Tri-C LMS workshop 20140318 handout

Uploaded on

Slides from workshop at Cuyahoga Community College (Tri-C) in preparation for their LMS needs assessment / selection project.

Slides from workshop at Cuyahoga Community College (Tri-C) in preparation for their LMS needs assessment / selection project.

More in: Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Cuyahoga Community College LMS Workshop March 18, 2014 ! ! Presented by: Phil Hill, Molly Langstaff and Michael Feldstein MindWires Consulting and e-Literate blog
  • 2. MindWires Consulting and e-Literate blog 9:30a   ! Welcome,  Introduc4on  of  MindWires,  Background  of  project   Overview  of  workshop   Goals  for  Academic  Technology  at  Tri-­‐C   What  are  you  trying  to  accomplish  with  technology  to  support  teaching  and  learning? Sasha   Phil   Group   Discussion,   Michael 10:00a LMS  Landscape  (45  min)   •  LMS  Market  Share  for  HE   •  Technology  Adop4on  Curve   •  Holis4c  view  of  learning  plaTorm  environment   •  Market  External  Forces:  Private  Equity,  Venture  Capital,  Ins4tu4onal  Investment Phil 10:45a Update  on  LMS  Vendor  demos.  What  did  we  learn  from  demos?  What  ques4ons  were  raised  by   demos?  (30  min) Group   Discussion 11:15a   LMS  Market  Trends  (45  min)   •  Future  shape  of  LMS  market   •  Impact  of  Cloud  Services   •  Learning  Analy4cs   •  Associated  topics  such  as  Mobile  Compu4ng,  eTextbooks,  Courseware,  and  Social  learning Phil 12:00a Q&A  /  Lunch   1:00p   LMS  Market  Trends  –  How  do  these  trends  apply  to  Tri-­‐C  and  direc4ons  for  technology-­‐ enhanced  instruc4on?  (60  min) Group   Discussion 2:00p LMS  Review  Project  Update  &  Status  (60  min)  ▪ Framework  for  project  –  not  your  typical  RFP   process.     ▪ Status  on  surveys   ▪ Focus  groups     ▪ One-­‐on-­‐one  interviews Phil  &  Sasha,   Group   Discussion 3:00 Wrap-­‐up,  next  steps  (15  min)
  • 3. LMS Landscape
  • 4. • One one hand, the market is saturated - almost all schools have standard LMS • On the other hand, the usage of LMS is typically shallow - mostly syllabus and content sharing • Broader faculty adoption requires more complete support Trend: Broader Adoption
  • 5. • System stability and reliability - too many outages for too long • Feature bloat - too many features at expense of usability • Very light or shallow adoption by faculty • Primary benefits have been administrative Problems in LMS Market
  • 6. LMS as Hub, or Platform • Farewell to the enterprise LMS market, hello to the Learning Platform market • Interoperability with tools
  • 7. Source: Mary Meeker / Liang Wu KPCB
  • 8. LMS Market Trends
  • 9. Trend: Many Market Entries, Not All Succeed
  • 10. New Market Entries
  • 11. Trend: Cloud-Based Hosting • Three primary hosting models • Self-hosting is becoming the exception • Vendor hosting in non-cloud-native environment growing • Native cloud environments growing
  • 12. Trend: Cloud Platforms, cont’d • No new LMS or learning platform is being developed as enterprise system - all new are cloud platforms • Lore designed 2 LMS systems in ~ 12 months and less than $4M investment • Coursera and Udacity developed platform in less than 12 months
  • 13. Trend: Ed Tech Market
  • 14. Trend: Pricing Power • LMS Market is much more competitive than 3 years ago • For schools going through selection process, they often find significant cost savings (we’ve seen 50%+ in some cases)
  • 15. Learning Analytics
  • 16. Trend: Focus on Content / LMS Interaction • All major academic publishers working with most major LMS solutions for deeper integration with digital content • Rise of Courseware • IMS / LTI Standards are key
  • 17. The Course as a Product:Then and Now Enter the of Courseware
  • 18. Typical LMS Select & Implementation Projects
  • 19. LMS Selection Process RFI = Request for Information RFP = Request for Proposal
  • 20. Phil Hill: Molly Langstaff: Michael Feldstein: ! Web Site: ! e-Literate Blog: