SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 49
Download to read offline
Corporate Presentation
April 2013
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
Forward Looking Information
This Presentation contains „„forward-looking information‟‟ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking information may include, but is not limited to, information with respect to the anticipated production and developments in our operations
in future periods, our planned exploration and development activities, the adequacy of our financial resources, the estimation of mineral resources, realization of mineral resource
estimates, costs and timing of development of the projects we currently intend to acquire (the “Projects”), costs and timing of future exploration, results of future exploration and
drilling, timing and receipt of approvals, consents and permits under applicable legislation, our executive compensation approach and practice, the composition of our board of
directors and committees, and adequacy of financial resources. Wherever possible, words such as „„plans‟‟, „„expects‟‟ or „„does not
expect‟‟, „„budget‟‟, „„scheduled‟‟, „„estimates‟‟, „„forecasts‟‟, „„anticipate‟‟ or „„does not anticipate‟‟, „„believe‟‟, „„intend‟‟ and similar expressions or statements that certain
actions, events or results „„may‟‟, „„could‟‟, „„would‟‟, „„might‟‟ or „„will‟‟ be taken, occur or be achieved, have been used to identify forward-looking information. Statements
concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking information to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be
encountered if the property is developed. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to
predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as
„„expects‟‟, „„anticipates‟‟, „„plans‟‟, „„projects‟‟, „„estimates‟‟, „„assumes‟‟, „„intends‟‟, „„strategy‟‟, „„goals‟‟, „„objectives‟‟, „„potential‟‟ or variations thereof, or stating that certain
actions, events or results „„may‟‟, „„could‟‟, „„would‟‟, „„might‟‟ or „„will‟‟ be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not
statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Many of these risks are listed and described in our
final short-form prospectus dated March 19, 2012 (the “Prospectus”), which is available for review on SEDAR at www.sedar.com under our profile. Although we have attempted
to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results
not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ
materially from those anticipated in such information. Forward-looking information involves statements about the future and is inherently uncertain, and our actual achievements
or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking information due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other
factors, including, without limitation, those referred to in the Prospectus under the heading „„Risk Factors‟‟. Our forward-looking information is based on the beliefs, expectations
and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and we do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking information, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, prospective investors should not place undue reliance on
forward-looking information.
National Instrument 43-101
Technical and scientific information contained herein relating to the Projects is derived from National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) compliant technical reports (“Reports”)
“Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Brucejack Project” dated February 20, 2012 “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated April
3, 2012, “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated September 18, 2012 and “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated November 20, 2012. We have filed the
Reports under our profile at www.sedar.com. Technical and scientific information not contained within the Reports for the Projects have been prepared under the supervision of
Mr. Kenneth C. McNaughton, an independent “qualified person” under NI 43-101.
This presentation uses the terms “measured resources”, “indicated resources” (together “M&I”) and “inferred resources”. Although these terms are recognized and required by
Canadian regulations (under NI 43-101), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do
not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-
political, marketing, or other relevant issues. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves.
In addition, “inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an
inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre
feasibility studies, or economic studies, except for a Preliminary Assessment as defined under NI 43-101. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred
resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
Currency
Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar values herein are in Canadian $.
2
3
 Significant high-grade gold resource:
Valley of the Kings
8.5 M oz gold Indicated (16.1 Mt @ 16.4 g/t gold)
2.9 M oz gold Inferred (5.4 Mt @ 17.0 g/t gold)
 Located in British Columbia, Canada
 Underground feasibility study Q2 2013
 Commercial production target early 2016
An investment in Gold
Kirkland Lake Mine
(Kirkland Lake)
Kensington Mine
(Coeur)
Casa Berardi
(Aurizon)
El Penon Mine
(Yamana)
Red Lake Mine
(Goldcorp)
Pogo Mine
(Sumitomo)
Valley of the
Kings
F2 Deposit
(Rubicon)
Buritica
(Continental)
Cerro Negro
(Goldcorp)
Eleonore
(Goldcorp)
Cerro Moro
(Yamana)
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0
M&I+InferredGoldGrade(g/t)
M&I + Inferred Gold Resources (mm oz)
HIGH-GRADE GOLD WITH SIZE
4November 2012 Valley of the Kings High-Grade Gold Mineral Resource based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne.
Data sources: Intierra Ltd., NRH.
Indicated Gold:
8.5 mm oz @ 16.4 g/t Au
Inferred Gold:
2.9 mm oz @ 17.0 g/t Au
5
BRUCEJACK PROJECT LOCATION
EXPLORATION AND OWNERSHIP HISTORY
1960-1980
1980-1985
1986-1989
1990
1993
1999-2000
2009
2010
2011-2012
2013
Exploration by
various
companies
West Zone discovery
and definition
by Newhawk
5.3 km
underground
development of
West Zone
West Zone
Feasibility Study
completed
Acquisition by
Silver Standard
Resources Inc.
Exploration resumes.
Discovery of Valley of
the Kings Zone
Acquisition by
Pretivm
Extensive exploration
program, high-grade
resource, exploration road
Mine Development
Certificate issued
Valley of the Kings
underground bulk
sample and feasibility
study
6
BRUCEJACK GEOLOGY/DRILLING
7
Meters
500
Valley of the Kings
West Zone
GEOLOGY CROSS SECTION
8
9
MAIN MINERALIZED DOMAINS
West Zone
Underground
Development
Bulk
Sample
N
S
Domain 17 Domain 11
200 m
Category Tonnes
(mil)
Gold
(g/t)
Silver
(g/t)
Contained(3)
Gold
(mil oz)
Silver
(mil oz)
Indicated 16.1 16.4 14.2 8.5 7.3
Inferred(2)
5.4 17.0 15.7 2.9 2.7
Valley of the Kings Mineral Resource Estimate
– November 2012(1,4,5)
(Based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne)
(1) Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by
environmental, permitting, legal, marketing, or other relevant issues. The Mineral Resources in
this news release were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and
Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and
Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by
CIM Council.
(2) The quantity and grade of reported Inferred resources in this estimation are uncertain in
nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Resources as an
Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in
upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category.
(3) Contained metal may differ due to rounding.
(4) The Mineral Resource estimate is defined using 5 m by 5 by 5 m blocks in the well drilled
portion of West Zone (5 m by 10 m drilling or better) and 10 m by 10 m by 10 m blocks in the
remainder of West Zone and in Valley of the Kings.
(5) The gold equivalent value is defined as AuEq=Au + Ag/53
VALLEY OF THE KINGS INDICATED RESOURCE
Northing
( 25 m)
Ind.Gold*
(Oz.)
6258225 230,900
6258175 484,000
6258125 703,100
6258075 336,600
6258025 1,951,100
6257975 2,365,900
6257925 1,021,000
6257875 513,600
6257825 687,500
6257775 176,400
Total Ounces per 100 m Easting and 50 m Northing strips
Valley of the Kings
Indicated Mineral Resource:
8.5 Moz. Au @ 5.0 g/t AuEq.
(16.1 Mt @ 16.4 g/t Au)
*Nov. 2012 Indicated Mineral Resource;
≥5.0 g/t AuEq.
10
1,092,100 1,776,900 1,467,600 2,185,800 1,391,000 380,100 192,900 Ind. Au* (Oz.)
MINERAL RESOURCE CONTINUITY
11
Total Ounces* per 10 x 100 m N-S corridor – 6257800 N Long SectionLevel (m) Ind. Gold (Oz)*
1540-1570 116,300
1510-1540 499,700
1480-1510 734,800
1450-1480 510,400
1420-1450 365,450
1390-1420 566,700
1360-1390 631,700
1330-1360 364,800
1300-1330 527,400
1270-1300 992,000
1240-1270 998,200
1210-1240 521,950
1180-1210 213,050
1150-1180 246,800
1120-1150 294,600
1090-1120 393,900
1060-1090 317,600
W E
100 m
4,000-6,000
6,000-7,000
7,000-8,000
>10,000
Key (Oz. Au)
3,000-4,000
1,000-3,000
<1,000
8,000-10,000
Total Ounces per level
(Valley of Kings Zone)
*Nov. 2012 Indicated Mineral Resource;
≥5.0 g/t AuEq.
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS
12Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq
Valley of the Kings block model – 426550E section view East (50m wide)
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS
13Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq
Valley of the Kings block model – 426600E section view East (50m wide)
1414
100 m
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS
Valley of the Kings block model plan view - 1300m level (50m thick)
1515
100 m
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS
Valley of the Kings block model plan view - 1250m level (50m thick)
16
10,000-TONNE BULK SAMPLE (Q2/Q3)
N S
0.5-5.0 g/t AuEq
5.0-15.0 g/t AuEq
>15.0 g/t AuEq
Key
West Zone
Underground
Development
Valley of the
Kings Bulk
Sample
200 m
546 m
100 m 200 m 300 m
400 m
500 m
Over 400 meters out of 546 total meters to reach Valley of the Kings have been completed.
BULK SAMPLE: SECTION 426625
17
SN
HIGH-GRADE CORRIDORS
18
Valley of the Kings Drill Hole Trace Bar Graphs – 426615E Section View
Bulk
sample
N S
Domain 17/20
BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
19
Vertical viewing window 40 m
1345 m Level
5-10
10-20
20-60
>60
Key (g/t AuEq)
2.5-5
1-2.5
0.3-1
BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
20
5-10
10-20
20-60
>60
Key (g/t AuEq)
2.5-5
1-2.5
0.3-1
1345 m Level
Vertical viewing window 8.5 m
Siltstone, litharenite, p
ebble conglomerate
Polylithic Conglomerate
Fragmental
Volcanic Rocks
Intensely
Silicified
Conglomerate
Hbl-phyric
Latite Flow
BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
21
5-10
10-20
20-60
>60
Key (g/t AuEq)
Only Indicated blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq shown
1345 m Level
Vertical viewing window 8.5 m
Siltstone, litharenite, p
ebble conglomerate
Polylithic Conglomerate
Fragmental
Volcanic Rocks
Intensely
Silicified
Conglomerate
Hbl-phyric
Latite Flow
BULK SAMPLE PROCESS(1)
22
Typical sample tower flowsheet
Source: Strathcona Mineral Services Limited, Meladine Project
 Process flowsheet summary:
 Crosscut rounds of 100 tonnes transported to
surface
 Crushing to ¾ inch, then to ½ inch
 Run through on-site sample tower
 120 kilograms in 4 samples are sent for testing
 Remainder (99.8 tonnes) shipped for processing
to produce gold
 Representivity testing:
 Representative of drillhole density that informs
the Indicated Mineral Resource
 Representative of average grade of Indicated
Resource and the global resource for Valley of
the Kings
 Representative of style of mineralization for the
rest of Valley of the Kings
(1) Strathcona Mineral Services Ltd is independent QP for Valley of the Kings bulk sample
UNDERGROUND DRILLING
23
N
SN
Typical Section – Fan Drilling
Detailed underground drilling at <15 meter centers to outline 700,000 ounces of gold.
VISIBLE GOLD STRINGERS IN STOCKWORK
24
VALLEY OF THE KINGS GOLD GRADE
25
Valley of the Kings – Indicated Resource grade consistency
Resource Estimate
(Snowden)
Cumulative Drilling
(m)
Indicated Gold Resource
Ounces (mil)
Indicated Gold
Grade (g/t)
April 2012 59,100 4.9 17.3
September 2012 114,949 5.1 16.2
November 2012 174,182 8.5 16.4
Valley of the Kings – Drilling results and gold grade
Year
Hole number
by series
Over 1
kilogram
per tonne
500 -
1,000
g/t
100 –
500
g/t
30 – 100
g/t
15 – 30
g/t
5 – 15
g/t Annual total
2009 1 - 37 2 3 14 17 107 143
2010 38 - 110 6 2 12 26 26 129 201
2011 111 - 288 21 11 48 63 74 304 521
2012 289 - 585 49 26 125 151 134 491 976
2009-2012 Total: 78 39 188 254 251 1,031 1,841
2626
 Corridors of high-grade visible
gold seams within lower grade
(5g/t to 20g/t) gold quartz
stockwork
 Steeply dipping ore body
 Competent ground conditions
 Stope widths (15m wide X 30m
high) appropriate both for
transverse and longitudinal
layouts
 Cost effective
First 50 meters of Valley of the Kings ramp
Long hole stoping mining method:
MINING METHOD FOR STOCKWORK
PROPOSED MINE DEVELOPMENT
27
Oblique View of Mining Stopes, Valley of the Kings
S
N
100 m
West-Zone
(late mine life)Valley of the Kings
MINE AND MILL SITE LAYOUT
28
Crushing
Grinding
Gravity Concentrate Circuit
Doré (50%-60% of gold
production)
Flotation Concentrate Circuit
Off-take (40%-50% of
gold production)
Flowsheet Summary:
 Dore bars produced on
site, shipped to gold
refinery
 Flotation concentrate (~300
tpd) shipped to Stewart
then sea transport
West Zone
Valley of the Kings
BRUCEJACK PROJECT ECONOMICS
29
(1) Source: Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of
the Brucejack Project, effective date February 20, 2012
(2) Base case metals prices of US$1,100 /oz gold and US$21/oz silver
PEA is based on Mineral Resource estimates for the Valley of the Kings and
West Zone effective November 28, 2011 which are now out-of-date.
February 2012 Preliminary Economic
Assessment Results(1,2) :
Processing rate 1,500 tpd
Mine life 24 years
Total gold production 6.9 million oz
Average annual gold
production (Yrs 1-12)
325,000 ounces
Capex US$436.3 million
Total operating costs C$170.90/t milled
Internal Rate of
Return
29.8%
Net Present Value
(5% discount)
US$2.262 billion
 Processing rate increased
 2,700 tonnes per day
 Mill facilities streamlined
 Flotation concentrate to be sold to
3rd parties rather than refined on
site
 Capex and Opex savings, reduced
project footprint
 Metallurgy continues to be positive
 Feasibility metallurgical studies
confirm gold recoveries 98%, silver
recoveries 92%
Feasibility Study Refinements to PEA:
2013 BRUCEJACK PROJECT PLANS
30
H1 2013
 Access ramp to Valley of the Kings is
underway, with over 300 meters completed out
of 546 meters in total
 Channel sample the ramp to Valley of the Kings
 Underground sampling/drilling Valley of the
Kings
 Commence 10,000-tonne underground bulk
sample from Valley of the Kings
 Feasibility study completed
H2 2013
 Complete bulk sample report
 Process bulk sample
 File Environmental Assessment Certificate
Application
 Resource update
 Valley of the Kings drilling
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
31
 Pretivm‟s management team has been
cooperatively engaging with First Nations
and local community leaders in the
Stewart, BC region for over 10 years
 We work to ensure that our
communication about the progress of the
Brucejack Project is open and continuous
 Commercial relationships with local First
Nations developed during the exploration
phase at Brucejack have been mutually
successful
 We will continue to extend both
commercial contract and employment
opportunities to locals whenever possible
Stewart warehouse constructed by development
corporation of Skii km Lax Ha First Nation
BRUCEJACK PERMITTING
32
1986
1989
1993
1998
1999
2006
2011-2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Reclamation
Permit
Mine Development
Certificate issued
April 15, 1993
Project Assessment
Certificate
Permitted for
exploration and
exploration road
Project Assessment
Certificate allowed to
expire
Approval in principle
for development of a
mine at West Zone
Reclamation
Completion
Project Description
under review for
underground mine at
Brucejack‟s Valley of
the Kings
 Brucejack Lake is not fish habitat
 Waste rock from 1980‟s/1990‟s
underground development was deposited
in Brucejack Lake as part of 1999
reclamation
 More than 50% of tailings (targeting 60%) to
be used for paste backfill and deposited
underground, with remainder of tailings to
be deposited in bottom 30 meters of
Brucejack Lake
Anticipate
Environmental
Assessment Certificate
Construction, commiss
ioning
Commercial
production target
PRETIVM MANAGEMENT
33
Robert Quartermain, B.Sc., M.Sc., P.Geo, D.Sc.
President & Chief Executive Officer,
Director
Peter de Visser, CA
Chief Financial Officer
Joseph Ovsenek, B.A. Sc., P.Eng., LLB
Vice President & Chief Development Officer,
Director
Ken McNaughton, M.A. Sc., P.Eng.
Vice President & Chief Exploration Officer
Ian I Chang, M.A. Sc., P.Eng.
Vice President, Project Development
Michelle Romero, B.A., M.L.S.
Director, Corporate Relations
Kevin Torpy, B.Sc.
Director, Mine Engineering
Warwick Board, Ph.D., P.Geo.
Chief Geologist
Max Holtby, B.Sc., P. Geo.
Director, Permitting
Andrew Saltis, I.Eng.
Site Project Manager, Mine Manager
SHAREHOLDING & ANALYST COVERAGE
34
Institutions, 5
0%
Retail, 23%
Management,
5%
Silver
Standard, 20
%
Capital Structure(1)
Public Float 77.5
Silver Standard Shares 19.0
Total Issued & Outstanding Shares 96.5
Incentive Options 8.5
Total Fully Diluted Shares 105.0
Market Capitalization C$735 million
Working Capital (at Dec. 31, 2012) C$30.1 million
Share Offering gross proceeds (at
February 15, 2013)(3) C$21.0 million
(1)As of March 27, 2013; ownership calculated on an undiluted basis.
(2)As of March 27, 2013. Source: IPREO, SEDI
(3)See news release dated February 15, 2013
(shares in millions)
Top Shareholders(2)
(shares in millions)
Silver Standard Resources 18.986
Royce & Associates 10.689
Passport Capital 5.386
Fidelity Management 3.720
Robert Quartermain 2.853
Connor, Clark & Lunn 2.602
TD Asset Management 2.153
Carmignac Gestion 1.898
Sprott Asset Management 1.718
Analyst Coverage
BMO John Hayes
CIBC Jeff Killeen
Citibank Alex Hacking
Cormark Securities Richard Gray
Dahlman Rose Adam Graf
Global Hunter Securities Jeff Wright
GMP Securities TBD
RBC Dan Rollins
Salman Partners Ash Guglani
Scotiabank Ovais Habib
UBS TBD
Very Independent Research John Tumazos
Pretium  dubai handouts
CONTACT
Phone: 604-558-1784
Fax: 604-558-4784
Toll-free: 1-877-558-1784
invest@pretivm.com
www.pretivm.com
HEAD OFFICE
Pretium Resources Inc.
570 Granville St.
Suite 1600
Vancouver, BC
Canada V6C 3P1
COMMON SHARES
TSX/NYSE:PVG
Issued: 96.5 million
Fully diluted: 105.0 million
52-week hi/low: $16.74/$6.48
Market cap: $735 million
Advancing a major high-grade gold resource in Canada
APPENDIX: DECLINING GRADES AND DISCOVERIES
37
Decade Yield/Spend-Ratio
1950‟s 42
1960‟s 106
1970‟s 83
1980‟s 57
1990‟s 23
2000‟s 11
Ratio of Discovered US$ in the Ground Per
US$ Exploration Expenditure
Source: Open Geology Journal, 2010 Volume 4
(*) Added for comparison
Arithmetic mean of gold grade in ores mined in South
Africa, Australia, Canada, Brazil and the US, 1830-2004
PVG‟s Valley of the Kings(*)
Four-sub-cycle Model of
Gold Production 1850-2008*
*Global gold production with exponential fit of +1.96 p.a. (R2 = 0.9222 ) and four sub-cycles
Source: Open Geology Journal, 2010 Volume 4
APPENDIX: GOLD EQUITIES VERSUS GOLD
38
Gold price (%) XAU Index (%)
Gold Price ($US) (%)
10-Year Performance of Gold, and Gold‟s Relative Performance to XAU Index:
January 1, 2003 to March 31, 2013 (monthly,%)
Gold price ($US)
APPENDIX: GOLD EQUITIES IN GOLD TERMS
39
Source: RBC Capital Markets
APPENDIX: GOLD EQUITIES: TRADING AT 2008 LEVEL
40
Senior/Mid-Tier Gold Producer Average
APPENDIX: RISING COSTS – FOCUS ON GRADE
41
Rising costs erode margins, even in high gold price environment
Source: Scotiabank
APPENDIX: RISING COSTS – FOCUS ON GRADE
42
Rising costs erode margins, even in high gold price environment
Source: Randgold
APPENDIX: COMPARATIVE GEOCHRONOLOGY
43
GEOLOGICAL EVOLUTION
44
~192-188 Ma
Active island arc
Porphyry-related hydrothermal system
Initial mineralization
Telescoping porphyry
Syn-deposition volcanic pile deformation
Main mineralization continuum
Magmatic
Brine
Vapour
~196-192 Ma
Heated
Seawater
Ocean
Mineralizing
fluids
Volcano-sedimentary
sub-basin
GEOLOGICAL EVOLUTION
45
Cretaceous deformation at ~110 Ma
Uplift and erosion
Valley of the Kings
Waning of porphyry system
Arc-related deformation
Mafic dyke intrusion
West Zone
SN
~184 Ma
APPENDIX: BRUCEJACK AREA GEOLOGY
46
>0.3 g/t gold
500mExisting 5km underground workings
1980-1994 – Newhawk
908 DDH/120,000m
2009-2010 – Silver Standard
110 DDH/50,946m
2011-2012 – Pretivm
426 DDH/155,144m
West Zone
Valley of the Kings Zone
North – South
Valley of the Kings Zone
Valley of the Kings Zone
500m
West Zone
West Zone
(Teuton)
0.65 g/t Au
0 - 1047 m
(Seabridge)
APPENDIX: VALLEY OF THE KINGS – GOLD GRADE
47
Gold grade distribution inside mineralized corridors – Valley of the Kings
All 1.5 m composites Au > 5.0 g/t only
5 g/t Au
Au (g/t) Au (g/t)
CumulativeProbability(%)
CumulativeProbability(%)
APPENDIX: BRUCEJACK BULK TONNAGE
48
Category Tonnes
(millions)
Gold
(g/t)
Silver
( g/t)
Contained(3)
Gold
(million oz)
Silver
(million oz)
Measured 7.4 2.77 152 0.66 36.3
Indicated 139.0 2.14 12.9 9.6 57.8
M+I 146.0 2.17 19.9 10.3 94.1
Inferred(2)
857.0 0.86 8.49 23.7 234.0
Category Tonnes
(millions)
Gold
(g/t)
Silver
(g/t)
Contained(3)
Gold
(million oz)
Silver
(million oz)
Measured 7.4 2.78 153 0.66 36.3
Indicated 100.0 2.87 16.4 9.2 52.5
M+I 107.0 2.86 25.8 9.9 88.8
Inferred(2)
600.0 1.09 10.2 21.0 197.0
Brucejack Grade-tonnage estimate (Open Cut sensitivity)
September 2012
(1)(4)(5)
(Based on a cut-off grade of 0.30 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne)
Brucejack Grade-tonnage estimate (Open cut sensitivity)
September 2012
(1)(4)(5)
(Based on a cut-off grade of 0.50 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne)
(1) Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by
environmental, permitting, legal, marketing, or other relevant issues. The Mineral Resources in
this news release were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and
Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and
Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by
CIM Council.
(2) The quantity and grade of reported Inferred resources in this estimation are uncertain in
nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Resources as an
Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in
upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category.
(3) Contained metal may differ due to rounding.
(4) The Mineral Resource estimate is defined using 5 m by 5 by 5 m blocks in the well drilled
portion of West Zone (5 m by 10 m drilling or better) and 10 m by 10 m by 10 m blocks in the
remainder of West Zone ,Valley of the Kings, Galena Hill and parts of the Shore Zone, and by
20m by 20m by 20m in the poorer informed Bridge Zone, Gossan Hill and parts of Shore
Zone
(5) The gold equivalent value is defined as AuEq=Au + Ag/53
APPENDIX: SNOWFIELD PROJECT
49
Snowfield Open Pit
(September 2010 PA)
Mitchell Zone
(SEA)
Sulphurets Zone
(SEA)
Iron Cap Zone
(SEA)
Grade Contained Metal
Tonnes Au Ag Cu Mo Re Au Ag Cu
(mt) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (ppm) (ppm)
(mm
oz)
(mm
oz)
(bil lbs)
Measured 189.8 0.82 1.69 0.09% 97.4 0.57 4.98 10.3 0.38
Indicated 1,180.3 0.55 1.73 0.10% 83.6 0.50 20.93 65.4 2.60
Measured &
Indicated
1,370.1 0.59 1.72 0.10% 85.5 0.51 25.92 75.8 2.98
Inferred 833.2 0.34 1.90 0.06% 69.5 0.43 9.03 50.9 1.10
Snowfield Mineral Resource Summary – Feb. 2011(1,2)
(Based on a cut-off grade of 0.30 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne
(1) Technical Report and Updated Resource Estimate on the Snowfield Property, February 18, 2011
(2) See notes 1,2 and 3 on slide 41
Inferred ResourcesMeasured + Indicated Resources
40
14.5
4 9
67
45
38 26
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Pebble KSM Donlin Gold Snowfield
GoldResources(mmoz.)
Large –Scale North American Gold Projects
(PVG)(NG/ABX)
(SEA)
(NDM)

More Related Content

What's hot

Dalradian Corporate Presentation February 2017
Dalradian Corporate Presentation February 2017Dalradian Corporate Presentation February 2017
Dalradian Corporate Presentation February 2017DalradianResource
 
Solaris Resources - August 2021 Presentation
Solaris Resources  - August 2021 PresentationSolaris Resources  - August 2021 Presentation
Solaris Resources - August 2021 PresentationJacquelineWagenaar1
 
Equinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate PresentationEquinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate PresentationEquinox Gold Corp.
 
A fund presentation oct 25 2016
A fund presentation oct 25 2016A fund presentation oct 25 2016
A fund presentation oct 25 2016PretiumR
 
Agm may 12 2017 final
Agm may 12 2017 finalAgm may 12 2017 final
Agm may 12 2017 finalPretiumR
 
Corporate Presentation May 23, 2014
Corporate Presentation May 23, 2014Corporate Presentation May 23, 2014
Corporate Presentation May 23, 2014PretiumR
 
Solaris Resources September 2020 Corporate Presentation
Solaris Resources   September 2020 Corporate PresentationSolaris Resources   September 2020 Corporate Presentation
Solaris Resources September 2020 Corporate PresentationJacquelineWagenaar1
 
Equinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate PresentationEquinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate PresentationTrek Mining Inc.
 
Equinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate PresentationEquinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate PresentationEquinox Gold Corp.
 
2020-10-01 NOVAGOLD Q3 2020 Results and Project Update
2020-10-01 NOVAGOLD Q3 2020 Results and Project Update2020-10-01 NOVAGOLD Q3 2020 Results and Project Update
2020-10-01 NOVAGOLD Q3 2020 Results and Project UpdateNOVAGOLD
 
Dalradian Corporate Presentation November 2017
Dalradian Corporate Presentation November 2017Dalradian Corporate Presentation November 2017
Dalradian Corporate Presentation November 2017DalradianResource
 
Ramping Up Brucejack – Presented at the Scotiabank Mining Conference
Ramping Up Brucejack – Presented at the Scotiabank Mining ConferenceRamping Up Brucejack – Presented at the Scotiabank Mining Conference
Ramping Up Brucejack – Presented at the Scotiabank Mining ConferencePretiumR
 

What's hot (15)

Dalradian Corporate Presentation February 2017
Dalradian Corporate Presentation February 2017Dalradian Corporate Presentation February 2017
Dalradian Corporate Presentation February 2017
 
Solaris Resources - August 2021 Presentation
Solaris Resources  - August 2021 PresentationSolaris Resources  - August 2021 Presentation
Solaris Resources - August 2021 Presentation
 
Solaris Resources - July 2021
Solaris Resources - July 2021Solaris Resources - July 2021
Solaris Resources - July 2021
 
Solaris Resources - August 2021
Solaris Resources - August 2021Solaris Resources - August 2021
Solaris Resources - August 2021
 
Solaris Resources - March 2022
Solaris Resources - March 2022Solaris Resources - March 2022
Solaris Resources - March 2022
 
Equinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate PresentationEquinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate Presentation
 
A fund presentation oct 25 2016
A fund presentation oct 25 2016A fund presentation oct 25 2016
A fund presentation oct 25 2016
 
Agm may 12 2017 final
Agm may 12 2017 finalAgm may 12 2017 final
Agm may 12 2017 final
 
Corporate Presentation May 23, 2014
Corporate Presentation May 23, 2014Corporate Presentation May 23, 2014
Corporate Presentation May 23, 2014
 
Solaris Resources September 2020 Corporate Presentation
Solaris Resources   September 2020 Corporate PresentationSolaris Resources   September 2020 Corporate Presentation
Solaris Resources September 2020 Corporate Presentation
 
Equinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate PresentationEquinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate Presentation
 
Equinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate PresentationEquinox Gold Corporate Presentation
Equinox Gold Corporate Presentation
 
2020-10-01 NOVAGOLD Q3 2020 Results and Project Update
2020-10-01 NOVAGOLD Q3 2020 Results and Project Update2020-10-01 NOVAGOLD Q3 2020 Results and Project Update
2020-10-01 NOVAGOLD Q3 2020 Results and Project Update
 
Dalradian Corporate Presentation November 2017
Dalradian Corporate Presentation November 2017Dalradian Corporate Presentation November 2017
Dalradian Corporate Presentation November 2017
 
Ramping Up Brucejack – Presented at the Scotiabank Mining Conference
Ramping Up Brucejack – Presented at the Scotiabank Mining ConferenceRamping Up Brucejack – Presented at the Scotiabank Mining Conference
Ramping Up Brucejack – Presented at the Scotiabank Mining Conference
 

Similar to Pretium dubai handouts

Corporate presentation october 2013
Corporate presentation october 2013Corporate presentation october 2013
Corporate presentation october 2013PretiumR
 
Vancouver Resource Investment Conference Jan 20, 2014
Vancouver Resource Investment Conference Jan 20, 2014Vancouver Resource Investment Conference Jan 20, 2014
Vancouver Resource Investment Conference Jan 20, 2014PretiumR
 
Corp presmay23 2014
Corp presmay23 2014Corp presmay23 2014
Corp presmay23 2014PretiumR
 
Solaris Resources - September 2022
Solaris Resources - September 2022Solaris Resources - September 2022
Solaris Resources - September 2022JacquelineWagenaar1
 
Solaris Resources - June 2022-Public-2.pdf
Solaris Resources - June 2022-Public-2.pdfSolaris Resources - June 2022-Public-2.pdf
Solaris Resources - June 2022-Public-2.pdfJacquelineWagenaar1
 
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Project Presentation September 2018
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Project Presentation September 2018TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Project Presentation September 2018
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Project Presentation September 2018Kirill Klip
 
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Presentation December 2018
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Presentation December 2018TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Presentation December 2018
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Presentation December 2018Kirill Klip
 
Solaris Resources - April 2022-MRE-3-Public.pdf
Solaris Resources - April 2022-MRE-3-Public.pdfSolaris Resources - April 2022-MRE-3-Public.pdf
Solaris Resources - April 2022-MRE-3-Public.pdfJacquelineWagenaar1
 
Solaris Resources - February 2022
Solaris Resources - February 2022Solaris Resources - February 2022
Solaris Resources - February 2022JacquelineWagenaar1
 
Solaris Resources - January 2022
Solaris Resources -  January 2022Solaris Resources -  January 2022
Solaris Resources - January 2022JacquelineWagenaar1
 
Solaris Resources - December 2021
Solaris Resources - December 2021Solaris Resources - December 2021
Solaris Resources - December 2021JacquelineWagenaar1
 
Investor day 2013 v final
Investor day 2013 v finalInvestor day 2013 v final
Investor day 2013 v finalnewgold2011
 
Blackwater pea slides v final
Blackwater pea slides   v finalBlackwater pea slides   v final
Blackwater pea slides v finalnewgold2011
 
Scotiabank Latin American Mining Conference
Scotiabank Latin American Mining ConferenceScotiabank Latin American Mining Conference
Scotiabank Latin American Mining Conferencenewgold2011
 
Solaris Resources - May 2022.pdf
Solaris Resources - May 2022.pdfSolaris Resources - May 2022.pdf
Solaris Resources - May 2022.pdfJacquelineWagenaar1
 

Similar to Pretium dubai handouts (20)

Corporate presentation october 2013
Corporate presentation october 2013Corporate presentation october 2013
Corporate presentation october 2013
 
Vancouver Resource Investment Conference Jan 20, 2014
Vancouver Resource Investment Conference Jan 20, 2014Vancouver Resource Investment Conference Jan 20, 2014
Vancouver Resource Investment Conference Jan 20, 2014
 
Corp presmay23 2014
Corp presmay23 2014Corp presmay23 2014
Corp presmay23 2014
 
Solaris Resources - September 2022
Solaris Resources - September 2022Solaris Resources - September 2022
Solaris Resources - September 2022
 
Solaris Resources - August 2022
Solaris Resources - August 2022Solaris Resources - August 2022
Solaris Resources - August 2022
 
Solaris Resources - June 2022-Public-2.pdf
Solaris Resources - June 2022-Public-2.pdfSolaris Resources - June 2022-Public-2.pdf
Solaris Resources - June 2022-Public-2.pdf
 
Solaris Resources - July 2022-2
Solaris Resources - July 2022-2Solaris Resources - July 2022-2
Solaris Resources - July 2022-2
 
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Project Presentation September 2018
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Project Presentation September 2018TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Project Presentation September 2018
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Project Presentation September 2018
 
Solaris Resources - May 2021
Solaris Resources - May 2021Solaris Resources - May 2021
Solaris Resources - May 2021
 
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Presentation December 2018
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Presentation December 2018TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Presentation December 2018
TNR Gold Shotgun Gold Presentation December 2018
 
Solaris Resources - April 2022-MRE-3-Public.pdf
Solaris Resources - April 2022-MRE-3-Public.pdfSolaris Resources - April 2022-MRE-3-Public.pdf
Solaris Resources - April 2022-MRE-3-Public.pdf
 
Solaris Resources - February 2022
Solaris Resources - February 2022Solaris Resources - February 2022
Solaris Resources - February 2022
 
Solaris Resources - January 2022
Solaris Resources -  January 2022Solaris Resources -  January 2022
Solaris Resources - January 2022
 
Solaris Resources - December 2021
Solaris Resources - December 2021Solaris Resources - December 2021
Solaris Resources - December 2021
 
Solaris Resources - April 2021
Solaris Resources  - April 2021Solaris Resources  - April 2021
Solaris Resources - April 2021
 
Solaris Resources - April 2021
Solaris Resources - April 2021Solaris Resources - April 2021
Solaris Resources - April 2021
 
Investor day 2013 v final
Investor day 2013 v finalInvestor day 2013 v final
Investor day 2013 v final
 
Blackwater pea slides v final
Blackwater pea slides   v finalBlackwater pea slides   v final
Blackwater pea slides v final
 
Scotiabank Latin American Mining Conference
Scotiabank Latin American Mining ConferenceScotiabank Latin American Mining Conference
Scotiabank Latin American Mining Conference
 
Solaris Resources - May 2022.pdf
Solaris Resources - May 2022.pdfSolaris Resources - May 2022.pdf
Solaris Resources - May 2022.pdf
 

More from PretiumR

AFund Natural Resource Symposium Luncheon 2019
AFund Natural Resource Symposium Luncheon 2019AFund Natural Resource Symposium Luncheon 2019
AFund Natural Resource Symposium Luncheon 2019PretiumR
 
Pretivm Investors Day Presentation
Pretivm Investors Day PresentationPretivm Investors Day Presentation
Pretivm Investors Day PresentationPretiumR
 
31st Annual ROTH Conference 2019
31st Annual ROTH Conference 201931st Annual ROTH Conference 2019
31st Annual ROTH Conference 2019PretiumR
 
BMO Capital Markets 28th Global Metals & Mining Conference
BMO Capital Markets 28th Global Metals & Mining ConferenceBMO Capital Markets 28th Global Metals & Mining Conference
BMO Capital Markets 28th Global Metals & Mining ConferencePretiumR
 
Pretium resources q1 2018 conference call may 11 , 2018
Pretium resources   q1 2018 conference call may 11 , 2018Pretium resources   q1 2018 conference call may 11 , 2018
Pretium resources q1 2018 conference call may 11 , 2018PretiumR
 
Pvg investors day presentation april 11 2018
Pvg investors day presentation april 11 2018Pvg investors day presentation april 11 2018
Pvg investors day presentation april 11 2018PretiumR
 
Fourth Quarter 2017 Financial Results Webcast and Conference Call
Fourth Quarter 2017 Financial Results Webcast and Conference CallFourth Quarter 2017 Financial Results Webcast and Conference Call
Fourth Quarter 2017 Financial Results Webcast and Conference CallPretiumR
 
Bmo conf feb26-2018
Bmo conf feb26-2018Bmo conf feb26-2018
Bmo conf feb26-2018PretiumR
 
Ramping Up Brucejack - Presented at the BMO Capital Markets Conference
Ramping Up Brucejack - Presented at the BMO Capital Markets ConferenceRamping Up Brucejack - Presented at the BMO Capital Markets Conference
Ramping Up Brucejack - Presented at the BMO Capital Markets ConferencePretiumR
 
Pretium corporate-presentation-feb-16-2018
Pretium corporate-presentation-feb-16-2018Pretium corporate-presentation-feb-16-2018
Pretium corporate-presentation-feb-16-2018PretiumR
 
Corporate Presentation Feb 16, 2018
Corporate Presentation Feb 16, 2018Corporate Presentation Feb 16, 2018
Corporate Presentation Feb 16, 2018PretiumR
 
Ramping Up Brucejack Mine - Presented at the AFund Natural Resource Symposium...
Ramping Up Brucejack Mine - Presented at the AFund Natural Resource Symposium...Ramping Up Brucejack Mine - Presented at the AFund Natural Resource Symposium...
Ramping Up Brucejack Mine - Presented at the AFund Natural Resource Symposium...PretiumR
 
Pretium a fund oct 25 2017
Pretium a fund oct 25 2017Pretium a fund oct 25 2017
Pretium a fund oct 25 2017PretiumR
 
Denver Gold Forum 2017
Denver Gold Forum 2017Denver Gold Forum 2017
Denver Gold Forum 2017PretiumR
 
Pretium rodman renshaw sept 12 2017 final
Pretium rodman renshaw sept 12 2017 finalPretium rodman renshaw sept 12 2017 final
Pretium rodman renshaw sept 12 2017 finalPretiumR
 
Brucejack tour august 2017 (web)
Brucejack tour august 2017 (web)Brucejack tour august 2017 (web)
Brucejack tour august 2017 (web)PretiumR
 
Pretium rbc-metals-presentation-june-13-2017-web
Pretium rbc-metals-presentation-june-13-2017-webPretium rbc-metals-presentation-june-13-2017-web
Pretium rbc-metals-presentation-june-13-2017-webPretiumR
 
RBC Global Mining & Materials Conference 2017
RBC Global Mining & Materials Conference 2017RBC Global Mining & Materials Conference 2017
RBC Global Mining & Materials Conference 2017PretiumR
 
Minerals north apr 2017 final
Minerals north apr 2017 finalMinerals north apr 2017 final
Minerals north apr 2017 finalPretiumR
 
Pvg presentation-roth-march-13-2017-presentation
Pvg presentation-roth-march-13-2017-presentationPvg presentation-roth-march-13-2017-presentation
Pvg presentation-roth-march-13-2017-presentationPretiumR
 

More from PretiumR (20)

AFund Natural Resource Symposium Luncheon 2019
AFund Natural Resource Symposium Luncheon 2019AFund Natural Resource Symposium Luncheon 2019
AFund Natural Resource Symposium Luncheon 2019
 
Pretivm Investors Day Presentation
Pretivm Investors Day PresentationPretivm Investors Day Presentation
Pretivm Investors Day Presentation
 
31st Annual ROTH Conference 2019
31st Annual ROTH Conference 201931st Annual ROTH Conference 2019
31st Annual ROTH Conference 2019
 
BMO Capital Markets 28th Global Metals & Mining Conference
BMO Capital Markets 28th Global Metals & Mining ConferenceBMO Capital Markets 28th Global Metals & Mining Conference
BMO Capital Markets 28th Global Metals & Mining Conference
 
Pretium resources q1 2018 conference call may 11 , 2018
Pretium resources   q1 2018 conference call may 11 , 2018Pretium resources   q1 2018 conference call may 11 , 2018
Pretium resources q1 2018 conference call may 11 , 2018
 
Pvg investors day presentation april 11 2018
Pvg investors day presentation april 11 2018Pvg investors day presentation april 11 2018
Pvg investors day presentation april 11 2018
 
Fourth Quarter 2017 Financial Results Webcast and Conference Call
Fourth Quarter 2017 Financial Results Webcast and Conference CallFourth Quarter 2017 Financial Results Webcast and Conference Call
Fourth Quarter 2017 Financial Results Webcast and Conference Call
 
Bmo conf feb26-2018
Bmo conf feb26-2018Bmo conf feb26-2018
Bmo conf feb26-2018
 
Ramping Up Brucejack - Presented at the BMO Capital Markets Conference
Ramping Up Brucejack - Presented at the BMO Capital Markets ConferenceRamping Up Brucejack - Presented at the BMO Capital Markets Conference
Ramping Up Brucejack - Presented at the BMO Capital Markets Conference
 
Pretium corporate-presentation-feb-16-2018
Pretium corporate-presentation-feb-16-2018Pretium corporate-presentation-feb-16-2018
Pretium corporate-presentation-feb-16-2018
 
Corporate Presentation Feb 16, 2018
Corporate Presentation Feb 16, 2018Corporate Presentation Feb 16, 2018
Corporate Presentation Feb 16, 2018
 
Ramping Up Brucejack Mine - Presented at the AFund Natural Resource Symposium...
Ramping Up Brucejack Mine - Presented at the AFund Natural Resource Symposium...Ramping Up Brucejack Mine - Presented at the AFund Natural Resource Symposium...
Ramping Up Brucejack Mine - Presented at the AFund Natural Resource Symposium...
 
Pretium a fund oct 25 2017
Pretium a fund oct 25 2017Pretium a fund oct 25 2017
Pretium a fund oct 25 2017
 
Denver Gold Forum 2017
Denver Gold Forum 2017Denver Gold Forum 2017
Denver Gold Forum 2017
 
Pretium rodman renshaw sept 12 2017 final
Pretium rodman renshaw sept 12 2017 finalPretium rodman renshaw sept 12 2017 final
Pretium rodman renshaw sept 12 2017 final
 
Brucejack tour august 2017 (web)
Brucejack tour august 2017 (web)Brucejack tour august 2017 (web)
Brucejack tour august 2017 (web)
 
Pretium rbc-metals-presentation-june-13-2017-web
Pretium rbc-metals-presentation-june-13-2017-webPretium rbc-metals-presentation-june-13-2017-web
Pretium rbc-metals-presentation-june-13-2017-web
 
RBC Global Mining & Materials Conference 2017
RBC Global Mining & Materials Conference 2017RBC Global Mining & Materials Conference 2017
RBC Global Mining & Materials Conference 2017
 
Minerals north apr 2017 final
Minerals north apr 2017 finalMinerals north apr 2017 final
Minerals north apr 2017 final
 
Pvg presentation-roth-march-13-2017-presentation
Pvg presentation-roth-march-13-2017-presentationPvg presentation-roth-march-13-2017-presentation
Pvg presentation-roth-march-13-2017-presentation
 

Pretium dubai handouts

  • 2. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT Forward Looking Information This Presentation contains „„forward-looking information‟‟ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking information may include, but is not limited to, information with respect to the anticipated production and developments in our operations in future periods, our planned exploration and development activities, the adequacy of our financial resources, the estimation of mineral resources, realization of mineral resource estimates, costs and timing of development of the projects we currently intend to acquire (the “Projects”), costs and timing of future exploration, results of future exploration and drilling, timing and receipt of approvals, consents and permits under applicable legislation, our executive compensation approach and practice, the composition of our board of directors and committees, and adequacy of financial resources. Wherever possible, words such as „„plans‟‟, „„expects‟‟ or „„does not expect‟‟, „„budget‟‟, „„scheduled‟‟, „„estimates‟‟, „„forecasts‟‟, „„anticipate‟‟ or „„does not anticipate‟‟, „„believe‟‟, „„intend‟‟ and similar expressions or statements that certain actions, events or results „„may‟‟, „„could‟‟, „„would‟‟, „„might‟‟ or „„will‟‟ be taken, occur or be achieved, have been used to identify forward-looking information. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking information to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as „„expects‟‟, „„anticipates‟‟, „„plans‟‟, „„projects‟‟, „„estimates‟‟, „„assumes‟‟, „„intends‟‟, „„strategy‟‟, „„goals‟‟, „„objectives‟‟, „„potential‟‟ or variations thereof, or stating that certain actions, events or results „„may‟‟, „„could‟‟, „„would‟‟, „„might‟‟ or „„will‟‟ be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Many of these risks are listed and described in our final short-form prospectus dated March 19, 2012 (the “Prospectus”), which is available for review on SEDAR at www.sedar.com under our profile. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Forward-looking information involves statements about the future and is inherently uncertain, and our actual achievements or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking information due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to in the Prospectus under the heading „„Risk Factors‟‟. Our forward-looking information is based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and we do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, prospective investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. National Instrument 43-101 Technical and scientific information contained herein relating to the Projects is derived from National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) compliant technical reports (“Reports”) “Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Brucejack Project” dated February 20, 2012 “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated April 3, 2012, “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated September 18, 2012 and “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated November 20, 2012. We have filed the Reports under our profile at www.sedar.com. Technical and scientific information not contained within the Reports for the Projects have been prepared under the supervision of Mr. Kenneth C. McNaughton, an independent “qualified person” under NI 43-101. This presentation uses the terms “measured resources”, “indicated resources” (together “M&I”) and “inferred resources”. Although these terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations (under NI 43-101), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio- political, marketing, or other relevant issues. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves. In addition, “inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre feasibility studies, or economic studies, except for a Preliminary Assessment as defined under NI 43-101. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable. Currency Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar values herein are in Canadian $. 2
  • 3. 3  Significant high-grade gold resource: Valley of the Kings 8.5 M oz gold Indicated (16.1 Mt @ 16.4 g/t gold) 2.9 M oz gold Inferred (5.4 Mt @ 17.0 g/t gold)  Located in British Columbia, Canada  Underground feasibility study Q2 2013  Commercial production target early 2016 An investment in Gold
  • 4. Kirkland Lake Mine (Kirkland Lake) Kensington Mine (Coeur) Casa Berardi (Aurizon) El Penon Mine (Yamana) Red Lake Mine (Goldcorp) Pogo Mine (Sumitomo) Valley of the Kings F2 Deposit (Rubicon) Buritica (Continental) Cerro Negro (Goldcorp) Eleonore (Goldcorp) Cerro Moro (Yamana) 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 M&I+InferredGoldGrade(g/t) M&I + Inferred Gold Resources (mm oz) HIGH-GRADE GOLD WITH SIZE 4November 2012 Valley of the Kings High-Grade Gold Mineral Resource based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne. Data sources: Intierra Ltd., NRH. Indicated Gold: 8.5 mm oz @ 16.4 g/t Au Inferred Gold: 2.9 mm oz @ 17.0 g/t Au
  • 6. EXPLORATION AND OWNERSHIP HISTORY 1960-1980 1980-1985 1986-1989 1990 1993 1999-2000 2009 2010 2011-2012 2013 Exploration by various companies West Zone discovery and definition by Newhawk 5.3 km underground development of West Zone West Zone Feasibility Study completed Acquisition by Silver Standard Resources Inc. Exploration resumes. Discovery of Valley of the Kings Zone Acquisition by Pretivm Extensive exploration program, high-grade resource, exploration road Mine Development Certificate issued Valley of the Kings underground bulk sample and feasibility study 6
  • 9. 9 MAIN MINERALIZED DOMAINS West Zone Underground Development Bulk Sample N S Domain 17 Domain 11 200 m Category Tonnes (mil) Gold (g/t) Silver (g/t) Contained(3) Gold (mil oz) Silver (mil oz) Indicated 16.1 16.4 14.2 8.5 7.3 Inferred(2) 5.4 17.0 15.7 2.9 2.7 Valley of the Kings Mineral Resource Estimate – November 2012(1,4,5) (Based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne) (1) Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, marketing, or other relevant issues. The Mineral Resources in this news release were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council. (2) The quantity and grade of reported Inferred resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Resources as an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category. (3) Contained metal may differ due to rounding. (4) The Mineral Resource estimate is defined using 5 m by 5 by 5 m blocks in the well drilled portion of West Zone (5 m by 10 m drilling or better) and 10 m by 10 m by 10 m blocks in the remainder of West Zone and in Valley of the Kings. (5) The gold equivalent value is defined as AuEq=Au + Ag/53
  • 10. VALLEY OF THE KINGS INDICATED RESOURCE Northing ( 25 m) Ind.Gold* (Oz.) 6258225 230,900 6258175 484,000 6258125 703,100 6258075 336,600 6258025 1,951,100 6257975 2,365,900 6257925 1,021,000 6257875 513,600 6257825 687,500 6257775 176,400 Total Ounces per 100 m Easting and 50 m Northing strips Valley of the Kings Indicated Mineral Resource: 8.5 Moz. Au @ 5.0 g/t AuEq. (16.1 Mt @ 16.4 g/t Au) *Nov. 2012 Indicated Mineral Resource; ≥5.0 g/t AuEq. 10 1,092,100 1,776,900 1,467,600 2,185,800 1,391,000 380,100 192,900 Ind. Au* (Oz.)
  • 11. MINERAL RESOURCE CONTINUITY 11 Total Ounces* per 10 x 100 m N-S corridor – 6257800 N Long SectionLevel (m) Ind. Gold (Oz)* 1540-1570 116,300 1510-1540 499,700 1480-1510 734,800 1450-1480 510,400 1420-1450 365,450 1390-1420 566,700 1360-1390 631,700 1330-1360 364,800 1300-1330 527,400 1270-1300 992,000 1240-1270 998,200 1210-1240 521,950 1180-1210 213,050 1150-1180 246,800 1120-1150 294,600 1090-1120 393,900 1060-1090 317,600 W E 100 m 4,000-6,000 6,000-7,000 7,000-8,000 >10,000 Key (Oz. Au) 3,000-4,000 1,000-3,000 <1,000 8,000-10,000 Total Ounces per level (Valley of Kings Zone) *Nov. 2012 Indicated Mineral Resource; ≥5.0 g/t AuEq.
  • 12. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS 12Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq Valley of the Kings block model – 426550E section view East (50m wide)
  • 13. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS 13Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq Valley of the Kings block model – 426600E section view East (50m wide)
  • 14. 1414 100 m CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS Valley of the Kings block model plan view - 1300m level (50m thick)
  • 15. 1515 100 m CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS Valley of the Kings block model plan view - 1250m level (50m thick)
  • 16. 16 10,000-TONNE BULK SAMPLE (Q2/Q3) N S 0.5-5.0 g/t AuEq 5.0-15.0 g/t AuEq >15.0 g/t AuEq Key West Zone Underground Development Valley of the Kings Bulk Sample 200 m 546 m 100 m 200 m 300 m 400 m 500 m Over 400 meters out of 546 total meters to reach Valley of the Kings have been completed.
  • 17. BULK SAMPLE: SECTION 426625 17 SN
  • 18. HIGH-GRADE CORRIDORS 18 Valley of the Kings Drill Hole Trace Bar Graphs – 426615E Section View Bulk sample N S Domain 17/20
  • 19. BULK SAMPLE LOCATION 19 Vertical viewing window 40 m 1345 m Level 5-10 10-20 20-60 >60 Key (g/t AuEq) 2.5-5 1-2.5 0.3-1
  • 20. BULK SAMPLE LOCATION 20 5-10 10-20 20-60 >60 Key (g/t AuEq) 2.5-5 1-2.5 0.3-1 1345 m Level Vertical viewing window 8.5 m Siltstone, litharenite, p ebble conglomerate Polylithic Conglomerate Fragmental Volcanic Rocks Intensely Silicified Conglomerate Hbl-phyric Latite Flow
  • 21. BULK SAMPLE LOCATION 21 5-10 10-20 20-60 >60 Key (g/t AuEq) Only Indicated blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq shown 1345 m Level Vertical viewing window 8.5 m Siltstone, litharenite, p ebble conglomerate Polylithic Conglomerate Fragmental Volcanic Rocks Intensely Silicified Conglomerate Hbl-phyric Latite Flow
  • 22. BULK SAMPLE PROCESS(1) 22 Typical sample tower flowsheet Source: Strathcona Mineral Services Limited, Meladine Project  Process flowsheet summary:  Crosscut rounds of 100 tonnes transported to surface  Crushing to ¾ inch, then to ½ inch  Run through on-site sample tower  120 kilograms in 4 samples are sent for testing  Remainder (99.8 tonnes) shipped for processing to produce gold  Representivity testing:  Representative of drillhole density that informs the Indicated Mineral Resource  Representative of average grade of Indicated Resource and the global resource for Valley of the Kings  Representative of style of mineralization for the rest of Valley of the Kings (1) Strathcona Mineral Services Ltd is independent QP for Valley of the Kings bulk sample
  • 23. UNDERGROUND DRILLING 23 N SN Typical Section – Fan Drilling Detailed underground drilling at <15 meter centers to outline 700,000 ounces of gold.
  • 24. VISIBLE GOLD STRINGERS IN STOCKWORK 24
  • 25. VALLEY OF THE KINGS GOLD GRADE 25 Valley of the Kings – Indicated Resource grade consistency Resource Estimate (Snowden) Cumulative Drilling (m) Indicated Gold Resource Ounces (mil) Indicated Gold Grade (g/t) April 2012 59,100 4.9 17.3 September 2012 114,949 5.1 16.2 November 2012 174,182 8.5 16.4 Valley of the Kings – Drilling results and gold grade Year Hole number by series Over 1 kilogram per tonne 500 - 1,000 g/t 100 – 500 g/t 30 – 100 g/t 15 – 30 g/t 5 – 15 g/t Annual total 2009 1 - 37 2 3 14 17 107 143 2010 38 - 110 6 2 12 26 26 129 201 2011 111 - 288 21 11 48 63 74 304 521 2012 289 - 585 49 26 125 151 134 491 976 2009-2012 Total: 78 39 188 254 251 1,031 1,841
  • 26. 2626  Corridors of high-grade visible gold seams within lower grade (5g/t to 20g/t) gold quartz stockwork  Steeply dipping ore body  Competent ground conditions  Stope widths (15m wide X 30m high) appropriate both for transverse and longitudinal layouts  Cost effective First 50 meters of Valley of the Kings ramp Long hole stoping mining method: MINING METHOD FOR STOCKWORK
  • 27. PROPOSED MINE DEVELOPMENT 27 Oblique View of Mining Stopes, Valley of the Kings S N 100 m West-Zone (late mine life)Valley of the Kings
  • 28. MINE AND MILL SITE LAYOUT 28 Crushing Grinding Gravity Concentrate Circuit Doré (50%-60% of gold production) Flotation Concentrate Circuit Off-take (40%-50% of gold production) Flowsheet Summary:  Dore bars produced on site, shipped to gold refinery  Flotation concentrate (~300 tpd) shipped to Stewart then sea transport West Zone Valley of the Kings
  • 29. BRUCEJACK PROJECT ECONOMICS 29 (1) Source: Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Brucejack Project, effective date February 20, 2012 (2) Base case metals prices of US$1,100 /oz gold and US$21/oz silver PEA is based on Mineral Resource estimates for the Valley of the Kings and West Zone effective November 28, 2011 which are now out-of-date. February 2012 Preliminary Economic Assessment Results(1,2) : Processing rate 1,500 tpd Mine life 24 years Total gold production 6.9 million oz Average annual gold production (Yrs 1-12) 325,000 ounces Capex US$436.3 million Total operating costs C$170.90/t milled Internal Rate of Return 29.8% Net Present Value (5% discount) US$2.262 billion  Processing rate increased  2,700 tonnes per day  Mill facilities streamlined  Flotation concentrate to be sold to 3rd parties rather than refined on site  Capex and Opex savings, reduced project footprint  Metallurgy continues to be positive  Feasibility metallurgical studies confirm gold recoveries 98%, silver recoveries 92% Feasibility Study Refinements to PEA:
  • 30. 2013 BRUCEJACK PROJECT PLANS 30 H1 2013  Access ramp to Valley of the Kings is underway, with over 300 meters completed out of 546 meters in total  Channel sample the ramp to Valley of the Kings  Underground sampling/drilling Valley of the Kings  Commence 10,000-tonne underground bulk sample from Valley of the Kings  Feasibility study completed H2 2013  Complete bulk sample report  Process bulk sample  File Environmental Assessment Certificate Application  Resource update  Valley of the Kings drilling
  • 31. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 31  Pretivm‟s management team has been cooperatively engaging with First Nations and local community leaders in the Stewart, BC region for over 10 years  We work to ensure that our communication about the progress of the Brucejack Project is open and continuous  Commercial relationships with local First Nations developed during the exploration phase at Brucejack have been mutually successful  We will continue to extend both commercial contract and employment opportunities to locals whenever possible Stewart warehouse constructed by development corporation of Skii km Lax Ha First Nation
  • 32. BRUCEJACK PERMITTING 32 1986 1989 1993 1998 1999 2006 2011-2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Reclamation Permit Mine Development Certificate issued April 15, 1993 Project Assessment Certificate Permitted for exploration and exploration road Project Assessment Certificate allowed to expire Approval in principle for development of a mine at West Zone Reclamation Completion Project Description under review for underground mine at Brucejack‟s Valley of the Kings  Brucejack Lake is not fish habitat  Waste rock from 1980‟s/1990‟s underground development was deposited in Brucejack Lake as part of 1999 reclamation  More than 50% of tailings (targeting 60%) to be used for paste backfill and deposited underground, with remainder of tailings to be deposited in bottom 30 meters of Brucejack Lake Anticipate Environmental Assessment Certificate Construction, commiss ioning Commercial production target
  • 33. PRETIVM MANAGEMENT 33 Robert Quartermain, B.Sc., M.Sc., P.Geo, D.Sc. President & Chief Executive Officer, Director Peter de Visser, CA Chief Financial Officer Joseph Ovsenek, B.A. Sc., P.Eng., LLB Vice President & Chief Development Officer, Director Ken McNaughton, M.A. Sc., P.Eng. Vice President & Chief Exploration Officer Ian I Chang, M.A. Sc., P.Eng. Vice President, Project Development Michelle Romero, B.A., M.L.S. Director, Corporate Relations Kevin Torpy, B.Sc. Director, Mine Engineering Warwick Board, Ph.D., P.Geo. Chief Geologist Max Holtby, B.Sc., P. Geo. Director, Permitting Andrew Saltis, I.Eng. Site Project Manager, Mine Manager
  • 34. SHAREHOLDING & ANALYST COVERAGE 34 Institutions, 5 0% Retail, 23% Management, 5% Silver Standard, 20 % Capital Structure(1) Public Float 77.5 Silver Standard Shares 19.0 Total Issued & Outstanding Shares 96.5 Incentive Options 8.5 Total Fully Diluted Shares 105.0 Market Capitalization C$735 million Working Capital (at Dec. 31, 2012) C$30.1 million Share Offering gross proceeds (at February 15, 2013)(3) C$21.0 million (1)As of March 27, 2013; ownership calculated on an undiluted basis. (2)As of March 27, 2013. Source: IPREO, SEDI (3)See news release dated February 15, 2013 (shares in millions) Top Shareholders(2) (shares in millions) Silver Standard Resources 18.986 Royce & Associates 10.689 Passport Capital 5.386 Fidelity Management 3.720 Robert Quartermain 2.853 Connor, Clark & Lunn 2.602 TD Asset Management 2.153 Carmignac Gestion 1.898 Sprott Asset Management 1.718 Analyst Coverage BMO John Hayes CIBC Jeff Killeen Citibank Alex Hacking Cormark Securities Richard Gray Dahlman Rose Adam Graf Global Hunter Securities Jeff Wright GMP Securities TBD RBC Dan Rollins Salman Partners Ash Guglani Scotiabank Ovais Habib UBS TBD Very Independent Research John Tumazos
  • 36. CONTACT Phone: 604-558-1784 Fax: 604-558-4784 Toll-free: 1-877-558-1784 invest@pretivm.com www.pretivm.com HEAD OFFICE Pretium Resources Inc. 570 Granville St. Suite 1600 Vancouver, BC Canada V6C 3P1 COMMON SHARES TSX/NYSE:PVG Issued: 96.5 million Fully diluted: 105.0 million 52-week hi/low: $16.74/$6.48 Market cap: $735 million Advancing a major high-grade gold resource in Canada
  • 37. APPENDIX: DECLINING GRADES AND DISCOVERIES 37 Decade Yield/Spend-Ratio 1950‟s 42 1960‟s 106 1970‟s 83 1980‟s 57 1990‟s 23 2000‟s 11 Ratio of Discovered US$ in the Ground Per US$ Exploration Expenditure Source: Open Geology Journal, 2010 Volume 4 (*) Added for comparison Arithmetic mean of gold grade in ores mined in South Africa, Australia, Canada, Brazil and the US, 1830-2004 PVG‟s Valley of the Kings(*) Four-sub-cycle Model of Gold Production 1850-2008* *Global gold production with exponential fit of +1.96 p.a. (R2 = 0.9222 ) and four sub-cycles Source: Open Geology Journal, 2010 Volume 4
  • 38. APPENDIX: GOLD EQUITIES VERSUS GOLD 38 Gold price (%) XAU Index (%) Gold Price ($US) (%) 10-Year Performance of Gold, and Gold‟s Relative Performance to XAU Index: January 1, 2003 to March 31, 2013 (monthly,%) Gold price ($US)
  • 39. APPENDIX: GOLD EQUITIES IN GOLD TERMS 39 Source: RBC Capital Markets
  • 40. APPENDIX: GOLD EQUITIES: TRADING AT 2008 LEVEL 40 Senior/Mid-Tier Gold Producer Average
  • 41. APPENDIX: RISING COSTS – FOCUS ON GRADE 41 Rising costs erode margins, even in high gold price environment Source: Scotiabank
  • 42. APPENDIX: RISING COSTS – FOCUS ON GRADE 42 Rising costs erode margins, even in high gold price environment Source: Randgold
  • 44. GEOLOGICAL EVOLUTION 44 ~192-188 Ma Active island arc Porphyry-related hydrothermal system Initial mineralization Telescoping porphyry Syn-deposition volcanic pile deformation Main mineralization continuum Magmatic Brine Vapour ~196-192 Ma Heated Seawater Ocean Mineralizing fluids Volcano-sedimentary sub-basin
  • 45. GEOLOGICAL EVOLUTION 45 Cretaceous deformation at ~110 Ma Uplift and erosion Valley of the Kings Waning of porphyry system Arc-related deformation Mafic dyke intrusion West Zone SN ~184 Ma
  • 46. APPENDIX: BRUCEJACK AREA GEOLOGY 46 >0.3 g/t gold 500mExisting 5km underground workings 1980-1994 – Newhawk 908 DDH/120,000m 2009-2010 – Silver Standard 110 DDH/50,946m 2011-2012 – Pretivm 426 DDH/155,144m West Zone Valley of the Kings Zone North – South Valley of the Kings Zone Valley of the Kings Zone 500m West Zone West Zone (Teuton) 0.65 g/t Au 0 - 1047 m (Seabridge)
  • 47. APPENDIX: VALLEY OF THE KINGS – GOLD GRADE 47 Gold grade distribution inside mineralized corridors – Valley of the Kings All 1.5 m composites Au > 5.0 g/t only 5 g/t Au Au (g/t) Au (g/t) CumulativeProbability(%) CumulativeProbability(%)
  • 48. APPENDIX: BRUCEJACK BULK TONNAGE 48 Category Tonnes (millions) Gold (g/t) Silver ( g/t) Contained(3) Gold (million oz) Silver (million oz) Measured 7.4 2.77 152 0.66 36.3 Indicated 139.0 2.14 12.9 9.6 57.8 M+I 146.0 2.17 19.9 10.3 94.1 Inferred(2) 857.0 0.86 8.49 23.7 234.0 Category Tonnes (millions) Gold (g/t) Silver (g/t) Contained(3) Gold (million oz) Silver (million oz) Measured 7.4 2.78 153 0.66 36.3 Indicated 100.0 2.87 16.4 9.2 52.5 M+I 107.0 2.86 25.8 9.9 88.8 Inferred(2) 600.0 1.09 10.2 21.0 197.0 Brucejack Grade-tonnage estimate (Open Cut sensitivity) September 2012 (1)(4)(5) (Based on a cut-off grade of 0.30 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne) Brucejack Grade-tonnage estimate (Open cut sensitivity) September 2012 (1)(4)(5) (Based on a cut-off grade of 0.50 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne) (1) Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, marketing, or other relevant issues. The Mineral Resources in this news release were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council. (2) The quantity and grade of reported Inferred resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Resources as an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category. (3) Contained metal may differ due to rounding. (4) The Mineral Resource estimate is defined using 5 m by 5 by 5 m blocks in the well drilled portion of West Zone (5 m by 10 m drilling or better) and 10 m by 10 m by 10 m blocks in the remainder of West Zone ,Valley of the Kings, Galena Hill and parts of the Shore Zone, and by 20m by 20m by 20m in the poorer informed Bridge Zone, Gossan Hill and parts of Shore Zone (5) The gold equivalent value is defined as AuEq=Au + Ag/53
  • 49. APPENDIX: SNOWFIELD PROJECT 49 Snowfield Open Pit (September 2010 PA) Mitchell Zone (SEA) Sulphurets Zone (SEA) Iron Cap Zone (SEA) Grade Contained Metal Tonnes Au Ag Cu Mo Re Au Ag Cu (mt) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (mm oz) (mm oz) (bil lbs) Measured 189.8 0.82 1.69 0.09% 97.4 0.57 4.98 10.3 0.38 Indicated 1,180.3 0.55 1.73 0.10% 83.6 0.50 20.93 65.4 2.60 Measured & Indicated 1,370.1 0.59 1.72 0.10% 85.5 0.51 25.92 75.8 2.98 Inferred 833.2 0.34 1.90 0.06% 69.5 0.43 9.03 50.9 1.10 Snowfield Mineral Resource Summary – Feb. 2011(1,2) (Based on a cut-off grade of 0.30 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne (1) Technical Report and Updated Resource Estimate on the Snowfield Property, February 18, 2011 (2) See notes 1,2 and 3 on slide 41 Inferred ResourcesMeasured + Indicated Resources 40 14.5 4 9 67 45 38 26 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Pebble KSM Donlin Gold Snowfield GoldResources(mmoz.) Large –Scale North American Gold Projects (PVG)(NG/ABX) (SEA) (NDM)

Editor's Notes

  1. Change the
  2. Nick’s updated map
  3. Indicated Mineral Resource in 100 m thick slice shown:3.4 Moz (6.3 Mt @ 16.8 g/t Au) at a 5.0 g/t AuEq cut-off
  4. 1300
  5. 1250
  6. Splay basin off main Brucejack Fault – present day view to West, i.e., we are looking down the axis of an E-W (present-day) trending basin.Initial mineralization stratigraphically controlled in permeable horizons – likely mixing of Au(HS2)- complexes with seawater, and local over pressure controls on mineralization.Main stage is related to deformation and structural fault-control relating to doming and retreating (pulsing) of telescoping porphyry, with stockwork development along faults and blasting through pressure caps.
  7. System wanes with intrusion of late, now deformed mafic dykes.Cretaceous docking of Insular Terrane folds and up-domes the rocks. Rocks on E-edge of McTagg Anticlinorium are tilted E. Stockworks and overpressure horizons steepened to sub-vertical E-W.