13th Annual Meeting of the OECD LEED Forum on Partnerships and Local Development INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY, JOB CREATION AND INCLUSION FROM THE BOTTOM-UP 10th-11th April 2017 | Prague, Czech Republic
2. Is cultural heritage a lever for development?
Added Value and New jobs through tourism and cultural
products
Attractivity and better historic urban landscape
Positive contribution to the wellbeing of local communities
Fabric for creativity: The role of intangible cultural heritage
xg 11/12/09
3. How are museums levers for development?
By producing intrinsic artistic and cultural values.
Developing facilities for visitors, organising exhibitions and other events, and
producing scientific knowledge through the use of various media are the
principal categories.
By developing the supply of extrinsic values: educational, social, and
even environmental.
This can be considered as an extension of the the museum’s traditional
educational function to support general knowledge.
By redesigning the cultural landscape of the city.
The design of a new building or the extension of an existing building proves
to be a major architectural creation. They increasingly encompass an urban
dimension in serving as meeting places or stopping-off points, making the
museum a landmark and a symbol of shared identity (like the M9 Museum
under construction in Mestre.)
xg 11/12/09
4. The variation of the Museum
Economic Models
The Branding Museum (as an extension of the superstar
museum)
The Event-making museum
The Empowering local community museum
xg 11/12/09
5. The Branding Museum
From Superstars to Branding Museums
Superstars museums were identified as outstanding in terms of their
attendance figures, collections, architecture, and associated products
and services.
The “branding museum” goes further by mobilizing and caitalizing
on numerous intangible assets, which put the importance of physical
assets into new perspective: The assets are organizational as well as
scientific or communicational.
The relative importance of these intangible assets is in general
complemented by a high degree of autonomy, the possession of
working capital, a support from international patrons, and a strategy
of events planning that goes far beyond temporary exhibitions or
purely cultural themes.
Co-opetition at the global level.
From Image to Brand, and vice-versa
xg 11/12/09
6. The Event-Making Museum
For this type of museum the chief mechanism for attracting visitors,
and thus remaining financially sustainable, is the organization of
events, exhibitions, concerts, conferences, etc.
But they also have to count on a significant increase in the costs of
organizing these events.
When the model of “event-driven museum” is adopted, it unleashes
profound changes in the future management of the museum. By
turning itself into an event, the museum enters into the events
market, which has numerous producers and consumers, and hence
into monopolistic competition with other “event-driven museums”.
xg 11/12/09
7. The Local Community Empowering
Museum (1)
A vast majority of museums have been built around locally sourced
collections brought together through the clustering of works or objects
around some local practice, activity, or cultural expression.
The economic model of the “empowering local community museum” is
mainly underpinned by subsidies, grants, patronage, sources that for
many reasons are strongly declining.
How long such museums will survive? Is their future their own
transformation in a community meeting center? Can they benefit from
the mutualization of their backyard resources, keeping some autonomy
for delivering frontyard services?
xg 11/12/09
8. The Local Community Empowering
Museum (2) : Which Challenges?
Disappearing local networks
Shrinking support from local governments
Increasing costs of the conservation of the
existence value
Different perspectives between stakeholders
xg 11/12/09
10. Which agenda for local
development strategies?
Taking into consideration the difference of perspectives?
Re-thinking the institutional design?
New clues for production and services
From auto-evaluation to evaluation
xg 11/12/09
11. Taking into consideration the difference of
perspectives :
Which is the relevant contribution of museums to local
development?
According to the Local
Government
Indicators According to the
museum
87% Tourism 7%
60% Creation of products 12%
65% Bettering the skills 8%
47% Piloting new
technologies
40%
xg 11/12/09
12. Taking into consideration the difference of
perspectives :
Which is the Target group of the soicla inclusion for
museums?
According to the Local
Government
Indicators According to the
museum
72% Young people less than
25 years old
75%
21% Adults 7%
4% Disadvantaged people 6%
4% Senior citizens 5%
xg 11/12/09
13. Rething the institutional design:
In what ways do local governments hamper the accomplishment
of your goals for development?
xg 11/12/09
14. Rething the institutional design:
What is the most positive role of the local government for your
museum?
Objective %
Make you known to the local population 20,2%
Provide funding 54%
Take over management responsibilities 6,8%
Give political support for your work? 19 %
Total 100%
xg 11/12/09
15. Re-thinking the institutional design:
What organisational structure facilitates cooperation between
museums and local governments?
Directed by local government 14,6%
Directed by national government 4,2%
Mixed direction, both local and national 27,1%
Public-Private Partnership 39,6%
Private non-profit? 12,5%
Private for-profit 2,0%
Total 100%
xg 11/12/09
16. Re-thinking the institutional design:
Between devolution and mutualization
A not so strong demand of devolution
Mixed System: The Renaissance program in United Kingdom
The mutualization of the backyard
The mutualization of the frontyard
xg 11/12/09
17. New clues for prodution and services
Starting from the collections
Training for adult
Disposal of venues
Health and wellbeing
Archives for economic development
Driver for creativity
Disposal of venues and places for meeting
Is a vitual museum a museum (or a cultural center
xg 11/12/09
18. From evaluation to auto-evaluation:
Which are the desirable indicators?
According to the Local
Government
Indicators According to the
museum
17% Education & Training 36%
42% Number of Visitors 36%
63% Economic Development 49%
68% Social Welfare 57%
xg 11/12/09
19. From evaluation to auto-evaluation:
Which are the desirable indicators?
To agree on the difference between intriniscal and extrinsical
values
Three dimensions to take into consideration:
Assessment, monitoring and mediatization
Involve the human resources in the definition of the
indicators
xg 11/12/09