JAIDS, Aug 2009 Infectious Disease Journal Club 17 September 2007 Dr Preneshni Naicker
Introduction
TB is the leading cause of death among HIV-infected patients
50% of TB patients are HIV co-infected
Sputum smear microscopy detects less than half of HIV-infected TB cases
Priority = simple, accurate, inexpensive test for TB case detection in HIV-positive individuals
Strategy = Detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis ANTIGENS
LAM (Lipoarabinomannan)
17.5 kD glycolipid component of the cell wall of mycobacteria
Attractive diagnostic target
Theoretical potential to discriminate active TB from latent TB (independent of immune responses)
Heat stable
Cleared by kidney
Detectable in urine
Facilitates TB diagnosis if sputum unhelpful
Lacks infection control risks associated with sputum production or blood collection
Amenable to simple, inexpensive, point-of-care platform
Aim
Evaluated the accuracy of U-LAM test for the diagnosis of active TB in patients admitted to 3 hospitals in South Africa with a presumptive diagnosis of TB
Materials and Methods
Nested in a prospective multicenter cohort study
Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (tertiary hospital)
Selby hospital (private hospital)
Tshepong Hospital (provincial hospital)
Participants were identified by review of admission intake log by study personnel
Chart reviews and clinical interviews were utilised to determine study eligbility
Eligibility criteria were kept broad to capture pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB cases
Study interview at 2 months after enrollment to assess clinical status
Inclusion criteria
≥ 18 years
Signs and/or symptoms compatible with TB
Urine sample available for testing
Informed consent
Exclusion
Prior hospitalization within 2 weeks
TB therapy for >2 months
Study directed testing
1 sputum for AFB smear microscopy and culture
1 mycobacterial blood culture
HIV antibody testing (CD4 for HIV +)
Spot urine sample
Additional diagnostic tests :
TB Culture (CSF, pleural fluid, LN biopsies, other resp samples)
All treatment provided at the discretion of the treating clinician
Study results (except U-LAM) were available to the treating clinician
Laboratory testing
Clearview TB ELISA
Direct antigen sandwich immunoassay (96-well plate format)
Rabbit anti-LAM antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase
Substrate= tetramethylbenzidine
Duplicate samples with average OD 0.1 greater than the negative control = POSITIVE
TB diagnostic categories Confirmed TB —M. tuberculosis cultured from any site, or microscopical examination of any specimen revealing AFB or granuloma(s) in the absence of a culture positive for any Mycobacteria. Possible TB —no culture positive for M. tuberculosis, and presence of clinical response to empiric TB treatment as defined by subjective report of improvement in cough, weight loss, and/or fever at 2-month follow-up. Not TB —cultures negative for M. tuberculosis, and 1 of the following: (a) alternative definitive microbiological diagnosis, (b) clinical improvement in the absence of TB treatment, and (c) failure to respond to empiric TB treatment. Indeterminate —failure to meet criteria for any of the above diagnostic categories
Results
Disease categorizations
LAM test performance
LAM performance by HIV status
All participants
PPV for confirmed TB = 73%
NPV = 34%
HIV +
PPV for confirmed TB = 75%
NPV = 30%
HIV Positive with confirmed TB - LAM test sensitivity differed by CD4 category (p < 0.001)
Independently associated with + LAM in confirmed TB patients
U-LAM compared with Sputum Smear Microscopy
Discussion
For the diagnosis of active TB in a setting of high HIV prevalence, the LAM test had a sensitivity of 59% in confirmed TB cases and a specificity of 96% in ‘not TB’ patients
LAM sensitivity higher in HIV-positive TB patients than HIV-negative
LAM sensitivity highest in subgroup of HIV-positive TB patients with CD4 < 50
Able to detect over half of confirmed TB cases not detected by smear microscopy
Combination of sputum smear + LAM identified 75% of confirmed TB cases.
Comparison of LAM test performance 100% 38% (All) 67% (CD4 <50) Lawn 2009 Cape Town - 52% HIV + TBcul + Corbett 2003 Harare Unaffected by HIV status 99% 80.3% Boehme 2005 Tanzania Specificity Sensitivity
Limitations
Unable to establish definite diagnosis (indeterminate group)
Unable to assess if LAM detects NTM
Conclusions
Combination of LAM and smear microscopy attractive in the setting of high HIV burden
Further studies needed to determine if LAM testing results in improved clinical outcomes.
0 comments
Post a comment