Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Reading and Assignment Schedule
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Reading and Assignment Schedule

269
views

Published on


0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
269
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. BIOL 171. ETHICAL ISSUES IN BIOTECHNOLOGY & GENETICS Fall 2003 Prof. Margaret McLean, Markkula Center for Applied Ethics; Voice mail, 554-7889; e mail, mmclean@scu.edu Prof. Leilani Miller, Alumni Science 316; Voice mail, 554-4427; e mail, lmiller@scu.edu Joint Office Hours: Thurs. 1:30-3:00 (or by appointment) Alumni Science 316 Course Description: This course is an interdisciplinary investigation into some of the compelling issues raised by the advent of “the biotech century.” It explores the intersection between theology, ethics, and the biological sciences through the lens of biotechnology, focusing on genetics. The objective is to acquire an understanding of the disciplines of biotechnology and ethics and the theological- ethical implications inherent in the development and use of biotechnology. Biology 171 fulfills the third level Religious Studies requirement through critical engagement of current, open-ended issues in religion, specifically issues and problems inherent in 21st century science and biotechnology. A broad spectrum of plant, animal, and human biotechnologies is addressed, including human genetic testing and gene transfer experiments as well as agricultural and food biotech. The course is team taught by a Biology professor (Miller) and an ethics professor from Religious Studies and the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics (McLean). Ethical considerations, grounded in theory and methodology, are directed towards issues in biotechnology where questions of meaning and value loom large. Class time includes lectures and participatory discussions. Required texts: • Sherlock, Richard and John D. Morrey (eds.), Ethical Issues in Biotechnology. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2002 • Additional resources distributed in class Course Objectives: At the end of the course, students will have: • an increased understanding of the science of biotechnology, especially genetics; • delineated major ethical theories and principles relative to science and biotechnology; • applied ethical theories and principles to concerns and cases in biotechnology; • critically evaluated ethical issues, arguments and decisions in biotechnology; -1-
  • 2. • explored and assessed multiple positions and made intellectually defensible, integrative and nuanced decisions; • developed individual and collaborative critical thinking skills; • explored theological-ethical understandings of science and biotechnology. Requirements: Midterm examination (closed book, in class, 20% of final grade); two short papers (20%), poster and paper on scientific and ethical dimensions of a particular biotechnology (35%), class participation and evidence of preparation for class (25%). Adequate class participation will include attendance at all class meetings, intelligent and informed participation in class discussion, and completion of assigned readings in advance of the date for which it is assigned. All written work needs to be proof read for errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar and may be returned ungraded for revision if the errors are excessive in the instructors' judgment. Poster Session and Course Paper: The final project is in 2 parts—the first is the development of a poster (done in pairs) and the second is an individually authored 5 page paper taking an in-depth look at the topic covered in the poster. Both the poster and the paper help students to integrate the topics of the course and to address a particular aspect of the agricultural or human biotechnology and the attendant ethical concerns. Students can choose their own topics for investigation. Detailed instructions will be provided. Attendance policy and classroom etiquette: Prompt attendance at class is required (i.e., unexcused absences or tardiness will negatively impact your grade and excessive unexcused absences or lateness (i.e., > 4 class meetings) may result in failure of the course regardless of completed assignments. (NB., Excused absences would include a note from Cowell regarding illness, a verified family emergency, etc.) Class participation includes (but is not limited to) active engagement and listening, informed participation (both written and oral) in discussion, regular and punctual attendance, and prompt completion of assignments. Cell phones and pagers are to be turned off during class. Baseball caps are not to be worn during exams. Evaluation of evidence of preparation for class includes but is not limited to student preparation of discussion notes. When noted, students will prepare brief, ½ page only, written notes before class. Discussion notes will be collected at the end of the day’s discussion and reviewed by the instructor. The following symbol will alert students to those days for which discussion notes are required: ♫. Please keep to the ½ page limit. In the case of a necessary absence (e.g. illness but not completing an assignment for this or another class), please inform one of the instructors. If a -2-
  • 3. student is absent, it is his/her responsibility to get the materials from the missed class. Note: It is expected that all assignments will be turned in on the due date and the exam taken as scheduled. At the instructors' discretion, papers, and exams completed after the due date will be subject to a “sliding grade scale,” i.e., a drop of a full grade per day determined when the assignment is received by the instructors. All assignments must be completed and the exams taken on time unless the student presents written proof of illness or emergency or discusses a particular conflict with the instructors in advance of the due date. Papers must be submitted to the instructors; it is not acceptable to fax or e-mail an assignment. Papers are to be typed, doubled-spaced with 1 in. margins on all sides and in 12 point font preferably Times New Roman. Papers that do not show evidence of having been proof read and/or run over the specified length and/or do not meet the format guidelines will be returned to the student for rapid revision and may be subject to a “sliding grade scale.” Papers are to be the student's own work done specifically for this class. Grading: Grading is in accordance with University guidelines and policy. Grades are determined fairly and reflect the “meeting” of course requirements and objectives as set down in this syllabus. The grades on exams are based on the number of “correct,” “complete,” and “appropriate” answers given to the questions asked. For “short answer” or “essay” questions, points are given for understandable, complete, and correct responses. The grades on papers are based on the completeness and accuracy of the essay. Each ethical term (e.g., deontology) must be defined the first time it appears in each written assignment (points will be deducted if definitions are ignored). It is expected that all written work is direct, responsive, accurate, in good form, and the student’s own work. Remember all of the assignment grades are weighted. A guide to expectations and associated letter and percent grades follows: The student who does excellent work, who is engaged and participatory and surpasses course expectations, can expect a grade of A. The student who does good work, who is attentive in meeting course requirements, who is prepared for class discussions can expect a grade of B. The student who meets the basic requirements of the course and does the work as required can expect a grade of C. The student who “barely” meets the most basic requirements can expect a grade of D. The student who does not meet class expectations as set forth in this syllabus can expect a grade of F. Academic honesty and integrity: It is assumed that all work for this course will be done honestly and will be the student’s own work. Acts of academic dishonesty (e.g., plagiarism, cheating, etc.) will not be tolerated and will result in immediate and appropriate disciplinary action not limited to flunking the course and possible expulsion from the University. (See “Student Handbook.”) This is a course on ethics. -3-
  • 4. Inclusive language: You are asked to use inclusive language in all written assignments and class discussions. In many ways, language creates reality. In particular, you are being asked to avoid the use of language that limits opportunities for any group to grow fully as individual persons and members of society. Sensitivity to what is said and how it is said is expected regarding race, class, gender, etc. At root, it is an issue of justice. NB. Instructors reserve the right to modify the syllabus and schedule in response to class needs. -4-
  • 5. Reading and Assignment Schedule Tu Sep 23 What is biotechnology and why do we care? Th Sep 25 Genetic Basics, pp. 1-16 Tu Sep 30 Ethics Basics, pp. 16-29; article: “Ethics 101” available at http://scu.edu/ethics/publications/submitted/mclean/biotechframework.html Th Oct 02 Fundamental Issues of Ethics and Biotech, pp. 31-46, 71-88 Fr Oct 03 Annual Biotech Conference: “The Future of Pharmaceuticals” Tu Oct 07 Agricultural Biotech, pp. 97-110, 149-159 Case discussion: Red Rice, Case #3, p. 608 ♫ List the potential benefits and harms of using herbicide resistant rice Story Time: June 29, 1999 Th Oct 09 Food Biotech I, pp. 203-219 Guest lecturer: Michelle Marvier, Ph.D. Tu Oct 14 Food Biotech II, pp. 183-201, 231-246 Case discussion: Getting Rid of Worms, Case #5, p. 612 ♫ Briefly describe the process used to produce transgenic apple trees. Th Oct 16 Genetic Testing of Humans I: Science Basics, pp. 359-366, 439- 460 Case discussion: Cutting Edge, Video Tu Oct 21 Genetic Testing of Humans II: Ethical Implications, pp. 375-417 Case discussion: Am I Forgetting Something? Case #3, p. 617 ♫ Should genetic testing for diseases such as Alzheimer’s or breast cancer be mandatory? Why or why not? • Short (3 page) Discussion Paper focusing on the Science of Genetic Testing due. Details will be provided in class. Th Oct 23 Genetic Testing of Humans III: Family Ties, pp. 419-437 Case discussion: Do I Really Want to Know? Video Tu Oct 28 Midterm Exam Th Oct 30 Gene Transfer in Humans I: Somatic Cell Engineering, pp. 367- 373, 461-494 Case discussion: Jesse’s Case -5-
  • 6. Story Time: Frank Was a Monster Who Wanted to Dance Tu Nov 04 Gene Transfer in Humans II: Engineering the Germ-Line, pp. 495-516 Case discussion: The RAC, Case #6, p. 618 • Poster/paper topic and thesis statement due Th Nov 06 Human Cloning I, pp. 247-252, 517-548 Case discussion: Is Cloning Right, or a Right? Case #2, p. 618 ♫ Is human reproduction using cloning technology an ethical right? Why or why not? Tu Nov 11 Human Cloning II, pp. 551-581 Case discussion: Cloning a Donor, Case #4, p. 620 • Short Critical Ethical Thinking Paper Due: Write a 3 page ethical analysis of Huntington Disease case on last page of syllabus. A brief guide: o What is the fundamental ethical issue in this case? o What is at stake and for whom? o What are one or two relevant theories and principles for critical ethical thinking in this case (e.g., utility, natural law, informed consent)? o Argue for and support your ethical stance on the duty to disclose to his future wife and his brothers. Th Nov 13 Human Stem Cells, pp. 583-601 ♫ Is current policy allowing government funded research on 62 or so stem cell lines derived more than 2 years ago scientifically sound? Why or why not? • 3-5 references for poster/paper due Tu Nov 18 GATTACA I • Introductory panel for poster due. Th Nov 20 GATTACA II, pp. 47-70 Tu Nov 25 Thanksgiving Break Th Nov 27 Happy Thanksgiving Tu Dec 02 Critical Thinking in Biotech Th Dec 04 Poster Session Th Dec 11 Final paper due at noon -6-