Ad Revenue 2009 Branding On Ad Networks

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Ad Revenue 2009 Branding On Ad Networks - Presentation Transcript

    1. A Closer Look at Ad Networks  for Branding Campaigns Michele Madansky Oct 8, 2009 1
    2. What You Will See • Industry normative data that proves that ad networks can be effective for online branding • Examples of best practices for branding on ad networks 2
    3. What You Will See • Industry normative data that proves that ad networks can be effective for online branding • Examples of best practices for branding on ad networks What You Will Not See • Price/value analysis for ad networks versus publisher sites 3
    4. Ad Networks Rival Portals in Online Reach,  and Far Exceed Vertical Publishers’ Reach Top 10 Ad Networks Major Publisher Sites % Reach % Reach Platform-A 91.5% Google 77.0% Yahoo! Network 86.7% Yahoo! 76.4% Google Ad Network 85.3% MSN-Windows Live 58.0% ValueClick Networks 83.1% AOL LLC 55.7% Specific Media YOUTUBE.COM 46.5% 81.9% FOX Audience Network MYSPACE.COM* 36.8% 77.4% 76.6% FACEBOOK.COM 35.0% 24/7 Real Media CNN 18.1% Traffic Marketplace 74.4% ESPN 11.1% Microsoft Media Network US 72.4% NYTIMES.COM 5.5% Tribal Fusion 71.7% Source: comScore Media Metrix, US, June 2009
    5. InsightNorms: Ad Networks Have Positive Brand Impact InsightNorms: Ad Networks Data Control Brand Metrics; Dec 2003-Aug 2009 n=31,357 100% Exposed n=123,117 80% 61.8% 59.2% 60% 41.8% 37.7% 34.1% 40% 32.1% 24.0% 20.1% Delta:  20% 13.0% 11.7% Exposed 1.3% 2.6% 3.9% 4.1% 2.0% - Control 0% Unaided Aided Online Ad Brand Purchase Awareness Awareness Awareness Favorability Intent Sample sizes vary across different measures. Min sample sizes are : Control N= 31.357, Exposed N= 123,117 5
    6. For Select Metrics, Ad Networks Outperform  Campaign Norms 80% 70% 65.0% 67.0% control exposed 59.2% 61.8% 60% 50% 41.8% 44.0% 45.0% 37.7% 40% 30% 20% 2.6% 2.0% 4.1% 1.0% 10% 0% Aided Awareness - Ad Aided Awareness - Brand Favorability - Brand Favorability - Network Total Ad Network Total 6
    7. Dynamic Logic Normative Data Shows That Ad Networks Impact is Slightly Below Campaign Average • Purchase Intent more positively impacted by ad networks MarketNorms Average Compared to Ad Networks Average MarketNorms Average Average Ad Networks 5% 4.6% Percent Impacted 4% 3.6% 3% 2.4% 2.2% 1.8% 2% 1.5% 1.2% 1.2% 1% 0.7% 0.2% 0% Aided Brand Online Ad Message Brand Purchase/ Awareness Awareness Association Favorability Behavior Intent Source: MarketNorms: Last 3 Years, Q2/2009, N=2,371, n=3,718,839  Ad Networks: Last 3 Years, Q2/2009, N=439, n=187,614
    8. However, Top 20% of Campaigns on Ad Networks Far Surpassed Industry Average Best/Worst Performers on Ad Networks MarketNorms Average Top 20% Ad Networks Average Ad Networks 16.0% 15.0% 14.0% Percent Impacted 12.0% 10.0% 9.9% 10.0% 9.1% 9.2% 8.0% 3.6% 6.0% 4.6% 4.0% 2.2% 1.2% 2.4% 1.8% 1.5% 1.2% 2.0% 0.7% 0.2% 0.0% Aided Brand Online Ad Message Brand Purchase/ Awareness Awareness Association Favorability Behavior Intent Source: MarketNorms: Last 3 Years, Q2/2009, N=2,371, n=3,718,839  Ad Networks: Last 3 Years, Q2/2009, N=439, n=187,614
    9. While Bottom 20% Actually Harm Brands Best/Worst Performers on Ad Networks MarketNorms Average Top 20% Ad Networks Average Ad Networks Bottom 20% Ad Networks 20.0% 15.0% 15.0% 10.0% 9.9% Percent Impacted 9.1% 9.2% 10.0% 4.6% 3.6% 5.0% 2.2% 1.2% 2.4% 1.8% 1.5% 0.7% 1.2% 0.2% 0.0% -5.0% -4.3% -6.7% -6.0% -10.0% -8.7% -9.2% Aided Brand Online Ad Message Brand Purchase/ Awareness Awareness Association Favorability Behavior Intent Source: MarketNorms: Last 3 Years, Q2/2009, N=2,371, n=3,718,839  Ad Networks: Last 3 Years, Q2/2009, N=439, n=187,614
    10. Case Study: Compared to Publisher sites, Ad Network sites drove action, lift message recall and association and recommendation intent  Ad Network Sites Publisher Sites Control Exposed Impact Control Exposed Impact Sample Size: X X X X Unaided Message Recall: XXXX 0% 13% +12.9 15% 16% +1.3 Message Association: XXXX 3% 8% +4.9 7% 7% +0.9 Message Association: XXXX 4% 8% +4.1 9% 9% 0.0 Online advertising recall 21% 31% +9.7 34% 39% +4.7 Purchase Intent 42% 53% +10.8 39% 45% +5.8 Recommendation Intent 8% 21% +13.6 13% 15% +1.4 Actions Taken Consider purchase 12% 24% +11.4 15% 15% +0.3 Download free trial 10% 20% +9.9 11% 12% +0.9 Visit website 11% 25% +14.2 19% 21% +2.0 Gather more info 15% 22% +7.1 17% 19% +1.7 T2 Box: Overall Opinion of Brand 48% 56% +7.8 43% 50% +6.9 Brand Opinions (Top Box) Is high quality 26% 29% +2.7 19% 24% +4.9 Always up-to-date 24% 29% +4.2 22% 25% +3.1 Is best in the category 16% 18% +2.3 10% 14% +3.9 Has improved their product 15% 17% +1.6 8% 11% +3.4 Sig @ 90%
    11. What are Factors That Help Branding On Ad Networks? •  Context/Targeting •  Great creative unit •  Emerging media 11
    12. What are Factors That Help Branding On Ad Networks? •  Context/Targeting •  Great creative unit •  Emerging media •  Let’s look at a few of those top 20% campaigns 12
    13. Puma Women’s Soccer Campaign
    14. Puma Women’s Soccer Campaign •  Contextually relevant placements generated CTRs over 20x average
    15. Forgetting Sara Marshall: 4Info Text Network Campaign Objectives •  Engage male users ages 18-34 •  Increase awareness of the upcoming film release •  Drive trailer views •  Drive theater visits Campaign •  Integrated media campaign: •  SMS ads placed on multiple 4INFO channels NBA Forgetting •  Branded facebook widget for mobile CHI:126 MIL: 121 F 3/4 Sarah Marshall in sports content *Been theaters 4/18. Check •  Mobile video trailers dumped? Reply it out: www. 4info.net/ix/1 •  Goal: Drive trailer views + increase SARAH movie audience.
    16. Text Campaign Significantly Drove Viewership Intent Brand Metrics 100% 88.1% 90% 80.7% 80% 68.4% 70% 65.5% 59.4% 60% 50% 43.9% 40% 27.8% 30% 20% 13.4% 19.7% 20.6% 14.4% 21.3% 10% 0% Aided Brand Recommendation Plan to See Viewed the Trailer Awareness Intent control exposed *Statistically significant difference between control and exposed group at a 95% confidence level. Results significant at 95% confidence
    17. 17
    18. Videoegg Creative Far Exceeded Ad Network Norms Delta Aided Brand Purchase Sponsorship between Brand Favorability Intent Ass’n control and Awareness exposed Marketnorms 4.5% 2.3% 2.0% 8.1% Brand 1 10.7% 13.3% 4.9% - Brand 2 - - 7.1% 10.1%
    19. Ad Networks Can be Effective (and Efficient) for Brand Advertisers •  Advertiser Considerations: • Great creative • Appropriate contextual environment • Smart Geo/Demo/Psychographic/Behavioral Targeting • New Platforms 19
    20. Ad Networks Can be Effective (and Efficient) for Brand Advertisers •  Ad Network Considerations: • Great creative (or non-horrible creative) • Contextual environment that lets the ad “breathe” • Prove that you can work for branding campaigns 20
    21. Thanks! •  Special thanks to Dynamic Logic, Insight Express and comScore •  michele@michelemadansky.com 21

    + PubMaticPubMatic, 1 month ago

    custom

    185 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presented by Michele Madansky, at PubMatic's premiu more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 185
      • 185 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 10
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories