Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Ch 4 Callahan   Academic Paternalism
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Ch 4 Callahan Academic Paternalism

1,718
views

Published on

Published in: Education

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,718
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
13
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. “Academic Paternalism” Joan C. Callahan
    • Are university, college, department policies or practices paternalistic?
    • Two Classes of Possible Paternalistic Behavior: Academic and Non-Academic
    • What is the appropriate model of the university/student and faculty/student relationship?
  • 2. Paradigm Case of Paternalism
    • Paternalism: a relationship where one party acts on the presumption that he knows what is best for the other party.(106)
    • Paternalism involves beneficence or the interest in the well-being of the child.
    • Paternalism is objectionable when applied to adults- particularly when the acts lack beneficence.
  • 3. Problem of Paternalism in Higher Education
    • When policies, decisions, or behaviors involve an interference with the liberty of students for their own good.
    • When policies, decisions, or behaviors toward students involve treating students in patronizing or other ways which fail to recognize their adult status. (106)
    • Callahan argues that occurs in higher education is NOT paternalistic.
  • 4. Instructor/Student Relationship
    • All policies or actions based on the presumption that one party knows what is best for another does not count as paternalistic.
    • Fundamental difference is that the service being provided is requested by the client or trainee.
    • Relationship between the two is essentially contractual.
  • 5. Rights of the Trainee
    • Right to require a justification for professional decisions
    • Right (and freedom) to ignore the professional’s advice
    • Right to withdraw from the relationship
  • 6. Rights of the Professional
    • Right to terminate the relationship if the client demands he/she act in ways below professional standards.
    • Right to terminate if the pupil refuses to cooperate in the learning process.
    • Analogous Models: Professional/Client or the Master/Apprentice
  • 7. Goals of a University Education
    • Developing capacities for autonomous agency
    • Preparation for the professions
    • Formation of educated persons fit for citizenship in a free society
    • Cultivation of individuals for their own purposes.(107)
  • 8. University/Student vs. Parent/Child Relationship
    • Student voluntarily enters into the relationship with another agent/agency for a specific purpose
    • Student and university are free to terminate the relationship.
    • Relationship is essentially contractual.
  • 9. Academic Paternalism and Paternalistic Rationales
    • Departmental Requirements
    • College/University Requirements
    • In-Course Requirements
    • All requirements are justified provided they further academic ideals e.g.”What every educated person should know.”