Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Using Social Media in Public Communication
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.


Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Using Social Media in Public Communication


Published on

Felicia Song & Masudul Biswas, Louisiana State University. Sea Grant Week 2010

Felicia Song & Masudul Biswas, Louisiana State University. Sea Grant Week 2010

Published in: Education

1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide
  • FWS: Thank you – Introductions (sociology / mass comm)
  • FWS: Web 2.0- sns (facebook, myspace), blogs & microblog tools (Twitter), Flickr & YouTube, wikis, podcasts
    What makes them different from Web 1.0– traditional websites with discussion forums, emails/list-servs?
  • MB--Tell that H1N1 flu is the first pandemic of the century.
    Transition after first bullet – to explain why is this study done? Rationale.
    Transition after third bullet – switch to emergency communication context and potentials of social media tools during emergency communication.
  • MB
  • MB:
  • MB: Web-promotion message (will explain) is a derived message category used in this study. It refers to the messages conveying web-based communication services about H1N1-related information, e.g. podcasting, video, PSA, press briefing transcripts, social media tools, and web briefings posted on the official website.
    MAKE THIS POINT IN THE NEXT SLIDE WHEN COMPARING: Only the CDC about H1N1 flu via separate Twitter (CDC e-Health) and Facebook.
    MOVE THIS TO THE NEXT SLIDE: Two additional observations:
    The CDC and WHO got more users of their Twitter pages than Facebook pages.
    The CDC posted more messages (posts) on their Facebook page than the WHO.
  • MB
  • MB
  • MB
  • MB
  • MB
  • MB
  • MB: Effective use will depend on the purposes of using social media.
    Re. Interaction: Facebook and blogs can be two other platforms for interaction. Also monitoring related tweets of followers and SEA Grant issue-related “search” results.
  • FWS
  • Transcript

    • 1. Felicia Song & Masudul Biswas Louisiana State University
    • 2. Social Media & New Communication Potentials User-generated content Networking capacity Interactivity
    • 3. Social Media Use Today About 73% of American teens and young adults, and 40% of adults aged over 30 used social networking sites in 2009 (Lenhart, Purcell, Smith, & Zickuhr, 2010). SNS users ages 50 and over have nearly-doubled from 22% in 2009 to 42% in 2010 (Madden, 2010). Nearly 1 in 5 Internet users is using Twitter or another service to share & see personal and business updates. (October 2009)
    • 4. Nuances in the Digital Divides Who is online? From 2000 - 2010, internet users who are black or Latino has nearly doubled—from 11% to 21%. BUT, language, economic disadvantage, and conditions of access still matter.
    • 5. Nuances in the Digital Divides Of those who are online… Digital access is increasingly mobile, especially for people of color (70% are texting) Nearly ½ of black internet users go to a social networking site on a typical day (vs. just 1/3 of white internet users) 25% of online African-Americans use Twitter & other status update services (vs. 15% of white internet users)
    • 6. ROLES OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN PANDEMIC COMMUNICATION: A STUDY The study examined the use of social networking sites by the CDC and the WHO in the context of the H1N1 flu outbreak It compared (1) types of messages; (2) relationships to message trends on official websites; and (3) levels of interaction with users
    • 7. POTENTIALS OF SOCIAL MEDIA Quick & live communication Widget compatible and simultaneously accessible on and from multiple platforms Allows users to interact within network Pushes web traffic to official web sites/web pages
    • 8. STUDY SAMPLE Content analysis of Twitter updates, Facebook posts, and official website posts/ messages. 243 Twitter updates, 251 Facebook messages and comments, and 222 web site posts disseminated by CDC and WHO, April - July, 2009. Twitter pages: CDCflu, CDCemergency, CDC_eHealth, whonews Facebook pages: CDC and WHO
    • 9. FINDINGS Types of message content about H1N1 on Twitter, Facebook, and official websites - Investigation or diagnosis - Preventive and safety measure - Treatment issues - Situation updates - “web-promotion” messages
    • 10. FINDINGS Differences between CDC and WHO usage? WHO: more situation update-related messages on both Twitter and Facebook pages CDC: the CDCflu and CDCemergency posted more messages on situation updates on Twitter pages, and more messages on preventive and safety issues on their Facebook page. Twitter page CDC_eHealth mainly posted web-promotion messages.
    • 11. FINDINGS Did Twitter and Facebook pages reflect the message- focus of the official websites? WHO - Message postings on Twitter and Facebook pages reflected messaging trends of their official website. - The official website posted more situation updates than messages on investigation, prevention and safety, and treatment.
    • 12. FINDINGS Did Twitter and Facebook pages reflect the message- focus of the official websites? CDC - The Facebook page reflected the messaging trend of the official website and posted more messages on prevention and safety than other messages. - BUT the combination of three Twitter pages posted more situation updates than other four types of messages.
    • 13. FINDINGS Did CDC and WHO use Facebook and Twitter for interactivity? Facebook -CDC and WHO did not directly interact or exchange messages with Facebook users. -But Facebook users interacted with other users on the H1N1 flu situation on Facebook pages of the CDC and the WHO.
    • 14. FINDINGS Did CDC and WHO use Facebook and Twitter for interactivity? Twitter - CDC only shared or re-tweeted the messages from government organizations and other CDC Twitter pages. They did not react to messages of other Twitter users on Twitter. - WHO also did not interact with other Twitter users.
    • 15. Conclusions & Assumptions Social media function as supportive tools for website-based interventions during a case of outbreak communication, requiring speedy and constant dissemination of essential messages to address situational uncertainty. Both CDC and WHO avoided any engagement or interaction, particularly involving unconfirmed information. The structure of Twitter is more effective in avoiding rumor and misinformation than Facebook in pandemic or emergency situations.
    • 16. Effective use of Facebook & Twitter Facebook Twitter Educational (in combination with YouTube/podcasting/an online discussion forum) Interaction/Participation Promoting website content Routine & Emergency Updates Monitoring / Crowdsourcing Networking & Creating Lists Promoting website content Promoting researchers (encouraging researchers to tweet) Separate Twitter page for news media
    • 17. Conclusion: Questions to Address Who is your audience? What is your purpose of communication? What is the nature of your message content?
    • 18. Social Media Strategies/Planning Issues Oil spill, Seafood safety, rip currents, beaches Nature of Communication Routine OR emergency/ crisis? Identifying Audiences/Publics Priority OR Target external publics? Active OR Passive external publics? Planning & Developing Messages •Informative (research-based OR situational?) •Participatory (for the purpose of idea generation) •Gathering and monitoring public perception/opinion on SEA Grant-related issues