The ideas that shaped PISA, & the ideas that PISA shaped - Andreas Schleicher TED Global 2013

Andreas PISASchleicher OECD Programme forTEDGlobal 2013 International Student AssessmentThe ideas thatshaped PISA,& the ideas thatPISA shapedThe yardstick for educationalsuccess is no longerimprovement by nationalstandards but the bestperforming education systems

30 80 10 40 60 90 0 20 50 70 100 % United States 1 13 Czech Republic Estonia 1990s Germany Switzerland Denmark Canada Norway 1980s SwedenRussian Federation Austria3 Slovenia Israel 1970s Slovak Republic New Zealand Hungary Finland 1960s United Kingdom Netherlands Luxembourg EU19 average OECD average the global talent pool France The world of change in Australia Iceland Belgium Poland Ireland Korea 1 27 Chile Greece 44 and 25-34 Italy Spain Turkey Portugal of persons with high school Mexico Approximated by percentage or equivalent qualifications in Brazil the age groups: 55-64, 45-55, 35-

2003 2009PISA countries in 2001 2006 2000 1998 Coverage of world 86% 85% 87% economy 81% 83% 77%In 2009, over half a million students representing 28 million 15-year-oldsPISA: An internationally agreed 2 -hour test that goes beyond testingin 74 education systems took the what they were taught… to assesswhether students can reproduce PISA test.students’ capacity to extrapolate from what they know and creatively applytheir knowledge in novel situations. PISA countries

Average performance of 15-year-olds in reading High reading performance 560 Shanghai-China 540 Korea Finland Hong Kong-China Singapore Canada 520 New Zealand Japan Australia Netherlands Belgium Norway 500 Estonia Switzerland Poland United States Iceland Liechtenstein Sweden Germany Ireland France Chinese Taipei Denmark United Kingdom Hungary Macao-China Italy Portugal 480 Latvia Slovenia Greece Spain Czech Republic Slovak Republic Croatia Israel Luxembourg Austria Lithuania Turkey 460 Dubai (UAE) Russian Federation Chile 440 Serbia … 17 countries perform below this line Low reading performance

Average performance of 15-year-olds in reading High average performance High average performance Large socio-economic disparities High reading performance High social equity 560 Shanghai-China 540 Korea Finland Hong Kong-China Singapore Canada 520 New Zealand Japan Australia Netherlands Belgium Norway 500 Estonia SociallyStrong socio-economic Switzerland Poland United States Iceland Liechtenstein equitableimpact on student Sweden Germany Ireland France Chinese Taipei distribution ofperformance Denmark learning United Kingdom Hungary opportunities Macao-China Italy Portugal 480 Latvia Slovenia Greece Spain Czech Republic Slovak Republic Croatia Israel Luxembourg Austria Lithuania Turkey 460 Dubai (UAE) Russian Federation Chile 440 Serbia … 17 countries perform below this line Low average performance Low reading performance Low average performance Large socio-economic disparities High social equity

Average performance of 15-year-olds in reading High average performance High average performance Large socio-economic disparities High reading performance High social equity 560 Shanghai-China 540 Korea Finland Hong Kong-China Singapore Canada New Zealand Japan 520 Australia Netherlands Belgium Switzerland Norway Iceland 500 United States Poland Estonia Liechtenstein Germany Sweden France Chinese Taipei Ireland Denmark Hungary United Kingdom Portugal Italy Slovenia Latvia Greece 480 Spain Czech Republic Slovak Republic Croatia Israel Luxembourg Austria Lithuania Turkey 460 Dubai (UAE) Russian Federation Chile Serbia 440 Low average performance Low reading performance Low average performance Large socio-economic disparities High social equity

Average performance of 15-year-olds in reading High average performance High average performance Large socio-economic disparities High reading performance High social equityAustraliaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepDenmark KoreaFinland FinlandGermanyGreece CanadaHungary New Zealand JapanIceland AustraliaIrelandIsrael NetherlandsItaly Belgium Switzerland Norway IcelandJapan United States PolandKorea Germany SwedenLuxembourg Hungary United Kingdom Ireland Denmark PortugalMexico ItalyNetherlands Slovenia Greece Luxembourg SpainNew Zealand Czech RepublicNorway IsraelPoland LuxembourgPortugalSpainSwedenSwitzerlandUK ChileUS Low average performance Low reading performance Low average performance Large socio-economic disparities High social equity

Countries spend their Contribution of various actors to upper secondary teacher compensation costs per studentmoney differently as a percentage of GDP per capita (2004) Salary as % of GDP/capita Instruction time 1/teaching time 1/class size Difference with OECD …15151010 5 5 0 0 -5 -5-10-10 Portugal Greece Belgium Italy Denmark France Mexico Finland United States Korea Spain Sweden Luxembourg Japan Australia Netherlands Austria Hungary Norway Poland Ireland Germany New Zealand Iceland Switzerland Slovak Republic Czech Republic United Kingdom

Spending per student and value for money 2009 High average performance High average performance Large socio-economic disparities High reading performance High social equityAustraliaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepDenmarkFinlandGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourgMexicoNetherlandsNew ZealandNorwayPolandPortugalSpainSwedenSwitzerlandUKUS Low average performance Low reading performance Low average performance Large socio-economic disparities High social equity

Spending per student and value for money 2000 High average performance High average performance Large socio-economic disparities High reading performance High social equityAustraliaBelgiumCanadaChileCzech RepDenmark KoreaFinlandGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaLuxembourg GermanyMexico Hungary PolandNetherlandsNew ZealandNorway PortugaPoland lPortugalSpainSwedenSwitzerlandUKUS Low average performance Low reading performance Low average performance Large socio-economic disparities High social equity

Average school systems High performers in PISASome students learn at high levels High performers in PISAUniformity Embracing diversityCurriculum-centered Learner-centeredLearning a place Learning an activityLow status of the teaching professions Countries attract and develop high quality teachersPrescription Informed professionDelivered wisdom User-generated wisdomProvision OutcomesBureaucratic look-up Devolved – look outwards

Average school systems High performers in PISAAdministrative control and accountability Professional forms of work organisationConformity Ingenious Attract the most talented teachers to the mostStandardise distribution of resources challenging classroomsManagement LeadershipPublic vs private Public with private Alignment of policies, coherence over time, fidelityIdiosyncratic reforms of implementation

Andreas PISASchleicher OECD Programme forTEDGlobal 2013 International Student AssessmentThe ideas thatshaped PISA,& the ideas thatPISA shapedPISA has shown what is possible in education andtaken away excuses from those who are complacent.It has helped to set meaningful targets in terms ofmeasurable goals. It has shown how data canprovide a powerful momentum for change.

Andreas PISASchleicher OECD Programme forTEDGlobal 2013 International Student AssessmentFind out more aboutPISA at OECDwww.pisa.oecd.orgEmail: Andreas.Schleicher@OECD.orgRemember: Without data, you are just another personwith an opinion.

https://twitter.com	164
http://alnteacher.tumblr.com	92
http://torresani-edu.blogspot.cz	51
http://torresani-edu.blogspot.it	21
http://torresani-edu.blogspot.com	5
http://www.twylah.com	2
http://imagining2022.wordpress.com	2
https://mail.google.com	1
http://www.alnteacher.tumblr.com	1

The ideas that shaped PISA, & the ideas that PISA shaped - Andreas Schleicher TED Global 2013

by OECD Education on Mar 01, 2013

Accessibility

Upload Details

Usage Rights

9 Embeds 339

Statistics

The ideas that shaped PISA, & the ideas that PISA shaped - Andreas Schleicher TED Global 2013 Presentation Transcript