Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
The evolution of sex differences in jealousy: Discussion and critique
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

The evolution of sex differences in jealousy: Discussion and critique

186
views

Published on

Published in: Education

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
186
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • The 1st study was designed to test whether men and women differ in which form of infidelity – sexual vs. emotional – triggers more upset and subjective distress.Subjects were asked to image a partner became involved with someone else – one sexual intercourse scenario and one emotional attachment scenario and choose which one of the two elicited the most personal distress.
  • In the 2nd study measured a series of physiological variables in order to try to confirm the hypothesis explored in the previous study, that men find sexual infidelity more distressful than women and that women find emotional infidelity more distressfull than man.The procedure was the same as last study.
  • It might be possible that feelings of jealousy diminish with age since it could be linked to students’ own insecurities.Might me a confouding variable - A swinger, or someone that would like to try out swing would also be aroused by the picture of his/her partner having a sexual relationship with other person.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology Buss, Larsen, Westen, and Semmelroth
    • 2. Paternity Uncertainty
    • 3. Potential Loss of Investment
    • 4. The Answer is . . .
    • 5. “(...) a state that is aroused by a perceived threat to a valued relationship or position and motivates behavior aimed at countering the threat.” (Buss et al., 1992)
    • 6. “Men indifferent to sexual contact between their mates and other men presumably experienced higher paternity uncertainty, greater investment in competitors’ gametes, and lower reproductive success” than did men who were motivated to attend to cues of infidelity and to act on those cues to increase paternity probability.” (Buss et al., 1992) Therefore, over time, evolution through means of natural selection managed to “choose” jealous men over the not so jealous.
    • 7. General Hypothesis: The experience of jealousy is felt differently for men and women because of the different adaptative problems posed to both sexes. Distinction between sexual and emotional infidelity.
    • 8. Study 1 N=202 undergraduate students (a) Imagining your partner forming a deep emotional attachment to another person. (emotional infidelity) (b) Imagining your partner enjoying passionate sexual intercourse with another person. (sexual infidelity)
    • 9. • 60% of the male sample chose partner’s potential sexual infidelity in comparison to only 17% of the female sample (p < .001) • 83% of the female sample chose partner’s potential emotional infidelity as the most worriesome of the two options.
    • 10. Study 2 GOAL: To confirm the previous hypothesis through the use of physiological measures. Measures of autonomic arousal: – Electrodermal Activity (EDA) via skin conductance; – Pulse Rate (PR); – Electromyographic (EMG) activity of the corrugator supercilii muscle.
    • 11. Electrodermal Activity • Men showed significant increases in EDA during the sexual imagery compared with the emotional imagery (p < .0.5) • Women showed significant increases in EDA to the emotional infidelity image than to the sexual infidelity image (p < .05)
    • 12. Pulse Rate • Men showed increase in PR to both images, but significantly more so in response to the sexual infidelity image (p < .05) • Women showed elevated PR to both images, but not differentially so.
    • 13. Brow Contraction • Men showed greater brow contraction to the sexual infidelity image, and women showed the opposite pattern (non significant, p < .13, p < .12)
    • 14. Study 3 GOAL: Replicate and extend the results of the two previous studies by incorporating the experience of being in a committed relationship. Results: • Highly significant differences for men but not for women. • 55% of the men who had experienced a committed relationship reported more distress for sexual infidelity whereas only 29% of the men that didn’t experience it felt distressed by it.
    • 15. Critical Limitations • Undergraduate students • No clear-cut distinction – Emotional vs. Sexual • Imagined Infidelity ≠ Actual Infidelity • Swinging (maybe?)