I diritti in gioco

696 views
629 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
696
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
11
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

I diritti in gioco

  1. 1. Diritti in gioco: Comunicazione scientifica, copyright e licenze d’uso I diritti della biblioteca: accesso alla conoscenza, proprietà intellettuale e nuovi servizi
  2. 3. What is CARE ? <ul><li>CRUI- Conference of Rectors of Italian Universities Library Committee- a 3 year project called CARE- Coordinamento per l’accesso alle risorse elettroniche </li></ul><ul><li>CRUI assembly approval and the project started out at the end of 2006 </li></ul><ul><li>CARE: 3 consortia (CILEA- Digital Library, CIBER/CASPUR, CIPE)+ 3 rapresentatives of the Italian universities </li></ul>
  3. 4. CARE main objectives <ul><li>Improving access and services related to e-resources at national level </li></ul><ul><li>Promoting national deals </li></ul><ul><li>Negotiating best licence clauses </li></ul><ul><li>Devising cost sharing models, proposing business models </li></ul><ul><li>Acting on govt on VAT issues or other issues penalizing e-resources and their dissemination </li></ul><ul><li>Promoting national solutions for long term preservation </li></ul><ul><li>Maintaining contacts with national and international organizations acting in this area </li></ul>
  4. 5. CARE results <ul><li>Contract Negotiations </li></ul><ul><li>CARE initiated the first national deal: the renewal of Elsevier Science contract in 2007. Almost finalized. Negotiators: Content Complete + local consultant under the lead and supervision of CARE group. </li></ul><ul><li>In July 2007 the renewal of Springer contract started and it is almost finalized. </li></ul><ul><li>In September 2007 started a negotiation with PORTICO- Negotiations finalised in February 2008 </li></ul>
  5. 6. Users/libraries rights and licence clauses <ul><li>Progress has been made but still a long way to go </li></ul><ul><li>Authorized Users </li></ul><ul><li>Permitted use </li></ul><ul><li>ILL </li></ul><ul><li>Open Access and Hybrid Model </li></ul><ul><li>Archival Rights </li></ul>
  6. 7. Quality access problems <ul><li>Users rights, library rights vs publishers and professional societies rights </li></ul><ul><li>Metadata quality- linking resolver – knowledge base </li></ul><ul><li>Publisher’s platforms vs Google </li></ul><ul><li>Quality (content, editorial process, peer-reviewing) </li></ul>
  7. 8. Definition of authorized users <ul><li>Inclusion of other categories </li></ul><ul><li>Alumni </li></ul><ul><li>Retired Staff </li></ul>
  8. 9. Permitted uses <ul><li>Publicly display or publicly perform parts of the licensed material as a part of a presentation at a seminar , conference, workshop or other such similar activity </li></ul><ul><li>Incorporating parts of the material in print and electronic and non-print perceptible form(Braille) course packs </li></ul><ul><li>Deposit in perpetuity the learning and teaching objects in electronic repositories on secure network system </li></ul><ul><li>Incorporating parts of the materials in electronic form in assignements, portofolio, in thesis and dissertations (Academic Works) </li></ul>
  9. 10. ILL Clause <ul><li>Digital rights management and access issues </li></ul><ul><li>DD - Secure electronic transmission </li></ul><ul><li>Crucial issue for electronic articles: previous print of copy, </li></ul><ul><li>Recognition of NILDE a secure electronic transmission system </li></ul>
  10. 11. Open Access <ul><li>save and deposit the articles of which authorized users in institutional archives or disciplinary ones </li></ul><ul><li>current CARE licences with Elsevier and Springer include a clause on deposit of the post-print version of articles in author’s institutional archives (including DOI and a link to publishers’ website) </li></ul>
  11. 12. Hybrid model <ul><li>Author’s pay model and journal subscription costs </li></ul><ul><li>A clause referring to a subscription price decrease in case more open access articles </li></ul><ul><li>are published </li></ul><ul><li>So far no effect, few OA articles are published? </li></ul><ul><li>Is the model sustanaible? </li></ul>
  12. 13. Archival rights <ul><li>Crucial issue </li></ul><ul><li>Post-cancellations rights </li></ul><ul><li>Access restricted to library subscribed titles in package deals </li></ul><ul><li>Cost per download or nominal fee(?) </li></ul>
  13. 14. Long term preservation <ul><li>More solutions in place (LOCKSS, PORTICO, third party repositories) </li></ul><ul><li>More costs for libraries </li></ul>
  14. 15. Few more issues <ul><li>Users rights, library rights vs publishers and professional societies rights </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Transfer titles; Code of Practice - Transfer </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>XML versions- the electronic version is not an output of the print journal, it is something different, something nes. More investments are requested in this area- Semantic Web, text mining, data mining- New standards (ORE) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Publisher’s platforms vs Google </li></ul><ul><li>Metadata quality- linking resolver – knowledge base </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Certification and auditing processes are necessary, linking resolves can be very frustrating for the end-users and above all for librariand </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Quality (content, editorial process, peer-reviewing) </li></ul>
  15. 16. Cited web sites <ul><li>CARE- http://www.crui-care.it </li></ul><ul><li>INFER – http://www.infer.it </li></ul><ul><li>CILEA- Digital Library – http ://cdl.cilea.it </li></ul><ul><li>CIBER – http://www.uniciber.it </li></ul><ul><li>CASPUR- http://www.caspur.it </li></ul><ul><li>CIPE – http://www.unicipe.it </li></ul><ul><li>PLEIADI – http://www.openarchives.it/pleiadi </li></ul>

×