Denmark interliminal design_final oslo
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Denmark interliminal design_final oslo

on

  • 857 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
857
Views on SlideShare
244
Embed Views
613

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0

2 Embeds 613

http://systemic-design.net 612
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Denmark interliminal design_final oslo Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Interliminal Design ! mitigating design distortion ! ! Desired Outcome ≠ Actual Outcome ! DeAunne Denmark, MD, PhD Pacific Northwest College of Art Oregon Health & Science University
  • 2. 2
  • 3. What causes design distortion? Cognitive Heuristics and Biases Decision shortcuts that are rapid automatic the default 3
  • 4. Cognitive Bias = Inappropriately applied heuristic Unknown Unseen Unacknowledged and Uncompensated Ex. Confirmation bias 4
  • 5. Perception is (always) biased 5
  • 6. Biases/heuristics create limits Interliminal Design inter between liminal on both sides of a boundary “Agile switching between systems” 6
  • 7. Intentional Conscious purpose Adaptive Changing to suit a new purpose Imaginative Relating previously unconnected elements or ideas 7
  • 8. Interliminal Design is nonlinear and crosses boundaries Question Assess Wickedness Collaborate with yourself and others Opportunity Imagine Analyze Iterate Implement Adapt/ Abandon
  • 9. Interliminal methods mitigate biases ! Personal Structural that cause design distortion 10
  • 10. How? Deliberate altering of rules, viewpoints, roles, etc. to enhance perception and awareness Question Everything Now What are we doing and Why? Personal uncomfortable, upset, charged Structural re-visit desired outcome switch roles adopt conflicting viewpoint 11
  • 11. Acknowledgments Andrew McCollough, PhD Don Harker, MS Pacific Northwest College of Art MFA Program in Collaborative Design Peter Schoonmaker, PhD Oregon Health & Science University OHSU Brain Institute Bobby Heagerty ! ! many further resources upon request 12