Barter for adb transport forum 2010

Parking Policy in Asian cities – highlights Dr Paul Barter LKY School of Public Policy National University of Singapore [email_address] Photo: Zaitun Kasim Photo by Rutul Joshi Study commissioned by ADB under RETA 6416: A Development Framework for Sustainable Urban Transport - Parking Policy in Asia: Status, Comparisons and Potential

1. Framework for thinking about parking policy choices
Conventional approaches
parking as ancillary infrastructure for buildings, hence parking requirements
Parking management approaches
parking as a tool for wider policy goals
Market-based approaches
parking as a real-estate based service

1. Framework for thinking about parking policy choices Approaches to parking policy What is parking? And whose responsibility? Central goals Conventional Autocentric Infrastructure Government + property owner responsibility. Avoid parking scarcity Demand-realistic Avoid both scarcity and wasteful surplus Parking management Multi-objective Infrastructure Government responsibility mainly Serve wider urban & transport policy goals Constraint-focused Key goal is constraint of car travel (to certain locations) Market-based Real-estate based service Private beneficiaries (willingness to pay) Ensure demand, supply and prices are responsive to each other

2. Selected results: Parking requirements at commercial buildings (on average) versus approximate car ownership

2. Selected results: Exempting small buildings from requiring parking Floor area threshold below which no parking requirements Tokyo Yes (1500 or 2000 sq. m). Above this requirements phase in gradually Taipei Yes (300 or 500m 2 ) Bangkok Yes (commercial, office, shopping malls: 300m 2 ; condominiums: 60m 2 per unit; hotels: 30 rooms; restaurants: 300m 2 ; entertainment buildings 500 seats) Seoul No? Jakarta No? Singapore No Kuala Lumpur No Manila No Hong Kong No Guangzhou Yes (500m 2 ) Ahmedabad Yes (60m 2 ) Beijing Yes? Hanoi Low-rise residential buildings exempt Dhaka No

2. Selected results: On-street pricing and time limits Source: Shoup, D. Prices vary from place to place or time to time? Highest price found (PPP$/hr) Time limits used? Jakarta Two zones 0.37 No Kuala Lumpur One price per municipality 0.41 Yes (3 hrs) Bangkok Uniform where priced 0.60 No Hong Kong Uniform legislated price 1.46 Yes (2 hrs) Manila One price per municipality 1.71 Yes (3 hrs) Singapore Two zones 1.90 No Tokyo Uniform legislated price 2.58 Yes (60 min) Taipei Higher where demand high 3.45 No Seoul Five zones 7.86 No Dhaka Higher in CBD 0.78 per day No Ahmedabad Uniform where priced 0.16 No Hanoi Two zones 0.81 No Guangzhou Zones with different prices 1.05 ? Beijing Two zones 1.32 ?

2. Selected results: Where do people park? Locations for shopping/entertainment parking by survey respondents

2. Selected results: Proportion paying for parking (as % of respondents parking for each purpose)

2. Selected results: Average work-based parking prices paid by survey respondents per month (January 2010 US$) * In Manila, Seoul, and Ahmedabad fewer than 20 respondents paid for parking at work so their mean prices should be treated with extra caution.

2. Selected results: CBD parking prices compared with CBD Grade A office rents (on a rent per square meter basis) in many international cities, based on Colliers International data sources

2. Selected results: other highlights
Parking enforcement best practices make a difference (e.g. freeing the police from this role)
Japan's proof-of-parking policy is important
Priced off-street parking (both private and public sector) outside of destination premises is most significant in Beijing, Taipei, Hanoi, Hong Kong and (apparently) Tokyo
Several cities have price controls over private sector parking (Beijing, Guangzhou, Hanoi, Jakarta)
Parking policy for TDM is surprisingly rare in Asia (Seoul is the main exception)

3. Parking policy trajectories in Asia
Parking requirement enthusiasts : Kuala Lumpur, Bangkok, Jakarta and Manila. South Asian cities seem headed this way.
TDM cities with surprisingly conventional parking policy : Hong Kong, Seoul and Singapore
(Inadvertent) Market-fostering : Tokyo
Result of 3 pragmatic policies: low parking requirements that exempt small buildings; limited on-street parking; and the proof-of-parking rule.
An intermediate path : Taipei, Beijing and Guangzhou and (perhaps) Hanoi.

4. Key policy implications
Fear of chaotic on-street parking is a key motivation for requiring parking in real estate developments
BUT plentiful off-street parking provides no guarantee of orderly on-street parking
Solving on-street parking problems requires on-street parking management, not necessarily off-street supply expansion.
On-street parking chaos is not proof of a shortage

Pricing is widespread in Asian cities, especially in East Asia
A surprising proportion of parking is free-of-charge (or cheap) even in cities with high property prices
Price controls on private-sector parking are unwise
Government-subsidized parking is a highly regressive and unwise use of taxpayers’ resources
Parking requirements seem an easy option but are problematic. Audacious to think that we can predict parking demand of buildings for decades

Constraint-focused parking policy deserves wider application but faces political and practical barriers in many cities
Multi-objective parking management has much to offer and deserves much wider application
‘ Park-once neighborhoods’ (most parking in shared public parking with market-prices) are already common and are highly relevant to Asian conditions. They could provide a useful focus for ‘market-oriented’ parking policies.

http://www.reinventingparking.org	747
http://www.reinventingtransport.org	464
http://reinventingtransport.blogspot.com	48
http://feeds.feedburner.com	24
http://translate.googleusercontent.com	6
http://inclusivemobility.net	3
http://passing.tk	1

Barter for adb transport forum 2010

by Paul Barter on Jul 12, 2010

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Usage Rights

7 Embeds 1,293

Statistics

Barter for adb transport forum 2010 — Presentation Transcript