Eye contact without explaining the benefits thereof – Body language for the sake of talking about body language – Etc;  Adds little new learning for the speaker. 5 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  6. 6. Mr. Nice Guy  Has nothing but praise for every aspect of the presentation  Omits STGO’s because emphasis is on praise only  Is liberal with words like “fantastic,” “fabulous,” “superb,” until they become meaningless  Comes across as shallow and insincere 6 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  7. 7. The Star Treats Speaker’s performance as secondary Uses evaluation to promote Self Overkills with personal skills Uses inane techniques, gimmicks + lot of drama. Provides little constructive feedback 7 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  8. 8. The Sleaze-ball  Gushes over appearance of speaker  Hardly pays attention to what is said because he/she is so captivated by looks alone  Most suggestions are about improvement of appearance and looks  Ends up annoying the speaker 8 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  9. 9. How To Be a Bad Evaluator  Evaluate as if you were E.T  Edit as if you were Shakespeare  Criticize speaker until he shrinks to death  Provide one set of solutions for all kinds of problems  Flatter the speaker till her head floats in fatty poo  Smile, gush and constantly talk about yourself until everyone leaves the room  Slurp, lick and suck-up to the speaker till he/she wants you to be padlocked in a pub. 9 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  10. 10. How Not to be a Bad Evaluator  Have fair knowledge of the principles of Public Speaking  Read and know objectives of speech project  Listen actively, objectively and with a goal to improve presentation and help speaker  Shortlist suggestions and praise speech and performance highlight  Chuck out own ego and own bias  Be genuine, gentle and giving towards the speaker  Keep feedback short, sweet and well structured 10 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  11. 11. Ultimate Purpose is to… Coach the Speaker to Improve 11 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  12. 12. World's Best Evaluators Presented By: ATM-G Raju Mandhyan and ATM-S Khris Albano 12 Presented by:Executive Toastmasters Club of Makati 11/17/13
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×