Platform 7 - Danika Viznerova

Uploaded on


  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Development of National CSR Agendas through multi-stakeholder dialogue Formatvorlage des Untertitelmasters durch Klicken Lyra Jakulevičienė, UNDP LITHUANIA 13-14 October 2008, Prague bearbeiten Page  1
  • 2. Why more active Government involvement in CSR needed? Countries covered: Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Lithuania, Macedonia, Poland, Slovakia and Turkey. Situation in the region (Baseline Study on CSR implementation, 2007) - businesses themselves – supported by local, membership based business organisations are currently the main agents of change for CSR - the awareness, ability and organisational power of NGOs to put pressure on business and government are limited - the media in the Region is failing to hold corporate actors accountable for irresponsible business activities - the direct involvement of Governments across the region is diverse and systematic government incentives and initiatives for social and environmental performance are generally missing Page  2
  • 3. National CSR Agendas to accelerate developments Rationale: when traditional driving factors for CSR are missing, § Government policies and actions may stimulate developments Objective: to coordinate state measures for enabling better § environment for companies to engage in CSR (CSR promotion measures); to set priority actions of Governments for 3-5 years – thus not a new tool of regulation Format: no single format – ranging from - Roadmap in Turkey, § Stakeholder agreement in Poland to - official government strategy in a form of national programme in Lithuania and Slovakia Page  3
  • 4. Development of National CSR Agendas: process Mapping out various § stakeholders and building their capacities to implement CSR CSR peer groups formed from § government representatives and stakeholders-allowed to see “all sides” Partnership with three § CSR/Global Compact Networks in Germany, Spain and UK and external CSR experts Multi-stakeholder forums § nationally and locally Page  4
  • 5. National CSR Agendas in a multi-stakeholder context TURKEY - SECTORS POLAND-STAKEHOLDERS Consultations with 6 main groups 4 CSR peer groups working actively in the development of Agenda: of CSR stakeholders: • Business § TUSIAD (Turkish Industrialist’s and • NGOs Businessmen’s Association) WG • labour unions § CSR Association round table • Government § Textile CSR peer group • academia • media § PR and Strategic Communication Companies CSR peer group BULGARIA – FORMAL GROUP A multi-stakeholder CSR experts’ group is MACEDONIA – CSR BODY appointed by the Order of Deputy Minister of Labour and Social Policy Coordinative Body on CSR Page  5
  • 6. Development of National CSR Agendas: challenges The definition of CSR: Often mixed up with PR, charity, philanthropy or § ad-hoc initiatives, the CSR concept should be understood and applied on the basis of common denominator by all national (CSR) stakeholders. Lack of capacities of stakeholders § Leadership and financial sustainability: Which institution assumes § the leading role in the implementation of the National CSR strategy and Action Plan? How to ensure the financial sustainability of the national strategy? Monitoring and Assessment of results: How do we assess the § progress? Promotion and spreading the CSR practices among SMEs: What § kind of incentives to be applied? Specific requirements which are less cumbersome and less expensive in order to be effectively implemented Page  6
  • 7. National CSR Agendas: priorities Among the priority areas for advancing public policies on CSR the eight countries recognised: CSR education and advocacy, - support to civil society organisations and capacity development of other - local stakeholders, small and medium enterprise (SME) guidance, - responsible public procurement, - development of regional CSR reporting standards and impact monitoring - systems (Statement of Vilnius Conference on Public CSR Policies, 9 September 2008) Page  7
  • 8. Results so far Comparable baseline analysis of CSR implementation situation in the § region mapping the actors in the field of CSR CSR Agendas in 7 countries as first multi-stakeholder agreements to § outline vision/ action plan for CSR development. Led to formalized public CSR policies - provides sustainability for many years to come Multi-stakeholder forums turned into permanent or formalized § structures (CSR Coordinative Body in Macedonia, CSR Association in Bulgaria, CSR Platform in Turkey, etc.) – will allow to continue the dialogue Better understanding among stakeholders - working together allowed § to understand each other concerns better Cooperation among countries: establishment of knowledge and § expert sharing platform in the region, a database of good practices, a joint European masters programme on CSR Page  8