• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Distribution of income
 

Distribution of income

on

  • 713 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
713
Views on SlideShare
713
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
13
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Distribution of income Distribution of income Presentation Transcript

    • Distribution of Income
    • Taxes and the Distribution of Income:Governments tax the public and firms to raiserevenue which it redistributes through spendingon public goods and services. The degree towhich a tax is redistributive in nature dependson the type of tax and its progressivity.
    • Transfer payments: These are one meansby which tax revenue (and national income)is redistributed. Various less fortunatemembers of society may receive transferpayments.Examples include: unemployment benefits,welfare for the poor,government provided health care for thepoor and elderly, subsidies to producersand state child care benefits
    • Types of Taxes:Direct taxes: These are taxes placed directly on theincome, revenues and profits ofhouseholds and firms. They must legally be paid by allparticipants in the economy.Indirect taxes: These are taxes placed on goods andservices, and are thereby paidindirectly to the government through consumerspurchases. Indirect taxes are known in differentplaces as Value Added Tax (VAT), Goods and ServicesTax (GST) or simply Sales Tax. The tax rate may bestandard for all goods and services, or in the case ofan excise tax, may vary depending on the particulargood or service.
    • Direct and indirect taxes have different effects onthe incomes of rich and poor. Some taxes place largerburdens on the incomes of the rich, while othersplace larger burdens on the poor.Progressive tax: This is a tax that increases in rateas ones income rises, the proportion of the incomethat goes towards the tax increases. Most incometaxes are progressive. Progressive taxes areredistributive because they place the lightest burdenon the lowest income earners.Regressive tax: A tax which as income rises, theproportion of income paid in tax decreases. Indirecttaxes are regressive.
    • For example:• Price of laptop: $1000• Sales tax: 10%• Amount of tax: $100• Tax rate on a consumer who earns $10,000 = 0.1%• Tax rate on a consumer who earns $50,000 = 0.02%The higher income consumer is paying a lowerproportion of his income in tax
    • Proportional tax: Sometimes called a "flat tax", aproportional tax is one which all income levels paythe same percentage of income in tax. This hasbeen proposed in many countries to replaceprogressive income taxes. Advocates considerproportional taxes to be more"fair" since they do not "punish" the hard work ofhigh income earners.
    • Supply-side (Neo-classical) vs Demand-side (Keynesian)views: Not surprisingly, the different schools ofeconomic thought have different views on the roletaxes should play in the economy.• Supply-side argument: Low taxes are necessary to assure an incentive to work, invest, and save.• Supply-siders are anti-tax• Supply-siders believe that taxes discourage productivity and efficiency, since workers get to save less of their hard-earned income.• Taxes discourage investment since firms get to keep less of their profit.5/18/2012
    • • Lower motivation to work and invest will lead to slow increases in productivity, thus stifle the outward shift of AS, keeping prices high and growth sluggish.• Supply-siders believe that lower tax rates may, in some cases, lead to higher tax revenues.5/18/2012
    • History of the supply-side view:Promoted by economist Arthur Laffer, worked for Reganadministration.Regan cut personal income taxes by 25% over threeyears. Lower tax rates tend to result in higher taxrevenues only after about a 5-6 year period. In otherwords, the tax cuts themselves probably dont accountfor the increases in revenue, rather a combination ofdemand-side effects of the tax cut and increases inproductivity and output due to new technologies.The Laffer Curve: Illustrates the supply sidersview that higher taxes could lead tolower tax revenue5/18/2012
    • The Demand-side view: Generally demand-side Keynesiansenvision taxes playing an important role in governmentsmanaging of the macroeconomy.During expansion: During periods of rapid economic growthand rising AD, income and indirect taxes should be raisedto avoid inflation and "tame the business cycle".During recession: When demand in the economy is weak,taxes should be slashed to increase disposable income andfirms profits so as to encourage consumption andinvestment.
    • In the case of market failure: Markets sometimesfail to allocate resources efficiently. In the case ofan over allocation of resources towards demeritgoods, corrective taxes can help achieve efficiency inthe market. On the other hand, neo-classicaleconomists, policymakers will only interfere with theefficient function of markets when taxes areimposed.5/18/2012
    • Fairness in income distribution: Many economists view the inequalities visible among various classes of society as unfair and see taxes and welfare payments as a means of achieving equity and fairness to the harsh reality of the unfettered free market forces that can result in large gaps between the rich and the poor.5/18/2012