Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Long-term economic impact of better skills
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Long-term economic impact of better skills

1,132

Published on

Measuring the long-term economic impact of skills and improving outcomes

Measuring the long-term economic impact of skills and improving outcomes

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,132
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
49
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • We have seen tremendous improvements in the output of educational institutions over the last years.But how do we know what kind of human capital really makes a difference for the economic and social prospects of individuals? The significance of the publication I am presenting to you lies in establishing and quantifying that link between educational outcomes, on the one hand, and economic growth, on the other. It shows you two things: Improving the quantitative output of educational systems, the length of schooling, is making some, but not a lot of difference for your success. But you will see that those countries that have been able to improve quality of learning outcomes, as measured by PISA, have seen enormous gains.
  • Education systems are responding to the challenges, first of all, with rapidly rising output. The pace of change is most clearly visible in higher education, and I want to bring two more dimensions into the picture here. Each dot on this chart represents one country. The horizontal axis shows you the college graduation rate, the proportion of an age group that comes out of the system with a college degree. The vertical axis shows you how much it costs to educate a graduate per year.
  • *Lets now add where the money comes from into the picture, the larger the dot, the larger the share of private spending on college education, such as tuition.The chart shows the US as the country with the highest college graduation rate, and the highest level of spending per student. The US is also among the countries with the largest share of resources generated through the private sector. That allows the US to spend roughly twice as much per student as Europe. US, FinlandThe only thing I have not highlighted so far is that this was the situation in 1995. And now watch this closely as you see how this changed between 1995 and 2005.
  • You see that in 2000, five years, later, the picture looked very different. While in 1995 the US was well ahead of any other country – you see that marked by the dotted circle, in 2000 several other countries had reached out to this frontier. Look at Australia, in pink.
  • Thatwasallveryquick, letusgothroughthisdevelopmentonceagain
  • Let me then address the issue of what we know about the kind of human capital that will make a difference.
  • Let us go back to the 1960s. The chart shows you the wealth of world regions and the average years of schooling in these regions, which is the most traditional measure of human capital. Have a look at Latin America, it ranked third in wealth and third in years of schooling, so in the 1960s the world seemed pretty much in order.
  • But when you look at economic growth between 1960 and 2000, you see that something went wrong. Despite the fact that Latin America did well in terms of years of schooling, only Sub-Saharan Africa did worse in terms of economic growth. So in 2000, Latin America had fallen back considerably in terms of GDP per capita.You can draw two conclusions from this: Either education is not as important for economic growth as we thought, or we have for a long time been measuring the wrong thing.
  • Now let me add one additional element, and that is a measure of the quality of education, in the form of the score of the different world regions on international tests like PISA or TIMSS. And you see now that the world looks in order again, there seems a close relationship between test scores and economic growth. You can see that even more clearly when you put this into graphical form. This is one of the charts produced by Professor Hanushek. And, as Professor Hanushek will explain, the relationship holds even when you account for other factors, it even holds when you compare growth in economies with growth in learning outcomes, which is the closest we can come to examining causality.So what this tells you is that it is not simply years of schooling or the number of graduates we produce, but indeed the quality of learning outcomes that counts.
  • How do we know that we know?I want to distinguish here between the impact knowledge and skills such as those assessed by PISA have for the success of individuals, on the one hand, and economies, on the other.
  • The best way to find out whether what students have learned at school matters for their life is to actuallywatch what happens to them after they leave school. This is exactly what we have done that with around 30,000 students in Canada. We tested them in the year 2000 when they were 15 years old in reading, math and science, and since then we are following up with them each year on what choices they make and how successful they are in their transition from school to higher education and work.The horizontal axis shows you the PISA level which 15-year-old Canadians had scored in 2000. Level 2 is the baseline level on the PISA reading test and Level 5 the top level in reading.The red bar shows you how many times more successful someone who scored Level 2 at age 15 was at age 19 to have made a successful transition to university, as compared to someone who did not make it to the baseline PISA level 1. And to ensure that what you see here is not simply a reflection of social background, gender, immigration or school engagement, we have already statistically accounted for all of these factors. The orange bar. …How would you expect the picture to be like at age 21? We are talking about test scores here, but for a moment, lets go back to the judgements schools make on young people, for example through school marks. You can do the same thing here, you can see how well school marks at age 15 predict the subsequent success of youths. You see that there is some relationship as well, but that it is much less pronounced than when we use the direct measure of skills.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Why quality in education mattersAnd what it takes to improve it
      Egypt Education SummitLuxor, 18 March 2010
      Andreas SchleicherEducation Policy Advisor of the OECD Secretary-General
    • 2. Know why you are looking
      The yardstick for success is no longer just improvement by national standards…
      … but the best performing education systems globally
      Know what you are looking for
      The kind of ‘human capital’ that makes a difference for individuals and nations
      How do we recognise it when we found it?
      The link between skills, and economic and social outcomes
      Policy implications
      Understanding what contributes to the success of education systems and improving performance .
    • 3. A world of change – highereducation
      Expenditure per student at tertiary level (USD)
      Cost per student
      Graduate supply
      Tertiary-type A graduation rate
    • 4. A world of change – highereducation
      Expenditure per student at tertiary level (USD)
      United States
      Cost per student
      Finland
      Graduate supply
      Tertiary-type A graduation rate
    • 5. A world of change – highereducation
      Expenditure per student at tertiary level (USD)
      Australia
      Finland
      United Kingdom
      Tertiary-type A graduation rate
    • 6. A world of change – highereducation
      Expenditure per student at tertiary level (USD)
      Tertiary-type A graduation rate
    • 7. A world of change – highereducation
      Expenditure per student at tertiary level (USD)
      Tertiary-type A graduation rate
    • 8. A world of change – highereducation
      Expenditure per student at tertiary level (USD)
      Tertiary-type A graduation rate
    • 9. A world of change – highereducation
      Expenditure per student at tertiary level (USD)
      Tertiary-type A graduation rate
    • 10. A world of change – highereducation
      Expenditure per student at tertiary level (USD)
      Tertiary-type A graduation rate
    • 11. A world of change – highereducation
      Expenditure per student at tertiary level (USD)
      United States
      Australia
      Finland
      Tertiary-type A graduation rate
    • 12. Know what you are looking for
      The kind of human capital that makes a difference for people and nations
    • 13. Latin America then…
      Hanushek 2009
    • 14. Latin America then and now…
      Hanushek 2009
    • 15. Latin America then and now…
      Why quality is the key
      Hanushek 2009
    • 16. OECD’s PISA assessment of the knowledge and skills of 15-year-olds
      Coverage of world economy
      83%
      77%
      81%
      85%
      86%
      87%
    • 17. México (410)
      High science performance
      Average performanceof 15-year-olds in science – extrapolate and apply
      Low science performance
    • 18. How do we know that we found it?
      To what extent knowledge and skills matter for the success of individuals and economies
    • 19. Increased likelihood of postsec. particip. at age 19/21 associated with PISA reading proficiency at age 15 (Canada)after accounting for school engagement, gender, mother tongue, place of residence, parental, education and family income (reference group PISA Level 1)
      Odds ratioCollege entry
      School marks at age 15
      PISA performance at age 15
    • 20. Modelling the impact
      Programmes to improve cognitive skills through schools take time to implement and to have their impact on students.
      Assume that it will take 20 years to implement reform
      The impact of improved skills will not be realised until the students with greater skills move into the labour force
      Assume that improved PISA performance will result in improved skill-based of 2.5% of the labour-force each year
      The economy will respond over time as new technologies are developed and implemented, making use of the new higher skills
      Estimate the total gains over the lifetime of the generation born this year .
    • 21. México (410)
      High science performance
      Average performanceof 15-year-olds in science – extrapolate and apply
      Low science performance
    • 22. Relationship between test performance and economic outcomesAnnual improved GDP from raising performance by 25 PISA points
      Percent addition to GDP
    • 23. Increase average performance by 25 PISA points (Total 115 trillion $)
      bn$
    • 24. México (410)
      High science performance
      Average performanceof 15-year-olds in science – extrapolate and apply
      Low science performance
    • 25. Raise everyone to minimum of 400 PISA points
      bn$
    • 26. Raise everyone to minimum of 400 PISA points
      % currrent GDP
    • 27. Some conclusions
      The higher economic outcomes that improved student performance entails dwarf the dimensions of economic cycles
      Even if the estimated impacts of skills were twice as large as the true underlying causal impact on growth, the resulting present value of successful school reform still far exceeds any conceivable costs of improvement.
    • 28. Implications
      Understanding what contributes to the success of education systems and improving performance
    • 29. Money matters - but other things do too
      Question:
      If better education results in more money,
      Does more money result in better education?
    • 30. Spending choices on secondary schoolsContribution of various factors to upper secondary teacher compensation costsper student as a percentage of GDP per capita (2004)
      Percentage points
    • 31. High ambitions and universal standards
      Rigor, focus and coherence
      Great systems attract great teachers and provide access to best practice and quality professional development
    • 32. Challenge and support
      Strong support
      Poor performance
      Improvements idiosyncratic
      Strong performance
      Systemic improvement
      Lowchallenge
      Highchallenge
      Poor performance
      Stagnation
      Conflict
      Demoralisation
      Weak support
    • 33. International Best Practice
      The past
      • Principals who are trained, empowered, accountable and provide instructional leadership
      • 34. Principals who manage ‘a building’, who have little training and preparation and are accountable but not empowered
      • 35. Attracting, recruiting and providing excellent training for prospective teachers from the top third of the graduate distribution
      • 36. Attracting and recruiting teachers from the bottom third of the graduate distribution and offering training which does not relate to real classrooms
      • 37. Incentives, rules and funding encourage a fair distribution of teaching talent
      • 38. The best teachers are in the most advantaged communities
      Human capital
    • 39. International Best Practice
      The past
      • Expectations of teachers are clear; consistent quality, strong professional ethic and excellent professional development focused on classroom practice
      • 40. Seniority and tenure matter more than performance; patchy professional development; wide variation in quality
      • 41. Teachers and the system expect every child to succeed and intervene preventatively to ensure this
      • 42. Wide achievement gaps, just beginning to narrow but systemic and professional barriers to transformation remain in place
      Human capital (cont…)
    • 43. High ambitions
      Devolved responsibility,the school as the centre of action
      Accountability and intervention in inverse proportion to success
      Access to best practice and quality professional development
    • 44. School autonomy, standards-based examinations and science performanceSchool autonomy in selecting teachers for hire
      PISA score in science
    • 45. Public and private schools
      %
      Score point difference
      Public schools perform better
      Private schools perform better
    • 46. Pooled international dataset, effects of selected school/system factors on science performance after accounting for all other factors in the model
      School principal’s positive evaluation of quality of educational materials(gross only)
      Schools with more competing schools(gross only)
      Schools with greater autonomy (resources)(gross and net)
      School activities to promote science learning(gross and net)
      One additional hour of self-study or homework (gross and net)
      One additional hour of science learning at school (gross and net)
      School results posted publicly (gross and net)
      Academically selective schools (gross and net) but no system-wide effect
      Schools practicing ability grouping (gross and net)
      One additional hour of out-of-school lessons (gross and net)
      20
      Each additional 10% of public funding(gross only)
      School principal’s perception that lack of qualified teachers hinders instruction(gross only)
      Effect after accounting for the socio-economic background of students, schools and countries
      Measured effect
      OECD (2007), PISA 2006 – Science Competencies from Tomorrow’s World, Table 6.1a
    • 47. Strong ambitions
      Devolvedresponsibility,the school as the centre of action
      Integrated educational opportunities
      From prescribed forms of teaching and assessment towards personalised learning
      Accountability
      Access to best practice and quality professional development
    • 48. High science performance
      Durchschnittliche Schülerleistungen im Bereich Mathematik
      High average performance
      Large socio-economic disparities
      High average performance
      High social equity
      Strong socio-economic impact on student performance
      Socially equitable distribution of learning opportunities
      Early selection and institutional differentiation
      High degree of stratification
      Low degree of stratification
      Low average performance
      Large socio-economic disparities
      Low average performance
      High social equity
      Low science performance
    • 49. Getting the order right
      Phases of development
      Adequate  Good
      Poor  Adequate
      Good  Great
      Main focus of assessment
      • Tackling underperformance
      • 50. Transparency .
      • 51. Spreading best practice
      • 52. World class performance.
      • 53. Continuous learning and innovation .
      Role of government
      Role of professions
      Nature of relationship between government and professions
      • Steady improvement
      • 73. Growing public satisfaction .
      • 74. Consistent quality
      • 75. Public engagement and co-production .
      • 76. Improvement in outcomes
      • 77. Reduction of public anxiety.
      Main outcomes
    • 78. Paradigm shifts
    • 79. www.oecd.org; www.pisa.oecd.org
      All national and international publications
      The complete micro-level database
      email: pisa@oecd.org
      Andreas.Schleicher@OECD.org
      … and remember:
      Without data, you are just another person with an opinion
      Thank you !

    ×