These are the slides used for a 2 hours course on data visualisation. The course was addressed to biologists, hence most examples come from scientific publications in this area (but not only)
2. • This course contains lot of visualisations from
scientific articles, newspapers or made up.
• Not all of them are good, try to be critic on
each of them
6. This content downloaded from 84.88.66.194 on Fri, 15 May 2015 15:10:54 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
7. A good data visualization…
• Conveys one or several message(s)
• Does it as accurately as possible
• And as efficiently as possible
• Is not necessarily unique!
8. A good data visualization…
• Conveys one or several message(s)
16. Is your figure understandable?
Hint: ask your colleagues. =)
17. • Is the visualization readable?
• Are axis properly labeled?
• Are legends provided?
• Do you show error bars?
• Is the scale identifiable?
• Are the observed differences significant?
• Does the reader have all the information to understand the visualization?
• Do the visualization’s annotations help to convey the message?
18.
19.
20.
21. Why is it important to get external
review…
• Get feedback from persons with different profiles
• Don’t tell them what you meant to show
70. A good data visualization…
• Conveys one or several message(s)
• Does it as accurately as possible
• And as efficiently as possible
71. Data to ink ratio
• (term coined by E. Tufte in 1983)
• All elements (printed elements = ink) should be
informative
• Avoid “chartjunk”, elements which does not add
information or distract the reader
• Avoid information duplication