STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES: A REVIEW OF     STATE EVALUATION PRACTICES      Weights and Local MeasuresJill LindseyOERC Resear...
Changes in Teacher Evaluation Policies since 2009 36 states + DC changed teacher evaluation policies 43 states require a...
Research by Jerald and Hook 2011  graph by Hull, Center for Public Education 2011                          SGM @ Connectin...
States with 50%-50%   Ohio   Colorado   Pennsylvania   Florida   South Dakota   Idaho                      SGM @ Con...
New Jersey 2013-14Tested Grades and Subjects (20% of teachers) 50 - 50 including 35 percent student growth and 15  percen...
Connecticut Minimum of 40% for announced and  unannounced observation (a least 3  observations) 45% student growth using...
Indiana 20-50% SLOs + teacher performance including  observations                       SGM @ Connecting the Dots Confere...
Arkansas Multiple measure Including observations Including student academic growth and  achievement                    ...
New York 60% observations and performance with majority  based on observations by administrator and the  rest on independ...
Tennessee 50% Observation + 35% student growth +  15% state-approved student  achievement Teachers with <3yrs experience...
Delaware & Rhode Island No designated weights Delaware has 5 components and requires one  must be student improvement/gr...
9 of the 14 States               Use Danielson’sReviewed Today                   Framework for                            ...
Four Levels of Performance RatingsOHIO                            INDIANA Accomplished                   Highly effectiv...
More Levels of Performance RatingsWASHINGTON & IDAHO                   NEW YORK Distinguished                       High...
District Decisions   About SGMWeights, SLOs andShared Attribution               SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference   3/2...
Partnership   SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference   3/22/2013   16
BASELINE DATA       SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference   3/22/2013   17
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT            SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference   3/22/2013   18
COLLABORATION      SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference   3/22/2013   19
SETTING GROWTH TARGETS           SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference   3/22/2013   20
SLO DEVELOPMENT Grade Level Teacher Level Building Level                   SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference   3/22/...
MID-YEAR REFLECTION“We do not learn from                    experience….  We learn from reflecting on               experi...
LESSONS LEARNED              Staff               Development              Impact on               Culture              ...
QUESTIONS?             Making Research Work for Education                   connect@oerc.osu.edu                     www.o...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Student Growth Measures: A Review of State Evaluation Practices

226
-1

Published on

OERC researchers provided a brief review of other state practices regarding student growth measures (including sample SLOs) and teacher /principal evaluation. Also included was a discussion of preliminary findings from Ohio Education Research Center (OERC) research regarding using Student Growth Measures for OTES and OPES within a sample of LEAs in Ohio.

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
226
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Student Growth Measures: A Review of State Evaluation Practices

  1. 1. STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES: A REVIEW OF STATE EVALUATION PRACTICES Weights and Local MeasuresJill LindseyOERC Research LeadProfessor and Chair, College of Education & Human ServicesWright State UniversityBetsy ChaddDirector of Curriculum & Professional DevelopmentBellbrook-Sugarcreek School DistrictNational Network for Educational Renewal Partners Making Research Work for Education connect@oerc.osu.edu www.oerc.osu.edu
  2. 2. Changes in Teacher Evaluation Policies since 2009 36 states + DC changed teacher evaluation policies 43 states require annual evaluation of teachers 26 incorporated differentiated levels of teacher performance 32 states incorporated Student Achievement Measures (SGM) 26 states use Student Growth Percentiles (SGP) to measure & communicate SGM 39 included classroom observations 22 included multiple observations each year SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 2
  3. 3. Research by Jerald and Hook 2011 graph by Hull, Center for Public Education 2011 SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 3
  4. 4. States with 50%-50% Ohio Colorado Pennsylvania Florida South Dakota Idaho SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 4
  5. 5. New Jersey 2013-14Tested Grades and Subjects (20% of teachers) 50 - 50 including 35 percent student growth and 15 percent LEA measure In future years, 5 percent school-wide and cohort comparison measures in LEA measuresNon-Tested Grades and Subjects (80% of teachers) 85 percent teacher practice and 15 percent student achievement In future years, 50-50 with 5 percent school-wide and cohort comparison measures and 45 percent "student growth objectives” SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 5
  6. 6. Connecticut Minimum of 40% for announced and unannounced observation (a least 3 observations) 45% student growth using multiple indicators including goals/objectives with indicators and evidence and at least 22.5% based on state tests 5% student feedback 10% parent or peer feedback/survey SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 6
  7. 7. Indiana 20-50% SLOs + teacher performance including observations SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 7
  8. 8. Arkansas Multiple measure Including observations Including student academic growth and achievement SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 8
  9. 9. New York 60% observations and performance with majority based on observations by administrator and the rest on independent trained evaluators, peer classroom observations, student and parent feedback from evaluators, and evidence of performance through student portfolios + 40% SGM with 20% based on state tests and 20% on other vendor or locally developed tests SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 9
  10. 10. Tennessee 50% Observation + 35% student growth + 15% state-approved student achievement Teachers with <3yrs experience are observed 6 times a year. Experienced teachers are observed 4 times a year SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 10
  11. 11. Delaware & Rhode Island No designated weights Delaware has 5 components and requires one must be student improvement/growth weighted as high as the highest other component Rhode Island requires annual student growth and achievement be included but classroom observations are optional SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 11
  12. 12. 9 of the 14 States Use Danielson’sReviewed Today Framework for Teaching as the evaluation model SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 12
  13. 13. Four Levels of Performance RatingsOHIO INDIANA Accomplished  Highly effective Proficient  Effective Developing  Improvement necessary Ineffective  IneffectiveCONNECTICUT SOUTH DAKOTA Exemplary  Distinguished Proficient  Proficient Developing  Basic Below standard  Unsatisfactory SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 13
  14. 14. More Levels of Performance RatingsWASHINGTON & IDAHO NEW YORK Distinguished  Highly Effective Proficient  Effective Basic  Developing Unsatisfactory  Ineffective ILLINOISARKANSAS  Excellent Feedback No Ratings  Proficient  Needs improvement  Unsatisfactory SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 14
  15. 15. District Decisions About SGMWeights, SLOs andShared Attribution SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 15
  16. 16. Partnership SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 16
  17. 17. BASELINE DATA SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 17
  18. 18. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 18
  19. 19. COLLABORATION SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 19
  20. 20. SETTING GROWTH TARGETS SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 20
  21. 21. SLO DEVELOPMENT Grade Level Teacher Level Building Level SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 21
  22. 22. MID-YEAR REFLECTION“We do not learn from experience…. We learn from reflecting on experience.” -John Dewey SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 22
  23. 23. LESSONS LEARNED  Staff Development  Impact on Culture  Growth Target Rigor SGM @ Connecting the Dots Conference 3/22/2013 23
  24. 24. QUESTIONS? Making Research Work for Education connect@oerc.osu.edu www.oerc.osu.edu
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×