Network Infrastructure for Cooperative Print Management Constance Malpas Program Officer ALCTS CMDS  Chief Collection Deve...
Context <ul><li>Changing value of print collections in scholarly workflows is driving  reassessment of traditional print p...
Why I’m here . . . <ul><li>Part of broad community consultation  </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Collection managers – confirm (or d...
MARC 583 Essentials <ul><li>‘ Action note’ used to record local preservation actions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Condition asses...
Current Proposal:  Print Preservation <ul><li>Amend CCMT guidelines to  support use of 583 to record title or range-specif...
Potential Benefits  <ul><li>Elevates visibility and value of existing print archives </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Improved knowle...
If you wish to contribute . . . <ul><li>Participate in upcoming consultations </li></ul><ul><li>Discuss use of the 583 wit...
Comments, Questions?
Further information <ul><li>Preservation Administration Interest Group </li></ul><ul><li>Saturday, 24 January 2009 </li></...
 
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Network Infrastructure for Cooperative Print Management

1,369 views

Published on

Presentation to Chief Collection Development Officers of Large Research Libraries discussion group at ALA MW 2009 on importance of systematically disclosing print archiving commitments and proposing MARC 583 as a potential vehicle for network disclosure.

Published in: Education, Business
1 Comment
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Simple but effective presentation.

    Mark Chang, www.free-ringtones.co.in/ www.free-ringtones-for-sprint.com/
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,369
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
1
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Raising awareness of efforts within OCLC Research to provide some core infrastructure to support cooperative print management initiatives. Specifically, interested in soliciting feedback from Collection Management officers at large research libraries on the potential value of aggregating and sharing information about local and regional print archiving efforts.
  • Network Infrastructure for Cooperative Print Management

    1. 1. Network Infrastructure for Cooperative Print Management Constance Malpas Program Officer ALCTS CMDS Chief Collection Development Officers of Large Research Libraries 24 January 2009 ALA Midwinter
    2. 2. Context <ul><li>Changing value of print collections in scholarly workflows is driving reassessment of traditional print preservation mandates </li></ul><ul><li>Evidence that distributed archiving arrangements can substantially reduce ‘optimal overlap’ thresholds </li></ul><ul><li>In current economic circumstances, risk that opportunistic changes in print acquisitions may affect system wide preservation infrastructure </li></ul><ul><li>Absence of community or technical infrastructure to support coordinated management of aggregate resource </li></ul>System-wide challenges … system-wide solutions
    3. 3. Why I’m here . . . <ul><li>Part of broad community consultation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Collection managers – confirm (or deny) strategic value </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Technical services – assess operational feasibility </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Preservation administrators – workflow integration </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Seeking CCDO guidance on how to make aggregate data a source of actionable intelligence for collection management </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Operational considerations – when can data add value? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Selection principles – which data are most valuable? </li></ul></ul>
    4. 4. MARC 583 Essentials <ul><li>‘ Action note’ used to record local preservation actions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Condition assessment, de-acidification, repairs, microfilming, digitization etc </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Indexed and displayed in OCLC management systems </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Cooperative microfilming; Web archiving; Registry of Digital Masters </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Supports title-level aggregation of distributed investment </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Local preservation investments ‘rise to the surface’ in WorldCat; 400K recorded actions associated with 1M holdings </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Previously proposed as vehicle for disclosing item-level retention commitments and condition information for monographic titles </li></ul><ul><ul><li>North American Storage Trust / Cooperative Collection Management Trust </li></ul></ul>
    5. 5. Current Proposal: Print Preservation <ul><li>Amend CCMT guidelines to support use of 583 to record title or range-specific archiving commitments for serial publications </li></ul><ul><li>Encourage programmatic implementation to increase visibility (and viability) of distributed print archiving efforts </li></ul><ul><ul><li>RLG Journal Preservation project titles </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>JSTOR archives </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Single- and last-copy archives (TRLN, VALE, UC/CRL etc) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>National libraries (LC, NLM, NAL) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Depository libraries </li></ul></ul>
    6. 6. Potential Benefits <ul><li>Elevates visibility and value of existing print archives </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Improved knowledge base for decision-making </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Increases incentives for participation in distributed archiving arrangements </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Content contributors gain privileged role in building and securing ‘national’ collection; de-duplication less risky </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Supports coordinated management of print archiving efforts across regional and national boundaries </li></ul><ul><ul><li>UK Research Reserve, Group of Eight (Australia) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Represents existing infrastructure that can be deployed in near term </li></ul>
    7. 7. If you wish to contribute . . . <ul><li>Participate in upcoming consultations </li></ul><ul><li>Discuss use of the 583 with your cataloging staff </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Is it being used locally? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Included in batch loads to WorldCat? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Consider how preservation and archiving data from other libraries might be factored into local collection development decisions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>If CRL (etc) has digitized a title, can be it transferred to storage? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>If aggregate holdings are low and local interest is high, would you commit to retention? For whole classes of material? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Provide feedback on how (or if) this evidence base can be made more valuable </li></ul>
    8. 8. Comments, Questions?
    9. 9. Further information <ul><li>Preservation Administration Interest Group </li></ul><ul><li>Saturday, 24 January 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>10:30 – 11:30 AM, Marriott Denver, Columbine room </li></ul><ul><li>RLG Update Session </li></ul><ul><li>Saturday, 24 January 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>4:00-5:30 PM, Colorado Convention Center, Korbel Ballroom 4 </li></ul><ul><li>CONSER At-Large Meeting </li></ul><ul><li>Sunday, 25 January 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>8:00 – 9:30 AM, Colorado Convention Center, Room 403 </li></ul><ul><li>RLG Shared Print Update Session </li></ul><ul><li>Monday, 26 January 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>10:00 – 11:30 AM, Sheraton Denver, OCLC Green Suite </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li> Constance Malpas </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li> [email_address] </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li> Tel: 650-287-2131 </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul>

    ×