• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Open Source Innovation Factory, OW2con11, Nov 24-25, 2011, Paris

on

  • 675 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
675
Views on SlideShare
675
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Open Source Innovation Factory, OW2con11, Nov 24-25, 2011, Paris Open Source Innovation Factory, OW2con11, Nov 24-25, 2011, Paris Presentation Transcript

    • Open Source Innovation Factory
 
 Paolo Ceravolo, Università degli Studi di Milano 
 in cooperation with Engineering Group
 [Our Framework equipped with Innovation Metrics can dramatically reduce the time required to transfer an innovative project to a real environment] OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Outlook  Open Issues in Open Innovation  Our Proposal  Our Framework  Future work OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Innovation  72% of company executives rank innovation in their top 3 priorities (Boston Consulting Group, 2006)  80% of new product results will tend to come from only 20% R&D projects (Eduardo, 2003)  successful companies cancelled as many innovation projects as non-successful companies. However, successful companies were able to cancel unattractive projects much earlier in the process (Ogawa & Ketner, 1997) OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Open Innovation  The central idea behind open innovation is that in a world of widely distributed knowledge, companies cannot afford to rely entirely on their own research, but should instead buy or license processes or inventions (i.e. patents) from other companies. In addition, internal inventions not being used in a firms business should be taken outside the company (Chesbrough, 2003). OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Open InnovationOW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Open Issues in Open Innovation  Reduce time to identify unproductive projects  Understand the synergy that are potentially relating different projects  Represent Innovation Activity  Measure Innovation Activity  Report on Innovation Activity OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Open Source Innovation Factory  Mixes three complementary approaches: 1.  Innovation Factory Metamodel (IFM), proposed in the ARISTOTELE project (www.aristotele-ip.eu) 2.  Open source platform SpagoBI (www.spagobi.org), LOAP and Reporting 3.  Knowbots, advanced tools for the acquisition of concepts from internal and external knowledge sources OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Open Source Innovation Factory OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Innovation Factory Metamodel OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Innovation Metrics• Goal 1: Innovation Level Improvemento Q1.1: Which is the level of innovative knowledge exploited in the Organization?o Q1.2: How much are innovative the new products?• Goal 2: Quality of Innovation Sourceso Q2.1: Which is the quality of sources of innovation process?• Goal 3: Open Innovation Permeabilityo Q3.1: To what extend the customer contribution is exploited?o Q3.2: To what extend the concepts coming from competitors sites are exploited?o Q3.3: Evaluate the level of technologies that are transferred by the analysis of competitorso Q3.4: How much internal proposals influence innovative products?• Goal 4: Return of Innovation Investmento Q4.1: How much innovation process produces profits?o Q4.2: How much innovation process costs?o Q4.3: Indirect Advantages OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Innovation MetricsGoal 1: Innovation Level Improvement Q1.1: Which is the level of innovative knowledge exploited in the Organization? M1.1.1: no. accesses to blog/forum marked as innovation sources M1.1.2: no. concepts transferred from innovation sources to produced documents (e.g. cut&paste) Q1.2: How much are innovative the new products? M1.2.1: no. tags describing new functionalities / no. concepts in innovative sources tag cloud M1.2.2: no. requirements covered by new products . OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org. www.ow2.org
    • Innovation MetricsGoal 2: Quality of Innovation Sources Q2.1: Which is the quality of sources of innovation process? M2.1.1: % of external requirements, coming from outside the organisation (e.g. analyzing innovative sources) M2.1.2: % of internal requirements, coming from inside the organisation (e.g. from internal meetings) M2.1.3: % of customer requirements, coming directly from the customer M2.1.4: % of new products implementing external requirements M2.1.5: % of new products implementing internal requirements M2.1.6: % of new products implementing customer requirements M2.1.7: % of human resources that contribute to the innovation process OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Innovation MetricsGoal 4: Return of Innovation Investment Q4.1: How much innovation process produces profits? M4.1.1: no. new products sold per month M4.1.2: no. new products sold per week M4.1.3: no. new customers M4.1.4: % revenue from new products M4.1.5: % new product within deadline Q4.2: How much innovation process costs? M4.2.1: time-to-market of new products M4.2.2: time-to-market of changes to existing products M4.2.3: budget spent on human resources training M4.2.4: no. competences involved in innovation process M4.2.5: no. human resources involved in innovation process M4.2.6: no. man-months spent to realize new product M4.2.7: no. man-months spent to realize changes to existing products M4.2.8: average number of training hours per human resource Q4.3: Indirect Advantages M4.3.1: % customer satisfaction with new products M4.3.2: % of human resources reaching desired competence level after training M4.3.3: % difference in productivity before and after training OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • SpagoBIOW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • SpagoBIOW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • SpagoBIOW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • KnowBots•  KB consists of two distinct modules which interact with each other•  One module is running locally in the workspace of the worker•  A second module is a remote server module that interrogates various database services across the network and provides the results to a user agent running in the local workspace•  This way we can track the information that are provided by the Knowbots and are used in the workspace OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Scenario: AVIO•  AVIO traditionally run two separate business: •  Plant in Torino selling engines •  Plant in Brindisi providing overhaul services•  AVIO has no foresight on the mid-term arrivals of engines and is unable to optimize plans and procurement processes.•  FLEET MANAGEMENT•  centralizing engine monitoring and scheduling their overhaul process•  optimizing the flow of engines in arrival and reducing congestion or underutilization OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • Lesson Learned•  Access to data •  process (competences, requirements) •  products (requirements, ROI)•  Define Innovation Profile based on successful story to support comparability among past and running processes OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org
    • This work is co-funded by the European Commission as part of the ARISTOTELE project (FP7-ICT-2009-5 –257886) OW2Con 2011, November 23 -24, Orange Labs, Paris www.ow2.org