Review of Communications in DFID-funded Research Programme Consortia (RPCs)

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    Review of Communications in DFID-funded Research Programme Consortia (RPCs) - Presentation Transcript

    1. Review of Communications in DFID-funded Research Programme Consortia (RPCs) DFID Research Communications Meeting 22 nd July 2008 John Young (j.young@odi.org.uk) ODI, London
    2. DFID RPCs
      • DFID currently funds 30 Research Programme Consortia
      • Introduced a 10% minimum spend on communications
      • Each RPC required to produce a strategy demonstrating how research would be put into use
      • DFID provided a series of support mechanisms to enable this
    3. RAPID Review
      • Key questions
      • How effective is this policy?
      • What has it achieved – is there evidence?
      • What are the challenges in implementing the communication cycle?
      • How can DFID continue to support research uptake?
      • How can DFID demonstrate impact – an M&E system
    4. RAPID Review
      • Methodology
      • Review of RPC documents
      • Interviews with RPC directors and COs
      • Review of comparators and “state of knowledge”
      • Workshop with DFID staff and selected others
      • Wide range of written outputs and meetings
      • Clearly policy-oriented
      • Few uses of popular media and stories
      • Little investments in building networks
      Outputs
    5. Processes and Structure
      • Stakeholder consultations often lead to national advisory groups
      • Most have dedicated communications post & communications working group
      • Average spend is higher than 10%
      • Organisational tension between researchers and comms staff
    6. Monitoring & Evaluation
      • RPCs have followed DFID requirements (Log-Frame)
      • Little knowledge of appropriate M&E methods
      • Little differentiation between quality of outputs, uptake and impact
      • Little knowledge of how to monitor and evaluate partnerships and networks
    7. Working Practices
      • RPCs are seeking opportunities for policy engagement – stakeholder workshops
      • Research is more demand driven, more applied, more multi-disciplinary and more open access
      • More links between RPCs
      • More multiplier funding being sought
      • Serious reflection on North-South partnerships, but still a big challenge
      • Incentives for the above are not clear
    8. Getting Research Taken Up
      • Several RPCs already made successful bids at getting research taken up
      • They are focussing on pathways that will yield opportunities in the future
      • International, national, sub-national levels of policy, DFID policy, civil society, media, academics
    9. Capacity Strengthening
      • Good opportunities for strengthening individual research and communication skills
      • Some strengthening of southern capacity for research leadership but little discussion of the challenges
      • Same for South-South exchange and collaboration
      • RPCs reflecting as best they can on complexities of partnership and funding
      • Little discussion of how to sustain capacity after the life of the RPC
    10. Summary
      • Best understood part of research communication cycle is Stakeholder involvement
        • Inception meetings, advisory groups, relationship building activities
        • Enabled higher quality involvement in policy processes
      • Least understood part is M&E
        • How can we review the impact pathways we are creating?
    11. Next steps
      • Identify changes in behaviour among RPCs and reasons
        • Individual events
        • Longer term changes
      • Explore cases of claimed impact and reasons
      • Comparison with pre-10% rule research programmes
      • Strategy for further improvement and M&E system
    12. Some examples
      • New practices:
      • Stakeholder meetings (Crisis States)
      • Building alliances (CPRC)
      • Impact:
      • Increased attention to population issues in UK Parliament (Realising rights)
      • China approach to TB control (COMDIS)
    13. Stories of change
      • What is the story about?
      • Is there any other important background information?
      • What was the existing behaviour?
      • What did the RPC do that contributed to the behaviour change?
      • What was the behaviour change?
      • What factors helped make this change successful?
      • What comes next for the key actors?
      • Where can we find more information or supporting evidence?
    14. Group work
      • Share experiences of approaches to research communication
      • Explore successes and challenges
      • Identify suppport needed for more effective work
      • (feedback on ODI’s proposal for next steps)

    + ODI_WebmasterODI_Webmaster, 2 years ago

    custom

    972 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    A presentation given by John Young, director of the more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 972
      • 972 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 10
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories