Comparison Of Open Source App Servers Final

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

1 comments

Comments 1 - 1 of 1 previous next Post a comment

Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

1 Favorite

Comparison Of Open Source App Servers Final - Presentation Transcript

  1. A Comparison of Open Source Application Servers for the Enterprise Webinar on Dec 11, 2008 Presented by Rod Cope & Veljko Krunic of OpenLogic Recording available at: www.openlogic.com/downloads/webinars.php
    • OpenLogic enables enterprises to
    • safely and securely
    • acquire, manage and control
    • open source software,
    • and thereby
    • realize significantly higher savings .
    About OpenLogic
  2. Goal
    • Help you choose which open source application servers to evaluate more thoroughly:
      • JBoss
      • GlassFish
      • dm Server
      • Geronimo
      • Tomcat
  3. Introduction
    • Rod Cope
      • CTO & Founder of OpenLogic
      • 25 years of software development experience
      • IBM Global Services, Anthem, Ericsson, many more
    • Veljko Krunic
      • Senior Consultant
      • 15 years of software development experience
      • JBoss Division of Red Hat, Rally Software, PeopleSoft, many more
    • OpenLogic, Inc.
      • SLA support, security updates, and indemnification for over 450 open source packages (including JBoss, GlassFish, Geronimo and Tomcat)
      • Governance and policy enforcement
      • Consulting services and training
      • Dozens of Fortune 500 customers
  4. Background
    • Application servers are strategic investments
      • You are likely to use them for years to come
    • In the past
      • J2EE standard
      • Selection based on
        • “ -ilities”
        • Maturity
        • Value-add features beyond the standard
    • Are you replacing proprietary application servers with open source application servers (check one)?
    Polling Results from Webinar Attandees
    • Which open source application servers are your using or considering using (check all that apply)?
    Polling Results from Webinar Attandees
  5. J2EE Didn't Fill the Need
    • EJB 2 is difficult to use
      • Many people consider it unnecessary difficult
      • Entity Beans were especially problematic
      • But even session beans earned bad reputations
    • The Open Source community responds
      • OSS packages mitigating the problem
        • Hibernate instead of Entity Beans
        • Spring as a component model
      • They were very successful in the marketplace
    • Many Spring/Hibernate applications
      • Required only Tomcat to run but also work in full app servers
  6. When Tomcat Is Not Enough
    • Tomcat doesn't support
      • JMS
      • EJBs
      • Other...
    • Enterprises need integration
      • The more mature the app is, the more likely it is to be added
    • Add-ons
      • It was possible to add things that Tomcat was missing
      • But this became a “build your own Frankenstein” exercise
  7. Java Enterprise Edition in the Meantime
    • Weaknesses in EJB 2 model were recognized
    • Work on new specification was completed
      • J2EE -> JEE 5
      • EJB 2 -> EJB 3
        • Entity Beans -> JPA
    • EJB 3
      • Simple annotation-based programming model
      • Not everybody adopted EJB 3
    • JEE 6 will embrace modularity
      • Profiles, including web profile
  8. Choices in 2007
    • Use Spring
      • Start with full app server
      • Start with Tomcat, build from there
    • Use EJB 3
      • Requires full app servers
    • Full application server
      • Pros – everything you are likely to need, could use EJB
      • Cons – complexity, might use more resources then Tomcat
    • Tomcat
      • Pros – small, simple, low resource usage
      • Cons – you might need to build your own app server, no EJB
  9. OSGi
    • Started in 1999
      • Recently got a lot of exposure
      • In particular, R 4.1
        • JSR-294
    • OSGi brings
      • Dependency management and modularity
      • Ability to load only parts it needs
    • OSGi currently has a lot of mindshare
  10. What Does This Mean For Me?
    • Decisions, decisions
      • EJB 3 or Spring
      • Spring on dm Server or on J2EE/JEE server?
      • OSGi or not OSGi
      • Do I need EJB 2 compatibility?
      • In addition, there are many “old” considerations
    • Servers are not “all inclusive”
      • EJB 3 apps won't work on SpringSource dm Server or Tomcat
    • What are your reasons for using or considering open source application servers (check all that apply)?
    Polling Results from Webinar Attandees
    • What is your biggest concern or challenge with using open source application servers (check one)?
    Polling Results from Webinar Attandees
  11. Contenders
    • Make a decision about what functionality you need
    • Evaluate the contenders
      • JBoss
      • GlassFish
      • dm Server
      • Geronimo
      • Tomcat
  12. JBoss
    • Started in 1999, incorporated in 2001
      • LGPL License
    • Reasons for Success
      • One of the first OSS app servers that was proven enough for production
      • Good product
    • Developers generally like it
      • Fast startup and operations, easy configuration (for developers)
      • Good standard support
    • Modular architecture
      • Possible to control amount of resources used
  13. JBoss Thought Leadership
    • Complete ecosystem
      • Portal
      • ESB
      • BPM
    • JBoss has history of innovation
      • Pioneer of EJB 3
      • Seam Application Framework
      • Web Beans
    • OSGi
      • Support in JBoss 5
  14. JBoss in Production
    • Dependability
      • Excellent clustering and failover capability
      • Reliable in production
    • Monitoring and deployment capabilities
      • Not really oriented toward system administration out of the box
        • Command line/file edit flavor of configuration
        • GUI tools (Tomcat manager and JMX Console) are fairly basic
      • Excellent 3 rd party tools available for monitoring
        • Hyperic
        • GroundWork IT
        • JON *
  15. JBoss for Developers
    • Excellent customizability
      • JMX-based, don't deploy what you don't need
    • Seam is worth a look for developers
    • JDK 6 with 4.2.3 and 5.0 GA
      • JDK 5 compiled binaries work on both JDK 5 and JDK 6
    • JBoss IDE
      • Eclipse-based
      • JBoss Tools
        • Free version (RHDS is paid version)
  16. JBoss - Conclusions
    • Strengths
      • Mature, scalable and reliable
      • Good support for J2EE and EJB 3
      • Seam framework
    • Weaknesses
      • Limited GUI-based configuration in open source version
      • LGPL License may be a concern for ISV's embedding app servers
  17. GlassFish
    • Relatively new
      • Launched in June 2005
      • JEE 5 support introduced in May 2006
    • Glassfish 2
      • September 2007
      • Clustering and enterprise capabilities
      • Merged with Sun Java System Application Server
      • CDDL License
    • Huge interest
      • First seven months of 2008 - 4.5 million downloads
      • Compare to Spring Framework's 5 million downloads
  18. GlassFish Thought Leadership
    • JEE 5 certified
      • Reference implementation
      • Full support for EJB 3
    • OSGi is coming in version 3
      • Sun is a strong supporter of OSGi
    • Good support for dynamic languages
      • JRuby
      • GoldSpike
      • Grails
  19. Living with GlassFish
    • IDE
      • NetBeans-based
      • Excellent support for GlassFish
    • Support for Java 6 for a long time
    • Sun has fairly large ecosystem (e.g., openESB)
    • Relatively new
      • Not as easy to hire expertise
    • Good production capabilities
      • Clustering
      • Failover
  20. GlassFish – Conclusions
    • Strengths
      • Good support for emerging standards
      • Good heritage of code, based on a good application server
      • Excellent support for dynamic languages
    • Weaknesses
      • Less widely used than JBoss
      • Relatively new
  21. SpringSource dm Server
    • Newcomer
      • Released in April of 2008
      • GPL license
      • Incorporates many mature components
        • Spring Framework
        • Tomcat
        • Equinox
      • dm Server users are very early adopters
    • Different take on app server
      • OSGi support
      • No support for EJB
      • No JMS out of the box
  22. dm Server Thought Leadership
    • OSGi-based
      • Good OSGi implementation
      • OSGi discussed a lot in their documentation
    • No support for EJB
      • No support for EJB 3 or old EJB 2 spec
    • Spring offers similar functionality to Seam
      • Which is somewhat more mature
      • Although some of the Seam ideas might be somewhat more powerful
        • Bijection
  23. dm Server for Developers
    • Server works well with Spring Framework
    • IDE
      • Spring IDE - IDE for Eclipse platform
      • Support for NetBeans and IntelliJ
    • OSGi support
      • Resolves “dependency hell”
      • But requires application migration to take advantage of it
    • Supports Java 5 and 6
  24. dm Server - Conclusions
    • Strengths
      • Support for Spring Framework
      • Support for OSGi
    • Weaknesses
      • Newcomer
      • No EJB
      • Limited experience among workforce
  25. Geronimo
    • Supported by IBM
      • WSCE based on Geronimo announced in October 2005
    • JEE 5 certified
    • Full support for EJB 3
    • Apache licensed
  26. Geronimo Details
    • Capabilities
      • Clustering
      • GBeans and IoC
      • Built-in frameworks (ActiveMQ, Spring)
    • Less often used than others (like JBoss) on large deployments
    • Certified on Java 5
      • Works with Java 6
    • IDE support
      • GEP, MyEclipse
  27. Geronimo – Conclusions
    • Strengths
      • Apache licensed
      • JEE certified with full EJB 3 support
      • Sponsored by IBM
    • Weaknesses
      • Not as widely used in production as other servers
      • Less usage means that it is more difficult to find people who are experts in it
      • Smaller ecosystem than others (like JBoss)
        • Although WAS and WSCE share the same name, they do not share the same code
  28. Tomcat
    • First release (3.0.x) in 1999
      • Apache license
    • Servlet container
      • Lightweight server
    • Used in many other app servers
      • JBoss
      • dm Server
      • Geronimo
  29. Tomcat in Development and Production
    • Tomcat 6 supports
      • Clustering
      • Failover
    • Widely used for both development and production
    • Supported in most popular IDEs
  30. Tomcat – Conclusions
    • Strengths
      • Lightweight
      • Well known and tested
      • Fast startup/deployment for development
    • Weaknesses
      • No support for EJB, JMS or almost anything else outside of “web side”
  31. Conclusions
    • App servers are not just about the JEE specs
    • Make some high-level decisions before evaluation
      • Do I need EJB 2 compatibility?
      • Do I intend to follow EJB 3 and other industry standards?
      • Do I need something fast, lightweight, and easy to use?
      • Do I have a need for lifecycle management of server components (through OSGi)?
      • Do I need support for dynamic languages like Groovy and JRuby?
      • Am I an early adopter of new technology?
  32. Recommendations
    • “ I’m using EJBs and I’m conservative”
      • JBoss, GlassFish
    • “ I don't need XA/JMS/EJB”
      • Tomcat, JBoss, GlassFish, dm Server
    • “ I’m using Spring”
      • Conservative - JBoss, Tomcat, GlassFish
      • Leading edge - dm Server
    • “ I need to embed an app server in my commercial code”
      • Tomcat, Geronimo
  33. Recommendations (continued)
    • “ I use Spring heavily and I need OSGi”
      • I need it today and don't need EJBs - dm Server
      • I need it soon and/or need EJBs – GlassFish, JBoss
    • “ I use Seam”
      • JBoss
    • “ I want ActiveMQ/Spring/Hibernate preinstalled”
      • Geronimo
    • “ I need dynamic language support”
      • Groovy/Grails – dm Server, JBoss, GlassFish
      • JRuby/Rails - GlassFish, Geronimo
    • Which non-Java based server technologies are used in your enterprise (check all that apply)?
    Polling Results from Webinar Attandees
  34. Q & A
    • Any questions?
  35. Contact Information
    • Rod Cope: [email_address]
    • Veljko Krunic: [email_address]
    • __________________________________________________________________________________________
    • Download the webinar recording and slides:
    • www.openlogic.com/downloads/webinars.php
    • Get a quote on technical support for open source:
    • www.openlogic.com/products/support.php
    • Get a quote on training & professional services for open source: www.openlogic.com/products/open-source-services.php

+ OpenLogicOpenLogic, 10 months ago

custom

4630 views, 1 favs, 2 embeds more stats

OpenLogic provides overview of open source applicat more

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 4630
    • 4578 on SlideShare
    • 52 from embeds
  • Comments 1
  • Favorites 1
  • Downloads 195
Most viewed embeds
  • 34 views on http://www.techpitch.com
  • 18 views on http://itlab.wordpress.com

more

All embeds
  • 34 views on http://www.techpitch.com
  • 18 views on http://itlab.wordpress.com

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories