Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Opal case study 58 le mill finland
Opal case study 58 le mill finland
Opal case study 58 le mill finland
Opal case study 58 le mill finland
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Opal case study 58 le mill finland


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. Template Sections for completion: Case Study Title: LeMill Case Study Country: Finland Type of organisation described by the case study, address of organisation, hyperlink to organisation, hyperlink to case study source: Case Study Contributed by: Aalto University Case Study Sections: Please complete Section 1 – mandatory. Please complete whichever of Sections 2-10 is/are relevant to the case study. From an analytical perspective we are looking for the following generic questions to be answered in the case study: • What constitutes open educational practice in this case study? • What are the elements of innovation in educational practice? • How is OER being used to innovate educational practice? • How is open educational practice used to improve quality? Sections 1-10 1. Mandatory - A brief summary of the institution to be used as a case study About 500 words please on a description of the institution, its OER history and approach. LeMill is a web community of teachers and other learning content creators for finding, authoring and sharing open educational resources. At the moment LeMill has more than 8000 reusable learning content resources, more than 4000 descriptions of teaching and learning methods, and almost 1000 descriptions of teaching and learning tools. There are also teaching and learning stories available. LeMill community has members from 61 countries. At the moment content can be found in 13 languages. LeMill was designed and developed as part of European Commission’s 6th Framework Programme project CALIBRATE. Its aims were to support the collaborative use and exchange of learning resources in schools. It brought
  • 2. together eight Ministries of Education including six from new member states and involved 17 partners in all. The continuation of development was supported by Tiger Leap Foundation. The dissemination of LeMill is supported by ESF AVO project. LeMill project is currently run by Media Lab at the Aalto University (Finland) together with Centre for Educational Technology at the Tallinn University (Estonia). The most active users of LeMill are in Georgia and Estonia. 2. Quality – OER/OEP How does the institution approach quality in OER? Is there any current indication of a quality concept or process? Does the institution perceive quality from the perspective of the quality of open educational resources or the quality of open educational practice? How does the institution show quality through OEP versus quality of OEP? What methods, concepts and practices are used to enhance the quality of OEP? LeMill supports the idea of working in groups through LeMill community. There are community blogs for interest groups to coordinate and discuss the group's work. All learning resources in LeMill are either in the stage of being "draft" or "published". The member who started the project of making the content may decide when the content will be published. The change from "draft" to "published" does not change anything in the availability of the content. The flag "published" just tells to the users of the site that the author(s) have considered it to be ready. When content is public, its authors are shown. For draft resources the authors are not shown. People can continue to modify and improve the resource after publishing it. If the user finds some content incorrect he/she can join LeMill and fix it. The guidelines tell to respect other people's points of view and possible "deeper thought and reasons" behind the content they have made. LeMill trust the community’s self-evaluation, however the maintainer of the service pretty much track all the editing made to the site. It can block vandals and even report criminal activities for authorities. 3. Innovation How can OER/OEP innovate educational practices? What current innovative practices are there in the institution? Please do not regard innovation from just a technology perspective! In addition to content, methods, and tools there are teaching and learning stories. A story is a description of how some content, methods, and tools have been used together in a single learning event, such as a study course. Stories loosely join the other resources together. From the stories users get valuable hints on how the resources found from LeMill have been used in real
  • 3. teaching and learning. Through stories they may share their own experiences or use them to plan your own teaching. 4. Policy What are the current OER/OEP policy arrangements at institutional and national level across Europe/the World? About 70% of LeMill use comes from Georgia and 15% from Estonia. These two countries have been so active because the national ICT agencies (Deer Leap Foundation and Tiger Leap Foundation) have promoted LeMill among the teachers. 5. Actors What actors are involved in OER/OEP? Is there any evidence to show that OER actors do not always promote OEP but “only” access to OER? 6. Initiatives What OER/OEP initiatives can be evidenced? Is there any evidence to show that OER initiatives do not always promote OEP but “only” access to OER? For all resources in LeMill (content, methods, tools, stories, group blogs) LeMill use Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. LeMill support reusing and shared development of the content, methods, tools and stories. 7. Open Educational Practices Can you identify some case studies/ descriptions which form the illustrative base for a more general model of OEP? See answer to section 3 8. Tools and Repositories What tools and repositories are being used to deliver OER/OEP? For example GLOW, Connexions Are there any other special tools for OER/OEP? e.g. Cloudworks, in which practices can be discussed and validated? Are there any tools for Visualisation? e.g. CompendiumLD Are there any tools for Argumentation? e.g. Cohere LeMill is a web site engine to author and share learning resources. All content in LeMill server are free/libre/open for all web users. Anyone may also start their own LeMill website. Users can download LeMill engine, install it on your own server and put it online. After this you will automatically be part of the global network of LeMill servers. Because of this the creators say that LeMill is "do it yourself" learning resource website engine. The Tools section is a place to describe different kinds of virtual or physical tools users use or may use in teaching and learning. In this section the users find tools that other teachers and educators are using.
  • 4. 9. Strategies Can you identify any strategies for organisations to use OER/OEP? Can you identify any business models that promote OER/OEP? 10. Current barriers and enablers What are the barriers to the use of OER/OEP? Is there any evidence to how these barriers have been overcome? What are the enablers to the use of OER/ OEP? The community is currently searching for additional money in order to be able to maintain the service.