The Uniform Probate Code

1,064 views
986 views

Published on

The lawyers and attorneys at Cohen & Oalican, LLC service the Boston areas legal needs for guardianships and Conservatorships, as well as Medicaid and MassHealth law, and Supplemental Needs Trusts. We present here a series of discussions around the updated Uniform Probate Code and its impact on the needs of the elder law community specifically in Boston and Massachusetts.

(http://www.cohenoalican.com)

Published in: Economy & Finance
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,064
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
15
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

The Uniform Probate Code

  1. 1. THE UNIFORM PROBATE CODE Steven M. Cohen, Esq. Cohen & Oalican, LLP 18 Tremont Street - Suite 903 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 263-1035
  2. 2. WELCOME TO THE UNIFORM PROBATE CODE <ul><li>Article V of the Uniform Probate Code (the UPC) was put into effect on July 1, 2009. The purpose of the UPC is to try to improve legal proceedings for incapacitated persons. </li></ul><ul><li>These improvements address outdated terminology, shortfalls in protecting the legal rights of incapacitated persons and lack of monitoring by the courts. </li></ul><ul><li>The statute embraces the basic idea that there are many degrees of incapacity and that the courts should carefully tailor the appointment of a guardian or conservator to the specific needs of the individual. </li></ul>
  3. 3. WELCOME TO THE UNIFORM PROBATE CODE <ul><li>The UPC instructs the courts to favor limited guardianships whenever possible. Although the law attempts to provide better court oversight for guardians and conservators with a new monitoring system, it remains to be seen whether this will be more true in theory than in practice. </li></ul><ul><li>Regardless, all of the new changes reflect additional sensitivity and respect for individuals who are unable to manage their personal and financial affairs. </li></ul>
  4. 4. Terminology <ul><li>The UPC has revised some of the outdated terminology used under our old guardianship statute. </li></ul><ul><li>The new definitions provide more meaningful descriptions which are more consistent with the purpose of the statute. </li></ul><ul><li>Below are some of the more important changes. </li></ul>
  5. 5. Guardians/Conservators <ul><li>Under the old statute a guardian could be appointed over both the person and the property. </li></ul><ul><li>Now under the UPC, guardians only have authority over the person and conservators only have authority of the estate. </li></ul><ul><li>The UPC has eliminated guardians of property. </li></ul><ul><li>Article V provides separate parallel sections describing the powers and responsibilities of both guardians and conservators. </li></ul>
  6. 6. Incompetent / Incapacitated / Protected Person <ul><li>Under the old statute, the court appointed a guardian or conservator if it found that the individual was “incompetent”. </li></ul><ul><li>Now the court focuses on functional limitations instead. Specifically, the court looks to the person’s ability to process information and how that relates to their ability to make personal or financial decisions. </li></ul><ul><li>A Guardian is appointed for an incapacitated person and a conservator is appointed for a protected person. </li></ul>
  7. 7. Incompetent / Incapacitated / Protected Person <ul><li>An Incapacitated person is a an individual who has as “clinically diagnosed condition that results in an inability to receive and evaluate information or make or communicate decisions to such an extent that the individual lacks the ability to meet essential requirements for health, safety, self care, even with appropriate technological assistance.” </li></ul><ul><li>The term “ward” used to be used for anyone who had a guardian or conservator. </li></ul><ul><li>Now ward is limited to a minor who has a guardian appointed. </li></ul><ul><li>The elimination of the term incompetent, hopefully will remove some of the stigma from this process. </li></ul>
  8. 8. THE UNIFORM PROBATE CODE – TERMINOLOGY Pt. 1 of a series Steven M. Cohen, Esq. Cohen & Oalican, LLP 18 Tremont Street - Suite 903 Boston, MA 02108 (617) 263-1035

×