Oxfam’s most recent report on climate change, released days before G8 and MEF meetings in L’Aquila, Italy.
Increased hunger likely to be climate change’s most savage impact on humanity. Rice and maize are two of world’s staple crops on which hundreds of millions depend.
Island communities from Vanuatu, Tuvalu and the Bay of Bengal have already been forced to move because of sea level rise. Others, Maldives, are making plans for repatriation.
Rising temperatures will make it impossible for people to work at the same rate on hot summer days without serious health impacts, with huge ramifications for labourers paid by the hour and the wider economy. Cities such as Delhi could see a drop in worker productivity by as much as 30 percent.
Emissions of greenhouse gases, that trap heat in the atmosphere. This is not a presentation about climate science, though happy to direct people to relevant sources (IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, and subsequent peer-reviewed science.) None of the major international partners in the global negotiations denies the scientific evidence for man-made climate change.
We haven’t begun to seriously address the problem.
The Bali Action Plan sets five building blocks for an agreement by Copenhagen on a post-2012 global climate regime. Negotiations taking place in each of these areas. Huge technical complexity – developing countries, particularly LDCs, have low capacity to follow all details under negotiation in all tracks.
UNCED 1992: Rio Declaration on Env and Devpt; Agenda 21; UNFCCC; statement of forest principles (UNFCCC entered into force on 21 March 1994). Stated objective is "'to achieve stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a low enough level to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system”. As originally framed set no mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions for individual countries and contained no enforcement provisions. Included provisions for updates ("protocols") that would set mandatory emission limits. Principal update is the Kyoto Protocol . Established a national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory , as a count of GHG emissions and removals. Accounts must be regularly submitted by signatories of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, available on UNFCCC website.
But in the end, this is what it boils down to. These are the two deal-makers or deal-breakers in Copenhagen. Despite the huge technical complexity to the talks, in the end, this is what the political deal will come down to. This presentation will focus on these two issues, not withstanding there are an array of other issues from deforestation to technology transfer also being negotiated with significant implications for the environmental integrity and equity of the deal (happy to talk more about that afterwards/bilaterally).
Energy-related emission trajectories from 2000 to 2100 to achieve stabilisation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at three different targets (coloured lines). The black line is a reference trajectory based on no climate policy. Estimated (median) probabilities of limiting global warming to maximally 2°C are indicated for the three stabilisation targets 35,58,63. Why the threshold of 2°C above pre-industrial levels? While by no means a 'safe' level of warming, 2°C is widely recognised as being a temperature level which would result in catastrophic and potentially runaway climate change, due to feedback loops in the climate system. Unfortunately the lowest scenario for concentrations of atmospheric GHGs modelled by IPCC in the Fourth Assessment Report, was 450ppm-eq – which gives just a 50% chance of global warming of 2-2.4C. Oxfam along with many other groups is calling for the IPCC to model lower atmospheric concentration scenarios, consistent with a high probability of keeping global warming well below 2C. Note the trajectory giving greatest probability of keeping to 2C or less in the graph here (400ppm-eq) requires negative emissions after 2070.
Note China and India on right. High absolute emitters – but huge populations, and still mass poverty. A fair deal must allow developing countries the carbon space to develop and cannot punish countries for large populations.
The reductions required to take place in developing countries, are nonetheless the responsibility in terms of a fair deal, of developed countries, and therefore it is they that are required to pay for them. The additional (or incremental) costs of mitigation, are the additional costs required to invest in a low-carbon rather than a high-carbon way (ie the extra costs of investing in a new wind farm, over investing in a new coal fired power station).
The additional (or incremental) costs of mitigation, are the additional costs required to invest in a low-carbon rather than a high-carbon way (ie the extra costs of investing in a new wind farm, over investing in a new coal fired power station). The total additional costs of mitigation in developing countries includes measures to reduce emissions in the energy (power) and industrial (manufacturing) sectors; by reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD); from agriculture; as well as the up-front capacity-building financing required in many developing countries (establishing GHG inventories etc). Oxfam’s estimate is based on range of available estimates – see slide in annex.
Climate Change, Duncan Green - Presentation Transcript
Book image
Climate Change Duncan Green University of Notre Dame September 2009
Main messages
Climate change is fundamentally a development crisis: the central poverty issue of our time
The scientific battle has been won – the debate now is over what to do about it
A global framework for responding has now been agreed, but time is short to agree specifics
The elements of this framework are Mitigation; Adaptation; Finance and Technology
Key decisions are who acts, who pays and when
Copenhagen meeting in December is make or break
Plan Bs look pretty unattractive!
Suffering the Science: The human costs of climate change
Climate change is affecting every issue linked to poverty and development today, from access to food and water to health and security.
Without immediate action 50 years of development gains in poor countries will be permanently lost
Hunger, agricultural productivity and water availability
Rice and maize face significant drops in yields
Maize yields forecast to drop by 15% or more by 2020 in most of sub-Saharan Africa and India
South African government scientists predicting 50% drop in all cereal yields by 2080
Water supplies running out
Several major cities (Kathmandu, La Paz) which depend on glaciers may soon be unable to function
The Ganges basin alone is home to 500 million people
Disasters and displacement
Climate-related disasters – storms, floods, droughts and wildfires – increasing in frequency
26 million people already displaced
1 million more people displaced every year by weather-related events
375 million people at risk each year by 2015 – a 50% increase which could overwhelm humanitarian systems
Health, labour productivity and trade
Diseases like malaria and dengue fever are creeping into new areas
Heat stress a massive risk to farmers and outdoor workers
Uneven impacts on agriculture
US agricultural profits to rise by $1.3bn per year
Sub-Saharan Africa to lose $2bn per year as viability of just one crop - maize - declines
The Science Atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases and global average temperatures
The Urgency Greenhouse gas emissions are rising faster than even worst case scenarios
So what do we do?
Adaptation: helping people to build their resilience to climate change
Adaptation is good development
Best way is to build human security
Who pays? How much?
Mitigation: cutting global emissions
Who cuts? How fast?
Adaptation in practice: Sahena’s story
Mitigation: Wouldn’t we expect them to cut their emissions faster? If they lived like us… … and we lived like them
Bali Action Plan SHARED VISION Global emissions reduction pathway and key principles of future action to confront climate change Mitigation Binding emission reduction targets for rich (Annex I) countries Actions by developing (Non-Annex I) countries supported by rich countries Adaptation Globally increased efforts to adapt the world to climate change, esp. in developing countries Finance Search for new financial resources to help developing countries both to mitigate and to adapt Technology Increased co-operation for the uptake and wide diffusion of clean technologies
The crunch moment: Copenhagen
COP-15: 15th meeting of the 192 countries that signed the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
UNFCCC (drawn up at 1992 Rio Earth Summit):
Aims to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations at levels that prevent dangerous climate change; effort to be shared based on principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities”
Rich countries (Annex I) shall reduce their emissions first and fastest, and support developing countries in both mitigation and adaptation, by providing financial support and technology transfer
Developing countries’ (Non-Annex I) actions to address emissions contingent upon support from rich countries
Climate Change: make or break issues
Financing offer from rich countries for mitigation and adaptation in developing countries
2020 mitigation targets for rich (Annex I) countries
What do we need at Copenhagen?
A SAFE and FAIR deal
SAFE:
To reduce emissions sufficiently to avoid catastrophic climate change
FAIR:
So that rich countries finally take responsibility for the crisis they have created, committing to:
cut emissions first, furthest and fastest
financing for mitigation and adaptation in developing countries
SAFE: Keep global warming well below 2 º C
<2 º C target long-since accepted by EU; G8 and MEF agree in L’Aquila, July 2009
450ppm-eq gives 50/50 chance of 2.0-2.4 º C rise
Emissions must peak within next 5-10 years and decline steeply thereafter
to stay below 2 º C
Who Pays? Responsibility and capability Top 20 world polluters: per capita pollution and income
A fair share of the global mitigation effort
Oxfam say:
Based on responsibility for historic emissions and capability to pay, Annex I must:
Reduce emissions by at least 40% by 2020
AND
Provide financing for the additional costs of limiting emissions growth in developing countries
How much cash are we talking about?
Additional costs of mitigation in developing countries:
$100 billion (c.€70 billion) per year by 2020
Additional costs of adaptation:
$50 billion (c.€40 billion) per year from today
cf. global aid budget of about $100bn (or one AIG per year)
How do we get emissions down?
Standards (e.g. emissions standards)
Subsidies
Taxes
Examples of ‘market mechanisms’
Cap and Trade
(e.g. European Emissions Trading Scheme)
Issues: government will; free auctions; carve-outs; price volatility
Offsetting
Issues: credibility; monitoring; leakage
A FAIR and SAFE deal
Annex I countries have a DOUBLE DUTY:
- Reduce emissions by at least 40% by 2020
Provide at least $150 billion (€110 billion) in climate finance to developing countries to:
Limit the emissions growth in developing countries to the equivalent of Annex I reductions by 2020
Adapt to the impacts of climate change
Are there any Plan Bs?
Maybe 1500+ scientists are all wrong
Carbon apartheid and a New Dark Age
Geo-engineering
The Urgency of Now
Further Reading from the Blog
CC and Flooding in Bangladesh, www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=676
Organic farming and CC, www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=395
What has CC done to the seasons?, www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=387
CC and natural disasters, www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=232
Building a low carbon economy, www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=187
Further Reading and Links
UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, www.ipcc.ch
‘ What is the Economics of Climate Change?’ Stern Review, 2006
Oxfam America climate change campaign, www.oxfamamerica.org/issues/climate-change
1 comments
Comments 1 - 1 of 1 previous next Post a comment