Wh jon strath - Local and regional partnerships
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Wh jon strath - Local and regional partnerships






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 3

http://www.slideee.com 3


Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • What does PARES consist of?PARES strategic dialogue – forum where employment services can share and develop good practice in cooperation and complementary service provision.It took form of stakeholder conferences on  28-29 September 2011, 2-3 October 2012 and 24-25 October 2013, and dialogue events on: Evaluation of partnerships (14 May 2013)Drafting a Memorandum of Understanding on a national level (26 April 2013)Fields and forms of cooperation (13 March 2012)Working in partnership at the local and regional Level (29 March 2012)PARES call for proposals – for projects by employment services that showcase the mixed provision of employment services for vulnerable groups.WEESP: Web-tool for Evaluated Employment Services Practices – including organisational practices, tools and active labour market policies related to service delivery for jobseekers and employers.

Wh jon strath - Local and regional partnerships Wh jon strath - Local and regional partnerships Presentation Transcript

  • PARES Local and regional partnerships – Recommendations to employment services OECD LEED Forum on Partnerships and Local Development Stockholm, 2014-04-24
  • PARES – Partnership between Employment Services • Initiative to encourage an EU-level strategic dialogue between Employment Services on policy implementation and delivery issues • Aims to improve cooperation between the different employment services (public, private and non-profit) in EU member countries and • define fields where they can deliver complementary services.
  • Local and regional partnerships - Observations • No one organisation has the full range of competencies • Freedom to operate according to local situation required • Partnerships are founded on clear objectives and targets, full commitment and trust • All relevant actors should be included • Shared leadership does not work
  • Local and regional partnerships - Observations • Engage employers as much as possible • Simply building a partnership is no guarantee for better service delivery; must focus on goals and outcome – constantly question value of partnership
  • No one organisation has the full range of competencies - Recommendations • Undertake self-examination to diagnose weaknesses in service delivery • Identify others servicing the same clients • Review benefits to clients from coordinated delivery • Initiate dialogue
  • Freedom to operate according to local situation required - Recommendations • National level bodies with local operational units should review their policy of local autonomy for partnerships • Review should recognise the potential value of local partnerships, encourage local units to consider if, and how, to enter into partnerships, and provide a framework within which local units have the freedom to initiate and develop partnerships
  • Organisation of partnership - Recommendations • Preparation phase is vital – do not rush through it • Involve all partners in dialogue • Viability of partnership should be seriously questioned if key actors are reluctant • Ensure mutual understanding of objectives, approach and individual roles • Formalise the agreement • Objectives should be SMART • Leadership should be assumed by partner carrying most of the risk
  • Monitor and evaluation - Recommendations • Mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation should be part of the agreement • Minimum annual review • External evaluation recommended to avoid self- perpetuating • Ensure outcomes can be traced back to activities • Partnerships that have achieved their goals or does not add value should be dissolved
  • Final comment • The question is not why, but how! • Thank you for your attention!