European Funding For Cycling Iniatives In New Member States

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    European Funding For Cycling Iniatives In New Member States - Presentation Transcript

    1. EUROPEAN FUNDING FOR CYCLING INITIATIVES IN NEW EU MEMBER STATES (CEE10+) Current status and perspectives for improvement Andrzej B.Piotrowicz Brussels, Brussels, 12th May 2009 ssel
    2. AGENDA A VISION OF THE END DIAGNOSED CHALLENGES ACTUAL DEVELOPMENTS PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS PROMOTION EDUCATION & PROMOTION CONCLUDING REMARKS
    3. A VISION OF THE END
    4. IS EUROPEAN FUNDING IN NEW MEMBER STATES FACILITATING CYCLING IN CITIES? Source: http://www.goldenline.pl/forum/gielda/549168/s/6
    5. CENTRAL AND EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRIES (CEE 10+) Bulgaria The Czech Republic Estonia Hungary Latvia Lithuania Poland Romania Slovakia Slovenia + Belarus and Ukraine EU members since May 2004, January 2007 and …. 201...? Source: authors’ own collection
    6. POPULATION 7,26 M 10,22 M 1,30 M 9,93 M 2,24 M 3,56 M Bulgaria Czech Estonia Hungary Latvia Lithuania Republic 38,50 M 22,24 M 5,45 M 2,00 M 9,68 M 45,99 M Poland Romania Slovakia Slovenia Belarus Ukraine 158 M POTENTIAL CYCLISTS Source: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_pa%C5%84stw_%C5%9Bwiata_wed%C5%82ug_liczby_ludno%C5%9Bci
    7. PYRAMID OF GOALS IN A BICYCLE DESTINATION CYCLING TOURISTS – WHO THEY ARE HOLIDAY DESTINATION SHORT TRIP DESTINATION DAY TRIP DESTINATION FOR RESIDENTS AND TOURISTS RECREATION AREA FOR THE LOCAL POPULATION EVERYDAY USE AREA FOR THE LOCAL POPULATION Source: Claudia Krieger, Touristische Projekte. Cycling Tourists, Who they are, what they want and how they improve regional economy, Velo-city Munich 2007
    8. NINE MILLION DAILY URBAN CYCLOCHIC ENTHUSIASTS Source: authors’ own collection and http://www.rmf.fm/fakty/pic.html?id=154515&img=154515_n_mi.jpg and http://www.bicyclekingdom.com/bicycle/nine_million_bicycles_Beijing.htm
    9. DIAGNOSED CHALLENGES
    10. BACKWARDNESS – A CHALLENGE OR AN OPPORTUNITY LOW MOTORIZATION LEVELS HIGH LEVEL OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT USE LACK OF FUNDS BUT ACCESS TO EU FUNDING WILL SOLVE ALL PROBLEMS Source: authors’ own collection
    11. FEATURES OF ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE HIGH POWER DISTANCE low readiness to communicate with low ranking guys and gals HIGH UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE low tolerance of ambiguity and innovation HIGH MASCULINITY large and fast is beautiful Source: Hofstede, Geert and Hofstede, Gert-Jan. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill U.S.A., 2004 http://gbuddy.blogspot.com/2006_09_01_archive.html
    12. LADDER OF CIVIC INVOLVEMENT CIVIC PARTICIPATION CIVIC CONTROL EMPOWER MENT OF REPRESENTATIVES PARTNERSHIP SYMBOLIC PARTICIPATION CONSULTATIONS INFORMATION DISSEMINATION PASSIVITY NO PARTICIPATION TREATMENT MANIPULATION /CLAIMING ATTITUDE Source: Denvall, V. & Salonen, T. (2000) Att bryta vanans makt: Framtidsverkstäder . (Breaking with the force of the habits: Future workshops) Studentlitteratur. Lund
    13. NGOS DEVELOPMENT STAGES 1 Management Full participation in civic life Stage 4 of partnerships 14 Development Planned activities Stage 3 of professionalism for the local community 25 Creation and development % of NGOs Co- Co-operation of co-operation capacity in particular Stage 2 capacity building supporting environment development of the sector stages in Poland 60 Spontaneous Initial stage Stage 1 of quantitative growth altruism Source: authors’ own collection
    14. IDENTIFICATION OF THE NEED OF STRATEGIC REFLECTION REFLECTION LEVELS AXIOLOGICAL LEVEL POLITICAL LEVEL STRATEGIC LEVEL TACTICAL LEVEL TIMEFRAMES OPERATIONAL LEVEL MINUTES DAYS YEARS TERMS OF GENERATIONS OFFICE Source: Authors’ own considerations on the basis of Władysław Findeisen and krzysztof Zawalski
    15. HIGH NUMBER OF PRESIDENTS, NOBODY TO TALK ABOUT PARTNER RELATIONS ORGANISATIONAL CHARTS Source: http://gbuddy.blogspot.com/2006_09_01_archive.html
    16. DEADLINE IS DEADLINE ! Source: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com/2006/09/28/deadline-is-deadline/
    17. VICIOUS CIRCLE OF TRANSPORT ARGUMENTATION MODEST SHARE OF CYCLING HIGH SHARE OF CAR JOURNEYS IN MODAL SPLIT JOURNEYS IN MODAL SPLIT MODEST RESOURCES DEVOTED SUBSTANTIAL RESOURCES TO CREATION OF CYCLING DEVOTED FOR CREATION OF CAR FACILITIES TRANSPORT FACILITIES LOW COMPETITIVENESS HIGH COMPETITIVENESS OF CYCLING JOURNEYS OF CAR TRANSPORT Source: Johanna Kallioinen „Institutional position of cycling in transport planning”, paper presented at the Velo-city, Congress, Paris 2003
    18. 2007- EU FUNDS DEVOTED TO CEE 10 IN 2007-2013 181 734 BLN EUR BLN EUR National Level Regional programmes Cross-border, transnational and interregional co-operation 60 000 50 559 50 000 40 000 30 000 20 746 20 048 18 916 18 260 20 000 9 871 6 624 5 754 5 530 6 592 6 787 10 000 3 611 3 935 470 360 385 284 326 1 802 338 212 84 121 119 0 Bulgaria Czech Estonia Latvia Lithuania Hungary Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Republic Source: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/atlas2007/index_en.htm’
    19. FUNDS DEVOTED TO TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN CEE 10+ AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL 30 000 26 075 24 484 25 000 20 000 15 000 13 953 13 219 Transport 10 939 Other Programmes 10 000 7 321 6 793 5 697 6 026 5 313 4 621 4 529 3 845 5 000 2 859 2 993 2 003 1 279 1 076 1 001 618 0 Poland Hungary Czech Romania Slovakia Bulgaria Lithuania Slovenia Latvia Estonia Republic Source: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/atlas2007/index_en.htm’
    20. CHANGES IN MOTORIZATION RATE IN CEE 10 FROM 1997 TO 2006 Motorisation rate (passenger cars/1000 inhabitants) 489 468 444 500 412 401 392 450 358 351 345 341 400 329 326 304 298 293 286 350 275 263 248 247 229 243 243 240 238 300 223 221 211 207 1997 250 174 167 147 200 2001 115 150 2006 100 50 0 Source: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-DK-08-001/EN/KS-DK-08-001-EN.PDF
    21. CHALLENGES TO COPE WITH IN URBAN OR … Source: authors’ own collection
    22. …RURAL ENVIRONMENT Source: Prof. Jan Burnewicz – University of Gdańsk
    23. ACTUAL DEVELOPMENTS
    24. CYCLING AND INNOVATION – A CLEAR SYNERGY COUNTRY RANK Denmark 1 Finland 2 Sweden 3 Netherland 4 Germany 5 Un. Kingdom 6 Austria 7 In 2000, EU declared Luxembourg 8 France 9 their intention to make EU Belgium 10 “the most competitive Ireland 11 Estonia 12 and dynamic knowledge Portugal 13 world” - based economy in the world” Czech.Republik 14 Spain 15 Slovenia 16 Hungary 17 Slovak.Re 18 Malta 19 Lithuania 20 Cyprus 21 Latvia 22 Greece 23 Italy 24 Poland 25 Source: The Lisbon Review 2006
    25. PARADOXICAL INNOVATION CAR ORIENTED CYCLING POLICY Off-road cycling tracks built not to make cyclists happy but to keep them off the road so that they do not irritate car dependent people Cycling tracks closed for cyclists during the European In Town- Without My Car Day 2007, Szczecin, Western Pomerania, Poland Source: http://infobike.pl/text.php?id=20385
    26. STAKEHOLDERS IN THE CYCLING GAME Source: http://www.rowery.org.pl/poznan/index.htm
    27. CERTAIN QUOTATIONS DECISION • No cycling promotion before the whole cycling network is completed • Little girls on children’s bikes endanger car drivers in housing areas MAKERS URBAN AND • Cycling is only a form of recreation • Cycling tourism is ONLY for the young & the fit TRAFFIC • Cycling against traffic on one way streets provokes dangers PLANNERS ACADEMIC • Climate in Poland is not favourable for cycling CIRCLES • There is no such thing like transport demand management Source: authors’ own collection
    28. METAMPSYCHOSIS OPPONENTS of cycling promotion policies easily change their approach CLAIMING to represent either motorists or pedestrians and vice versa Source: http://www.rowery.gdansk.pl/
    29. ISOLATIONISM AND MARGINALISATION Cycling infrastructure built to KEEP CYCLISTS OFF THE CARRIAGEWAY (so that they do not irritate motorists) Cycling tracks construction used as a way to FINANCE SUBTERRANEAN NETWORKS sewage, water, electricity and gas supply systems MARGINALISATION OF CYCLING in the process of infrastructure modernisation process Source: http://infobike.pl/text.php?id=20385
    30. MISALLOCATION OF RESOURCES – WASTE OF FUNDS EU funds devoted to finance LARGE URBAN ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS When public transport infrastructure projects are undertaken, cyclists are either neglected or marginalised PARK AND RIDE YES BIKE AND RIDE NO Source: http://www.pkp.pl/files/IMG_0340.jpg & http://www.pkp.pl/files/IMG_0338.jpg
    31. CEE 10 –SPECIFIC BARRIERS PREVENTING ACCESS TO RESOURCES Cycling advocacy NGOs LACK RESOURCES to finance local contributions in EU projects Bank guarantee requirements Refinancing instead of advance payments RESULTS: SMALL FRACTION OF RESOURCES ACTUALLY USED Source: http://infobike.pl/text.php?id=20385
    32. PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS
    33. INTEGRATED APPROACH PROPOSED BY THE EU REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IS THE AIM PROMOTION OF CYCLING IS A WAY TO ATTAIN IT Source: BYPAD portal materials
    34. THE SECRET OF SUCCESS EDUCATION EDUCATION EDUCATION Tarja Halonen The President of Finland, when asked what is the secret of Finnish success Source: authors’ own collection
    35. PROMOTING EDUCATION & PROMOTION
    36. FROM ENGINEERING … Source: Cycling England (thanks to Alex Sully)
    37. … TO PROMOTION ADDRESSED TO…. Source: (1) http://forums.roadbikereview.com/showthread.php?t=157797 (2) http://www.cyclehero.com (thanks to Kevin Mayne)
    38. … COMMON PEOPLE Source: Department of Promotion of the city of Tczew
    39. CONCLUDING REMARKS
    40. NO NOTE, NO RESULT & GRASSROOT MONITORING Cycling is a SEXY tool of regional development GREEN PAPERS ON CYCLING AND WALKING should be developed and implemented in all car oriented constituencies Creation and support of the “Cycle –Watch” function of local cycling advocate organizations (civic monitoring of EU-funded cycling policies and initiatives) Source: http://www.enjoyart.com/single_posters/bicycling/CyclesOnyxVintageGicleeArtPrint.htm
    41. EU- EU-15 BASED CYCLING KNOW-HOW KNOW- BYPAD AUDIT an indispensable condition for providing funding for cycling initiatives PROPHETS ARE RARELY RECOGNISED IN THEIR OWN LAND Obligatory inclusion of the EU- EU-15 experts in all cycling and walking initiatives in the CEE10+ Source: http://www.tcz.pl/index.php?akcja=wiadomosci&art=05216d30cbbb389&tyt=Ruszyl/pionierski/w/skali/kraju/audyt/rowerowy
    42. BENEFITS EXPECTED FROM THE PROPOSED MEASURES: MEASURES: Mitigation of the itigation GLOBAL WARMING threat in the CEE 10+ Cycling as a factor contributing to the QUALITY OF URBAN LIFE Enhancement of CIVIC SOLIDARITY in Europe Source: authors’ own collection
    43. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
    44. THIS PRESENTATION WAS PREPARED BY : PIOTR KUROPATWIŃSKI +48 501 069 616 pkuropatwinski@pswe.org ANDRZEJ B. PIOTROWICZ +48 502 200 559 apiotrowicz@pswe.org

    custom

    333 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 333
      • 333 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?