Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Integration of C2 and M
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Integration of C2 and M

337

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
337
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Joint Training Simulation and Analysis Center in Civil-Military Emergency Planning (JTSAC-CMEP) is based on specially developed model for concept development and experimentation in the area of civil security through CAX. This model is a base for change management process – transformation of the security sector into an integrated network enabled organization as goal of the third generation of security sector reform to address challenges of defense against terrorism and other asymmetric threats. JTSAC is an instrument through which CoE-OA extends research, including M&S in crisis management to support CAX in this area. Especially in the context of the exercise EU TACOM SEE-2006 (EU terrorist attack consequence management in SEE exercise) – in particular its CAX part, the CoE-OA supported: Strategic review of civil protection system in Bulgaria and its EU/NATO/regional context Development of Civil Security Concept for Bulgaria Development of General scenario, Operational Architecture and Message Flow for EU TACOM SEE-2006 Establishing of a model environment based on JTSAC for implementation of the Operational Architecture and Message Flow for EU TACOM SEE-2006 Individual and pre-exercise training of the participants in the exercise CAX implementation itself and Currently undergoing process of analysis, assessment and lessons learned drafting from the exercise With plans to update White paper on Civil Protection and Concept for Civil Security CAX has a key role in this process of CDE, because provides integration of different organizations and technologies as well as involve people in the loop of experimentation. In certain sense CAX itself is motivation and a tool for joint work and well documented experimentation, providing objective material for analysis and adaptation of the concepts.
  • Current structure of the security sector to include different institutions with monopoly over use of force or information operations in support of use of force is mirroring the structure of well defined and separate operations of use of force / information support to use of force. At the same time nowadays security environment defines the need for complex crisis management operations where interagency, international, joint, private-public cooperation is essential. This reason drive integration in the security sector, where different institution keep their identity together with the opportunity to form combined interagency joint forces for specific complex operation with change of the mix of forces in different stage of operation or when moving from one to another operation in the same region. Integrated security sector is not an organization, but concept for organization of institutions participating in this network in order to be able to work together, to support each other, reinforce each other when for every certain operation one institution has a lead according to the legal status of the operation.
  • Experimentation of new concepts is a driving force of change. Training has a critical role to play in this process. We see training aspects in all different elements of knowledge management process for change management: General E&T Joint planning for CAX Individual training Pre-exercise group training CAX itself Lessons learned analysis and recommendations drafting And specialized tactical training in parallel or separately of CAX To play such a role of Change Management Tool the training has to be based on effective “M&S of the future reality or virtual reality at all” in order to learn from this future. It has to be supported by effective measurement system and adaptation. In this sense CAX is only platform to arrange different type of training with main focus to experiment nee concepts and to drive the change.
  • The JTSAC-CMEPO is developed under NATO Science for Peace Project SfP981149 by the Center of Excellence in Operational Analyses – network of working groups from Academy of Sciences, Defense Staff College and Academy of Interior Ministry. CAX environment is synthesis of tools for scenario development, simulation, multi-agency / international C4 network, web-based information sharing / collection / fusion and post exercise lessons learned analysis. The JTSAC-CMEP is considered as a test-bed for the new decision making software and information sharing technologies as well as a tool for adding exercise participants in the loop for experimentation of the concepts and acquisition of new knowledge in the area of CMEP. It is why focus of the environment is on modules for support of exercise (MOSEX), including planning and management to achieve higher effectiveness and efficiency of experimentation and training process. The Modelling and Simulation Tool - MOSEX is main engine of the CAX environment. The MOSEX software is tailored and adapted for the Bulgarian situation and will be applied in the exercise on "Terrorist Act Consequences Management in South East Europe" (EU TACOM SEE 2006) sponsored by the European Union. For the exercise extremely short time, limited budget and manpower for the preparation of software is available. A low cost, standard basic software was selected, which provides the minimum of required functionality of message handling, display capabilities and simulation tools (MS-Office, MS-Visual Basic, Map Objects, Google Earth, ArcVew, Outlook, Powersim, MS-Project). With add-ons to MS-Office, some tailoring of existing display software, and quick prototyping of simulation models a set of tools is generated which will support the exercise. An objective is to demonstrate the possibility to utilize existing low cost of the shelf software for command and control and to prototype already useful simulation models without great effort. General architecture includes different cells: Planning and analysis; administration and security; briefing cell, VIP cell, Press/PR cell, computer cell; comms cell; operations cell; analytical cell; simulation cell; field C2 cell. These elements were divided between different structures of the Operational Architecture for the exercise as Operations centers on national and district level, field operations centers, international and ministries operations centers and of course White Cell to run simulation and information collection for further analysis. Main divide line is between emulation of Integrated Emergency Management System (IEMS) and White cell.
  • For JTSAC there is another architectural view – oriented to the services provided for CAX. In this sense main elements are used to provide: Modeling of scenario in order to select right operational architecture and message flow Simulation of message flow and events Modeling and simulation of “white” systems not included in the main program for the exercise as notification, hydro-meteorological early warning and forecast, seismological monitoring, development of the “objective processes” – physical, chemical, psychological, … Information management (IM) in the operations centers, including message handing system (MHS), web information system (WIS), databases, comms, etc. Information fusion and display in the operations centers, including integrated display system (IDS) M&S to support decision making process for the participants in the operations centers Planning support and reporting, including financial management Assessment support and analysis There are four main areas where M&S plays critical role: Scenario development Environment simulation Decision making support Planning and analysis / assessment of the CAX For EU TACOM SEE-2006 special M&S product – SCIP was developed to provide analysis of the scenarios. For environment simulation different products provided by Institute of Geo-physics, Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology, Space research Institute and Smart Media Ltd. were used. For decision making support a bunch of models developed by Institute of Mathematics and Informatics were used. For Planning and analysis integrated package is under development and testing by University of National and World Economy and Imbility Ltd. General IM support and network management was provided by Electron Progress SHC, Telesys Ltd., National Computer Virology laboratory. Real challenge is to integrate commercial of the self IM systems with commercial Emergency management tools and to add to all these specific M&S tools in the areas mentioned above that are at experimentation phase. For EU TACOM SEE-2006 main approach was to integrate different subsystems through open operational web server and work is under progress to add to this data proxy server to “translate information” to and from the third component - M&S server that work over “meta simulation data”.
  • Real challenge for the team is to organize analysis of the results and drafting of lessons learned. It is why from the very beginning result oriented / effect based planning and management of the JTSAC-CMEP and exercises was a priority. This element of the CAX environment is considered as important as the performance of the exercise itself. During the exercise and analysis period special package of modeling and simulation tools will be used to be able to acquire as much as possible knowledge for the emergency management process and for the improvement of used models and software.
  • In the process of CAX Planning there are several M&S tools used in order to improve experimentation and training. First System Architect was used for EU TACOM SEE-2006 to develop operational and system / technical architecture for CAX environment. OpNet was used for M&S of the network to support IM in the wide area network to include several emergency operations centers in Bulgaria and abroad. In order to select different options for the CAX environment Expert Choice and it Bulgarian analog Multichoice 2 were used for final approval of CAX architecture as well as to select subcontractors for different elements of the architecture. MS-Project and MS-Excel Activity Based Costing model were used for development of the budget and deliverables time table. Finally QPR Balance Score Card system is under development for precise analysis of he results and strategic management of the exercise as well as emergency management system transformation at large. Even simple table / chart based models in MS-Excel proved to be very effective for improving the process of experimentation of Civil Security Concept and for adapting of the training of diverse personnel to the realities of CAX. This package for M&S in support of CAX planning will be very useful in preparation of more training session in future and better utilization of JTSAC-CMEP as a facility.
  • Special focus was given to develop a model for assessment of the CAX as a tool for change management through experimentation and training. Using the standard model for Balanced Score Cards special questionnaires where developed for CAX participants / users of JTSAC, CAX developers and CAX stakeholders / leadership of ministries in the area Financial effectiveness, Operational adequacy, Architecture and CAX support, Influence on capacity building for CAX team. Work is under progress to link these questionnaires with the process of planning and implementation of the CAX, development of JTSAC and overall process of emergency management transformation in order to improve measurability of the change management process and to upgrade it to classical economical mission.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Analytical Support for Decision Making in the Security Sector <ul><li>Integration of C2 and M&amp;S elements in CAX for Crisis Management </li></ul><ul><li>(federation management) </li></ul><ul><li>Dr. Velizar Mateev Shalamanov , Institute of Parallel Processing – BAS </li></ul><ul><li>Sofia 1113, Akad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 25 A, IPP-BAS, BULGARIA </li></ul><ul><li>Telephone: ++ 359 (2) 9796747 Telefax: ++ 359 (2) 8707273 </li></ul><ul><li>Email Address: [email_address] </li></ul>
    • 2. Outline <ul><li>CAX based Model for Concept Development and Experimentation </li></ul><ul><li>M&amp;S Capabilities of CAX Environment </li></ul><ul><li>CAX Federation Management </li></ul><ul><li>This publication is supported by NATO’s Scientific Division in the framework of Science for Peace Program - Project SFP-981149 (2005-2007) </li></ul><ul><li>CoE in Operational Analyses ( http://www.gcmarshall.bg/sfp981149/ ) </li></ul>
    • 3. CAX based Model for Concept Development and Experimentation Strategic Review Process: White paper Concept Development – list of principles and options Scenario Development Operational Architecture Model Environment Set-up Pre-exercise Training CAX / MAX Analysis, Assessment, Lessons, Recommendations
    • 4. Training as a Tool for Change Management in Third Generation of Security Sector Reform <ul><li>Building of Integrated Security Sector as Goal of Third Generation Security Sector Reform </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Defense (Sovereignty, Expeditionary Operations, Territorial defense) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Public Order and Security </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Emergency Management / Consequence Management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diplomacy / protection abroad </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Information operations </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Key Pillar of Integrated Security Sector - Defense Against Terrorism and Consequence Management (Crisis Management) </li></ul><ul><li>Role of Training in Change Management </li></ul>
    • 5. Third Generation SSR for Integrated Security Sector MoD MoI MoEM MoFA Special Services Integrated Security Sector MoFA MoD MoI MoEM Special Services <ul><li>One Ministry’s Operation: </li></ul><ul><li>Defense </li></ul><ul><li>Public order </li></ul><ul><li>Emergency management </li></ul><ul><li>Diplomacy </li></ul><ul><li>Information </li></ul>Complex Crisis Management Operations of the Integrated Security Sector
    • 6. Training as a Tool for Change Management General Education / Training Joint CAX Planning Individual Training Pre-exercise Training CAX Lessons Learned Analysis Specialized Tactical Training
    • 7. <ul><li>CAX are main tool for training and respectively change management of complex systems. Integrated emergency management system is a typical element of complex adaptive system, which needs effective change management internally and at the same time is an effective change management tool for the whole security sector in transition from traditional national security to civil security concept. </li></ul><ul><li>CAX requires integration of traditional C2 system with M&amp;S tools to provide real test–bed for new concepts and new technologies including the key element – people in the loop. </li></ul>
    • 8. M&amp;S Capabilities of CAX Environment <ul><li>M&amp;S elements in General Architecture of JTSAC </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Planning and Analysis Cell </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Planning and resource management </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Assessment of CAX </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>White Cell / Simulation cell </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Concept to scenario transition </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Simulation of scenario and environment </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Simulation of IEWS/Notification System </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Operations Center </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Analytical Cell DMS tools </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Communications Cell planning and management tolls </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Integration between scenario M&amp;S and C2 system </li></ul>
    • 9. Architecture of Joint Training Simulation and Analysis Center in Civil-Military Emergency Planning / Response (JTSAC-CMEP) White Cell IEMS White Cell WIS/LL Scenario Development Scenario Simulation Emerg calls Alerting system Meteorological info Hydrological info Seismological info IEWS Planning, Costing, Reporting Briefing room PR room VIP room EU, NATO, UN / MIC, EADRCC, OCHA Ministries: MoEM, MoI, MoD, MH, MoEW, MoE, MoAF National Media, NGOs, other agencies District EOC/LEMA as well as OSOCC MHS/IDS/WIS Field EOC and First responders C2 elements MHS IDS WIS Analy- tical cell Comms cell Functional areas incl. PR National EOC
    • 10. M&amp;S in JTSAC Service Oriented Architecture Scenario Modeling Scenario Simulation Environment Modeling And Simulation, incl. IEWNS, Network Basic IM tools for EMS Decision Making Support Information Fusion and Presentation White Cell Emergency Operations Center Planning Assessment M&amp;S Server WIS server Meta simulation data
    • 11. M&amp;S in Planning and Lessons Learned Drafting <ul><li>Life Cycle of CAX </li></ul><ul><li>Key role of economic dimension and PPP </li></ul><ul><li>Resource Management / Contracting </li></ul><ul><li>Knowledge Management </li></ul><ul><li>Business Continuity Management </li></ul>
    • 12. M&amp;S in CAX Planning reporting Problems in the transformation management in the security sector Resources Budget System Architect / OpNet General architecture Alternatives Expert Choice Multi Choice2 Choice Choice of alternatives Activity Based Costing MS Project Plan QPR Assessment Implementation Balanced system of indicators Integrated system of management Excel/Word
    • 13. M&amp;S in CAX Assessment Yesterday Today Tomorrow JTSAC Architecture How to Provide Best Environment for Experimentation and Training? Information Flow Analytical Support Use of new technologies Scenario and Operational Architecture How to Develop Best Concept and Organizational Structure for CM System? Minimize reaction time Maximize effectiveness Minimize negative consequences Increase Society Satisfaction CAX team training and development How to form and train team and develop CAX products / services for better way achieving other goals? Organizational, tasking, training Bonus payment and retaining personnel Financial How to Minimize Time and Money for Implementation of New Concepts? Time for planning / implementing Budget to run CAX Reusability of environment
    • 14. Need for “proxy” organization <ul><li>BAS and JTSAC role </li></ul><ul><li>Cooperation with NATO </li></ul><ul><ul><li>NSC </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>RTO </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Cooperation with EU </li></ul><ul><ul><li>DG Environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>6 and 7 FP </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Cooperation on bilateral basis </li></ul><ul><li>Regional (SEE, WBSA) cooperation </li></ul>
    • 15. CAX and Real C2 <ul><li>CAX without real C2 system </li></ul><ul><li>CAX with real C2 System </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Direct link </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>C2 =&gt; M&amp;S </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>M&amp;S =&gt; C2 </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>M&amp;S  C2 </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Link through “air gap” and human processing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Trainees </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Support staff </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Combined </li></ul></ul></ul>
    • 16. CAX Federation Federation Network BUS MoD MoI MoSPDA MoFA PMA and CBM PMA – Planning, Management and Assessment; CBM – Continuity of Business Management; DMS – Decision Making Support; M&amp;S – Modeling and Simulation; DB – Data base; GIS – Geographic Information System; e-GRID – European R&amp;D network of computing resources Scenario Development Scenario Simulation M&amp;S tools or real C2 of: DB GIS MHS WIS IDS Natural Environment M&amp;S from BAS Institutes Design and M&amp;S of the Technology Diagrams as well as the Network and Comms / Info Assurance Government – Security Council, Standing Committee on Protection of Population : Integrated Security Sector Internet DMS e – GRID Computing resource International Organizations
    • 17. Three critical elements <ul><li>There are four critical elements in CAX architecture </li></ul><ul><li>simulation cell </li></ul><ul><li>operations cell </li></ul><ul><li>analytical cell </li></ul><ul><li>comms cell </li></ul><ul><li>that need conceptual, information, hardware and software integration in order to support realistic flow of the training process. </li></ul>
    • 18. Key mechanism <ul><li>Current paper explores a model of such integration based on static and dynamic technological diagrams with distributed nodes in these four cells. </li></ul><ul><li>In normal C2 system all nodes will “sit” in operations and analytical cell with tendency to have as much as possible of them in the analytical cell providing scientific best solution for problems arising during crisis management scenario. </li></ul><ul><li>In exercise simulation cell has to cover all nodes that is impossible to be covered by operations and analytical cells. </li></ul><ul><li>So in one end is a system with participants in the exercise only looking at closed simulation run by simulation cell, without any input from operations or analytical cell. </li></ul>
    • 19. Next step is <ul><li>when we have some nodes implemented in analytical or operations cell and at the other end is a full C2 system where there are no elements in simulation cell – all of the nodes are implemented in operations and analytical cell. </li></ul>
    • 20. Interoperability patchwork <ul><li>Memorandum of Understanding between organizations </li></ul><ul><li>Standard Operating Procedures / Documents </li></ul><ul><li>Scenario as event / message list (Operational Architecture related) </li></ul><ul><li>Basic MHS/WIS/IDS to support interagency cooperation on proxy basis </li></ul><ul><li>GIS and DB (common for all organizations on proxy basis) </li></ul><ul><li>Environment simulation from different BAS Institutes – hydrology, meteorology, seismology, remote sensing, … </li></ul><ul><li>Internet simulated comms and computing power </li></ul><ul><li>CAX Federation BUS management based on Technological Diagrams </li></ul><ul><li>Integrated Implementation Plan and Balance Score Card Assessment </li></ul>
    • 21. Conclusions - I <ul><li>Growing number of new and diverse concepts – need for rapid experimentation and adaptation </li></ul><ul><li>Horizontal nature of the new concepts – need for cross culture training </li></ul><ul><li>Key element in concept implementation / change management is the personnel – people in the loop model for experimentation is needed </li></ul><ul><li>Low cost and flexibility of training environment is a prerequisite for large scale implementation </li></ul><ul><li>CAX and MAX balance in training and experimentation is needed </li></ul>
    • 22. Conclusions - II <ul><li>Evolutionary development (prototyping) and rapid implementation of the results of experimented concepts is required (CoE-OA =&gt; JTSAC-CMEP =&gt; EU TACOM SEE-2006 =&gt; IEMS FS example) </li></ul><ul><li>Integration of efforts of Administration / Forces, R&amp;D / E&amp;T academic institutions and business based on M&amp;S environment is a must </li></ul><ul><li>Proxy Organization is needed to provide patchwork interoperability between all participant in federation </li></ul><ul><li>JTSAC-CMEP is a tool set to provide environment for federation management </li></ul>

    ×