Oer11 cathedral bazaar


Published on

Is Open Education between the Cathedral and the Bazaar?: m?: the promise and pitfalls of borrowing models and metaphors for the OER community. R. John Robertson and Lorna Campbell , Phil Barker, and Li Yuan JISC CETIS
Presentation at OER 11, Manchester, May 11th 2011

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Image all rights reserved
  • Oer11 cathedral bazaar

    1. 1. Is Open Education between the Cathedral and the Bazaar?: the promise and pitfalls of borrowing models and metaphors for the OER community<br />R. John Robertson (1) and Lorna Campbell (1), Phil Barker (2), and Li Yuan (3) JISC CETIS<br />Presentation at OER 11, Manchester, May 11th 2011<br />1 Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement, University of Strathclyde, 2 Institute for Computer Based Learning, Heriot-Watt University, 3 Institute for Cybernetic Education, University of Bolton<br />This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence. Individual Images in this presentation may have different licences.<br />
    2. 2. overview<br />Some context<br />Models and metaphors<br />Examples<br />
    3. 3. Context: JISC CETIS<br /><ul><li>JISC CETIS is a JISC Innovation Support Centre. We provide advice to the UK Higher and Post-16 Education sectors on the development and use of educational technology and standards through:
    4. 4. participating in standards bodies
    5. 5. providing community forums for sharing experience about educational technologies and interoperability standards
    6. 6. providing strategic advice to JISC and supporting JISC development programmes</li></ul>3<br />
    7. 7. Context: UK OER and more<br /><ul><li>UKOER programme: Phase 2 of the HEFCE-funded Open Educational Resources (OER) programme runs between August 2010 and August 2011 (£5 million funding)
    8. 8. Other OER work in the UK and globally as well as other related technical developments</li></ul>4<br />
    9. 9. The impact of models and metaphors<br />models and metaphors shape how we think<br />for example, the Cloud<br />
    10. 10. The book<br />http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596001087/<br />or<br />http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/<br />Image from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cathedral-and-the-Bazaar-book-cover.jpg - Original image: Copyright all rights reserved O’Reilly Media<br />
    11. 11. models & metaphors in the OER world<br />What examples are there of models and metaphors connected to in OER?<br />Differences and similarities<br />The following is a brief, incomplete, and partially serious look at some popular models and metaphors considering, what they offer and some of their limits and problems<br />
    12. 12. The music industry<br />OER initiatives can model themselves on some parts of the music industry. <br />They can make money by selling services and stuff around the content they give away for free<br />
    13. 13. The music industry<br />Pros<br />Clear idea of paid for services to generate substantial income based on released content<br />Model appears intuitive and accessible to many<br />Con<br />Very few bands can make a sustainable income from this approach<br />Those that can are mostly already well established<br />Many bands either fail out right or have a very limited shelf life<br />
    14. 14. Open source software development<br />OER initiatives can model themselves on open source development techniques and communities.<br />Using voluntary community input<br />Selling services around content<br />
    15. 15. Open source software development<br />Pros<br />Clear idea of paid for, free, or community-supported services to generate substantial income based on openly released content<br />Familiar to educational technologists, developers, and those interested in technology more generally<br />Recognised ‘process’ for individuals to build demonstrable experience and reputation<br />Cons<br />Rate of failure of OSS projects (failure = unfinished and abandoned buggy code)<br />Difficulty in attracting and sustaining community input<br />Community input is often entirely self-motivated<br />Skills developed are ‘easy’ to test /accredit<br />
    16. 16. Open Access initiatives<br />OER initiatives can model themselves on successful Open Access efforts in sharing preprints of scholarly works<br />Use existing institutional structures, skills, staff<br />Publicly funded stuff should be publicly available<br />Doesn’t prevent others making money with materials<br />
    17. 17. Open Access initiatives<br />Pros<br />Relatively successful model set in an academic environment<br />Model has sustainability through ties to institutional priorities and use of existing infrastructure<br />Cons<br />Research materials and learning materials are very different (perceived value, shelf life)<br />Model and relationship with other forms of publishing still in flux <br />
    18. 18. The shop window<br />OER initiatives can model themselves on shop windows / loss leaders.<br />They can provide free access to some content to get people in so that they make you money by paying for other stuff<br />
    19. 19. The shop window<br />Pros<br />Application of proven commercial models of loss leaders and of advertising and using samples<br />Also provides an opportunity to enhance and promote institutional brand<br />Cons<br />Model does not need to be open just free<br />Always going to be a partial approach to sharing content<br />In academic sector, some value of giving away content known, risks unknown as yet<br />
    20. 20. The free market<br />OER initiatives can offer institutions a competitive edge and allow them to demonstrate the excellence of their courses<br />
    21. 21. The free market<br />Pros<br />Model partially reflects the context universities are in<br />Model will appeal to some universities and senior officers<br />Cons<br />Model likely to discourage reuse (we want our content out there)<br />Focus on competition likely to shape and restrict what content is released<br />The model may most appeal to the strong<br />
    22. 22. The commune<br />OER and OE initiatives can operate in a self sustaining manner based on relationship rather than ownership <br />
    23. 23. The commune<br />Pros<br />Model appeals to academics desire to share knowledge and teach<br />Model provides a ‘cause’ to join for altruistic reasons, out of commitment to your subject, or as a means to build reputation<br />Cons<br />Unclear how model is sustainable<br />Unclear how it relates to institutions<br />Unclear how model relates to accreditation works outside of institutions<br />
    24. 24. The charity<br />OER and OE initiatives can fulfil part of an institutions’ social responsibility.<br />Institutions can attract charitable donations to promote access to education<br />
    25. 25. The charity<br />Pros<br />Charitable funding model underpins much of early and large scale work releasing OER<br />For institutions, education as charitable act may appeal as it ties into local view of social responsibility and any relevant government policy around access to education (also fits shop window model)<br />Cons<br />Foundations have their own priorities and these have largely shifted from funding OER release<br />Appeal of charitable nature of OER is likely to be outweighed by required investment for many institutions<br />
    26. 26. The lifetime member’s plan<br />Alumni subscribe to their institution after graduation/ or sponsor a particular course. <br />As materials are released they get ongoing access to services around the OER or some form of acknowledgement<br />
    27. 27. The lifetime member’s plan<br />Pros<br />Alumni are an important source of additional income for universities<br />Ongoing access to resources for professional development may also act as a ‘shop window’<br />Cons<br />Role of alumni and their support for institution varies widely (by country and by institution)<br />Largely untested as a sustainable approach?<br />
    28. 28. The cute kitten<br />Everyone likes cute kittens – OER are like cute kittens – everyone should like them<br />People make lolcats for the fun of it and share them; people may make OER for the same reasons<br />
    29. 29. The cute kitten<br />Pros<br />Everyone likes cute kittens and the idea of OER is likely to have similar mass appeal<br />Cons<br />Even if something is good that does not make it sustainable<br />There may be a limit to how many kittens people need<br />It can be very hard to find a particular kitten<br />
    30. 30. The Reformation<br />OER initiatives are like the Reformation – they offer a radical overhaul of education and the development of a flexible and individually oriented (rather than institutional) process of education<br />
    31. 31. The Reformation<br />Pros<br />Many of those leading initiatives to develop OER do want radical change<br />Many OER initiatives treated suspiciously at first by institutions<br />Ties OER into an event that changed society<br />Cons<br />Potential to be a divisive metaphor for reasons unconnected to education<br />Likely to put off institutions<br />Blatantly ignores any historical understanding and unforeseen outcomes<br />
    32. 32. To think about<br />What models and metaphors are you basing your OER initiative on?<br />How are you describing it when talking about it to academics/ managers/ others?<br />What are the implications of your models and metaphors for sustainability?<br />
    33. 33. Questions<br />phil.barker@hw.ac.uk<br />robert.robertson@strath.ac.uk<br />lmc@strath.ac.uk<br />l.yuan@bolton.ac.uk<br />http://jisc.cetis.ac.uk/topic/oer<br />29<br />