Meeting of the ENVIRONET-WP-STAT
Task Team on OECD Rio Markers,
Environment & Development Finance
Statistics, 20-21 March ...
Treatment of multilateral climate-
related flows in DAC statistics
Valérie Gaveau, OECD
Outline
 How are multilateral climate-related flows treated in
DAC statistics?
 Update on status of reporting to the DAC...
UN
agencies
MDBs
How are multilateral climate-related flows
treated in DAC statistics?
Bilateral aid projects
Multi-bi pro...
Update on status of reporting to the DAC
Outflows from multilateral climate funds and multilateral agencies
 Several UN a...
Update on status of reporting to the DAC
Inflows to multilateral climate funds and multilateral agencies
 Contributions f...
Update on status of reporting to the DAC
Inflows to multilateral climate funds and multilateral agencies
Australia 7.1 0.0...
Options to improve the treatment of
multilateral flows
 O15.Develop a comprehensive and single system for
attributing to ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Treatment of multilateral climate-related flows in DAC statistics

176 views

Published on

Presented by Valérie Gaveau, this look at official development assistance targeting climate-related initiatives looks at:
How multilateral climate-related flows are treated in Development Assistance Committee (DAC) statistics;
Update on status of reporting to the DAC;
Options to improve the treatment of multilateral flows.

Published in: News & Politics
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
176
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Treatment of multilateral climate-related flows in DAC statistics

  1. 1. Meeting of the ENVIRONET-WP-STAT Task Team on OECD Rio Markers, Environment & Development Finance Statistics, 20-21 March 2014
  2. 2. Treatment of multilateral climate- related flows in DAC statistics Valérie Gaveau, OECD
  3. 3. Outline  How are multilateral climate-related flows treated in DAC statistics?  Update on status of reporting to the DAC  Options to improve the treatment of multilateral flows (Room Doc 3, sections I.3)
  4. 4. UN agencies MDBs How are multilateral climate-related flows treated in DAC statistics? Bilateral aid projects Multi-bi projects “earmarked” Multilateral aid projects, including a share of X or Y% for climate Rio marked DAC countries Australia Austria Belgium … GEF SCCF GEF GEF LDCF CIFs BILATERALODAMULTIODA contributions to multilateral climate funds Aid recipients core contributions to multi-purpose agencies Counted as X or Y% Not Rio marked at present Rio marked Counted as 100% Multilateral climate-related aid projects
  5. 5. Update on status of reporting to the DAC Outflows from multilateral climate funds and multilateral agencies  Several UN agencies, the GEF, the MDBs report on their contributions to the CRS, but do not assign Rio markers.  CIFs have not reported on their contributions to the CRS yet.  Collaboration to explore ways to record and reconcile data obtained from the MDB Joint Approach with the CRS.  Data on climate co-benefits at contribution level received so far from the World Bank and the African Development Bank.
  6. 6. Update on status of reporting to the DAC Inflows to multilateral climate funds and multilateral agencies  Contributions from donors to the CIFs, GEF LDCF, GEF SCCF, UNFCCC and Montreal Protocol are counted in their totality as multilateral contributions for climate purposes.  Only a share of core contributions from donors to multi-purpose organisations is counted: the share of the organisation’s outflows targeting climate change.  Share of GEF’s outflows targeting climate change is 32%  Share of IDA’s outflows targeting climate change is 30%  Share for other MDBs is not reflected yet in DAC statistics.
  7. 7. Update on status of reporting to the DAC Inflows to multilateral climate funds and multilateral agencies Australia 7.1 0.0 0.0 43.8 0.0 0.0 0.5 3.3 Austria 4.4 0.0 0.0 52.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.4 Belgium 7.0 6.4 11.6 49.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.7 Canada 17.5 0.0 0.0 132.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 7.1 Czech Republic 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 Denmark 5.5 0.0 0.0 21.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 EU Institutions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 Finland 9.0 0.0 0.0 20.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 France 0.0 83.8 0.0 154.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 10.2 Germany 35.7 25.7 14.1 226.1 0.0 25.7 4.0 12.6 Greece 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.1 Iceland 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ireland 0.0 0.0 1.8 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.8 Italy 2.1 0.0 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Japan 48.5 0.0 0.0 409.0 377.3 87.1 2.4 21.3 Korea 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.1 Luxembourg 0.5 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Netherlands 16.0 0.0 0.0 61.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 New Zealand 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Norway 5.9 3.4 2.9 46.1 0.0 36.1 3.3 1.4 Poland 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 Portugal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Slovak Republic 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Slovenia 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Spain 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 Sweden 0.0 17.0 0.0 69.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 Switzerland 9.7 1.1 1.3 63.5 0.0 4.8 0.2 1.9 United Kingdom 26.6 0.0 0.0 351.8 69.7 153.7 0.0 0.0 United States 38.3 0.0 0.0 397.5 229.6 74.9 9.8 31.5 Total 233.7 137.6 31.8 2199.0 676.6 382.3 25.0 103.1 GEF (32%) IDA (30%) Montreal Protocol (100%) GEF LDC fund (100%) GEF special climate change fund (100%) UNFCCC (100%) Clean Technology Fund Strategic Climate Fund Multilateral climate-related aid by DAC members in 2012, USD million, current prices
  8. 8. Options to improve the treatment of multilateral flows  O15.Develop a comprehensive and single system for attributing to donors core multilateral flows that target climate change  O16. Harmonisation of MDB and Rio marker methodologies  O17. Review of multilateral funds included in DAC Annex 2 (or not)  O18. Retroactively report historical data using the most recent rules for the bi/multi fund split

×