ony O’Donovan
Child Welfare Advisor, Irish Youth Justice Service
Tony O’Donovan has worked in youth detention, at differing levels, for over 30 years in both Ireland and Canada. He became a Certified Instructor in 1989 and was part of the International Advisory Board of CPI for many years. He is presently the Child Welfare Advisor in the Irish Youth Justice Service and involved in developing policy in relation to youth detention.
Presentation Topic: Tackling Challenging Behaviour in Irish Children Detention Schools
Using his expertise in Youth Justice, Tony showcases the impact of ongoing training, at an organisational level, on the reduction in the use of restraints in the Children Detention Schools. Tony outlines how developing staff confidence in dealing with challenging behaviours has helped the Irish Youth Justice Service and present statistics that demonstrate the effectiveness of training in reducing the number and severity of physical restraints across the service.
2. Mission Statement
"To create a safer society by working in
partnership to reduce youth offending
through appropriate interventions and
linkages into services".
Irish Youth Justice Service
3. Leadership and build public confidence in youth justice system
Reduce offending
Community sanctions and initiatives
Safe and secure environment for detained
children, assisting re-integration into the
community
Information and data sources in the youth justice system
Youth Justice Action Plan
- 5 high level goals
4. Background
Irish Youth Justice Service (IYJS)/Dept.
Children & Youth Affairs (DCYA)
Children Detention Schools (CDS)
Present Structures - Unification of a Campus
Staff Body (Qualifications/Experience)
Policy Development
5. Physical Restraint Systems
Review of Existing System
1983 – 1987 (Self-Defense Training – Police)
1987 – 1991 (C&R – Prisons)
1991 – 1996 (C&R Services – Mental Health)
1996 – 2008 (TCI)
6. Review
Review of Behaviour Management (2008)
Child Welfare Advisor
CDS Management & Staff
CPI
Beginning of Review Process
Nearly 2 year Process
7. Problems Highlighted
Lack of Staff Confidence
High Number of Restraints & Injuries
Suitability for Setting
Preparation for Managing Older YP
Greater Resources Required for Training
Consistency Across Campus
8. Policy Parameters
Must:
Accredited Course
Not Rely on Pain Compliance
Be Resourced at Trainer Level
Be Consistent in Delivery
Stand up to Cross-Examination
Be Adaptable to Environment
Be Developmental in Nature
9. Development
Working Group
Input from Independent Providers
Review of Existing Programmes
Public Tender for Provision
Awarding of Contract
Development of a ‘Bespoke’ Programme in
Conjunction with CPI
10. ‘Bespoke’ Programme
Acknowledged Experience of Staff &
Trainers
Dichotomy between Security/Care
Different Environments (Old/Newer Units)
Different Staff Perspectives
11. Obstacles
IR Issues
Implementation Issues
On-going Training
Practice Drill Sessions
Co-ordination of Reporting
12. Statistics
School Physical Restraint Grade 2or above Serious Incidents Average Occupancy School Physical Restraint Grade 2orabove Serious Incidents Average Occupancy
OBS 18 11 30 12 OBS 6 23 38 16
THS 26 0 26 10 THS 32 1 44 11
OGS 6 32* 39 5 OGS 2 0 40 6
FCAC 8 ** 30 12 FCAC 0 0 1 7*
Total 58 11 125 39 Total 40 24 123 33
*one incident of grade 1 *FCAC closed on 31st March 2010
**only grade 3are recorded
School Physical Restraint Grade 2or above Serious Incidents Average Occupancy School Physical Restraint Grade 2orabove Serious Incidents Average Occupancy
OBS 8 7 27 16 OBS 22 5 39 14
THS 39 0 55 16 THS 27 0 31 11
OGS 5 3 26 5 OGS 4 5 8 4
Total 52 10 108 37 Total 53 10 78 29
NB: The age range for the boys was increased to include 16year olds on the 1st May 2012
School Physical Restraint Grade 2or above Serious Incidents Average Occupancy School Physical Restraint Grade 2orabove Serious Incidents Average Occupancy
OBS 19 4 54 19 OBS 0 0 6 17
THS 22 0 23 15 THS 3 0 3 14
OGS 0 0 0 1 OGS 0 0 0 2
Total 41 4 77 35 Total 3 0 9 33
2009
2011
2013
2010
2012
2014up to the end of March
13. What Stats Tell Us
Overall Drop in Restraints
Drop in Injuries
Ability to Manage Change
Quality of Training
Quality of Staff
14. Staff Training
Instils Confidence
Teaches More than the Course
Gives Trainers a Sense of Worth
Allows Staff Experience Success
Better Outcome for Young People
Editor's Notes
Irish Youth Justice Service in brief
The Irish Youth Justice Service is an executive office of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform with responsibility for leading and driving reform in the area of youth justice.
Working with the Office of the Minister of Children and Youth Affairs, the IYJS is guided by the principles of the Children Act 2001. The IYJS funds organisations and projects providing services, including Garda and Probation Projects, to young people aged under 18 years who find themselves in conflict with the law. These children may be involved with An Garda Síochána, the Probation Service and the Courts Service. We are also responsible for the management and development of children detention facilities.
Our remit is to improve the delivery of youth justice services and reduce youth offending. This challenge is met by focusing on diversion and rehabilitation involving greater use of community based interventions and the promotion of initiatives to deal with young people who offend. Providing a safe and secure environment for detained children and supporting their early re-integration back into the community is also a key function.
Children Act 2001
The main legislation covering children and the criminal justice system is the Children Act 2001, as amended. This Act focuses on preventing criminal behaviour, diversion from the criminal justice system and rehabilitation. The use of detention for a child is to be a last resort; the Act requires that all avenues be explored before it is used.
The commencement of the Act implemented wide-ranging changes in relation to the treatment of children who find themselves in conflict with the law with the emphasis on diverting young people from crime; re-integration and using detention as a last resort.
To provide leadership and build public confidence in the youth justice system;
To work to reduce offending by diverting young people from offending behaviour;
To promote the greater use of community sanctions and initiatives to deal with young people who offend;
To provide a safe and secure environment for detained children which will assist their early re-integration into the community;
To strengthen and develop information and data sources in the youth justice system to support more effective policies and services.