Investigating_Prosecuting_and_Defending_Environmental_Crimes_What_You_Need_to_Know

  • 58 views
Uploaded on

ENREL Section Luncheon presentation by Michael Zody

ENREL Section Luncheon presentation by Michael Zody

More in: Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
58
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. S A L T L A K E C I T Y | R E N O | B O I S E | L A S V E G A S | P A R S O N S B E H L E . C O MENREL Section LuncheonInvestigating, Prosecuting andDefending Environmental Crimes:What You Need to KnowMichael A. Zody, Defense CounselMay 4, 2012Salt Lake City
  • 2. The Leap to Criminal Cases The Number One Rule for CriminalDefense Counsel?2
  • 3. Wildlife Cases Often resolved with pleas to misdemeanors andfines, with significant dollars invested indeveloping ways to reduce the incidental takes The beginning of the end of strict liability?– U.S. v. Brigham Oil & Gas, 2012 WL 120055 (D.N.D.2012) “take” under MBTA does not equal deathincidental to lawful commercial activity3
  • 4. Pollution Cases The rest of this presentation is focused onpollution cases And is predominantly designed for counselwho represent companies4
  • 5. Issues/Tactics Government has broad discretion– general intent and negligence standards• CAA, 42 USC § 7413; RCRA, 42 USC §6928; CWA, 33 USC § 1319– but, is generally looking for “lying, cheating,stealing”– competitive advantage gained?– harm to environment? ongoing or corrected?5
  • 6. Issues/Tactics Communicate early and at appropriateintervals with prosecutor Use credible complexity and ambiguity toyour advantage– complexity in regulatory terms, e.g.,“hazardous waste”– ambiguity in regulatory programs, particularlylocal ordinances– poorly drafted permits6
  • 7. Issues/Tactics Hope it stays local (DOJ-EnvironmentalCrimes Section in DC) Federal and state criminal enforcementagencies tend to coordinate, communicatewith each other– State A.G.‟s as acting federal prosecutors– Feds usually take the lead7
  • 8. Issues/Tactics False data in environmental cases– Beware of continued use, such as in emissionsinventories, that can repeat false statements– Title V and other broad certifications “Responsible corporate officer” issue Don‟t overlook Title 18, including– Section 371 - conspiracy– Section 1001 – false statements– Sections 1341, 1343 – mail and wire fraud8
  • 9. How Did We Get Here ? Whistleblowers: recently terminatedemployees, contractors Self-Disclosure Civil matter that catches the eye ofcriminal side– EPA often is copied, even on locally issuedcivil enforcement matters– Large dollar civil fines can trigger follow-oncriminal investigation9
  • 10. Typical First Contactfrom Client Frantic calls or emails Agents showed at homes in the evening Agents showed up and served subpoenaat facility Enforcement team showed up with warrantand gathered records, photos, videos,samples, interviewed people10
  • 11. Goals from the get go No indictment Civil resolution, if there is something toresolve No add-ons: avoid obstruction risks No one goes to jail If there are problems, correct and mitigate– generally cooperation is the best route– client takes its lumps and repairs relationships• regulators, media, employees, shareholders11
  • 12. Build Your Team Critical components– Criminal defense lawyer– Environmental lawyer: substance andregulatory players/relationships– Experienced litigation paralegal– Client that appreciates seriousness andallocates resources as appropriate– White collar defense lawyers available forindividuals if necessary12
  • 13. First Steps Assess subpoena Memos to employees Contact prosecutor, negotiate scope, timing, formatof subpoena response– Listen and get as much information as the prosecutorwill share Get document control and collection process inplace– Contact IT department immediately to stop automatic destruction Interview witnesses, starting with those interviewedby government13
  • 14. Memos to Employees Who needs to receive? Topics (can be one or more memos)– Fact of subpoena, documents requested, considerattaching subpoena– Duty to preserve documents, electronic records– Rights in an investigation: their decision whether totalk to government, must be truthful, can ask forcounsel, advise company if you have been contacted– Name of counsel for company14
  • 15. Documents Read the subpoena instructions, theyusually ask for documents in original files= entire files can be responsive if only onedocument is covered This is not a civil discovery matter, beoverly cautious and err on side ofproduction Do not let the client control documentcollection15
  • 16. Documents Consider unique electronic information,that might not be controlled by IT– Environmental monitoring equipment withsome memory on the device As you gain understanding, considercommunicating with prosecutor aboutburden, and phasing or limiting scope– Clearly document agreements16
  • 17. Documents Use tracking sheets for each person orlocation, designed to allow you to controland produce records with requiredinformation Develop a form or checklist for documentcollectors to use, covering requiredcategories17
  • 18. Interviews Take paralegal/associate as witness Advise at outset: you represent the company notthem, conversation is privileged, company holdsprivilege and company can decide to waiveprivilege Do not record the interview Indicate in your notes: contains thoughts,impressions, avoid verbatim formats so it doesnot equal a “witness statement”18
  • 19. Debriefing interviews Trying to mirror what the governmentlearned Ask witness to recreate: name ofinvestigator (usually leave cards), exact Q& A‟s, be a stickler and go back through it,any documents shown to you or gatheredfrom you? If appears they engaged in wrongdoing,advise of right to counsel19
  • 20. Meet with Prosecutor? Consider arranging meeting with prosecutor(who will likely bring investigator) when youmake the production Do you have a credible case to present on whyprosecution is not warranted?– Obviously, be flat out honest on any disclosures, givethe bad with the good– Run it by the criminal defense lawyer first Be careful on privilege waiver, consider non-waiver agreement20
  • 21. Meet with Prosecutor? Is there clear criminal behavior and doesan indictment appear likely? Consider controlling client‟s destinythrough negotiation– Criminal defense lawyer is a must!21
  • 22. Self-Reporting? EPA and State civil penalty relief– Utah, UCA 19-7-109– EPA, 65 FR 19618 (April 11, 2000) Criminal cases– One factor that prosecutor weighs Reasons to self report and discipline bad actors– Consistent with stated corporate compliance policies– Mitigates repeat violation potential22
  • 23. Parallel Civil andCriminal Proceedings Pressure to stay or delay civil if there ispending criminal investigation Global civil and criminal resolutions arenot favored by government but possible insome instances23
  • 24. Resolution Options Happiest ending, government declines toprosecute Less happy endings, government isheading towards indictment– If statute of limitations pressure, tolling agreementscan be used– Deferred or Non-Prosecution Agreements?• Pros: no indictment, no criminal liability• Cons: terms can be difficult, fact statements,compliance corrections burdensome– Plea deal and sentencing24
  • 25. Resolution Options Even less happy, Indictment issued– Plea or trial– Sentencing Don‟t overlook– Suspension and debarment possibilities forcompanies that do work with government25
  • 26. A Few Resources U.S. Attorneys Manual (in general, and specifically)– Chapter 9-28.100, Principles of Federal Prosecution of BusinessOrganizations (“Principles”) Joseph Block and Judson Starr, “Knock, Knock.” “Who‟s There?” “EPA CriminalAgents, That‟s Who.”, 55 RMMLI 12-1 (2009) Sheila Finnegan, “The First 72 Hours of a Government Investigation: A Guide toIdentifying Issues and Avoiding Mistakes,” National Legal Center for the PublicInterest (2007) (note, since publication there have been revisions to Principles inbullet one above on privilege waiver issue) Sandra Snodgrass, “It‟s for the Birds: Recent Developments under the MigratoryBird Treaty Act and Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act,” Federal Regulationof Cultural Resources, Wildlife and Waters of the U.S., Paper No.10, RMMLF(2012) Michael Zody, “Responding to Environmental Whistleblowers: Listen Carefully tothat Sound Coming „Round the Bend,” 51 RMMLI 6-1 (2005)26