Hepatitis and travellers 15.04.11 isom
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Hepatitis and travellers 15.04.11 isom



Vaccinatio and post imms serology teting

Vaccinatio and post imms serology teting



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds


Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Infinity pool.
  • Incidence of health problems during a month in a developing country.
  • 2
  • Prior to introduction of IG and inactivated vaccines in mid 1990s, Hep A occurred at 1-10 cases/1000 travellers per 2-3 weeks of exposure, even in 1 st class accommodation. The risk appears to be decreasing secondarily to widespread use of vaccines for protection of travellers and changing epidemiology of HAV in destination countries.
  • In Glasgow, Professor McKeown and his colleagues have argued that the decline in mortality that occurred in England and Wales in the 19thC was largely unrelated to the medical treatment and hospital provision then becoming increasingly available.' The purpose of this communication is to describe a study made of the relationship between mortality and hospital medical care in 19 th C Glasgow to test McKeown et al.'s thesis at a local level. T. McKeown and R. G. Brown, 'Medical evidence related to English population changes in the eighteenth century', Popul. Stud., 1955, 9: 119-141; and T. McKeown and R. G. Record, 'Reasons for the decline of mortality in England and Wales during the nineteenth century', ibid., 1962, 16:94-122
  • total number of hepatitis A lab reports in E&W, and NI has decreased in recent years; travel-associated cases also decreased in line with the total. In 1998, 131 (11%) cases of hep A were reported to be associated with travel abroad compared to 21 (5%) in 2006 and 15 (4%) in 2007. Not evident, whether this is a true decrease, as travel history reporting for hep A is incomplete,
  • The incidence of hep A in Ireland has fallen substantially since 2002, with fewer than 60 cases/yr. The age standardised incidence rate in 2005 was 1.4/100,000 pop. Prob most people under the age of 50 in Ireland are susceptible to HAV.
  • HAV may be transmitted by sexual oral-anal contact, or by oropharyngeal secretions. There is an association with multiple anonymous sexual contacts.
  • 1998 data
  • From 1990-2000, most frequently reported source was personal contact (household or sex) with an infected person (14%). 2% of cases involved a child or employee in day-care; 6% of cases were a contact of a child or employee in day-care; 5% of cases recent international travel ; and 4% of cases reported being part of a recognized foodborne outbreak. Injection drug use was a reported risk factor in 6% of cases ; MSM represented 10% of cases. 46% of reported hepatitis A cases could not identify a risk factor for their infection.
  • Monovalent vaccines HAV vaccine is a formaldehyde inactivated vaccine prepared from hepatitis A virus grown in human diploid cells (MRC5) and adsorbed onto an aluminium hydroxide adjuvant. The vaccine should be stored at 2-8°C and should be protected from light. The primary course of HAV vaccine is a single dose followed by a booster at 6-12 months. Approximately 95% of subjects acquire protective levels of HAV antibodies within 4 weeks of one dose, and over 99% after the 2nd dose. It is expected that immunity for at least 20 years is conferred by the full course. Individuals who have had a confirmed anaphylactic hypersensitivity to egg products should not be given the hepatitis A vaccine Epaxal, as a component of that vaccine is prepared on hens’ eggs.
  • Post-exposure prophylaxis Either passive immunisation (with HNIG, if available) or active immunisation (with HAV vaccine), or a combination of the two, may be used in the management of contacts of cases and for outbreak control, depending on the circumstances as outlined below. Vaccine and HNIG may be given at the same time, but in different sites, when both rapid and prolonged protection is required. When HNIG is given within 2 weeks of exposure, its effectiveness in preventing hepatitis A is >85%. In general the use of HNIG more than 2 weeks after the last exposure is not indicated. If HNIG is given after 2 weeks from last exposure it may modify disease severity rather than prevent infection. Results of a recent RCT, comparing the efficacy of hepatitis A vaccine and HNIG after exposure to HAV have suggested that the performance of vaccine when administered up to 14 days after exposure approaches that of HNIG in healthy children >2 yrs of age and in adults aged under 40 years. It is becoming increasingly difficult to access supplies of HNIG and therefore the use of HAV vaccine for healthy contacts aged 1-39 years may be a viable alternative.
  • Dr FO McCallum a British Physician vaccinating soldiers for Yellow fever using human serum derived vaccine noticed many developed hepatitis, after using re-used syringes. In 1963, Dr Baruch Bloomberg working at the NIH is the US discovered a common antibody in 2 American haemophilia patients which reacted to a foreign antigen in the blood of Australian Aborignes. Died 5.04.11 Later identified as HBsAg the protein coat encapsulates and encloses the HBV. Bloomberg and Millman went on to develop a test to identify HBV in blood samples in 1971 and were awarded the Nobel prize for med in 1976
  • The existing HBV vaccination programme in Ireland is a selective programme targeting high-risk groups, but there are often difficulties in successfully identifying and vaccinating those at risk. In light of increases in hepatitis B in Ireland in recent years, the NIAC is introduced universal HBV vaccination.
  • 30
  • Slide 71 Pathogenesis of Hepatitis B The outcome of HBV-related liver disease depends on an interplay between the HBV, the host, and the environment. Several studies, mostly from Asia have consistently showed that HBV genotype C is associated with more active and rapidly progressive liver disease than genotype B. Some but not all studies found that HBV precore and core promoter variants are more often found in patients with fulminant hepatitis or severe hepatitis. Host factors such as gender, age at infection, and immune response are also important. Environmental factors include other hepatotropic virus or hepatotoxins. Chu CJ, Lok AS. Clinical significance of hepatitis B virus genotypes. Hepatology 2002;35:1274-6. Benvegnu L, Fattovich G, Noventa F, et al. Concurrent hepatitis B and C virus infection and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. A prospective study. Cancer 1994;74:2442-8.
  • Hsu HY, Chang MH, Liaw SH, et al. Changes of hepatitis B surface antigen variants in carrier children before and after universal vaccination in Taiwan. Hepatology 1999;30: 1312–17. 94. Carman WF. The clinical significance of surface antigen variants of hepatitis B virus. J Viral Hepat 1997;4(suppl 1):11–20. 95. Ngui SL, O’Connell S, Eglin RP, et al. Low detection rate and maternal provenance of hepatitis B virus S gene mutants in cases of failed postnatal immunoprophylaxis in England and Wales. J Infect Dis 1997;176:1360–5. Nainan OV, Khristova ML, Byun K, et al. Genetic variation of hepatitis B surface antigen coding region among infants with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Med Virol 2002;68:319–27. 97. Ogata N, Cote PJ, Zanetti AR, et al. Licensed recombinant hepatitis B vaccines protect chimpanzees against infection with the prototype surface gene mutant of hepatitis B virus. Hepatology 1999;30:779–86. 98. Hussain M, Chu CJ, Sablon E, et al. Rapid and sensitive detection assays for determination of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes and detection of HBV precore and core promoter variants. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:3699–705.
  • Schematic course of acute hepatitis C virus infection. Patients may present at different phases during the infection. Phase A: postexposure. Phase B: asymptomatic viremic patients with normal liver enzymes 2–6 weeks postexposure before the onset of symptoms. Phase C: acute hepatitis with different levels of alanine aminotransferase elevations; symptoms may vary significantly between patients. Phase C1: early acute hepatitis phase. Phase C2: late acute hepatitis phase. Phase D: spontaneous recovery or partial tolerization— establishment of persistent viremia. Phase E: chronic hepatitis C after more than 6 months of infection. aHCV-ab, anti– hepatitis C virus-antibodies.
  • the risk for developing chronic hepatitis C after needle-stick injury is very low if antiviral therapy with interferon alfa alone is initiated within 3 to 4 months after infection. Treatment should be recommended especially for less-symptomatic patients infected with HCV genotype 1, while the “wait and see” strategy seems to be reasonable for individuals with genotype 2 or 3 infection. The bad news is that we still do not know the optimal interferon dose and treatment duration for patients in Western countries. Studies vary in their strategy of patient selection (symptomatic versus asymptomatic) with more bias towards enrolling symptomatic cases. Furthermore, studies have varied in their definition of symptomatic cases, and inclusion of subjective symptoms such as fatigue or malaise further highlights the difficulty in comparing different study populations. Secondly, there is still disagreement among authors on defining the onset of acute disease (time from exposure versus time from first symptoms). Finally, while more icteric patients may clear the virus spontaneously, there are still no precise and reliable predictors to determine which acutely infected patients will progress to chronicity.
  • Incubation period is 15-150 days, with symptoms developing anywhere from 5-12 weeks after exposure. During acute infection with HCV, symptoms may appear similar to those of HBV infection. In up to 80% of cases, however, patients are asymptomatic and do not develop icterus.
  • 2005
  • In wards, majority of incidents occurred between the hours of 08:00 and 21.59, a significant number still occurring at 22.00-07.59 (20%, 115/575). Theatre exposures more time dependent, down from 35% (74/212) at 12.01-16.00 to 27% (58/212) at 16.01-21.59, with a greater dip to 8% (17/212) at 22:00 to 07:59. In A&E, most of the reported incidents occurred between 22:00 - 07:59 hours (37%; 56/153), with the lowest numbers reported occurring between 08:00 and 12:00 hours (15%; 23/153). Two-hourly time intervals were also examined, with the ward and theatres (other than emergency sessions) busiest during the day between 08:00 and 18:00 hours, when most routine operations and therapeutic interventions occur (Figure 4). In comparison, A&E, showing two distinct peaks of reporting at 18.00-20.00 and midnight-02.00, is busier during the night when most emergency consultations occur. In the Intensive Care Unit, because of the constant nature of the care provided, incidents were not as time dependent as in other locations (Figure 4). Due to the type of work performed in community and dental settings, the majority of exposures (70% (62/88) and 81% (47/58), respectively), occurred between 08:00 and 16:00 hours. United Kingdom Surveillance of Significant Occupational Exposures to Bloodborne Viruses in Healthcare Workers: 2008
  • * Yazdanpanah Y, De Carli G, Migueres B, Lot F, Campins M, Colombo C, et al . Risk Factors for HCV Transmission after Occupational Exposure in Health Care Workers: A European Case-Control Study. Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC); Chicago, September 2003: poster no. 1087

Hepatitis and travellers 15.04.11 isom Hepatitis and travellers 15.04.11 isom Presentation Transcript

  • Hepatitis and travel Dr Peter Noone, HSE Dublin NE Area
  • Travel risk/100,000 travellers per month to a developing countryLöscher T, Keystone JS,Steffen R, Vaccination of travellers against hepatitis A & B, J of Travel Medicine 1999; 6:107-114 . Incidence of health problems duringa month in a developing country.
  • Major and minor killers: global impact viewed on a ‘Richter’ (logarithmic) scale 7 Tobacco HIV Infant/child ARI & diarrhoeal dis Malaria HBV + HCV 6 Road accidents Measles Non-HIV tuberculosis RSV, Rota virus Influenza Dengue 5 10,000-foldViruses Hospital infection difference in H Papilloma v 4 Suicide impact West Nile virus 3 SARS Ebola Polio 2 Hanta virus vCJD 1 Log 10 Weiss & McMichael, 2004
  • Impact and incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases in travellers to developing countries. CFR = case-fatality rate.
  • Type of Traveller• The Business Traveller,• The Backpacker,• The Package Tourist,• The Overseas aid worker/missionary.• The HCW
  • Viral Hepatitis - Overview Type of Hepatitis A B C D ESource of faeces blood/ blood/ blood/ faecesvirus blood-derived blood-derived blood-derived body fluids body fluids body fluidsRoute of percutaneous percutaneous percutaneoustransmission faecal-oral permucosal permucosal permucosal faecal-oralChronic no yes yes yes noinfectionPrevention pre/post- pre/post- blood donor pre/post- Ensure exposure exposure screening; exposure safe immunisation immunisation risk behaviour immunisation; drinking modification risk behaviour modification water
  • These naming conventions can lead to confusion later, e.g.,Viral hepatitis is caused by at least 6 different viruses E n t e r ic a lly“ In f e c t io u s ” A Et r a n s m i t t e d V ir a l F, G , NANB ? O the r * h e p a t it i s P a r e n t e r a lly “ S e rum” B Ct r a n s m i t t e d D* 10-20% of cases of presumed viral hepatitis are still not accounted for
  • Hepatitis A• Epidemic jaundice described by Hippocrates• Differentiated from hepatitis B in 1940s• Serologic tests developed in 1970s• Most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the US
  • Hepatitis A Virus• Picornavirus (RNA)• Humans are only natural host• Stable at low pH• Inactivated by high temperature, formalin, chlorine
  • G e o g r a p h ic D is t r ib u t io n o f H A V In f e c t io nAnti-HAV Prevalence High Intermediate Low Very Low
  • Basic Water Supply
  • Hepatitis A—United States, 1966-2002 70000 60000 Vaccine 50000 LicensedCases 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002
  • Hep A reports UKLaboratory reports of hepatitis A, England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: 1998 – 2007
  • Hep A in IrelandNumber of cases 2009: 52,Crude notification rate: 1.2/100,000No. of cases 2008: 42,
  • Hepatitis A Epidemiology• Reservoir Human, Endemic• Transmission Faeco-oral• Temporal pattern None• Communicability 2/52 before to 1/52 after onset
  • Declining Hepatitis A Rates – The Bad News 100 1980 80 1990Proportion Of Americans 60 SusceptibleTo Hepatitis A 40 (%) 20 0 20s 30s 40s 50s 60s 70s Age (Years) Data from NHANES II and III.
  • Consequences Of Adult Hepatitis A And B Infections HepA HepBSymptoms of overt hepatitis 73%-90% 41%Hospitalization 10%-26% 16%-19%Acute liver failure 2-15 per 1000 7.3 per 1000Liver transplant 1-3 per 1000 1.7 per 1000Post-transplant survival 7-14 years 7-14 yearsCase fatality rate (acute illness) 1-9 per 1000 4 per 1000Probability of chronic infection 0% 5%-8% Berge et al. Hepatology. 2000;31:469. Fendrick et al. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:126. Margolis et al. JAMA. 1995;274:120.
  • Hepatitis A Incidence* by Age Group 20 18 16 14 12 Rate 10 8 6 4 2 0 <5 5-14 15-24 25-39 40+ Age group (yrs) *rate per 100,000 population. 1997 data.
  • Age-specific Mortality Due to Hepatitis A A g e g r o u pC a s e - F a t a l i t y ( ye a r s ) ( p e r 10 0 0 ) <5 3.0 5-14 1.6 15-29 1.6 30-49 3.8 >49 17.5 Total 4.1 Source: Viral Hepatitis Surveillance Program CDC Atlanta, 1983-1989
  • Hepatitis A Pathogenesis• Entry into mouth, incub 15-50 days,• Viral replication in the liver• Virus present in blood and faeces 10-12 days after infection• Virus excretion may continue for up to 3/52 after onset of symptoms
  • Hepatitis A Clinical Features• Incubation period 28 days (range 15-50 days)• Illness not specific for hepatitis A• Likelihood of symptomatic illness directly related to age• Children generally asymptomatic, adults symptomatic
  • Hepatitis A: Significant Public Health Issue• On average, infected adults lose 27 days of work1• Between 11% and 22% of patients are hospitalized1• Annual costs of hepatitis A estimated at $488.8 million2• On average, in the United States, 1 person dies every 4 days as a result of acute liver failure from hepatitis A1 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48(RR-12):1. 2. Berge et al. Hepatology. 2000;31:469.
  • C o n c e n t r a t io n o f H e p a t it is A V ir u s in V a r io u s B o d y F lu id s FaecesB odyF lu id Serum Saliva Urine 100 102 104 106 108 1010 In f e c t io u s D o s e s Source: Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease m l p e r 1984;9-22 J Infect Dis 1989;160:887-890
  • epatitis A—United States, 1990-200 Risk Factors Sexual/household 14% Intl travel 5% MSM Unknown 10% 45% IDU 6% Daycare 2% Outbreak Other 4% 8% Source: NNDSS/VHSP DC contact 6%
  • Hepatitis A Vaccines• Inactivated whole virus• Avaxim (Sanofi Pasteur MSD)• HAVRIX (GlaxoSmithKline)• Paediatric and adult formulations• Licensed for persons >2 years• Epaxal (MASTA)
  • Hepatitis A Vaccine Immunogenicity Adults • 95% seropositive after one dose • 100% seropositive after two doses Children (>2 years) and Adolescents • >97% seropositive after one • 100% seropositive after 2 dosesVan Damme P, Banatvala J, Fay O et al. Hepatitis A booster vaccination: is there a need? Lancet 2003: 362:1065-71
  • Twinrix• Combination hepatitis B (adult dose) and hepatitis A vaccine (paediatric dose)• Schedule: 0, 1, 6-12 months• Approved for persons >16 years, (TWINRIX PAEDIATRIC ® (Glaxo SmithKline) this can be used from 1 year up to and including 15 years of age.• Not recommended for post exposure vaccination.
  • Hepatitis A VaccinesFormulation HAVRIX VAQTA AVAXIMPaedsAge 1-16 yrs 2-17 yrs <16yrsDose 0.5ml 0.5ml Not recommendedAdultAge >16 yrs >18yrs >16yrsDose 1.0ml 1.0ml 0.5ml
  • H e p a t it is A V a c c in e E f f ic a c y S t u d ie s Vaccine Site/Age EfficacyVaccine Group N (95% CI)HAVRIX® Thailand 38,157 94%(SKB) 1-16 yrs (79%-99%)2 doses360 EL.U.VAQTA ™ New York 1,037 100%(Merck) 2-16 yrs (85%-100%)1 dose25 unitsJAMA 1994;271:1363-4N Engl J Med 1992;327:453-7
  • Hepatitis A VaccinesAdult• 1 dose• Booster dose 6-18/12 after first doseChildren and Adolescent• 1 dose• Booster dose 6-18/12 after first dose Hepatitis A booster vaccination: is there a need?. The Lancet, Volume 362, Issue 9389, Pages 1065-1071 P. Van Damme, J. Banatvala, O. Fay, S. Iwarson, B. McMahon, K. Van Herck, D. Shouval, P. Bonanni, B. Connor, G. Cooksley
  • Hepatitis AVaccine Recommendations• International travellers• MSM,• IVDU’s• Persons who have clotting-factor disorders• Persons with occupational risk• Persons with chronic liver disease, including HCV
  • Hepatitis A Serologic TestingPrevaccination • Not indicated for children • May be considered for some adults and older adolescentsPostvaccination • Not indicated
  • Hepatitis AVaccine Adverse Reactions• Pain at injection site• Systemic reactions not common• No serious adverse reactions reported
  • Hepatitis A VaccineContraindications and Precautions • Severe allergic reaction to a vaccine component or following a prior dose • Moderate or severe acute illness
  • Hepatitis AVaccine Recommendations• Travellers to high- or intermediate- risk countries• Protected by 4 weeks after dose• Give concurrent IG for travel in <4 weeks or travellers who are immunocomprimised.
  • HBV
  • Hepatitis B• The first recognition of public health importance of HBV infection by direct inoculation of blood or blood products was first documented by Lurman in Bremen, Germany, in 1883, during a smallpox immunisation campaign. Thousands received vaccine that had been prepared from human lymph.• Of 1,289 shipyard workers who received this vaccine, 191 (15%) developed jaundice several weeks to 8 months later; jaundice did not occur among unvaccinated workers.• Lurman, A. 1855. Eine icterus Epidemic. Berlin Klin. Wochenschr. 22:20–23.
  • Hepatitis B• Epidemic jaundice described by Hippocrates in 5th century BCE• Jaundice reported among recipients of human serum and yellow fever vaccines in 1930s and 1940s• Australian antigen described in 1965• Serologic tests developed in 1970s
  • Hepatitis B Virus• Hepadnaviridae family (DNA)• Numerous antigenic components• Humans are only known host• May retain infectivity for at least 1 month at room temperature
  • Hepatitis B Virus Infection•40% of world’s population had contact withor are carriers of HBV, 2 billion infected,•>350 million chronic carriers worldwide•Established cause of chronic hepatitis andcirrhosis, 600,000 death in 2002.•Human carcinogen—cause of up to 80% ofhepatocellular carcinomas.Banatvala J et al “Lifelong protection against Hepatitis B; role of vaccine immunogenicity in immunememory”,Vaccine 2001;19:877-885.Goldstein ST, Zhou F, Hadler SC, Bell BP, Mast EE, Margolis HS. A mathematical model to estimate globalhepatitis B disease burden and vaccination impact. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34(6):1329.
  • HBV infection (2)•In Europe & US chronic infection with HBV, affects about 1-3% ofthe population,• In Africa and Asia, rate may be >10% and will remain so for manydecades,• Immigrants from the high incidence areas will carry the same riskof HBV carriage as the population in their country of birth,• ~ 1/3 of HCV and a variable number of HIV patients have occultHBV infection,•Before widespread vacc of HCWs, >12,000 HCWs per year wereinfected in U.S. in the pre-vaccine era.Guidelines for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus to health-care and public-safety workers. MMWRMorb Mortal Wkly Rep 1989;38(suppl 6):1–37.
  • Hepatitis B Virion, Dane particle and HBsAG From Murray et. al., Medical Microbiology 5th edition, 2005, Chapter 66, published by Mosby Philadelphia,,
  • Hepatitis B Clinical Features• Incubation period 6 weeks to 6 months (average 120 days)• Non-specific prodrome of fever, malaise, headache, myalgia• Illness not specific for hepatitis B• At least 50% of infections asymptomatic
  • Hepatitis B Epidemiology• Reservoir Human. Endemic• Transmission Bloodborne Subclinical cases transmit• Communicability 1-2 months before and after onset of symptoms Chronic carriers
  • HBV Diagnosis• A battery of serological tests are used for the diagnosis of acute and chronic hepatitis B infection.• HBsAg - used as a general marker of infection.• HBsAb - used to document recovery and/or immunity to HBV infection.• anti-HBc IgM - marker of acute infection.• anti-HBcIgG - past or chronic infection.• HBeAg - indicates active replication of virus and therefore infectiveness.• Anti-HBe - virus no longer replicating. However, the patient can still be positive for HBsAg which is made by integrated HBV.• HBV-DNA - indicates active replication of virus, more accurate than HBeAg especially in cases of escape mutants. Used mainly for monitoring response to therapy.
  • Clinical outcomes of Hepatitis B infections Figure 66-11. Clinical outcomes of acute hepatitis B infection. (Redrawn from White DO, Fenner F: Medical virology, ed 3, New York, 1986, Academic Press From Murray et. al., Medical Microbiology 5th edition, 2005, Chapter 62, published by Mosby Philadelphia,,
  • Risk of Chronic HBV Carriage by Age of Infection 100 90 80Carrier risk (%) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Birth 1-6 mo 7-12 mo 1-4 yrs 5+ yrs Age of infection
  • M Ramsay, HPA UK
  • Global Patterns of Chronic HBV Infection• High (>8%): 45% of global population – lifetime risk of infection >60% – early childhood infections common• Intermediate (2%-7%): 43% of global population – lifetime risk of infection 20%-60% – infections occur in all age groups• Low (<2%): 12% of global population – lifetime risk of infection <20% – most infections occur in adult risk groups
  • Geographic Distribution of Chronic HBV Infection HBsAg Prevalence ≥8% - High 2-7% - Intermediate <2% - Low
  • Worldwide distribution patterns of HBV genotypes and sub-genotypes.Regions with high, intermediate and low endemicity are shown by grey, light grey and white shades respectively.Datta Virology Journal 2008 5:156 doi:10.1186/1743-422X-5-156
  • Hepatitis B—United States, 1978-2002 Decline among homosexual men 30000 Decline among IV drug users 25000 20000Cases 15000 10000 Hepatitis B vaccine licensed 5000 0 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002
  • Figure 1: Notifications of Hepatitis B (acute and chronic) 2004-2009 Epidemiology of Hepatitis B in Ireland
  • Risk of Traveller Exposure HBV
  • Bloodborne Pathogen TrainingRisk of Bloodborne Virus Transmission after Occupational Percutaneous Exposure Source Risk Risk HBV HBeAg + 22.0-30.0% 22.0-30.0% HBeAg - 1.0-6.0% 1.0-6.0% 1.8% HCV 1.8% 0.3% HIV 0.3%
  • Risk Factors for Hepatitis B Other 23% Multiple sex partners 24% Household 3% Sex contact 13% MSM IDU 17% 20% CDC Sentinel Sites. 2001 data.
  • C o n c e n t r a t io n o f H e p a t it is B V ir u s in V a r io u s B o d y F lu id s Low/Not High Moderate Detectable blood semen urine serum vaginal fluid feceswound exudates saliva sweat tears Breast milk
  • Acute Hepatitis B Virus Infection with Recovery T y p ic a l S e r o lo g ic C o u r s e Symptoms HBeAg anti-HBe Total anti-HBcT it e r HBsAg IgM anti-HBc anti-HBs 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 52 100 We e k s a fte r E xpos ure
  • Progression to Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection T y p ic a l S e r o lo g ic C o u r s e Acute Chronic (6 months) (Years) HBeAg anti-HBe HBsAg Total anti-HBc T it e r IgM anti-HBc 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 52 Years We e k s a fte r E xpos ure
  • Pathogenesis of HepatitisHBV - Natural History B Modulating Factors in Hepatitis B HOST VIRUS Gender Genotype Age Molecular Variants Immune Response ENVIRONMENT Alcohol HCV, HDV, HIV Carcinogens
  • Hepatitis B Vaccine1965 Discovery of Australian antigen1973 Successful HBV infection of chimpanzees1981 License of plasma-derived vaccine1986 License of recombinant vaccine1991 Universal infant vaccination (U.S.)1996 Universal adolescent vaccination (U.S).
  • Hepatitis B Vaccine• Composition Recombinant HBsAg• Efficacy 95% (Range, 80%-100%)• Duration of Immunity >15 years• Schedule 3 Doses• Booster doses not routinely recommendedAre booster immunisations needed for lifelong hepatitis B immunity? European Consensus Group on HepatitisB Immunity.Lancet 2000 Feb 12;355(9203):561-5.
  • Hepatitis B Vaccine Formulations• HB-Vax II (Sanofi) - 5.0 mcg/0.5 mL (paediatric) - 10 mcg/1 mL (adult) - 40 mcg/1 mL (dialysis)• Engerix-B (GSK) - 10 mcg/0.5 mL (paediatric) - 20 mcg/1 mL (adult)
  • Protection* by Age Group and Dose Dose Infants** Teens and Adults*** 1 16%-40% 20%-30% 2 80%-95% 75%-80% 3 98%-100% 90%-95% * Anti-HBs antibody titre of 10 mIU/mL or higher ** Preterm infants less than 2 kg have been shown to respond to vaccination less often *** Factors that may lower vaccine response rates are age >40 years, male gender, smoking, obesity, and immune deficiency, HLA type.
  • Recommended Dose of Hepatitis B Vaccine HB-Vax II Engerix-B Dose (mcg) Dose (mcg)Infants and children 0.5 mL (5) 0.5 mL (10)<11 years of ageAdolescents 11-19 0.5 mL (5) 0.5 mL (10)yearsAdults >18 years 1.0 mL (10) 1.0 mL (20)
  • Hepatitis B Vaccine Long-term Efficacy • Immunologic memory established following vaccination • Exposure to HBV results in anamnestic anti-HBs response • Chronic infection rarely documented among vaccine respondersAre booster immunisations needed for lifelong hepatitis B immunity?European Consensus Group on Hepatitis B Immunity.Lancet 2000 Feb12;355(9203):561-5.
  • Management of Non-response to Hepatitis B Vaccine • Complete a second series of three doses or • Give a booster dose and recheck, • Should be given on the usual schedule of 0, 1 and 6 months • Retest 1-2 months after completing the second series
  • Persistent Non-response to Hepatitis B Vaccine• <5% of vaccinees do not develop anti-HBs after 6 valid doses• May be non-responder or "hypo- responder"• Check HBsAg status• If exposed, treat as non- responder with PEP (HBIG)
  • Non-response • Age (>40yrs), • Gender, • Obesity (BMI>30), • Smokers, • HLA_DR3+ or -DR7+ halotypes, • Site and route of injection.Zuckerman J et al, “Evaluation of a New Hepatitis B Triple-Antigen Vaccine in Inadequate Responders to Current Vaccine,Hepatology 2001; 34(4)798-802
  • Twinrix• Combination hepatitis B and hepatitis A vaccine (paediatric dose) (720 ELISA u’s HAV, 20mcgs recomb HBsAG in 1ml)• Schedule: 0, 1, 6-12 months• Approved for persons >16 years• Twinrix paediatric (360 ELISa u’s HAV, 10mcgs recomb HBsAg protein in 0.5ml)• Not recommended for post exposure vaccination
  • Northdruft H,Zuckerman J, “Accelerated Vaccination Schedules Provide Protection Against Hepatitis A & B in Last Minute Travellers” Vaccine 2002;20:1157-1162. Medicine
  • Evaluation of Hepatitis B Immune-Response in Elderly, Obese or Medically Compromised Subjects after Vaccination with HAB Combination or Monovalent Hepatitis B Vaccines Chlibek, R, von Sonnenburg F, Van Damme P, et al• response to HBV vacc in elderly, overweight or with medical conditions. Study of 4-yr persistence of anti-HBs and immunological memory to HBV in subjects ≥41 years with these conditions who had received either a combined HAB vaccine or one of two monovalent HBV vaccines.• 596 subjects ≥41-yrs randomised into 3 groups receive Twinrix™, at 0, 1 and 6/12, or one of two different monovalent HBV vaccines (Engerix-B™, or HBVAXPRO™) given at 0, 1 and 6/12 together with a HAV vaccine (at 0 and 6 months).• % with anti-HBs levels (≥10 mIU/ml) 4 yrs after vacc highest in HAB group, lower in Engerix-B and lowest in HBVAXPRO™. 1/12 after challenge HBV dose, the % elderly who mounted anti-HBs antibody ≥10mIU/ml highest in HAB (91.1%), lower in Engerix-B™ (89.1%) and lowest in HBVAXPRO™ group (76.4%).• In elderly, obese or ongoing medical conditions, combined HAB vaccine consistently greater anti-HBs than the other vaccines.• P2-15, NECTM 20010, Hamburg,
  • Hepatitis B Vaccine Adverse Reactions Infants and Twinrix Adults ChildrenPain at injection site 13%-29% 3%-9%Mild systemic complaints 11%-17% 0%-20%(fatigue, headache)Temperature >99.9°F (37.7°C) 1% 0.4%-6% rare rareSevere systemic reactions
  • Hepatitis B Vaccine Contraindications and Precautions• Severe allergic reaction to a vaccine component or following a prior dose,• Moderate or severe acute illness,• Hernán MA, Jick DS, Olek MJ, and Jick H, Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and the risk of multiple sclerosis A prospective study, NEUROLOGY 2004;63:838-842• Numerous studies have evaluated a possible relationship between hepatitis B vaccination and multiple sclerosis. The weight of the available scientific evidence does not support the suggestion that hepatitis B vaccine causes or worsens MS.• http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Vaccines/multiplesclerosis_and_h ep_b.html
  • HBV variants with mutations•Vaccine failures with HBV mutations in small surface protein (S) gene(S mutants) in infants who got HBV vaccine or HBIG appropriately andwho have anti-HBs in protective range.•HBV variants resistant to neutralizing anti-HBs, reduce effectivenessof HBV imms programs or accelerate formation of HBV variants?. •But S mutants implicated in perinatally exposed infant vaccine failures usually of maternal origin and not induced by vaccination. •Mothers of infants who responded to vaccine as likely to have sAg variants as mums of infants who did not respond, suggests infections among vaccinated children with S mutants represent immunoprophylaxis failures and infection with maternal viral variants rather than breakthrough infections among successfully vaccinated infants. •Vaccinated chimps are protected from challenge with the most common surface antigen variant .• Commercial assays employing polyclonal anti-HBs detect S mutants,making ongoing surveillance for S mutants possible.
  • Pre-core mutantsDisappearance of HBeAg and rise of anti-HBe is associated with decline in viremia titerand replacement of wild-type HBV by the core promoter mutants and/or precore mutants.However, the core promoter mutants become prevalent even before the rise of anti-HBe.
  • HBV in Immune-suppressed Subjects Background*• HBV reactivation occurs in up to 50% of HBsAg+ patients and in ~4% anti-HBc+ patients with occult HBV receiving chemotherapy,• ~10% will become icteric and mortality is increased by at least 5% and may reach 70% after a flare,• Clinical reactivation frequently occurs following withdrawal of chemotherapy and emergence of immune recovery (Median onset 16w; Range:4-36w)• There is currently no reliable way to predict severity of HBV reactivation during and after chemotherapy,• However, risk seems to correlate with degree of viral load, use of corticosteroids , degree of immunosuppression, male sex.• *Liang R et al. J Clin Oncology 1999;17:394, Yeo W et al. British J Cancer 2004;90:1306
  • Reactivation of HBV in Immunosuppressed Patients• A large number of patients undergoing immuno or chemotherapy are still not screened for HBV markers prior to initiation of treatment,• As a result, patients with overt (and also occult) HBV infection are exposed to an unnecessary and usually preventable risk,• Partners of such patients and their treating HCWs maybe exposed to HBV upon reactivation
  • Patients at Risk for HBV Reactivation• Any patients with overt or occult HBV receiving systemic chemo- radio- or immunotherapy,• Lymphoma, Leukaemia and hematologic malignancies,• Bone marrow (BMT,) peripheral lymphocyte and stem cell transplantation for any cause (incl. Autologous BMT),• Cancer (i.e. breast cancer, gastric cancer, HCC post TACE in HBsAg+ or anti-HBc+ patients),• Liver, renal, heart, lung transplantation,• Systemic diseases (i.e. HIV infection, Crohn’s disease, RA; SLE etc.),• Premature discontinuation of anti-viral therapy in immune suppressed patients
  • Reactivation of HBV may occur in two defined forms of persistent infection:• Reactivation of HBV in originally asymptomatic, overt HBV, HBsAg(+) patients,• Reactivation of HBV in HBsAg(-) patients with occult HBV infection - OBV (HBV DNA in serum; in hepatocytes or in immune cells (ccc HBV-DNA+, anti-HBc+ or anti-HBc+/anti-HBs+)
  • Background• HBV reactivation in patients at risk may be asymptomatic orsymptomatic and is associated with cytotoxic orimmunosuppressive treatment, with pregnancy or surgery,• Reactivation may lead to hepatitis, hepatic failure, delays inchemo or immunotherapy (M ~100 days) and decreased survival(4-60%),• Reactivation may occur in >50% in HBsAg+ patients receivingchemotherapy,• Reactivation may also occur spontaneously in up to ~22% of HBVinfected patients who do not receive immunosuppression,• Not all forms of chemotherapy confer an equivalent risk forreactivation,Review: Holbrook E et al. Clin Liver Dis 2007; 11:965
  • Treatment• Interferon - for HBeAg +ve carriers with chronic active hepatitis. Response rate is 30 to 40%. – alpha-interferon 2b (original) – alpha-interferon 2a (newer, claims to be more efficacious and efficient)• Lamivudine - a nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Well tolerated, most patients will respond favorably. However, tendency to relapse on cessation of treatment. Another problem is the rapid emergence of drug resistance.• Adefovir – less likely to develop resistance than Lamivudine and may be used to treat Lamivudine resistance HBV. However more expensive and toxic• Entecavir – most powerful antiviral known, similar to Adefovir• Successful response to treatment will result in the disappearance of HBsAg, HBV-DNA, and seroconversion to HBeAg.
  • Efficacy of current drug regimens eAg +ve eAg -veDrug HBeAg HBV DNA HBV DNA seroconversion negative at negative at at Yr 1, % Yr 1, % Yr 1, %Interferon 18 37 60-70Lamivudine 18 40-44 60-70Adefovir 12 21 51Entecavir 21 67 90Peg-IFNa-2a 27 25 63Telbivudine 23 60 88
  • Rates of resistanceDrug Resistance %Interferon noneLamivudine 23 at Yr 1 71 at Yr 4Adefovir 0 at Yr 1 30 at Yr 5Entecavir < 1 in naïve at Yr 4 40 in Lam-r at Yr 4Peg IFNa-2a noneTelbivudine 22 in HBeAg +ve at Yr 2 9 in HBeAg -ve at Yr 2
  • Key Points:Screening for HBV markers is mandatory in allpatients scheduled for chemo- or immuno-therapy,• Immunization against HBV should be completed as soon aspossible (non-response must be investigated for occult HBV),• Early pre-emptive anti-viral treatment is superior to treatment atonset of reactivation,• It is highly recommended to continue treatment for 6-12 monthsafter completing chemo or immuno therapy,• Awareness regarding the risk of HBV reactivation must bestrengthened , especially among oncologists, haematologists andtransplant surgeons
  • HCV
  • HCV Epidemiology•HCV single-stranded RNA 170 million chronicallyinfected with HCV. 4 million people HCV in US,•HCV causes 17-20% of acute hepatitis cases in the US,•CDC -150,000 new cases per year. Highest prevalencehaemophiliacs and IVDU. Before plasma screening HCVaccounted for 90% of post transfusion hepatitis cases.•HCV is the most common cause of chronic viral hepatitisin the US. About 80% of people infected progress tochronic HCV infection
  • H e p a t it is C V ir u s c a p s id e n v e lo p r o t e a s e /h e RNA- RNA pe lic a s e d e p e n d e n tp o l y m e r a s e p ro te i c 2 n 33 c - 10 2 c 05’ 3’ c o E1 E2 NS NS NS NS re 2 3 4 5 h y p e r v a r ia b le r e g io n
  • Course of clinical HCV WEDEMEYER ET AL. HEPATOLOGY, May 2004
  • HCV Transmission• HCV can be transmitted parenterally, perinatally, and sexually. Most reliably through transfusion of infected blood or blood products, transplantation of organs from infected donors, and sharing contaminated needles among IVDU’s.• NSI among HCW’s place them at significant risk of infection. Incidence of HCV infection in HCW with history of needle-stick exposure to infected blood approaches 6%.• There is a 0.4-1% chance of developing irreversible liver injury from a needle-stick infection in this setting.
  • Trials evaluating treatment for acute HCV Study Type Nos SC n (%) Regimen Time of therapy SVR (%) Jaeckel et al Non- 44 N/A A Immediately, average 89 days post 98 randomised exposure Gerlach et al “ 60 24 (52) B 10-26 months from symptom onset 80 Kamal et al Randomised 54 5 (9) C 12 wks from symptom onset or 1St +ve 83 HCV RNA Nomura et al “ 30 0 D 8 wks from symptom onset 87 Pimstone et al Non- 10 3 (30) E 14 wks from exposure 100 randomised Rocca et al “ 16 1 (6) F Immediately, <70 days post exposure 92 Wiegand et al Non- 60 N/A G Immediately 95 randomised Santantonio et “ 28 11 (38) G 12 wks from symptom onset 94 al Broers et al “ 27 5 (19) G 100±82 days from symptom onset or 57 63±53 days from 1st +ve HCV assay Delwaide et al “ 28 N/A H Immediate, average110 ±44days post 75 exposure Adapted from Zekry et al. Journal of Hepatology 2005; 42: 293-296
  • HCV Infection Testing Algorithm for Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Persons Negative (non-reactive) EIA for Anti-HCV STOP Positive (repeat reactive) OR Negative RIBA for Anti-HCV RT-PCR for HCV RNA Negative Indeterminate Positive Positive Additional Laboratory Medical STOP Evaluation (e.g. PCR, ALT) Evaluation Negative PCR, Positive PCR, Normal ALT Abnormal ALTSource: MMWR 1998;47 (No. RR 19)
  • Acute HCV• HCV infection is mostly asymptomatic (66-80%), incub 15-150 days,• Spontaneous viral clearance in 1- 30% 8-12 weeks post exposure,• Clearance can be predicted by rate of viral load decline,• Higher clearance rates reported in children, young adults particularly young women and persons with jaundice,• Up to 80% risk of going on to developing chronic disease with up to >20% risk of developing HCC,• Therapy once disease established improving but not completely effective in some genotypes,• Once disease is established response to treatment is reduced.Jaeckel E, et al “Treatment of Acute Hepatitis C with interferon Alpha-2B,N Eng J Med,2001; 345(20):1452-1456.
  • HCV Clinical course• Incubation period is 15-150 days, with symptoms developing anywhere from 5-12 weeks after exposure.• During acute infection with HCV, symptoms may appear similar to those of HBV infection. In up to 80% of cases, however, patients are asymptomatic and do not develop icterus.
  • Serologic Pattern of Acute HCV Infection with Recovery anti-HCV Symptoms +/- HCV RNATiter ALT Normal 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 Months Years Time after Exposure
  • Serologic Pattern of Acute HCV Infection with Progression to Chronic Infection anti-HCV Symptoms +/- HCV RNATiter ALT Normal 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 Months Years Time after Exposure
  • http://www.hpsc.ie/hpsc/A-Z/HepatitisHIVAIDSandSTIs/BloodborneVirus/File,4352,en.pdf
  • http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1227688128096
  • http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1227688128096
  • http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1227688128096
  • HCV in the Health care settingEuropean case-control study *• France, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, UK• 60 cases of occupationally acquired HCV in HCWs January 1993 andDecember 2002)• All cases percutaneous injuries.Risk factors associated with transmission:• -needle having been placed in the source patient’s vein or artery•-deep injury• -Hollow bore needle•-gender of the HCW (males were more likely to have seroconverted thanfemales) but this factor will need further investigation into its significance.Prevalence of infection in the specific populationVolume of inoculums and viral load in source patientPost exposure management.* Yazdanpanah Y, De Carli G, Migueres B, Lot F, Campins M, Colombo C, et al. Risk Factors for HCV Transmissionafter Occupational Exposure in Health Care Workers: A European Case-Control Study. Interscience Conference onAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC); Chicago, September 2003: poster no. 1087
  • UK HCV seroconversions in HCW’s Occupation Device Procedure 1st test positive HCW Virus (weeks) treated cleared Junior Doctor (1996) Hollowbore Resuscitation A&E 16 NK Yes needle Surgeon (2000) Solid needle Suturing 8 Yes Yes Dentist (2001) Hollowbore Injection 4 NK Yes needle Nurse (2003) Hollowbore Venepuncture 8 N/A* Yes needle Doctor (2003) Hollowbore Venepuncture 8 Yes Yes needle Nurse (2004) Hollowbore Someone else’s sharp 6 Yes† Treatment needle ongoing Nurse (2004) Hollowbore Cannulation 7 Yes Yes needleHealthcare Assistant (2004) Hollowbore Someone else’s sharp 7 Yes Yes needleDomestic Assistant (2003) Hollowbore Collecting rubbish bag 6 Yes Yes needle – needle protrudingHPA UK Eye of the Needle Report
  • HCV Complications• Acute infection with HCV -fulminant hepatic failure, associated aplastic anaemia.• Approximately 50-85% of patients chronically infected, 29-76% later develop CAH or cirrhosis.• In the US and Europe, chronic HCV infection is the leading indication for liver transplant. Chronic HCV infection causes 10,000 deaths per year in the US.• Chronic HCV infection is also strongly linked to the development of HCC, which usually develops after 30 years
  • Transmission in HCW• About 65,000 HBV, 16,400 HCV and 1000 HIV infxn in HCWs p.a worldwide from occ exposure,• Risk infxn to HCW from patient>HCW to patient,• Universal imms, PEP, std precautions (including barrier precautions & proper handwashing), appropriate techniques & devices reduce transmission,• Down from 10,000 pa in U.S in 1993 to 400 in 2002,• Transmission of HCV rare and seroprevalence HCV in U.S and UK similar in HCWs to gen pop.• High risk cardiothoracic, ortho, obs&gyn,• Role of precore mutants in 10 published HBV reports in last decade,• HCW to patient HCV infection a proxy for substance misuse.