Policy Recommendations - EUPOPP Final Conference 5 July 2011, Brussels
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Policy Recommendations - EUPOPP Final Conference 5 July 2011, Brussels

on

  • 766 views

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions deriving from food represent approx. one fifth of the total EU GHG emission balance when all upstream emissions from fertilizers and imports etc. are taken into account. ...

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions deriving from food represent approx. one fifth of the total EU GHG emission balance when all upstream emissions from fertilizers and imports etc. are taken into account. Avoiding unnecessary food wastage, eating less meat and more organic and vegetarian produce can reduce EU GHG emissions by up to 25 percent by 2030. This is one of the findings being presented by Oeko-Institut’s researchers at the final stakeholder conference for the EUPOPP project on sustainable consumption in Brussels on 5th July 2011.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
766
Views on SlideShare
765
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://paper.li 1

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Policy Recommendations - EUPOPP Final Conference 5 July 2011, Brussels Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Policy Recommendations EUPOPP Final Conference 5 July 2011, Brussels
  • 2. Rationale & objective of the policy recommendations…based on empirical results of EUPOPP suggest to EU policy makers ambitious and new SC policy regarding consumption patterns and socially equitable behaviours discuss options to enhance SC policies and instruments in the need areas housing + food
  • 3. Outline1. General recommendations for improved SC policy making Enhancing existing instruments Improving collaboration & coordination Bundling & ensuring policy coherence2. Policy recommendations for food3. Policy recommendations for housing
  • 4. General recommendationsfor improved SC policymaking
  • 5. Enhancing existing instruments 2. Better understand 1.Ambitious targets, consumer needs & improved monitoring practices: Decision makers should and enforcement: enhance their Decision makers should understanding of not refrain from consumers to tap into demanding instruments, needs and practices, ambitious targets, but capacities, and improving and enforcing “everyday life” them 3.Make use of visible situations co-benefits: Decision makers should tap into the potential of creating immediate co- benefits that can highlight progress and achievements to consumers
  • 6. 1. Improved target setting, monitoring & enforcement… this means… Set ambitious mandatory targets for absolute reductions in GHG emissions and resource use, and improvements of efficiency Prefer regulatory measures and economic instrument as main components of policy mixes Dedicate resources to monitoring, including harmonised systems of data collection and verification Invest in better communication and political marketing of consumer-side instruments
  • 7. 2. Better understand consumer needs & practices…this means… Better involve consumers in decision making, both consumer interest groups and individual consumers, e.g. through focus groups Target specific consumer groups, e.g. families with children, elderly consumers, single or low income households Pilot new policy instruments among targeted consumer groups before implementation Regularly survey consumer perceptions and understanding of newly introduced instruments
  • 8. 3. Make use of visible co- benefits…this means… Better use possibilities to create immediate co- benefits for consumers – motivation to comply tends to be higher when effects are visible “close to home”, e.g. cost savings due to energy savings or health benefits due to more sustainable food choices Consistently highlight such benefits in political marketing campaigns and through consumer advice services Regularly highlight progress/achievements to demonstrate positive impacts for consumers
  • 9. Improving collaborationand coordination Enable consumers to make sustainableIn the short term: consumption choices, e.g. throughpositive messages rather easy accessible infrastructures, pricethan “guilting“ signals, choice editing, etc. instead of mere “guilting“ Reconsider sharing of resposibilityIn the medium term: between policy, business &coordinated action among consumers; promote collaborativepolicy, business & civil processessociety Take lead in moderating societalIn the long term: dialogue on “quality of life“ andrevise notions of quality of sustainability, reconsider economiclife & growth growth paradigm, e.g. through “green GDP“  lead by examples, e.g. GPP
  • 10. Bundling…this means… cover more than one consumption phase (purchase, use, disposal) include various types of instruments which reinforce each other focus on one group of consumers in a certain consumption “setting” (e.g. catering at school), and on a specific issue (e.g. less meat) ideally be achievable at EU level (transposition of existing national/regional instrument to EU level and combination of with existing EU level instruments  optimisation)
  • 11. Bundling and ensuringpolicy coherence sustainable consumption and sustainable production away from an individual policies need to be more policy focus towards closely aligned coherent policy mixes and instrument bundlesThe effectiveness of SC Complementary, mutuallyinstruments is often supportive policy mixes arehampered by counter- essential for effectiveness, i.e.productive production-side checking existing strategiespolicies, e.g. infrastructures for consistency andlimiting consumption choices; embedding new instrumentsthus, develop enabling consistently in policy andstructures for SC instrument bundles
  • 12. Policy recommendations forthe need area of food
  • 13. 1. Policy recommendations: Food Relatively new field for policy interventions, therefore, policy makers should: Focus on moderating dialogue & developing shared visions of SC in this need area Invest in political marketing & consumer education when introducing policy instruments Build on & adjust established fields of intervention, such as food safety & public health Develop indicators & criteria for sustainable diets instead of promoting individual food products and/or characteristics
  • 14. 2. Develop common social awareness of the impacts of food consumption „Learning by doing“: promote consumer information through food labelling, education activities using multipliers such as school children, promoting information at “point of sale” Mainstreaming successful local initiatives, e.g. Veggy Days, through endorsing at EU/national level, and provision of adequate funding and support mechanisms Promote/enhance existing fora for dialogue, e.g. Retailer Roundtables, through regular consultation, and define milestones & targets
  • 15. 3. Use public spending power more effectively Revise existing procurement legislation to make sustainable pro- curement criteria mandatory across EU-27 Set ambitious criteria for public catering, e.g. 5-year framework plan to increase share of organic food and reduce meat/high-fat dairy in public catering Public Veggie Days in restaurants, school cafeterias etc. supported by public personalities (mayors, members of parliament, local celebrities etc.)
  • 16. 4. Reduce food waste Develop better knowledge on evitable waste of food in Europe  data Introduce incentives for households to reduce food waste, e.g. through differentiated waste disposal charges Work with retailers to expand shelf life dates for food products Capacity building for consumer regarding labelling issues of food shelf life with help of information campaigns and on-site consumer advice services, etc.
  • 17. 5. Taxation on food favouring sustainabily & health High monitoring costs & comparatively low potential for emissions reductions in certain agricultural practices (e.g. beef raising)  prefer direct-to-consumer eco-tax, e.g. on GHG emissions inherent to different food products Differentiate tax rates on food based on health & environmental considerations, e.g. No/low tax on healthy & low-impact foods (vegetables, fruit…) Higher tax on unhealthy & high-impact foods, especially meat (beef!), high-fat dairy, convenience foods & frozen ready meals
  • 18. Policy recommendations forthe need area of housing
  • 19. 1. Optimise & strengthen the EU Energy Label Introduce Top Runner Approach and integrate with EU Energy Label to realise synergies Harmonise & flexibilise the EU Energy Label, e.g. through 1. consistent scale for all appliances covered 2. regular phase-out of appliances labelled, e.g. of all categories below class C 3. grant refunds, tax exemptions or other incentives for scrapping old appliances (based on age/performance), parallel to buying A labelled appliances
  • 20. 2. Optimize & strengthen the EPBD Improve compliance by introducing a registry for demand-based energy performance certificates Dedicate resources to regular inspections & implement sanctions for non-compliance Introduce the obligation to retrofit when owners change in conjunction with scrapping premium where retrofitting is uneconomic Integrate requirements for improving thermal efficiency for major renovations Improve access to & range of available preferential financing services (subsidies, low interest rate credits, tax incentives)
  • 21. 3. Address both heating behaviour & heating systems Introduce mandatory minimum quota for green heating in newly installed systems (when constructing new building or replacing heating system) while taking into account national/regional differences (e.g. increasing gradually over time; determining benchmarks for “green heating”) Implement individual metering, billing and control over heat flow, based on apportioning heat costs, across the EU (especially important for CEE countries) to enable consumers to track costs & make savings visible
  • 22. 4. Address rebound effects Factor in rebound effects when designing new instruments  targets should be set to accommodate such effects and be strong enough to outperform them, especially through bundling (e.g. tax increase) Introduce new and align existing eco-taxes, e.g. consistent energy tax system, to tackle rebound effects by raising the price for energy