Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
OECD, 7th Meeting on Public-Private Partnerships - Isabel RIAL
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

OECD, 7th Meeting on Public-Private Partnerships - Isabel RIAL

409

Published on

This presentation by Isabel RIAL was made at the 7th Meeting on Public-Private Partnerships held on 17-18 February 2014. Find more information at http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/ppp.htm

This presentation by Isabel RIAL was made at the 7th Meeting on Public-Private Partnerships held on 17-18 February 2014. Find more information at http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/ppp.htm

Published in: News & Politics
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
409
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
18
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Budgeting Sustainably for PPPs and Traditional Capital Projects in the Medium and Long-term Isabel Rial Fiscal Affairs Department, IMF irial@imf.org OECD Annual Meeting for PPP Officials, February 17, 2014 The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. 1
  • 2. Outline I. Why is budgeting for public investment and PPPs from a long-term perspective important? II. What should we aim at? III. What can be done? IV. Final remarks 2
  • 3. I. Why is budgeting important? Why is budgeting for public investment and PPPs from a long-term perspective important? Two main reasons: – Efficiency of public spending • Adequate budgeting is key to ensure efficiency both in traditional public investment and PPPs – Fiscal risk management • Avoid “fiscal surprises” 3
  • 4. I. Why is budgeting important? a. Efficiency of public spending • Limited fiscal space in advanced economies led to a declining trend of public investment and capital stock. • This trend may hinder medium- and long-term growth and endanger the sustainability of required fiscal consolidation. Debt-to-GDP Ratio (2012, in percent of GDP) Japan Greece Italy Portugal Ireland United States Belgium Iceland France United Kingdom Spain Canada Germany Hungary Austria Netherlands 9 238 157 50 100 Source: WEO database, October 2013. 150 Advanced economies Emerging market economies Low-income countries 8 7 127 124 117 103 100 99 90 89 86 85 82 79 74 71 0 General Government Investment (Percent of GDP) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 200 250 1970-90 1990-2000 2000-08 2009-12 Sources: Penn World Tables (2012); OECD; and IMF staff estimates. 4
  • 5. I. Why is budgeting important? a. Efficiency of public spending • Higher public spending does not necessarily translates fully into productive capital assets [Gupta and others (2013)] • There is room to stabilize public capital stock by improving the efficiency of public investment – The Public Investment Management Index (PIMI), the core of the efficiency-adjustment, shows that project selection and budgeting are crucial to ensure efficiency • Eliminating inefficiencies in public investment processes can go a long way in meeting the infrastructure gap worldwide. 5
  • 6. I. Why is budgeting important? a. Efficiency of public spending • Yet, addressing inefficiencies may not be enough to stabilize public capital stock….. • Governments could rely further on PPPs… • But, efficiency gains can only be achieved if they are pursued for “good reasons”, where PPP projects compete for budget resources on a level playing field. 6
  • 7. I. Why is budgeting important? b. Fiscal risk management • During the global financial crisis, PPPs have been a significant source of unexpected increases in governments’ debt and contingent liabilities. • PPP "surprises" in countries where PPP stock magnitude was largest revealed large hidden risks (e.g., Portugal) • Given high levels of public debt in most AE, caution is warranted to avoid choosing PPPs for the wrong reasons…. • Adequate budgeting plays a critical role in managing fiscal risks from public capital, including PPPs. 7
  • 8. I. Why is budgeting important? b. Fiscal risk management 120 Example: General Government Debt in Portugal* (percent of GDP, 1997-2011) Arrears 120 General Government gross debt 100 80 SOE & PPP reclassifications SOE & PPP debt outside the General Government Non-SOE & PPP General Government debt 80 60 60 40 100 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 *Only includes Central Government SOE debt pre 2007 40
  • 9. I. Why is budgeting important? b. Fiscal risk management Sources of Unexpected Increase in General Government Debt (percent of GDP, 2007-2010) FRA DEU NLD Underlying fiscal position ESP PRT GBR USA GRC IRL ISL AVE* Issues Revealed by the Crisis 1.7 3.2 -2.4 1.8 11.3 3.7 8.1 16.3 1.3 10.9 6.0 1.7 1.8 -0.9 -0.1 0.1 1.5 7.1 2.5 1.6 4.0 4.7 -0.7 1.4 -0.2 0.6 9.4 1.9 0.9 11.2 -0.1 2.5 1.1 SoEs & PPPs 0.7 0.0 -1.3 1.3 1.7 0.3 0.0 2.6 -0.2 4.5 0.2 Arrears 8.4 12.8 14.2 15.4 8.1 17.0 6.3 40.0 60.2 39.5 9.8 Macroeconomic shocks 8.3 4.7 5.2 13.0 4.4 8.9 3.8 38.4 35.7 -3.3 6.0 Financial sector interventions 0.0 8.1 9.0 2.5 3.6 8.1 2.5 1.6 24.5 42.8 3.8 Contingent Liabilities Policy changes 2.3 3.8 1.9 4.9 4.7 1.1 6.4 -8.0 -9.9 -4.3 4.7 Stimulus / Consolidation Other factors 2.1 -0.3 6.5 1.9 3.7 6.2 8.3 -6.7 7.5 21.6 5.9 14.4 19.5 20.2 24.0 27.8 28.0 29.1 41.7 59.1 67.7 26.4 Revisions to 2007 deficit & debt Changes to government boundary Cash-accrual adjustments Exogenous shocks Total Unexpected Increase in Debt * GDP-weighted average Unreported Deficits Macroeconomic Risks 9
  • 10. II. What should we aim at? • Budget investment decisions should be determined primarily by policy priorities, cost-benefits analysis, and long-term affordability, and not by the timing of cash flows • Avoid the “accounting bias” towards PPPs • All investment projects should be treated equally, irrespective of the ultimate financing method 10
  • 11. II. What should we aim at? • Ensure that full life-costs of a project are taken into account at project approval – While this is relevant for all investment projects, whether they are implemented as PPP or as traditional investment… – …it is particularly a concern for PPPs due to long construction and contract periods 11
  • 12. III. What can be done? What can governments do to ensure that long-term budget affordability and not the timing of the cash flows drives investment decisions? At a budgeting level, some options include: • Up-front budget recognition for all financial commitments – Medium-term budget framework where PPPs are treated as publicly financed projects – Commitment budgeting • Impose budgetary limits 12
  • 13. III. What can be done? • Medium-term budget framework (MTBF) where PPPs are treated as publicly financed projects – Can be implemented in both accrual and cash budgeting process – Requires budget authorization for the acquisition of investment assets created by PPPs during the construction period – Yet, if the construction of an asset stretches beyond the time horizon covered by the MTBF…. – …. it does not ensure that the full financial implications of the project are considered when the investment decision is taken 13
  • 14. III. What can be done? • Commitment appropriation – Two kinds of authorizations: • Spending appropriation: authorizes spending in current year • Commitment appropriation: authorizes to commit public resources for future years – Addresses the affordability issue • Draws attention to the full costs of all investment projects • Government requires budget authorization before entering any long-term contract • Parliament is informed and could limit fiscal implications of investment decisions – Helps reducing the bias in favor of PPPs, albeit not totally 14
  • 15. III. What can be done? • Budgetary limits – Limits on long-term commitments (direct liabilities) • If up-front budget recognition is not possible, it could be compensated by budgetary limits on the level of PPP commitments • Limits could be measured on the basis of total net present value of long-term costs and/or total annual payments for projects already approved – Limits on total guarantees (contingent liabilities) • Should be estimated at the time that commitments are authorized and monitored during the whole project life-cycle 15
  • 16. IV. Final remarks • To avoid efficiency losses, and “fiscal surprises” PPPs and traditional public investment should be aligned in a medium to long-term planning framework • Governments have sought to compensate for weaknesses of budgetary controls and accountability in investment projects in various ways (e.g., improving accounting practices, disseminating better information, etc.) • Yet, stronger budgetary planning, selection, and approval procedures are necessary to support high quality public spending while ensuring fiscal sustainability 16
  • 17. Thanks! 17

×