Quality Assurance in e-Learning by Mohamed Amin Embi

14,428 views
14,590 views

Published on

Quality Assurance and e-Learning Future Plans in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions by Mohamed Amin Embi (MEIPTA)

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
14,428
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
12,556
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
18
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Quality Assurance in e-Learning by Mohamed Amin Embi

  1. 1. Quality Assurance & e-Learning Future Plans in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions<br />By:<br />Prof. Dr. Mohamed AminEmbi<br />
  2. 2. Key Findings of Quality Assurance and e-Learning Future Plans<br />Only 46.2% HEIs have guidelines on e-Learning quality. <br />Only 42.1% HEIs make e-Learning part of their respective Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) process.<br />The governance of quality assurance in the institutions involved are usually controlled by the Centre for Academic Development (or equivalent) or the Center for Teaching and Learning. <br />Only seven HEIs (26.9%) carry out periodic monitoring of the impact or the effectiveness of e-Learning on the delivery methods of academic staff. <br />
  3. 3. Only six HEIs (23.1%) carry out periodic monitoring of the impact or the effectiveness of e-Learning on students’ achievements. <br />In terms of e-Learning future plans, e-Learning administrators believe that the applications that should be provided according to priority are Mobile Learning (92.3%), podcasting (61.5%), Educational Games (50%), and Simulation (42.3%). According to them, the Intelligent Tutoring System is not an application that needs to be prioritised. <br />However, lecturers (67%) and students (76.8%) are of the view that HEIs should give priority to Intelligent Tutoring Systems as compared to other applications. In addition, lecturers (23.4%) and students (19.4%) place podcasting applications as the lowest in terms of priority. <br />
  4. 4. Number/Percentage of HEIs having quality assurance <br />procedures related to e-Learning<br />
  5. 5. Number/Percentage of HEIs in which e-Learning is part of institutional CQI<br />
  6. 6. Department in charge of quality assurance <br />related to e-Learning<br />
  7. 7. Number/Percentage of HEIs that monitors the impact of <br />e-Learning on the delivery methods of academic staff <br />
  8. 8. Number/Percentage of HEIs that monitors the impact of <br />e-Learning on student achievement<br />
  9. 9. Future applications most liked by <br />e-Learning administrators<br />
  10. 10. Future applications most liked by lecturers<br />
  11. 11. Future applications most liked by students<br />

×