What Happened To The Constitution

5,106
-1

Published on

This is a brief explanation of why we are under Military Rule and how we got there.

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
5,106
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
77
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • I put this presentation together so I could share with the people of this great country a true and accurate view of history about what happened to our country, these facts I am going to show you are not republic or democratic in nature, they are documents from the Library of Congress, State archives, Supreme Court, Senate and Congressional records and reports. Anyone can go get a certified copy of any of these documents for your own research. What I am going to show you is a small, but important part of what has delivered this country into its current condition and I kindly ask you do not believe what I am going to show you, please do your own research and the truth will be yours. One of the reasons we are in the shape we are in as a country, is because we let other people tell us what is true. The story these facts tell are about a corporate take over history forgot to tell you about.
  • We are going to discuss the Civil War and how effects us today by putting us under military ruleThe reconstructions acts and 14 amendment and how it changed our statusWe will show the Fraud of CongressBankingFederal ReserveIRSAnd much moreAnd we will do this using congressional record, Supreme court opinions and rulings and the law
  • Slavery was not an issue, it was State’s Rights. Lincoln even told president Davis that “slavery would be intact if they came back into the union”. Davis' response was “no because slavery is not the struggle we fight in this war”.Four States that fought with the North were slave states, Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri.President Buchanan did not wage war on seceded states, South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas all seceded while he was in office. November 1860 Abraham Lincoln is elected president. Lincoln received 40% of the popular vote and won 59% of the Electoral votes. He was not even on the ballot in the deep south.On Feb. 28, 1861 North Carolina Legislature voted on whether they wanted a convention to consider secession. The call for a convention was defeated by 651 votes, North Carolina would not even considering secession. Mar 30, 1861 "An Address to the People of Texas put forth by the Representatives of Texas, giving warning that, under the pretense of freeing the slaves, “the actual intention of the incoming Lincoln administration was to enslave a whole nation”, an ominous warning of what was to come.
  • On April 15, 1861 the Secretary of War notified governor Ellis of North Carolina that the Federal Government expected North Carolina to furnish 2 regiments of troops to make war of the seceded states. In Governor Ellis’s refusal he closed with these words “I can be no party to this wicked violation of the laws of the country, and to this war upon the liberties of a free people. You can get no troops from North Carolina.” North Carolina seceded from the Union
  • General Orders # 100The Lieber CodeWashington, D.C., April 24, 1863Instructions for the Government of Armies of theUnited States in the Field by Order of the Secretary of War:Article IIIMartial Law in a hostile country consists in the suspension, by the occupying military authority, of the criminal and civil law, and of the domestic administration and government in the occupied place or territory, and in the substitution of military rule and force for the same, as well as in the dictation of general laws, as far as military necessity requires this suspension, substitution, or dictation.Article VIIMartial Law extends to property, and to persons, whether they are subjects of the enemy or aliens to that government.
  • Article XXVICommanding generals may cause the magistrates and civil officers of the hostile country to take the oath of temporary allegiance or an oath of fidelity to their own victorious government or rulers, and they may expel every one who declines to do so. But whether they do so or not, the people and their civil officers owe strict obedience to them [commanding generals] as long as they hold sway over the district or country, at the peril of their lives.Article XXXIA victorious army appropriates [seizes] all public money, seizes all public movable property until further direction by its government, and sequesters for its own benefit or of that of its government all the revenues of real property belonging to the hostile government or nation. The title to such real property remains in abeyance [suspension] during military occupation, and until the conquest is made complete.Article XXXIIThe commander of the army must leave it to the ultimate treaty of peace to settle the permanency of this change. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A “TREATY OF PEACE” ENDING THE CIVIL WAR WE ARE STILL UNDER THESE RULES. DON’T BELIEVE ME next >
  • Where was the Treaty Signed that ended the Civil War?There was no treaty signed to end the Civil WarThe source of this information is National Park Service or NPS.GOV
  • SENATE DOC 43 also know as SENATE RESOLUTION 62 APRIL 17, 1933 (60 years later) states that:“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of government i.e., LAW and subordinate to the necessities of the state”
  • 1865 North Carolina was admitted back into the Union as the 12th StateDecember 4th 1865 North Carolina even ratified a new 13th amendment proving that the state was back into the union. The Old 13th amendment that was ratified in 1819 was removed from the history books and the Constitution.(unlawfully), Which said: “If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” Example “ESQUIRE”But, North Carolina along with other States refused to ratify the 14th amendment. Why?
  • On June 13, 1967 United States Representative, Rarick of Louisiana, submitted to the United States Congress, Louisiana House Concurrent Resolution, urging the United States Congress to declare the 14th Amendment Illegal. He also entered a treatise on the illegality of the 14th Amendment Prepared by a Louisiana Judge Leander H. Perez. The Resolution stated “Whereas the Reconstruction Acts of Congress unlawfully overthrew their existing governments, removed the lawfully constituted legislatures by military force and replaced them with rump legislatures which carried out military orders and pretended to ratify the 14th Amendment
  • March 2, 1867, Faced with ratification failure, Congress passed over President Johnson's vetoes three "Reconstruction Acts from March 2, 1867 through July 19, 1867 declaring the southern State governments to be illegal. Following are excerpts of President Johnson's veto message to Congress regarding its first Reconstruction Act. "The military is being used to coerce the people into adopting principles and measures that they are opposed to, and which they have an undeniable right to exercise their own judgment.”"The bill is without precedent and without authority, in palpable conflict with the Constitution, and utterly destructive to those principles of liberty and humanity for which our ancestors on both sides of the Atlantic have shed so much blood and expended so much treasure.""The purpose and object of the bill is to change the entire structure and character of the State governments and to compel them by force to the adoption of organic laws [14th amendment], and regulations, which they are unwilling to accept if left to themselves. If they do not form a constitution with prescribed articles in it and afterwards elect a legislature, which will act upon certain measures in a prescribed way [subjugation], neither blacks nor whites can be relieved from the slavery, which the bill imposes upon them“.
  • The Tulane Law Review Vol. 28 of 1953 in the article entitled The Dubious Origin of the 14th Amendment by Walter J. Suthon, Jr., former President of the Louisiana State bar Association, states;“The most extreme and amazing feature of the Act (Reconstruction Act of March 2, 1867) as the requirement that each excluded state must ratify the 14th Amendment, in order to again enjoy the status and rights of a State, including representation in Congress, Section 3 of the Act sets forth this compulsive coercion thus imposed upon the Southern States.The most apt characterization of this compulsive provision, placing these States under military authority, there to remain until they comply, inter alia with this requirement of ratifying the rejected 14th Amendment, is found in a speech of Senator Doolittle of Wisconsin, a Northerner and a Conservative Republican. During the floor debate on the bill he said; “My friend has said what has been said all around me, what is said everyday; the people of the South have rejected the constitutional amendment, and therefore we will march upon them and force them to adopt at the point of a bayonet, and establish military over them until they do adopt it.” Congressional Globe 39th Congress 2nd Session, Part 3, at 1644 (1867). Surely, the authors of our Constitution never contemplated or understood that ratification of a constitutional amendment proposal by a State could lawfully be compelled “at the point of a bayonet”, and by subjecting all aspects of civil life in the recalcitrant State to continue military rule, until said State recanted its heresy in rejecting the proposed amendment and yielded the desired ratification to the duress of continued and compelling force.”
  • The constitutionality of the Reconstruction Acts went before the US Supreme Court in Mississippi v. Johnson, 4 Wallace, 475. The court dismissed on the technical ground that the court had “no jurisdiction of a bill to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties” The Reconstruction Acts went to the Supreme Court a 2ndtime in Georgia v. Stanton, 6 Wallace, 50. The court found an equally good technical reason for declining jurisdiction by holding that the case concerned purely political matters, instead of personal and property rights. The court held that "A bill to restrain the defendants, who represent the executive authority of the government, from carrying into execution certain Acts of Congress, in as much as such execution would annul and totally abolish the existing State Government of Georgia, is not within the jurisdiction of this court.”The Reconstruction Acts went to the Supreme Court 3rd time in Ex Parte McCardle, 6 Wallace, 318. The US Supreme Court assumed jurisdiction on the constitutionality of the Reconstruction Acts and were argued before the Supreme Court. Before the Supreme Court could enter a judgment the Republicans in control of Congress rushed thru a bill repealing the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under the Act of 1867 prohibiting the Supreme Court from preceding on any appeal already before it. The court waited until the bill was passed and then postponed further consideration of the matter until the next term. In the biggest battle between Congress and the Supreme Court in this nation’s history, for the first time Congress removed the court’s jurisdiction to hear a case.The last attempt to obtain a ruling on the constitutionality of the Reconstruction Acts was made in the case of Ex Parte Yerger, 8 Wallace, 85. The Supreme Court assumed jurisdiction and this action was immediately answered by the introduction of a bill in the Senate explicitly prohibiting the Supreme Court from considering any case which involved the validity of the Reconstruction Acts, followed by another prohibiting the judicial review of any act of Congress.
  • The constitutionality of the Reconstruction Acts went before the US Supreme Court in Mississippi v. Johnson, 4 Wallace, 475. The court dismissed on the technical ground that the court had “no jurisdiction of a bill to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties” The Reconstruction Acts went to the Supreme Court a 2ndtime in Georgia v. Stanton, 6 Wallace, 50. The court found an equally good technical reason for declining jurisdiction by holding that the case concerned purely political matters, instead of personal and property rights. The court held that "A bill to restrain the defendants, who represent the executive authority of the government, from carrying into execution certain Acts of Congress, in as much as such execution would annul and totally abolish the existing State Government of Georgia, is not within the jurisdiction of this court.”The Reconstruction Acts went to the Supreme Court 3rd time in Ex Parte McCardle, 6 Wallace, 318. The US Supreme Court assumed jurisdiction on the constitutionality of the Reconstruction Acts and were argued before the Supreme Court. Before the Supreme Court could enter a judgment the Republicans in control of Congress rushed thru a bill repealing the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under the Act of 1867 prohibiting the Supreme Court from preceding on any appeal already before it. The court waited until the bill was passed and then postponed further consideration of the matter until the next term. In the biggest battle between Congress and the Supreme Court in this nation’s history, for the first time Congress removed the court’s jurisdiction to hear a case.The last attempt to obtain a ruling on the constitutionality of the Reconstruction Acts was made in the case of Ex Parte Yerger, 8 Wallace, 85. The Supreme Court assumed jurisdiction and this action was immediately answered by the introduction of a bill in the Senate explicitly prohibiting the Supreme Court from considering any case which involved the validity of the Reconstruction Acts, followed by another prohibiting the judicial review of any act of Congress.
  • What happened in North Carolina to Governor Worth From 1865 until his removal in1868 Governor Jonathan Worth fought against the programs of Reconstruction emerging from Washington D.C. He Loathed the 14th Amendment and the Reconstruction Acts, passed early in 1867, which provided for military rule, a new state constitution and elections to replace the existing government. The University of North Carolina Press, 1996 pp 272-273On June 30, 1868 General Canby of the US Army issued general orders #120 which states in part “to facilitate the organization of the new state Government, the following appointments are made: to be governor of NC, W.W. Holden, Governor elect, Vice Jonathan Worth removed…to take effect July 1, 1868 on the meeting of the General Assembly of North Carolina.
  • On July 1, 1868 Governor Worth surrendered the Government of NC under what he deemed military duress and not of the consent of the governed. During a time of supposed peace, in a letter addressed to W.W. Holden of North Carolina, he surrenders the State of North Carolina. The letter states in part: “Yesterday morning I was verbally notified by Chief Justice Pearson that in obedience to a telegram from General Canby, he would today at 10 A.M. administer to you the oaths required preliminary to your entering upon the discharge of the duties of Civil Governor of the State; and that there upon you would demand possession of my Office…I intimated to the Judge my opinion that such proceeding was premature even under the Reconstruction legislation of Congress and that I should probably decline to surrender the Office to you….I do not recognize the validity of the late election, under which you and those cooperating with you claim to be invested with the Civil Government of the State. You have no evidence of your election, save the certificate of a Major General of the United States Army. I regard all of you as, in effect, appointees of the Military power of the United States, and not as deriving your powers from the consent of those you claim to govern. Knowing, however, that you are backed by Military force here, which I could not resist if I would, I do not deem it necessary to offer a futile opposition but vacate the office without the ceremony of actual eviction, offering no further opposition than this, my protest. I would submit to actual expulsion in order to bring before the Supreme Court of the United States the question as to the Constitutionality of the legislation under which you claim to be the rightful Governor of the State, if the past action of that tribunal furnished any hope of a speedy trial. I surrender the office to you under what I deem Military duress, without stopping as the occasion would well justify. To comment upon the singular coincidence that the present State Government is surrendered, as without legality, to him whose own official sanction, but three years ago, declared it valid.”
  • On July 1, 1868 Governor Worth surrendered the Government of NC under what he deemed military duress and not of the consent of the governed. During a time of supposed peace, in a letter addressed to W.W. Holden of North Carolina, he surrenders the State of North Carolina. The letter states in part: “Yesterday morning I was verbally notified by Chief Justice Pearson that in obedience to a telegram from General Canby, he would today at 10 A.M. administer to you the oaths required preliminary to your entering upon the discharge of the duties of Civil Governor of the State; and that there upon you would demand possession of my Office…I intimated to the Judge my opinion that such proceeding was premature even under the Reconstruction legislation of Congress and that I should probably decline to surrender the Office to you….I do not recognize the validity of the late election, under which you and those cooperating with you claim to be invested with the Civil Government of the State. You have no evidence of your election, save the certificate of a Major General of the United States Army. I regard all of you as, in effect, appointees of the Military power of the United States, and not as deriving your powers from the consent of those you claim to govern. Knowing, however, that you are backed by Military force here, which I could not resist if I would, I do not deem it necessary to offer a futile opposition but vacate the office without the ceremony of actual eviction, offering no further opposition than this, my protest. I would submit to actual expulsion in order to bring before the Supreme Court of the United States the question as to the Constitutionality of the legislation under which you claim to be the rightful Governor of the State, if the past action of that tribunal furnished any hope of a speedy trial. I surrender the office to you under what I deem Military duress, without stopping as the occasion would well justify. To comment upon the singular coincidence that the present State Government is surrendered, as without legality, to him whose own official sanction, but three years ago, declared it valid.”
  • Trading with the Enemy Act 1917 (TWEA)This act was implemented to deal with the countries we were at war with during World War IIt gave the President and the Alien Property Custodian the right to seize the assets of the people included in this act, and if they wanted to do business in this country they could apply for a licenses to do so.The words “enemy and ally of enemy,” as used herein, shall be deemed to mean—  (a) Any individual, partnership, or other body of individuals, of any nationality, resident within the territory (including that occupied by the military and naval forces) of any nation which is an ally of a nation with which the United States is at war, or resident outside the United States and doing business within such territory, and any corporation incorporated within such territory of such ally nation, or incorporated within any country other than the United States and doing business within such territory. By 1921 The Federal Reserve Bank (the trustee for the Alien Property Custodian) held over 700 Million dollars in trust.In 1933 48 Stat 1 The TWEA was amended to include the United States Person because they wanted to take our GOLD away.In order for the Government to take our gold away and violate our Constitutional right’s we were reclassified as enemy combatants.
  • 1860 Congress was adjourned Sine Die, Lincoln could not legally reconvene Congress.1863 Leiber Code was established taking away your property and your rights.1864-1867 several Reconstruction Acts were passed forcing the states to ratify the 14th amendment which made everyone slaves June 30, 1868 Governor Worth was removed from office because he opposed Reconstruction Acts, the 14th Amendment and Military Rule.March 9, 1933 The US citizen was added to the TWEA Making us Enemy Combatants.April 5, 1933 Executive order 6102 was given to make it illegal for a US Citizen to own gold.April 17, 1933 Senate Doc 43 said it does not matter how we pay for things the because the State owns everything anyway.
  • 28 USC 3002”  The United States is a Federal corporationSenate Report 93-549 (Para 1) ”The United States has been under dictatorial control since March 9, 1933”.  (remember the TWEA)Senate Report 93-549 (Para 2) “Extraordinary powers have been delegated to the President, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners…to rule the country without reference to normal Constitutional processes” Report of the Special Committee on the Termination of the National Emergency, War and Emergency Powers Acts, November 19, 1973Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 1901.   Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan.  “Two national governments exist, one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument” (this is what we see operating in DC today)
  • Ben Franklin was asked what kind of government do we have, he said “A Republic if you can keep it.” Article IV, Section 4, guarantees "to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.What is a Republic? It means that law governs man.What is a Democracy or Oligarchy? Its when men govern each other by manuplating laws and statutes. (clearly what we have today)
  • In a Republic the Squirrel would be protected by the Law and the Raccoon and Fox could not vote on having the Squirrel for dinner.We started being called a Democracy around 1913 by President Woodrow Wilson. He said the American people are unable to make good decisions for themselves so the Government needs to be able to make those decisions for them. (time to eat the squirrel)Plato said a Democracy passes into Despotism(a form of government by which a single entity rules with absolute and unlimited power.)Karl Marx said Democracy is the road to Socialism.
  • We are supposed to have three branches of Government each equal in power. (well maybe even 4 branches) ExecutiveLegislativeJudicialWe the people
  • Department of Agriculture (USDA)Department of Commerce (DOC)Department of Defense (DOD)Department of Education (ED)Department of Energy (DOE)Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)Department of Homeland Security (DHS)Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)Department of Justice (DOJ)Department of Labor (DOL)Department of State (DOS)Department of the Interior (DOI)Department of the TreasuryDepartment of Transportation (DOT)Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
  • U.S. SenateCommittee Office WebsitesSenate Home PageSenate LeadershipSenators on the WebU.S. House of RepresentativesCommittee Office WebsitesHouse Home PageHouse Leadership OfficesHouse Organizations, Commissions, and Task ForcesOffice of Inspector GeneralOffice of the ClerkRepresentatives on the WebCAN THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH CONTROL ANYTHING OF IMPORTANCE WHEN THE PRESIDENT CAN ISSUE A EXECUTIVE ORDER AND DO WHAT HE WANTS WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, WITHOUT YOUR APPROVAL
  • Does it matter? Congress will just pass a law restricting the court’s from hearing any arguments it does not want the court to hear. They certainly have done this in the past.
  • NOWe are under military rule (we have to fix that first)Congress is destructive to the American people, I don’t care what your politics are.No political officer today is bound by their Oath of office, their contract protecting the people’s rights. If a Public officer violates their oath it’s a capitol crime. If Congress will not do what the President wants them to do he issue’s an executive order.There have been over 12,000 executive orders.The American People have failed to occupy the lawful offices created by our founding fathers since 1860 (Supreme Court)We no longer have the Three Branches of Government
  • The QueenThe LawyersThe UnionsThe Federal ReserveThe IRSOur GovernmentThe Bankers
  • She gets your Social SecurityStatutory Instrument 1997 No. 1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 22nd day of July 1997Present, The Queen's Most Excellent Majesty in CouncilWhereas at London on the 13th February 1984 an Agreement on social security between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America and an Administrative Agreement for the implementation of the AgreementNow, therefore, Her Majesty, in pursuance of section 179(1)(a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and of all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, as follows: Citation and commencement     1. This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997. Modification of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 and amendment of the Principal Order     2. The Social Security Administration Act 1992 and the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 shall be modified and the Principal Order shall be amended so as to give effect to the Agreement as modified by the Supplementary Agreement set out in Schedule 1 to this Order and to the Administrative Agreement as modified by the Supplementary Administrative Agreement set out in Schedule 2 to this Order, so far as the same relate to England, Wales and Scotland.Definitions     " 1. "Territory" means,as regards the United States, the States, the District of Columbia,
  • Who controls the Queen?1213 Papal Decree: On April 21, 1214, the Pope, in Rome, formally accepted King John’s surrender of his kingdoms and his pledge of vassal (together with the moneys paid in tribute); and three months later, in July 1214, Pope Innocent III raised the interdict against the English. Thus the Pope assured the English of ‘access to Heaven,’ from which they had been ‘barred’ by their king’s opposition to the Church Nazarene, or Communist, totalitarianism and denial of civil rights to mankind.  SOURCE: British Museum Publication G.R.C. Davis, entitled Magna Carta(211).  And American Counsel of Christian Laymen: How Red is the Federal Counsel of Churches
  • September 21, 1950REPORT ON THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILDLegal Bulwark of the Communist Party REPORT[Pursuant to H. Res. 5, 79th Cong., 1st sess. House report 3123]The National Lawyers Guild is the foremost legal bulwark of the Communist Party, its front organizations, and controlled unions. Since its inception it has never failed to rally to the legal defense of the Communist Party and individual members thereof, including known espionage agents. It has consistently fought against national, State, and local legislation aimed at curbing the Communist conspiracy. It has been most articulate in its attacks upon all agencies of the Government seeking to expose or prosecute the subversive activities of the Communist network, including national, State, and local investigative committees, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and law enforcement agencies generally. Through its affiliation with the International Association of Democratic Lawyers, an international Communist-front organization, the National Lawyers Guild has constituted itself an agent of a foreign principal hostile to the interests of the United States. It has gone far afield to oppose the foreign policies of the United States, in line with the current line of the Soviet Union.
  • These aims-the real aims of the National Lawyers Guild, as demonstrated conclusively by its activities for the past 13 years of its existence-are not specified in its constitution or statement of avowed purpose. In order to attract non-Communists to serve as a cover for its actual purpose as an appendage to the Communist Party, the National Lawyers Guild poses benevolently as “a professional organization which shall function as an effective social force in the service of the people to the end that human rights shall be regarded as more sacred than property rights.” In the entire history of the guild there is no record of its ever having condemned such instances of the violation of human rights as found in Soviet slave labor camps and in the series of Moscow trials, which shocked the civilized world. Communists publicly hailed the founding of the National Lawyers Guild. New Masses, a weekly publication of the Communist Party, featured an article entitled “Defense for the Counsel-The Need for the National Lawyers Guild” in its issue of June 14, 1938 (pp. 19-21) by Charles Recht, an attorney for the Soviet Government and a member of the guild, observed that: “With the growth of the American Labor Party in New York, and kindred progressive movements throughout the United States, the lawyers, who in many of the smaller communities are the nerve centers of political activities, will be an invaluable aid in galvanizing the latent liberal elements of the country into a political force. The National Lawyers Guild can and will form one of the most important adjuncts to a progressive movement representing the interests of the workers and farmers”.
  • These aims-the real aims of the National Lawyers Guild, as demonstrated conclusively by its activities for the past 13 years of its existence-are not specified in its constitution or statement of avowed purpose. In order to attract non-Communists to serve as a cover for its actual purpose as an appendage to the Communist Party, the National Lawyers Guild poses benevolently as “a professional organization which shall function as an effective social force in the service of the people to the end that human rights shall be regarded as more sacred than property rights.” In the entire history of the guild there is no record of its ever having condemned such instances of the violation of human rights as found in Soviet slave labor camps and in the series of Moscow trials, which shocked the civilized world. Communists publicly hailed the founding of the National Lawyers Guild. New Masses, a weekly publication of the Communist Party, featured an article entitled “Defense for the Counsel-The Need for the National Lawyers Guild” in its issue of June 14, 1938 (pp. 19-21) by Charles Recht, an attorney for the Soviet Government and a member of the guild, observed that: “With the growth of the American Labor Party in New York, and kindred progressive movements throughout the United States, the lawyers, who in many of the smaller communities are the nerve centers of political activities, will be an invaluable aid in galvanizing the latent liberal elements of the country into a political force. The National Lawyers Guild can and will form one of the most important adjuncts to a progressive movement representing the interests of the workers and farmers”.
  • Rockefeller, Warburg's, Aldridge, J.P. Morgan and other bankers created the Federal Reserve Plan in a private meeting on Jekyll Island on November 22, 1910.Charles A. Lindbergh, R-MN stated: “The financial system has been turned over to the Federal Reserve Board. That board administers a finance system by authority of a purely profiteering group. That system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people’s money. This (Federal Reserve) Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the president signs this bill, the invisible government by the monetary power will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed, the worst legislative crime of the ages perpetrated by this banking bill.” In 1913 The Federal Reserve Act was passed with only 3 congressmen voting on it. (congress was not properly adjourned for Christmas break allowing this to happen)
  • Congressional Record: March 3, 1934Congressman Weideman stated: "So the paramount issue of today is this: Shall the Government of the United States be run for the benefit of the international bankers or shall the citizens of the United States be given the right to 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness'? Shall we replace the Statue of Liberty with the golden statue erected to the god of greed? Shall we forget that the only time our Savior used force was when he drove the money changers from the temple? Let us reestablish the principle that we all believe in: That all men are entitled to a right to work, to own their own homes, to reap a just reward for their labors, and to enjoy nature's sunshine as God intended. We owe it to our children that we shall not depart and leave them in a condition of bondage and slavery to organized greed and gold.“Lewis v. United States 680 states the Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned: “we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities”
  • GRACE COMMISSION REPORTWAR ON WASTEJanuary 12, 1984  The Honorable Ronald ReaganMr. President, you have been so correct in resisting attempts to balance the budget by increasing taxes. The tax load on the average American family is already at counterproductive levels with the underground economy having now grown to an estimated $500 billion per year, costing about $100 billion in lost Federal tax revenues per year.  The size of the underground economy is understandable when one considers that median family income taxes have increased from $9 in 1948 to $2,218 in 1983, or by 246 times. This is runaway taxation at its worst. One-third of all their taxes is consumed by waste and inefficiency in the Federal Government as we identified in our survey. Another one-third of all their taxes escapes collection from others as the underground economy blossoms in direct proportion to tax increases and places even more pressure on law abiding taxpayers, promoting still more underground economy-a vicious cycle that must be broken. With two-thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government .Who is the IRSThe Government Accounting Office (GAO) stated in 2007 that “the IRS is a foreign corporation”.1954 Army Hand book has the IRS listed as a “Foreign Debt Collector”
  • National Security Study MemorandumNSSM 200Implications of Worldwide Population GrowthFor U.S. Security and Overseas Interests(THE KISSINGER REPORT)December 10, 197428. World policy and programs in the population field should incorporate two major objectives: (a) actions to accommodate continued population growth up to 6 billions by the mid-21st century without massive starvation or total frustration of developmental hopes; and (b) actions to keep the ultimate level as close as possible to 8 billions rather than permitting it to reach 10 billions, 13 billions, or more.29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two- child family on the average), by about the year 2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000 compared to the U.N medium projection, this goal would result in 500 million fewer people in 2000 and about 3 billion fewer in 2050. Attainment of this goal will require greatly intensified population programs. A basis for developing national population growth control targets to achieve this world target is contained in the World Population Plan of Action.30. The World Population Plan of Action is not self-enforcing and will require vigorous efforts by interested countries, U.N. agencies and other international bodies to make it effective. U.S. leadership is essential
  • If I stop paying my taxes how will the roads & schools get built.The Grace report showed you that all your income tax is wasted or goes to pay interest on the national debt, which is pure profit to a private bank called the Federal Reserve. Lets look at North Carolina’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report or CAFR report maybe we can find a clue there.
  • This is the cover for the 2009 North Carolina CAFR statement, the report is over 300 pages long I am not going to go over everything in the report you can do that for your State on your time.
  • But I will show you a few things that are in the report. On this page you can see that North Carolina has over 82 Billion dollars in assets and 11 billion dollars in liabilities, that leaves net assets at around 71 billion dollars, and they are going to raise your taxes seems like they have enough money. The City, County, and Federal CAFR statements will show you the same thing, that your government is well funded and takes your tax dollars and puts them in trust that benefits other people not the people that pay the taxes. You need to spend some time researching the CAFR funds, a good place to start is www.CAFR1.com. This is Walter Burien’s web site, he has spent years researching the CAFR funds and can give you a lot of information so you can completely understand your CAFR statement.
  • Article 1 Section 10 of the US CONSTITUTION clearly states the following:No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
  • http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqgs.htmNo, when the United States stopped selling gold to foreign official holders of dollars at the rate of $35 an ounce in 1971, it brought the gold exchange standard to an end. In 1973, the United States officially ended its adherence to the gold standard. In August 1974, President Ford repealed the prohibition on the public's owning gold or engaging in gold transactions..
  • NO, You are not a party to the Constitution you are a enemy combatant (remember the TWEA)HJR 192 (also known as public law 73-10) was passed making it illegal for anyone to require you to pay a debt in a particular kind or type of currency"To assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the Unites States,Whereas the holding of or dealing in gold affect public interest, and are therefore subject to proper regulation and restriction; andWhereas the existing emergency has disclosed that provisions of obligations which purport to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency of the United States, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, obstruct the power of the Congress to regulate the value of the money of the United States, and are inconsistent with the declared policy of the Congress to maintain at all times the equal power of every dollar, coined or issued by the United States, in the markets and in the payment of debts,Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representative of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that
  • (a) every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payments in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy; and no such provision shall be contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred. Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provision is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts. Any such provision contained in any law authorizing obligations to be issued by or under authority of the United States, is herby repealed, but the repeal of any such provision shall not invalidate any other provision or authority contained in such law.(b) As used in this resolution, the term 'obligation' means any obligation (including every obligation of and to the United States, excepting currency) payable in money of the United States; and the term 'coin or currency' means coin or currency of the United States, including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations.
  • Money is created by Congress telling Treasury to sell bonds to the Federal Reserve so the Fed can create money (these bonds are based on your labor). This money is created because the Fed is pretty sure the Treasury (IRS) will be able to collect taxes to pay off the debt.Most of the Nations Money is created at your bank when you borrow money. (LAW SAYS YOU CREATED THE MONEY)YOU CREATE ALL “MONEY” ONE WAY OR ANOTHER YOUR SLAVE LABOR PROVIDES THE ENERGY FOR IT BUT THE FEDERAL RESERVE GETS THE INTEREST.
  • The Uniform Commercial Code 3-102 (c) says "Regulations of the Board of governors of the Federal Reserve System and operating circulars of the Federal Reserve Banks supersede any inconsistent provision of this Article to the extent of the Inconsistency." The reason this is important is to prove that the Federal Reserve publications you are about to see have relevance in Law.
  • By Anne Marie L. Gonczy states on page 6 states:"Of course they [Banks] do not really pay out loans from the money they receive as deposits.” If they did this no additional money would be created.Your $10,000.00 loan you take out at a bank (that you pay back with interest) allows the bank to create an additional $90,000.00 in loans to other customers. (and you pay them interest)
  • You go to the bank to get a loan to buy a home and sign a promissory note for $100,000.00The bank Deposits this $100,000.00 note into a bank account with your name on it. (it’s the Law)The bank gives you a check for $100,000.00 to go and purchase your home.So, has the bank loaned you any money?
  • No, you made a deposit with the bank for $100,000.00 (your promissory note) and the bank gave you a check for $100,000.00, now you are even. Remember it’s against the law for a bank to loan you its depositors and investors moneyBut you are a good slave you think that you are able to purchase and own property, so why not let you think you barrowed money too.So you make payments to the bank, meanwhile the bank sends a 1099 A (abandonment of funds) to the IRS because you are paying money to a bank that you did not borrow any from. There books have to balance.
  • Well the worst part isn't that you are paying a bank principal and interest for money that the law says you did not borrow.The worst part is that the bank is using your promissory note as reserve so they can loan out more money.Your Promissory Note became a tier 1 asset for the bank allowing them to take your $100,000.00 note and lend out $900,000.00 more to other customers. And you are paying them interest.
  • Page 11, explains that “when banks grant loans, they create new money,The new money is created because a new loan becomes a deposit, just like a paycheck does.” Next is a copy of a promissory note that has been stamped on the bottom of the second page “PAY TO THE ORDER OF WITH OUT RECOURSE”so it could be deposited by the Bank.
  • “Most people suppose that a bank lends the deposit of its customers, however, no bank ever lends its deposits”
  • by David H. Friedman states:“banks create new money by depositing promissory notes”.“The commercial bank lending process is similar to that of a thrift in that the receipt of cash from depositors increases both its assets and its deposit liabilities, which enables it to make additional loans and investments. It accepts as an asset the borrower’s debt obligation (the promise to repay) and creates a liability on its books in the form of a demand deposit in the amount of the loan.”“Banks create new money by depositing IOUs, promissory notes, offset by bank liabilities called checking account balancesPage 5 says, “Money doesn’t have to be intrinsically valuable, be issued by government, or be in any special form”
  • By Anne Marie L. Gonczy on page 19 states:“Such newly created funds are in addition to funds that all financial institutions provide in their operations”"A deposit created through lending is a debt that has to be paid on demand of the depositor, just the same as the debt rising from a customer's deposit of checks in a bank”"depositor's balance rises when the depository institution extends credit either by granting a loan to, or by buying securities from the depositor in exchange for the note or security, the lending or investing institution credits the depositors account or gives a check that can be deposited at yet another depository at yet another institution. In this case no one loses a deposit the money supply is increased. New money has been brought into existence,"
  • Banks must follow the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) which are in the federal statutes at 12 USC. Sec. 1831n (a) (2) (Accounting objectives, standards, and requirements). This includes but not limited to the matching principleThis matching principle accounting shows the bank’s assets actually increased when they create loans. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles 2003 edition published by Wiley page 41 under the section cash and Cash equivalents states, "Anything accepted by a bank to deposit would be considered as cash.”Your promissory note is deposited at the bank the same way your pay check is. The bank uses that deposit as a reserve so they can create more money to loan out to other customers.
  • Congressional Record 1933, Page 83 “The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation”Congressional Record, April 9, 1934 Congressman Patman: “A Federal Reserve bank has a great privilege. It has the right to issue a blanket mortgage on all the property of all the people of this country. It is called a Federal Reserve note. For that privilege section 16 of the act provides that when the Government prints a Federal Reserve note and guarantees to pay that note and delivers it to a Federal Reserve bank, that Federal Reserve bank shall pay -- it seems to be mandatory, the rate of interest that is set by the Federal Reserve Board. The law has never been put into effect. The Federal Reserve Board sets the zero rate. Instead of charging an interest rate which the law says they shall charge, they set no rate at all. Therefore, for the use of this great Government credit, these blanket mortgages that are issued against all the property of all the people of this Nation and against the incomes of all the people of this Nation, they do not pay one penny. Not one penny of the stock of the Federal Reserve banks is owned by the Government or the people, but it is owned by private banks exclusively. They do not pay one penny for the use of that great privilege, to the people or to the Government. (CR, 4-9-1934)Your labor has built or rebuilt just about every nation in the world. Have you received any consideration for lending the world your credit? YOU ARE THE BEST SLAVE, BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU ARE FREE.
  • Banking and Monetary Studies, by Deane Carson, (Homewood, III.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1963), pp. 408-419.Whatever their other errors, a long line of financial heretics have been right in speaking of "fountain pen money"-”money created by the stroke of the bank president's pen when he approves a loan and credits the proceeds to the borrower's checking account”
  • They have sued and wonIN RE: First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Jerome Daly in The Justice Court State of Minnesota County Of Scott Township Of Credit River Justice Martin V. Mahoney the jury found that:That the Plaintiff is not entitled to recover the possession of Lot 19, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota according to the Plat thereof on file in the Register of Deeds office.That because of failure of a lawful consideration the Note and Mortgage dated May 8, 1964 are null and void.That the Sheriff's sale of the above described premises held on June 26, 1967 is null and void, of no effect.That the Plaintiff has no right title or interest in said premises or lien thereon as is above described.That any provision in the Minnesota Constitution and any Minnesota Statute binding the jurisdiction of this Court is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and to the Bill of Rights of the Minnesota Constitution and is null and void and that this Court has jurisdiction to render complete Justice in this Cause.Sections 50, 51 and 52 of Am Jur 2nd “Actions” on page 584 – “no action will lie to recover on a claim based upon, or in any manner depending upon, a fraudulent, illegal, or immoral transaction or contract to which Plaintiff was a party
  • The Supreme Court has said the De jure government offices still exist but the people have failed to occupy them. We need to change that by organizing Grand Jury’s and putting our official’s back under De jure rule and out of the Corporate (or Military) Rule that they are currently operating under.Our elected official’s will then have to operate under the limits of their Oath of office to uphold the U.S. and State Constitution’s circa 1860, when they violate the Oath it’s a capital crime.
  • MAGNA CARTA 1215Our Founding Fathers looked back to history for president when they decided they wanted to change their government. What they found was the Magna CartaLibertatum, the Great Charter of Freedoms. It set a precedent which changed the face of England forever, by establishing that the King was not above the law.King John of England signed the Magna Carta after immense pressure from the Church and his barons (the people). The King often lived above the law, violating both feudal and common law, and was heavily criticized for his foreign policy and actions within England. The Barons, with the support of the Church, pressured King John to spell out a list of their rights and guarantee that those rights would be enforced. The Barons provided a draft, and after some negotiation, King John put his seal to the Magna Carta in Runnymede in June of 1215Section 61 set rules for establishing the Grand Jury it states: SINCE WE HAVE GRANTED ALL THESE THINGS for God, for the better ordering of our kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons (people), and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lasting strength, for ever, we give and grant to the barons the following security: The barons shall elect twenty-five of their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter. If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us
  • MAGNA CARTA 1215Our Founding Fathers looked back to history for president when they decided they wanted to change their government. What they found was the Magna CartaLibertatum, the Great Charter of Freedoms. It set a precedent which changed the face of England forever, by establishing that the King was not above the law.King John of England signed the Magna Carta after immense pressure from the Church and his barons (the people). The King often lived above the law, violating both feudal and common law, and was heavily criticized for his foreign policy and actions within England. The Barons, with the support of the Church, pressured King John to spell out a list of their rights and guarantee that those rights would be enforced. The Barons provided a draft, and after some negotiation, King John put his seal to the Magna Carta in Runnymede in June of 1215Section 61 set rules for establishing the Grand Jury it states: SINCE WE HAVE GRANTED ALL THESE THINGS for God, for the better ordering of our kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons (people), and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lasting strength, for ever, we give and grant to the barons the following security: The barons shall elect twenty-five of their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter. If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us
  • I hope you have seen how our financial system has robed us and our children of the right to the pursuit of happiness and freedom. At the turn of the 20th century 90% of homes, farms and business were owned outright with no mortgages. At the turn of the 21st century only about 5% are mortgage free and today 1 out of 5 homes are in foreclosure.
  • Right now a bank is trying to take your neighbors home from them because they have not made their payments. But in realty not only did the bank not loan your neighbor any money. The bank took the promissory note your neighbor signed and then deposited the note into a bank account with your neighbors name one and used it as a asset. Then used it as reserves to loan out 10 times that amount of money out of thin air. The laws prove it, the banks accounting records prove, the banks operating circulars prove it and their Tax records prove it. This is a crime on a scale very few can even imagine. I challenge anyone to get the bank to show you the account where the money came from that say they loaned you, make them prove that the money existed before you signed the loan papers. Dose the bank pay you for loaning them the money, giving them the ability to create 10 times the money out of thin air. Do they send you a check for the interest they earned on the loan you made them. You purportedly borrowed 100,000.00 but the law proves their tax records prove you made a deposit with them and gave them the ability to create One Million dollars out of thin air. You are a very nice and giving person. Banks are a good thing when the take real risk and loan you money but the banks we see today are evil intuitions as quoted by Charles Lindberg
  • What would this country look like today if our labor had not been stolen over the last 100 years so the international bankers could use our slave labor to wage war, influence foreign policy against countries that refused to allow them control and force countries adopt population control programs by withholding food supplies. How much could we, the most charitable nation in the world have helped each other and other nations if that had not happened.
  • I do not want you to think that I am against government either or some kind of anarchist; I believe in government, I believe in agovernment by the people and for the people, and by people I do not mean only the people in Washington D.C. Most, of all those people are corrupt beyond repair, and the few good people that are there are so badly outnumbered they are irrelevant.
  • This country belongs to the people not the politicians and bankers. Other countries are watching us today wondering why the American people are allowing this to happen. Many countries are praying that we wake up and take back control so they will have a chance for freedom. We have been for so many years or that city upon the hill people have dreamed about. You and I have let our country down; we are failing our children. We have no one to blame but ourselves we have let other tell us what’s best for us because we did not want to take the time to educate ourselves with the facts. Please don’t wait for the 6 o’clock news or the local news paper to tell you. Thomas Jeffersonoften said Advertisements contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper.
  • We need to constantly educate ourselves to protect our freedoms and the freedoms of our children. This is the greatest country that has ever existed and we have our father in heaven to thank for it. But as stewards of the land we need to stay vigilant, educated and informed with the truth.
  • “If you love wealth better than liberty, and the tranquility of servitude better that animated context of freedom, go home from us in peace we ask not your council, or your arms, crouch down and lick the hands and the feet of those that feed you may your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget you were ever our country men”.Samuel Adams
  • What Happened To The Constitution

    1. 1. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE CONSTITUTION?<br />A STORY ABOUT A CORPORATE TAKEOVER HISTORY FORGOT TO TELL YOU ABOUT<br />Rabbit Hole Research Group<br />Mark Wasmuth<br />
    2. 2. IF YOU WANT TO SEE VIDEO PLEASE GOTO THE WEB SITE BELOW <br /> www.powercrossing.com<br />
    3. 3. “The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous that people cannot believe that it even exists.”<br /> J. Edgar Hoover<br />
    4. 4. WHY DID WE FIGHT THE CIVIL WAR ?<br />
    5. 5. FACTS ABOUT THE SOUTH SECEDING FROM THE UNION<br />Slavery was not an issue, it was State’s Rights. Lincoln even told president Davis that “slavery would be intact if they came back into the union”. Davis' response was “no because slavery is not the struggle we fight in this war”.<br />Four States that fought with the North were slave states, Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri.<br />President Buchanan did not wage war on seceded states, South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas all seceded while he was in office. <br />November 1860 Abraham Lincoln is elected president. Lincoln received 40% of the popular vote and won 59% of the Electoral votes. He was not even on the ballot in the deep south.<br />On Feb. 28, 1861 North Carolina Legislature voted on whether they wanted a convention to consider secession. The call for a convention was defeated by 651 votes, North Carolina would not even considering secession. <br />Mar 30, 1861 "An Address to the People of Texas put forth by the Representatives of Texas, giving warning that, under the pretense of freeing the slaves, “the actual intention of the incoming Lincoln administration was to enslave a whole nation”, an ominous warning of what was to come.<br />
    6. 6. WHY DID NORTH CAROLINA SECEDE FROM THE UNION?<br /><ul><li>On April 15, 1861 the Secretary of War notified governor Ellis of North Carolina that the Federal Government expected North Carolina to furnish 2 regiments of troops to make war of the seceded states. In Governor Ellis’s refusal he closed with these words
    7. 7. “I can be no party to this wicked violation of the laws of the country, and to this war upon the liberties of a free people. You can get no troops from North Carolina.”
    8. 8. North Carolina seceded from the Union</li></li></ul><li>General Orders # 100<br />The Lieber Code<br />Washington, D.C., April 24, 1863<br />Instructions for the Government of Armies of theUnited States in the Field by Order of the Secretary of War:<br />Article III<br /><ul><li>Martial Law in a hostile country consists in the suspension, by the occupying military authority, of the criminal and civil law, and of the domestic administration and government in the occupied place or territory, and in the substitution of military rule and force for the same, as well as in the dictation of general laws, as far as military necessity requires this suspension, substitution, or dictation.</li></ul>Article VII<br /><ul><li>Martial Law extends to property, and to persons, whether they are subjects of the enemy or aliens to that government.</li></ul>RULES OF ENGAGEMENT FOR THE CIVIL WAR<br />NOT A FULL COPY<br />
    9. 9. NOT A FULL COPY<br />Article XXVI<br /><ul><li>Commanding generals may cause the magistrates and civil officers of the hostile country to take the oath of temporary allegiance or an oath of fidelity to their own victorious government or rulers, and they may expel every one who declines to do so. But whether they do so or not, the people and their civil officers owe strict obedience to them [commanding generals]as long as they hold sway over the district or country, at the peril of their lives.</li></ul>Article XXXI<br /><ul><li>A victorious army appropriates [seizes] all public money, seizes all public movable property until further direction by its government, and sequesters for its own benefit or of that of its government all the revenues of real property belonging to the hostile government or nation. The title to such real property remains in abeyance [suspension] during military occupation, and until the conquest is made complete.</li></ul>Article XXXII<br /><ul><li>The commander of the army must leave it to the ultimate treaty of peace to settle the permanency of this change.
    10. 10. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A “TREATY OF PEACE” ENDING THE CIVIL WAR WE ARE STILL UNDER THESE RULES. DON’T BELIEVE ME next ></li></li></ul><li>Where was the Treaty (of Peace) Signed?<br />There was no treaty signed to end the Civil War<br />
    11. 11. FURTHER PROOF THAT WE’RE STILL UNDER MILITARY RULE AND HAVE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS<br /><ul><li>SENATE DOC 43 also know as SENATE RESOLUTION 62 APRIL 17, 1933 (60 years later) states that:
    12. 12. “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of government i.e., LAW and subordinate to the necessities of the state”</li></li></ul><li>
    13. 13.
    14. 14. EVERYTHING WAS SETTLED AFTER THE WAR RIGHT, WHAT HAPPENED?<br /><ul><li>1865 North Carolina was admitted back into the Union as the 12th State
    15. 15. December 4th 1865 North Carolina even ratified a new 13th amendment proving that the state was back into the union.
    16. 16. The Old 13th amendment that was ratified in 1819 was removed from the history books and the Constitution.(unlawfully), Which said: “If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” Example “ESQUIRE”
    17. 17. But, North Carolina along with other States refused to ratify the 14th amendment. Why?</li></li></ul><li>WHY WAS THE 14THAMENDMENT SO BAD?<br /><ul><li>On June 13, 1967 United States Representative, Rarick of Louisiana, submitted to the United States Congress, Louisiana House Concurrent Resolution, urging the United States Congress to declare the 14th Amendment Illegal. He also entered a treatise on the illegality of the 14th Amendment Prepared by a Louisiana Judge Leander H. Perez. The Resolution stated </li></ul>“Whereas the Reconstruction Acts of Congress unlawfully overthrew their existing governments, removed the lawfully constituted legislatures by military force and replaced them with rump legislatures which carried out military orders and pretended to ratify the 14thAmendment<br />
    18. 18. March 2, 1867, Faced with ratification failure, Congress passed over President Johnson's vetoes three "Reconstruction Acts from March 2, 1867 through July 19, 1867 declaring the southern State governments to be illegal. Following are excerpts of President Johnson's veto message to Congress regarding its first Reconstruction Act. <br />"The military is being used to coerce the people into adopting principles and measures that they are opposed to, and which they have an undeniable right to exercise their own judgment.”<br />"The bill is without precedent and without authority, in palpable conflict with the Constitution, and utterly destructive to those principles of liberty and humanity for which our ancestors on both sides of the Atlantic have shed so much blood and expended so much treasure."<br />"The purpose and object of the bill is to change the entire structure and character of the State governments and to compel them by force to the adoption of organic laws [14th amendment], and regulations, which they are unwilling to accept if left to themselves. If they do not form a constitution with prescribed articles in it and afterwards elect a legislature, which will act upon certain measures in a prescribed way [subjugation], neither blacks nor whites can be relieved from the slavery, which the bill imposes upon them“.<br />
    19. 19. The Tulane Law Review Vol. 28 of 1953 in the article entitled The Dubious Origin of the 14th Amendment by Walter J. Suthon, Jr., former President of the Louisiana State bar Association, states;<br />“The most extreme and amazing feature of the Act (Reconstruction Act of March 2, 1867) as the requirement that each excluded state must ratify the 14th Amendment, in order to again enjoy the status and rights of a State, including representation in Congress, Section 3 of the Act sets forth this compulsive coercion thus imposed upon the Southern States.<br />The most apt characterization of this compulsive provision, placing these States under military authority, there to remain until they comply, inter alia with this requirement of ratifying the rejected 14th Amendment, is found in a speech of Senator Doolittle of Wisconsin, a Northerner and a Conservative Republican. During the floor debate on the bill he said; <br />“My friend has said what has been said all around me, what is said everyday; the people of the South have rejected the constitutional amendment, and therefore we will march upon them and force them to adopt at the point of a bayonet, and establish military over them until they do adopt it.” <br />Congressional Globe 39th Congress 2nd Session, Part 3, at 1644 (1867). <br />Surely, the authors of our Constitution never contemplated or understood that ratification of a constitutional amendment proposal by a State could lawfully be compelled “at the point of a bayonet<br />
    20. 20. THE RECONSTRUCTION ACT’S WERE TAKEN TO THE SUPREME COURT<br />The constitutionality of the Reconstruction Acts went before the US Supreme Court in Mississippi v. Johnson, 4 Wallace, 475. The court dismissed on the technical ground that the court had “no jurisdiction of a bill to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties”<br /> The Reconstruction Acts went to the Supreme Court a 2ndtime in Georgia v. Stanton, 6 Wallace, 50. The court found an equally good technical reason for declining jurisdiction by holding that the case concerned purely political matters, instead of personal and property rights. The court held that "A bill to restrain the defendants, who represent the executive authority of the government, from carrying into execution certain Acts of Congress, in as much as such execution would annul and totally abolish the existing State Government of Georgia, is not within the jurisdiction of this court.”<br />
    21. 21. The Reconstruction Acts went to the Supreme Court 3rd time in Ex Parte v. McCardle, 6 Wallace, 318. The US Supreme Court assumed jurisdiction on the constitutionality of the Reconstruction Acts and were argued before the Supreme Court. Before the Supreme Court could enter a judgment the Republicans in control of Congress rushed thru a bill repealing the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under the Act of 1867 prohibiting the Supreme Court from preceding on any appeal already before it. The court waited until the bill was passed and then postponed further consideration of the matter until the next term. In the biggest battle between Congress and the Supreme Court in this nation’s history, for the first time Congress removed the court’s jurisdiction to hear a case.<br />The last attempt to obtain a ruling on the constitutionality of the Reconstruction Acts was made in the case of Ex Parte v. Yerger, 8 Wallace, 85. The Supreme Court assumed jurisdiction and this action was immediately answered by the introduction of a bill in the Senate explicitly prohibiting the Supreme Court from considering any case which involved the validity of the Reconstruction Acts, followed by another prohibiting the judicial review of any act of Congress. <br />
    22. 22. HOW DID THE RECONSTRUCTION ACTS AFFECT NORTH CAROLINA?<br /><ul><li>From 1865 until his removal in1868 Governor Jonathan Worth fought against the programs of Reconstruction emerging from Washington D.C. He Loathed the 14th Amendment and the Reconstruction Acts, passed early in 1867, which provided for military rule, a new state constitution and elections to replace the existing government. The University of North Carolina Press, 1996 pp 272-273
    23. 23. On June 30, 1868 General Canby of the US Army issued general orders #120 which states in part “to facilitate the organization of the new state Government, the following appointments are made: to be governor of NC, W.W. Holden, Governor elect, Vice Jonathan Worth removed…to take effect July 1, 1868 on the meeting of the General Assembly of North Carolina. </li></li></ul><li>NOT A FULL COPY<br />
    24. 24. On July 1, 1868 Governor Worth surrendered the Government of NCunder what he deemed military duress and not of the consent of the governed. During a time of supposed peace, in a letter addressed to W.W. Holden of North Carolina, he surrenders the State of North Carolina. The letter states in part:<br />“Yesterday morning I was verbally notified by Chief Justice Pearson that in obedience to a telegram from General Canby, he would today at 10 A.M. administer to you the oaths required preliminary to your entering upon the discharge of the duties of Civil Governor of the State; and that there upon you would demand possession of my Office…I intimated to the Judge my opinion that such proceeding was premature even under the Reconstruction legislation of Congress and that I should probably decline to surrender the Office to you…. I do not recognize the validity of the late election, under which you and those cooperating with you claim to be invested with the Civil Government of the State. <br />
    25. 25. You have no evidence of your election, save the certificate of a Major General of the United States Army. I regard all of you as, in effect, appointees of the Military power of the United States, and not as deriving your powers from the consent of those you claim to govern. Knowing, however, that you are backed by Military force here, which I could not resist if I would, I do not deem it necessary to offer a futile opposition but vacate the office without the ceremony of actual eviction, offering no further opposition than this, my protest. I would submit to actual expulsion in order to bring before the Supreme Court of the United States the question as to the Constitutionality of the legislation under which you claim to be the rightful Governor of the State, if the past action of that tribunal furnished any hope of a speedy trial. I surrender the office to you under what I deem Military duress, without stopping as the occasion would well justify. To comment upon the singular coincidence that the present State Government is surrendered, as without legality, to him whose own official sanction, but three years ago, declared it valid.”<br />
    26. 26. NOT A FULL COPY<br />
    27. 27. OTHER LAWS THAT EFFECTED THE RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE<br /><ul><li>Trading with the Enemy Act 1917 (TWEA)
    28. 28. This act was implemented to deal with the countries we were at war with during World War I
    29. 29. It gave the President and the Alien Property Custodian the right to seize the assets of the people included in this act, and if they wanted to do business in this country they could apply for a licenses to do so.</li></ul>The words “enemy and ally of enemy,” as used herein, shall be deemed to mean— <br /> (a) Any individual, partnership, or other body of individuals, of any nationality, resident within the territory (including that occupied by the military and naval forces) of any nation which is an ally of a nation with which the United States is at war, or resident outside the United States and doing business within such territory, and any corporation incorporated within such territory of such ally nation, or incorporated within any country other than the United States and doing business within such territory. <br /><ul><li>By 1921 The Federal Reserve Bank (the trustee for the Alien Property Custodian) held over 700 Million dollars in trust.
    30. 30. In 1933 48 Stat 1 The TWEA was amended to include the United States Person because they wanted to take our GOLD away.
    31. 31. In order for the Government to take our gold away and violate our Constitutional right’s we had to be reclassified as enemy combatants.</li></li></ul><li>NOT A FULL COPY<br />
    32. 32. TITLE I<br />SECTION 1. The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411 Trading With the Enemy Act), as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows:<br />
    33. 33. "(b) During time of war or during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President., and export, hoarding, melting, or earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, <br />
    34. 34. by any person within the United States or any place subject to the Jurisdiction thereof; and the President may require any person engaged in any transaction referred to in this subdivision to furnish under oath, complete information relative thereto, including the production of any books of account, contracts, letters or other papers, in connec­tion therewith in the custody or control of such person either before or after such transaction is completed. Whoever willfully violates any of the provisions of this subdivision or of any license, order, rule or regulation issued thereunder, shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than, $10,000, or, if a natural person, may be imprisoned<br />
    35. 35. <ul><li>1860 Congress was adjourned Sine Die, Lincoln could not legally reconvene Congress.
    36. 36. 1863 Leiber Code was established giving the government the ability to take away your property and your rights.
    37. 37. 1867 three Reconstruction Acts were passed forcing the states to ratify the 14th amendment which made Whites and Blacks slaves as stated by President Johnson
    38. 38. June 30, 1868 Governor Worth was removed from office because he opposed Reconstruction Acts, the 14th Amendment and Military Rule. He liked the North Carolina and united States Constitution’s as they were
    39. 39. March 9, 1933 The US Person/Citizen was added to the TWEA Making them Enemy Combatants.
    40. 40. April 5, 1933 Executive order 6102 was given to make it illegal for a US Citizen to own gold.
    41. 41. April 17, 1933 Senate Doc 43 said it does not matter how we pay for things the because the State owns everything anyway. </li></ul>REVIEW OF EVENTS THAT TOOK AWAY YOUR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS<br />
    42. 42. How do we know those events effected the American People<br />Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 1901.   Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan.  “Two national governments exist, one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument” (this is what we see operating in DC today)<br />Senate Report 93-549 states ”The United States has been under dictatorial control since March 9, 1933” <br />“Extraordinary powers have been delegated to the President, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, <br />
    43. 43. NOT A FULL COPY<br />
    44. 44.
    45. 45.
    46. 46. HOW DID THE CONSTITUTION STRUCTURE OUR GOVERNMENT<br />Ben Franklin was asked what kind of government do we have, he said “A Republic if you can keep it.” <br />Article IV, Section 4, guarantees "to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.<br />What is a Republic? It means that law governs man.<br />What is a Democracy? Its when a small group of men govern others by manipulating laws and statutes. (clearly what we have today) <br />
    47. 47. In a Republic the Squirrel would be protected by the Law and the Raccoon and Fox could not vote on eating the Squirrel. The Squirrel is well armed and will not tolerate being messed with.<br />We started being called a Democracy around 1913 by President Woodrow Wilson. He said the American people are unable to make good decisions for themselves so the Government needs to be able to make those decisions for them. (time to eat the squirrel)<br />Plato said a Democracy passes into Despotism(a form of government by which a single entity rules with absolute and unlimited power.)<br />Karl Marx said Democracy is the road to Socialism.<br />
    48. 48. HOW WAS THE POWER DIVIDED IN GOVERNMENT TO PROTECT THE REPUBLIC<br />We are supposed to have three branches of Government each equal in power. <br />Executive<br />Legislative<br />Judicial<br />
    49. 49. WHAT POWER DOES THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH HAVE?<br /><ul><li>Department of Agriculture (USDA)
    50. 50. Department of Commerce (DOC)
    51. 51. Department of Defense (DOD)
    52. 52. Department of Education (ED)
    53. 53. Department of Energy (DOE)
    54. 54. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
    55. 55. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
    56. 56. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
    57. 57. Department of Justice (DOJ)
    58. 58. Department of Labor (DOL)
    59. 59. Department of State (DOS)
    60. 60. Department of the Interior (DOI)
    61. 61. Department of the Treasury
    62. 62. Department of Transportation (DOT)
    63. 63. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)</li></li></ul><li>WHAT POWER DOES THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH HAVE?<br /><ul><li>U.S. Senate
    64. 64. Committee Office Websites
    65. 65. Senate Home Page
    66. 66. Senate Leadership
    67. 67. Senators on the Web
    68. 68. U.S. House of Representatives
    69. 69. Committee Office Websites
    70. 70. House Home Page
    71. 71. House Leadership Offices
    72. 72. House Organizations, Commissions, and Task Forces
    73. 73. Office of Inspector General
    74. 74. Office of the Clerk
    75. 75. Representatives on the Web
    76. 76. CAN THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH CONTROL ANYTHING OF IMPORTANCE WHEN THE PRESIDENT CAN ISSUE A EXECUTIVE ORDER AND DO WHAT HE WANTS WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, WITHOUT YOUR APPROVAL</li></li></ul><li>WHAT POWER DOES THE JUDICIAL BRANCH HAVE?<br /><ul><li>Does it matter? Congress will just pass a law restricting the court’s from hearing any arguments it does not want the court to hear. They certainly have done this in the past..
    77. 77. The president controls the Judicial department so he controls what actions are going to be prosecuted in the courts.</li></li></ul><li>CAN WE VOTE SOMEONE INTO OFFICE TO FIX OUR COUNTRY?<br /><ul><li>NO
    78. 78. We are under military rule (we have to fix that first)
    79. 79. Military rule is destructive to the American people.
    80. 80. Because we are under Military Rule, No political officer today is bound by their Constitutional Oath of office, which is their contract to protect the people’s rights.
    81. 81. If a Public official violates their oath it’s supposed to be a capitol crime.
    82. 82. If Congress will not do what the President wants them to do he issue’s an executive order.
    83. 83. There have been over 12,000 executive orders.
    84. 84. The American People have failed to occupy the lawful offices created by our founding fathers since 1860 (Supreme Court)
    85. 85. We no longer have three Equal Power Branches of Government</li></li></ul><li>WHO IS WORKING AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?<br /><ul><li>The Corporate Government
    86. 86. The Queen
    87. 87. The Federal Reserve
    88. 88. The IRS
    89. 89. The Lawyers
    90. 90. The Unions</li></li></ul><li>HOW IS THE QUEEN INVOLVED?<br />She gets your Social Security<br />Statutory Instrument 1997 No. 1778 The Social Security <br />(United States of America) Order 1997 <br />At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 22nd day of July 1997<br />Present, The Queen's Most Excellent Majesty in Council<br />Whereas at London on the 13th February 1984 an Agreement on social security between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America and an Administrative Agreement for the implementation of the Agreement<br />Now, therefore, Her Majesty, in pursuance of section 179(1)(a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and of all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, as follows: <br /><ul><li>Citation and commencement     1. This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997.
    91. 91. Modification of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 and amendment of the Principal Order     2. The Social Security Administration Act 1992 and the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 shall be modified and the Principal Order shall be amended so as to give effect to the Agreement as modified by the Supplementary Agreement set out in Schedule 1 to this Order and to the Administrative Agreement as modified by the Supplementary Administrative Agreement set out in Schedule 2 to this Order, so far as the same relate to England, Wales and Scotland.</li></ul>Definitions<br />     " 1. "Territory" means,as regards the United States, the States, the District of Columbia, <br />NOT A FULL COPY<br />
    92. 92. Who controls the Queen?<br />1213 Papal Decree: <br />On April 21, 1214, the Pope, in Rome, formally accepted King John’s surrender of his kingdoms and his pledge of vassal (together with the moneys paid in tribute); and three months later, in July 1214, Pope Innocent III raised the interdict against the English. Thus the Pope assured the English of ‘access to Heaven,’ from which they had been ‘barred’ by their king’s opposition to the Church Nazarene, or Communist, totalitarianism and denial of civil rights to mankind.  <br />SOURCE: British Museum Publication G.R.C. Davis, entitled Magna Carta(211).  And American Counsel of Christian Laymen: How Red is the Federal Counsel of Churches<br />
    93. 93. WHY HAVEN'T OUR LAW MAKERS FIXED THIS?<br />NOT A FULL COPY<br />September 21, 1950<br />REPORT ON THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD<br />Legal Bulwark of the Communist Party REPORT<br />[Pursuant to H. Res. 5, 79th Cong., 1st sess. House report 3123]<br />The National Lawyers Guild is the foremost legal bulwark of the Communist Party, its front organizations, and controlled unions. Since its inception it has never failed to rally to the legal defense of the Communist Party and individual members thereof, including known espionage agents. It has consistently fought against national, State, and local legislation aimed at curbing the Communist conspiracy. It has been most articulate in its attacks upon all agencies of the Government seeking to expose or prosecute the subversive activities of the Communist network, including national, State, and local investigative committees, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and law enforcement agencies generally. <br />
    94. 94. Through its affiliation with the International Association of Democratic Lawyers, an international Communist-front organization, the National Lawyers Guild has constituted itself an agent of a foreign principal hostile to the interests of the United States. It has gone far afield to oppose the foreign policies of the United States, in line with the current line of the Soviet Union. These aims-the real aims of the National Lawyers Guild, as demonstrated conclusively by its activities for the past 13 years of its existence-are not specified in its constitution or statement of avowed purpose. In order to attract non-Communists to serve as a cover for its actual purpose as an appendage to the Communist Party, the National Lawyers Guild poses benevolently as “a professional organization which shall function as an effective social force in the service of the people to the end that human rights shall be regarded as more sacred than property rights.” In the entire history of the guild there is no record of its ever having condemned such instances of the violation of human rights as -<br />
    95. 95. found in Soviet slave labor camps and in the series of Moscow trials, which shocked the civilized world. <br />Communists publicly hailed the founding of the National Lawyers Guild. New Masses, a weekly publication of the Communist Party, featured an article entitled “Defense for the Counsel-The Need for the National Lawyers Guild” in its issue of June 14, 1938 (pp. 19-21) by Charles Recht, an attorney for the Soviet Government and a member of the guild, observed that: <br />“With the growth of the American Labor Party in New York, and kindred progressive movements throughout the United States, the lawyers, who in many of the smaller communities are the nerve centers of political activities, will be an invaluable aid in galvanizing the latent liberal elements of the country into a political force. The National Lawyers Guild can and will form one of the most important adjuncts to a progressive movement representing the interests of the workers and farmers”.<br />
    96. 96.
    97. 97. WHAT IS THE FEDERAL RESERVE? <br /><ul><li>Rockefeller, Warburg's, Aldridge, J.P. Morgan and other bankers created the Federal Reserve Plan in a private meeting on Jekyll Island on November 22, 1910.
    98. 98. Charles A. Lindbergh, R-MN stated: “The financial system has been turned over to the Federal Reserve Board. That board administers a finance system by authority of a purely profiteering group. That system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people’s money. This (Federal Reserve) Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the president signs this bill, the invisible government by the monetary power will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed, the worst legislative crime of the ages perpetrated by this banking bill.”
    99. 99. In 1913 The Federal Reserve Act was passed with only 3 congressmen voting on it. (congress was not properly adjourned for Christmas break allowing this to happen)</li></li></ul><li>Congressional Record: March 3, 1934<br /><ul><li>Congressman Weideman stated: "So the paramount issue of today is this: Shall the Government of the United States be run for the benefit of the international bankers or shall the citizens of the United States be given the right to 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness'? Shall we replace the Statue of Liberty with the golden statue erected to the god of greed? Shall we forget that the only time our Savior used force was when he drove the money changers from the temple? Let us reestablish the principle that we all believe in: That all men are entitled to a right to work, to own their own homes, to reap a just reward for their labors, and to enjoy nature's sunshine as God intended. We owe it to our children that we shall not depart and leave them in a condition of bondage and slavery to organized greed and gold.“
    100. 100. Lewis v. United States 680 states the Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned: “we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities” </li></li></ul><li>HOW IS THE GOVERNMENT USING YOUR TAXES<br />GRACE COMMISSION REPORT<br />WAR ON WASTE<br />January 12, 1984  <br />The Honorable Ronald Reagan<br />Mr. President, you have been so correct in resisting attempts to balance the budget by increasing taxes. The tax load on the average American family is already at counterproductive levels with the underground economy having now grown to an estimated $500 billion per year, costing about $100 billion in lost Federal tax revenues per year.  <br /><ul><li>The size of the underground economy is understandable when one considers that median family income taxes have increased from $9 in 1948 to $2,218 in 1983, or by 246 times. This is runaway taxation at its worst. 
    101. 101. One-third of all their taxes is consumed by waste and inefficiency in the Federal Government as we identified in our survey. Another one-third of all their taxes escapes collection from others as the underground economy blossoms in direct proportion to tax increases and places even more pressure on law abiding taxpayers, promoting still more underground economy-a vicious cycle that must be broken.
    102. 102. With two-thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government .</li></ul>Who is the IRS<br /><ul><li>The Government Accounting Office (GAO) stated in 2007 that “the IRS is a foreign corporation”.
    103. 103. 1954 Army Hand book has the IRS listed as a “Foreign Debt Collector”</li></ul>NOT A FULL COPY<br />
    104. 104.
    105. 105. IS THE GOVERNMENT TRYING TO PROTECT US OR CONTROL US?<br />National Security Study Memorandum<br />NSSM 200<br />Implications of Worldwide Population Growth<br />For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests<br />(THE KISSINGER REPORT)<br />December 10, 1974<br />28. World policy and programs in the population field should incorporate two major objectives:<br /> (a) actions to accommodate continued population growth up to 6 billions by the mid-21st century without massive starvation or total frustration of developmental hopes; and<br /> (b) actions to keep the ultimate level as close as possible to 8 billions rather than permitting it to reach 10 billions, 13 billions, or more.<br />29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two- child family on the average), by about the year 2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000 compared to the U.N medium projection, this goal would result in 500 million fewer people in 2000 and about 3 billion fewer in 2050. Attainment of this goal will require greatly intensified population programs. A basis for developing national population growth control targets to achieve this world target is contained in the World Population Plan of Action.<br />30. The World Population Plan of Action is not self-enforcing and will require vigorous efforts by interested countries, U.N. agencies and other international bodies to make it effective. U.S. leadership is essential<br />NOT A FULL COPY<br />BUT YOU SHOULD READ THE FULL COPY<br />
    106. 106.
    107. 107.
    108. 108.
    109. 109. WHERE DOES ALL THE OTHER TAX MONEY GO?<br />If I stop paying my taxes how will the roads & schools get built.<br />The Grace report showed you that all your income tax is wasted or goes to pay interest on the national debt, which is pure profit to a private bank called the Federal Reserve. <br />Lets look at North Carolina’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report or CAFR report maybe we can find a clue there.<br />
    110. 110.
    111. 111. www.CAFR1.com<br />
    112. 112. HOW DOSE OUR BANKING SYSTEM WORK?<br />
    113. 113. U.S. CONSTITUTION ON PAYING DEBT<br /><ul><li>Article 1 Section 10 of the US CONSTITUTION clearly states the following:
    114. 114. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.</li></li></ul><li>IS OUR CURRENT MONEY BACKED BY SUBSTANCE?<br /><ul><li>http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqgs.htm
    115. 115. No, when the United States stopped selling gold to foreign official holders of dollars at the rate of $35 an ounce in 1971, it brought the gold exchange standard to an end. In 1973, the United States officially ended its adherence to the gold standard. In August 1974, President Ford repealed the prohibition on the public's owning gold or engaging in gold transactions.. </li></li></ul><li>ARE WE VIOLATING THE CONSTITUTION WITH HOW WE PAY DEBT <br /><ul><li>NO, You are not a party to the Constitution you are a enemy combatant (remember the TWEA)
    116. 116. HJR 192 (also known as public law 73-10) was passed making it illegal for anyone to require you to pay a debt in a particular kind or type of currency</li></ul>"To assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the Unites States,<br /><ul><li>Whereas the holding of or dealing in gold affect public interest, and are therefore subject to proper regulation and restriction; andWhereas the existing emergency has disclosed that provisions of obligations which purport to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency of the United States, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, obstruct the power of the Congress to regulate the value of the money of the United States, and are inconsistent with the declared policy of the Congress to maintain at all times the equal power of every dollar, coined or issued by the United States, in the markets and in the payment of debts,Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representative of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that</li></li></ul><li><ul><li>(a) every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payments in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy; and no such provision shall be contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred. Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provision is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts. Any such provision contained in any law authorizing obligations to be issued by or under authority of the United States, is herby repealed, but the repeal of any such provision shall not invalidate any other provision or authority contained in such law.
    117. 117. (b) As used in this resolution, the term 'obligation' means any obligation (including every obligation of and to the United States, excepting currency) payable in money of the United States; and the term 'coin or currency' means coin or currency of the United States, including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations.</li></li></ul><li>
    118. 118.
    119. 119.
    120. 120. HOW IS MONEY CREATED?<br /><ul><li>Money is created by Congress telling Treasury to sell bonds to the Federal Reserve so the Fed can create money (these bonds are based on your labor).
    121. 121. This money is created because the Fed is pretty sure the Treasury (IRS) will be able to collect taxes to pay off the debt.
    122. 122. Most of the Nations Money is created at your bank when you borrow money. (LAW SAYS YOU CREATED THE MONEY)
    123. 123. YOU CREATE ALL “MONEY” ONE WAY OR ANOTHER YOUR SLAVE LABOR PROVIDES THE ENERGY FOR IT BUT THE FEDERAL RESERVE GETS THE INTEREST.</li></li></ul><li>
    124. 124. UCC LAW ON FEDERAL RESERVE PUBLICATIONS<br /><ul><li>The Uniform Commercial Code 3-102 (c) says "Regulations of the Board of governors of the Federal Reserve System and operating circulars of the Federal Reserve Banks supersede any inconsistent provision of this Article to the extent of the Inconsistency."
    125. 125. The reason this is important is to prove that the Federal Reserve publications you are about to see have relevance in Law.</li></li></ul><li>FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO MODERN MONEY MECHANICS (1992)<br /><ul><li>By Anne Marie L. Gonczy states on page 6 states:
    126. 126. "Of course they [Banks] do not really pay out loans from the money they receive as deposits.” If they did this no additional money would be created.
    127. 127. Your $10,000.00 loan you take out at a bank (that you pay back with interest) allows the bank to create an additional $90,000.00 in loans to other customers. (and you pay them interest)</li></li></ul><li>
    128. 128.
    129. 129.
    130. 130.
    131. 131. You go to the bank to get a loan to buy a home and sign a promissory note for $100,000.00<br />The bank Deposits this $100,000.00 note into a bank account with your name on it. (it’s the Law)<br />The bank gives you a check for $100,000.00 to go and purchase your home.<br />So, has the bank loaned you any money?<br />
    132. 132. No, you made a deposit with the bank for $100,000.00 (your promissory note) and the bank gave you a check for $100,000.00, now you are even. Remember it’s against the law for a bank to loan you its depositors and investors money<br />But you are a good slave you think that you are able to purchase and own property, so why not let you think you barrowed money too.<br />So you make payments to the bank, meanwhile the bank sends a 1099 A (abandonment of funds) to the IRS because you are paying money to a bank that you did not borrow any from. There books have to balance.<br />
    133. 133. Well the worst part isn't that you are paying a bank principal and interest for money that the law says you did not borrow.<br />The worst part is that the bank is using your promissory note as reserve so they can loan out more money.<br />Your Promissory Note became a tier 1 asset for the bank allowing them to take your $100,000.00 note and lend out $900,000.00 more to other customers. And you are paying them interest.<br />
    134. 134. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS MONEY AND BANKING (1985)<br /><ul><li>Page 11, explains that “when banks grant loans, they create new money,The new money is created because a new loan becomes a deposit, just like a paycheck does.”
    135. 135. Next is a copy of a promissory note that has been stamped on the bottom of the second page “PAY TO THE ORDER OF WITH OUT RECOURSE”so it could be deposited by the Bank. </li></li></ul><li>
    136. 136.
    137. 137.
    138. 138. “Most people suppose that a bank lends the deposit of its customers, however, <br />no bank ever lends its deposits”<br />
    139. 139. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK I BET YOU THOUGHT (1984)<br /><ul><li>by David H. Friedman states:
    140. 140. “banks create new money by depositing promissory notes”.
    141. 141. “The commercial bank lending process is similar to that of a thrift in that the receipt of cash from depositors increases both its assets and its deposit liabilities, which enables it to make additional loans and investments. It accepts as an asset the borrower’s debt obligation (the promise to repay) and creates a liability on its books in the form of a demand deposit in the amount of the loan.”
    142. 142. “Banks create new money by depositing IOUs, promissory notes, offset by bank liabilities called checking account balances
    143. 143. Page 5 says, “Money doesn’t have to be intrinsically valuable, be issued by government, or be in any special form”</li></li></ul><li>
    144. 144. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO TWO FACES OF DEBT (1992)<br /><ul><li>By Anne Marie L. Gonczy on page 19 states:
    145. 145. “Such newly created funds are in addition to funds that all financial institutions provide in their operations”
    146. 146. "A deposit created through lending is a debt that has to be paid on demand of the depositor, just the same as the debt rising from a customer's deposit of checks in a bank”
    147. 147. "depositor's balance rises when the depository institution extends credit either by granting a loan to, or by buying securities from the depositor in exchange for the note or security, the lending or investing institution credits the depositors account or gives a check that can be deposited at yet another depository at yet another institution. In this case no one loses a deposit the money supply is increased. New money has been brought into existence," </li></li></ul><li>
    148. 148.
    149. 149. GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES<br /><ul><li>Banks must follow the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) which are in the federal statutes at 12 USC. Sec. 1831n (a) (2)
    150. 150. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles 2003 edition published by Wiley page 41 under the section cash and Cash equivalents states, "Anything accepted by a bank to deposit would be considered as cash.”
    151. 151. Your promissory note is deposited at the bank the same way your pay check is. The bank uses that deposit as a reserve so they can create more money to loan out to other customers.</li></li></ul><li>FURTHER EVIDENCE THAT THE MONEY WE USE TODAY IS CREATED BY YOU<br /><ul><li>Congressional Record 1933, Page 83 “The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation”
    152. 152. Congressional Record, April 9, 1934 Congressman Patman: “A Federal Reserve bank has a great privilege. It has the right to issue a blanket mortgage on all the property of all the people of this country. It is called a Federal Reserve note. For that privilege section 16 of the act provides that when the Government prints a Federal Reserve note and guarantees to pay that note and delivers it to a Federal Reserve bank, that Federal Reserve bank shall pay -- it seems to be mandatory, the rate of interest that is set by the Federal Reserve Board. The law has never been put into effect. The Federal Reserve Board sets the zero rate. Instead of charging an interest rate which the law says they shall charge, they set no rate at all. Therefore, for the use of this great Government credit, these blanket mortgages that are issued against all the property of all the people of this Nation and against the incomes of all the people of this Nation, they do not pay one penny. Not one penny of the stock of the Federal Reserve banks is owned by the Government or the people, but it is owned by private banks exclusively. They do not pay one penny for the use of that great privilege, to the people or to the Government. (CR, 4-9-1934)
    153. 153. Your labor has built or rebuilt just about every nation in the world. Have you received any consideration for lending the world your credit?
    154. 154. YOU ARE THE BEST SLAVE, BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU ARE FREE. </li></li></ul><li>
    155. 155. REPORT TO THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY 1963<br /><ul><li>Banking and Monetary Studies, by Deane Carson, (Homewood, III.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1963), pp. 408-419.
    156. 156. Whatever their other errors, a long line of financial heretics have been right in speaking of "fountain pen money"-”money created by the stroke of the bank president's pen when he approves a loan and credits the proceeds to the borrower's checking account”</li></li></ul><li>WHAT DOES THE BANKS ACCOUNT LOOK LIKE IF THIS IS TRUE?<br />
    157. 157. IF BANK’S WORKS THAT WAY WHY HASN’T SOMEONE SUED THEM<br />They have sued and won<br />IN RE: First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Jerome Daly in The Justice Court State of Minnesota County Of Scott Township Of Credit River Justice Martin V. Mahoney the jury found that:<br />That the Plaintiff is not entitled to recover the possession of Lot 19, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota according to the Plat thereof on file in the Register of Deeds office.<br />That because of failure of a lawful consideration the Note and Mortgage dated May 8, 1964 are null and void.<br />That the Sheriff's sale of the above described premises held on June 26, 1967 is null and void, of no effect.<br />That the Plaintiff has no right title or interest in said premises or lien thereon as is above described.<br />That any provision in the Minnesota Constitution and any Minnesota Statute binding the jurisdiction of this Court is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and to the Bill of Rights of the Minnesota Constitution and is null and void and that this Court has jurisdiction to render complete Justice in this Cause.<br />Sections 50, 51 and 52 of Am Jur 2nd “Actions” on page 584 states “ no action will lie to recover on a claim based upon, or in any manner depending upon, a fraudulent, illegal, or immoral transaction or contract to which Plaintiff was a party<br />
    158. 158. We have discussed the Civil War and the TWEA and how they still effect peoples rights today.<br />We have unquestionable evidence that our government knows they have violated our God given rights and made us all slaves.<br />We have seen how they use the IRS, Banking, Courts, Education, and our monetary systems to control us.<br />
    159. 159. HOW CAN WE PUT OUR COUNTRY BACK TOGETHER?<br /><ul><li>The Supreme Court has said the De jure government offices still exist but the people have failed to occupy them.
    160. 160. We need to seat Grand Jury’s and put our official’s back under De jure rule and out of the Corporate (or Military) Rule that they are currently operating under.
    161. 161. Our elected official’s will then have to operate under the limits of their Oath of office to uphold the U.S. and State Constitution’s circa 1860, when they violate the Oath it’s a capital crime.</li></li></ul><li>WHY A GRAND JURY?<br />The people are the fourth branch of government and the most powerful. The grand jury has been used in this country since it’s beginning.<br />The De Facto government has taken the grand juries over and made it so the people cannot use their Grand Jury's for justice, you have to be an attorney to get their grand jury to hear a case.<br />The people have always had the ability to convene a grand jury anytime they want. We just haven’t done it.<br />Grand juries date back before 1215<br /><ul><li>Our Founding Fathers looked back to history for president when they decided they wanted to change their government. What they found was the Magna CartaLibertatum, (MAGNA CARTA 1215) the Great Charter of Freedoms. It set a precedent which changed the face of England forever, by establishing that the King was not above the law.</li></li></ul><li><ul><li>King John of England signed the Magna Carta after immense pressure from the Church and his barons (the people). The King often lived above the law, violating both feudal and common law, and was heavily criticized for his foreign policy and actions within England. The Barons, with the support of the Church, pressured King John to spell out a list of their rights and guarantee that those rights would be enforced. The Barons provided a draft, and after some negotiation, King John put his seal to the Magna Carta in Runnymede in June of 1215
    162. 162. Section 61 set rules for establishing the Grand Jury it states: SINCE WE HAVE GRANTED ALL THESE THINGS for God, for the better ordering of our kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons (people), and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lasting strength, for ever, we give and grant to the barons the following security: The barons shall elect twenty-five of their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter. If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us </li></li></ul><li>
    163. 163.
    164. 164.
    165. 165.
    166. 166.
    167. 167.
    168. 168. “If you love wealth better than liberty, and the tranquility of servitude better that animated context of freedom, go home from us in peace we ask not your council, or your arms, crouch down and lick the hands and the feet of those that feed you may your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget you were ever our country men”.<br />Samuel Adams<br />Rabbit Hole Research Group<br />
    169. 169. <ul><li>Tea Parties are fun and important, but if we do not face the real issues, not the symptoms, we can never fix problem.
    170. 170. If you know about the problem and look the other direction pretending that it doesn’t exist, YOU ARE THE PROBLEM
    171. 171. Go to http://www.restoreamericaplan.net/</li></ul>Rabbit Hole Research Group<br />Mark Wasmuth<br />
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×