M.Goman, A.Khramtsovsky, Y.Patel (2003) - Modeling and Analysis of Aircraft Spin Produced by Aerodynamic Asymmetry


Published on

М.Г.Гоман, А.В.Храмцовский, Йоуг Патель «Моделирование и анализ режимов штопора самолёта, обусловленных аэродиномической асимметрией», проект доклада на конференции AIAA, 2003 г.

M.Goman, A.Khramtsovsky, Y.Patel "Modeling and Analysis of Aircraft Spin Produced by Aerodynamic Asymmetry", draft AIAA paper, 2003

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

M.Goman, A.Khramtsovsky, Y.Patel (2003) - Modeling and Analysis of Aircraft Spin Produced by Aerodynamic Asymmetry

  1. 1. Modeling and Analysis of Aircraft Spin Produced by Aerodynamic Asymmetry M. Goman A. Khramtsovskyy De Montfort University, Leicester, UK Y. Patelz QinetiQ, Bedford, UK Abstract This paper presents modellingand dynamic analysis of aircraft spin, which is typical for modern ma- neuverable aircraft con gurations having a slender body fuselage, low aspect ratio wings and produced by asymmetrical aerodynamic loads. The origin of an aerodynamic asymmetry in the rolling and yawing moments at high incidence ight is directly connected with the onset of asymmetry in the vortical ow, i.e. due to asymmetry in vortex breakdown points above the wings or due to asymmetrical shedding of vortices from an aircraft slender nose. In wind tunnel tests the aerodynamic asymmetry at high angles of attack has been observed for various aircraft models during many years 1]. However, only recently the signi cance of aerodynamic asymmetry in aircraft dynamics at high angles of attack has been identi ed in ight tests of the Su- 27 and the X-31 aircraft 2, 3] (see Figs.1). Computational prediction of asymmetrical vortical and separation ow conditions using Naveir-Stokes equations still encounters many di culties 4], however, simpli ed modeling approaches reveal the bifurcational nature of ow instability leading to the onset of aerodynamic asymmetry 5]. All this signi es, that the aerodynamic asymmetry plays important role and should be included in mathematical modeling and departure/spin dynamics predictions. Signi cant research has been carried out in the development of adequate mathematical modeling of high angles of attack aerodynamics in the presence of ow separation and vortex breakdown ?, 6, 7]. Based on this research a simple mathematical model for asymmetric aerodynamic moments is proposed in the formof di erential equations with account of angle ofattack dependence ofaerodynamic asymmetry magnitude and the time lag e ects from internal vortical ow dynamics. The aircraft spin dynamics is analyzed using proposed mathematical model for aerodynamic asym- metry and application of qualitative and bifurcation analysis methods 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. The analysis starts with the simple balance moment equations allowing to identify all possible equilibrium spin modes for di erent altitudes and control surfaces de ections, to estimate the critical level of aerody- namic asymmetry leading to onset of equilibrium spin 8, 9] (see Fig.2). These initial estimates are used later for accurate calculation of equilibrium spin parameters and stability dynamic analysis for all identi ed spin modes using the 8th-order motion equations. For locally oscillatory unstable spin modes special analysis is performed for a search of possible steady oscillatory spin modes (Fig.3). When the aerodynamic asymmetry exceeds some critical level an aircraft can have unrecoverable at spin modes due to the lack of control authority of traditional aerodynamic control surfaces at high incidence. The unrecoverable at spin modes with rotation produced by asymmetrical yaw moment are identical to the deep stall regimes at high angles of attack, which are unrecoverable due to insu - cient margin of aerodynamic pitch-down control (see Fig.4). Conditions leading to unrecoverable spin Professor, Faculty of Computing Science and Engineering, e-mail: mgoman@dmu.ac.uk yVisiting Research Fellow, Faculty of Computing Sciences and Engineering, e-mail: sspchram@online.ru zPrincipal Scientist, Future Systems Technology Division, e-mail ypatel@qinetiq.com Copyright c 2003 by British Crown. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. 1
  2. 2. modes will be analyzed and results demonstrating the e ect of thrust vectoring control and/or anti-spin parachute will be also presented. Special attention is given to the pitch-rocking control used for aircraft spin recovery at the presence of high aerodynamic asymmetry. The principle and algorithms of rocking control are discussed and illustrated by examples of numerical simulation (see Fig.5). Transition from rocking control to stabi- lization phase at low angles of attack is speci ed from the analysis of regions of attraction for critical and normal ight conditions (Fig.7). The computational means developed for spin dynamics analysis and recovery control design are also discussed (6). Figure 1: Aerodynamic asymmetry in wind tunnel and ight tests. References 1] Beyers, M.E. "Interpretation of Experimental High-Alpha Aerodynamics { Implication for Flight Prediction", Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 32, Number 2, Pages 247-261, 1995. 2] Aerodynamics, stability and controllability of supersonic aircraft. Edited by G.S.Bushgens, "Nau- ka*Fizmatlit" publ., 1998, Moscow, (Chapter 8, pp.380). 3] Cobleigh, B.R.,Croom,M.A., Tamrat,B.F."ComparisonofX-31 Flight,Wind-Tunnel,andWater- Tunnel Yawing Moment Asymmetries at High Angles of Attack", Paper HA-AERO-06, High Alpha Conference IY - Electronic Workshop, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, July 12-14, 1994, URL: http://www.dfrf.nasa.gov/Workshop/HighAlphaIV/highalpha.html 4] R.M.Cummings"ComputationalDi cultiesinHigh Angle ofAttackFlowPrediction", Proceedings of the Third International Conference on "Nonlinear Problems in Aviation & Aerospace", Vol.1, 2001, Florida (Editor: Seenith Sivasundaram). 5] Goman, M.G., Zaharov, S.B., and A.N. Khrabrov "Aerodynamic hysteresis at vortical ow around a slender body", Reports of Academy of Science (DAN USSR), Vol.282, No.1, 1985. 6] N.Abramov,M.Goman,A.Khrabrovand K.Kolinko"SimpleWingsUnsteady Aerodynamicsat High Angles of Attack: Experimental and Modeling Results", Paper N 99-4013, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, August 1999, Portland, OR. 7] N.Abramov, M.Goman, D.Greenwell and A.Khrabrov "Two-Step Linear Regression Method for Identi cation of High Incidence Unsteady Aerodynamic Model", Paper N 2001-4080, AIAA Atmo- spheric Flight Mechanics Conference, August 2001, Montreal, Canada. 2
  3. 3. Figure 2: Solutions of approximate spin equations. Figure 3: Bifurcation diagram: angle of attack steady state solutions for di erent stabilator de ections. 3
  4. 4. Figure 4: Unrecoverable deep stall and at spin regimes. Figure 5: Pitch rocking control for spin recovery. 4
  5. 5. Figure 6: Computational framework for spin dynamics analysis and design of recovery control. 8] Dolzenko, N.N., "Investigation of equilibrium aircraft spin", TsAGI Proceedings No. 8817, 1968 (in russian). 9] Tischler, M.B., andBarlow, J.B., "DeterminationofSpin andRecovery Characteristics of a General Aviation Design," Journal of Aircraft, Vol.18, No.4, 1981, pp.238-244. 10] Mehra,R.K., "Bifurcation analysis of aircraft high angle of attack ight dynamics", AIAA N 80- 1599, August 1980. 11] Carroll,J.V., and Mehra,R.,K., "Bifurcation Analysis of Nonlinear Aircraft Dynamics," Journal Guidance, Navigation, and Control, Vol. 5, No. 5, 1982, pp.529-536. 12] Guicheteau, P., "Bifurcation Theory Applied to the Study of Control Losses on Combat Aircraft," La Recherche Aerospatiale, Vol. 2, 1982, pp.61-73. 13] M.Goman, G.Zagainov, and A.Khramtsovsky "Application of Bifurcation Methods to Nonlinear Flight DynamicsProblems,"Progress inAerospace Sciences 33(1977), pp.539-586,Elsevier Science Ltd. 14] Goman, M.G., and Khramtsovsky, A.V., "KRIT : Scienti c Package for continuation and bifurca- tion analysis with aircraft dynamics applications," TsAGI, 1993. 5
  6. 6. 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 −1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 δ e =0.0, δ a =0.0, δ r =0.0 Angle of attack α, rad pitchrateq,rad/s Pitch rocking control trajectory Region of attraction of flat spin regime 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 −2 −1.5 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 δ e =0.0, δ a =0.0, δ r =0.0 Angle of attack α, rad yawrater,rad/s Region of attraction of flat spin regime Pitch rocking control trajectory Figure 7: Regions of attraction for recon guration of pitch rock recovery control. 6