Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Like this? Share it with your network

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Psychiatrically Relevant Co-Morbidities: Content Areas and Assessment Domains Philip D. Harvey, PhD Emory University School of Medicine
  • 2. Top Ten Causes of Disability
    • Ischemic heart Disease**
    • Cerebrovascular disease
    • Major Depression*
    • Lung Cancer**
    • Traffic Accidents**
    • Alcohol abuse*
    • Arthritis
    • Dementia*
    • COPD**
    • Self-inflicted injuries*
    Note. * Clearly neuropsychiatric; ** Likely neuropsychiatric Note. Skin Diseases are attributed to have an average DALYS (disability-adjusted life years) value of 0.1 compared to 25.4 for neuropsychiatric disorders. Is there some overlap here?
  • 3. Domains of Psychiatric Impairment
    • Symptomatic
      • Depression
        • Including hopelessness and suicidality
      • Anxiety
      • Frustration tolerance and explosiveness
    • Quality of Life
      • Subjective Impression
      • Illness Burden
    • Functional Disability
  • 4. Assessment of Psychiatric Symptoms
    • Self report scales
      • Abbreviated
        • BDI
        • STAI
      • Comprehensive
        • MMPI
    • Clinician Ratings
      • MADRS
      • HDRS/HARS
  • 5. Limitations of Assessment Domains
    • Transparent scales cannot prevent or detect response bias
    • Clinician ratings require expertise
    • Comprehensive inventories are long and require literacy
  • 6. Quality of Life Assessment
    • Global Impressions of Life Satisfaction
      • QLES-Q
    • Illness Burden
      • QWB
  • 7. Limitations with Assessment Domains
    • Again, no protection against bias
    • QWB is referenced against other illnesses
      • People with some psychiatric conditions underestimate their burden
  • 8. Dimensions of Functional Impairment
      • Occupational
      • Social
      • Self-Care
      • Independent Living
  • 9. How do you assess functional disability?
    • Self-report
    • Informant report
    • Direct observation
    • Objective information
    • Performance-based tests
  • 10. Limitations of Assessment Domains
    • Objective information
      • Availability; Relevance;
    • Informant report
      • Availability; situation specificity
    • Self-report
      • Bias; Cognitive limitations
    • Observation
      • Situation-specificity; low target frequency
    • Performance-based
      • Practicality; content validity; difficulty
  • 11. Depression as a source of bias
    • Current levels of depression have been reported across neuropsychiatric conditions to influence self-reports
    • These include self-evaluations and subjective reports of anticipated later outcomes
  • 12. Sadder, but wiser
    • College students with elevated BDI scores give self-reports of their attractiveness that are consistent with observer ratings; lower scores overestimate their attractiveness
    • MS patients with depression provide accurate reports of their cognitive disabilities; nondepressed patients overestimate
  • 13. Normal optimistic bias
    • David Dunning reports that 75% of college professors report that they are academically “above average” compared to college professor peers
    • 80% think that they are better looking
    • Feedback that deflates their self opinion leads to increases in convergence between observer ratings and self-report
  • 14. What are the determinants of real-world disability ?
    • The prediction of real-world disability is a considerable challenge
    • Quality of life can be predicted similarly
    • Many factors may contribute small increments of prediction
    • Precise modeling may be the key to answering the question
  • 15. Attn/WM Neg Sx Pos Sx Depression Functional Capacity Work Outcome .14 R 2 =0.20 Social Competence Processing Speed Executive Functioning Verbal Memory .17 -.11 .47 .26 .10 .25 -.17 -.29 .47 .40 .16 .36 Note. N=227; Bowie et al., 2008
  • 16. What are the potential causal models for dermatological conditions?
    • Does itching/acne lead to depression which leads to disability which leads to QoL reduction?
    • Does itching/acne lead to disability which leads to depression which leads to QoL reduction?
    • Does itching/acne leading to disability, depression, and QoL reduction, which are simply correlated?
    • All of these models suggest different points of intervention
  • 17. Social Competence
    • Communication skills
    • Interaction skills
    • Examine verbal, nonverbal, and social cognitive abilities
    • Example Measures
      • Maryland assessment of Social competence (MASC)
      • Social Skills Performance Assessment (SSPA)
  • 18. Everyday living skills
    • Cooking; shopping; planning
    • Child care
    • Emergency procedures
    • Financial Management
    • Example instruments
      • Direct Assessment of Functional Status (DAFS)
      • UCSD Performance-based skills assessment (UPSA)
      • Everyday functioning battery (EFB)
  • 19. Vocational Skills
    • Actual job-related performance
    • Job seeking and job maintenance
    • Example Instruments
      • COMPASS system
        • Provides detailed feedback about employability
  • 20. Medication management
    • The ability to acquire medications
    • Ability to plan and complete medication self-administration
    • Example Tests
      • Medication Management Ability Test (MMAT)
  • 21. Future Directions
    • Deployment of performance-based measures of functioning and collection of multi-channel outcomes
    • Direct assessment of functional potential
      • Use as a treatment outcome
    • Develop sophisticated models of influence
    • Test patterns of causal influence through treatment-outcomes designs