Download S.O.S. via SMS
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Download S.O.S. via SMS

on

  • 985 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
985
Views on SlideShare
985
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft Word

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Download S.O.S. via SMS Download S.O.S. via SMS Document Transcript

  • S.O.S via SMS 1 Abstract Hurricane Katrina changed the way that organizations deal with crises, because traditional methods of technology unexpectedly failed to work. Text messaging or SMS—short message service—emerged as a successful means of keeping people aware of what was happening. Text messaging has yet to be explored as a viable communicative practice during crises. The students enrolled in a crisis management class created a research project to answer these questions: What is text messaging or SMS? Who would likely use SMS during a hurricane crisis and how? For what purposes? What are the best practices for using text messaging? The end result of their efforts captures the next wave of communicative practices in crisis management.
  • S.O.S via SMS 2 S.O.S. via SMS: Text Messaging as a Communication Strategy in Hurricane Crises When the call for papers in the Southern Communication Journal was posted, I was teaching an upper level undergraduate course in Crisis Management at Ithaca College in New York. Two of the students enrolled were displaced from Tulane University because of Hurricane Katrina. Their personal experiences in conjunction with the way that the crisis was handled were central topics of conversation in the class. As the professor, I offered the students an opportunity to continue with the course syllabus, or to answer the call in the journal. After a week’s deliberation, the students unanimously expressed support for designing and conducting a research project and submitting a manuscript for publication. The twenty students enrolled in the course were assigned to 5 groups, each of which was responsible for a specific part of the research process: literature review, theoretical framework, Human Subjects Review Board (HSRB) application, data collection, and data analysis. The first question was “What should we research?” To determine the focus of their project, a brainstorming session was conducted and yielded their desired topic: text messaging and its uses during Hurricane Katrina. This topic was narrowed further with the help of the literature review group to text messaging within crisis management plans (CMP) at three universities directly affected by the hurricane and one indirectly affected. The goal was to compare the four universities to Ithaca College. This comparison was based on a model of technology that the theoretical framework group created.
  • S.O.S via SMS 3 Next, the question raised was “How do we go about researching this topic?” The general preference was to conduct qualitative research by interviewing the presidents and members of crisis teams at the universities. In order to do this, the HSRB group filled out the application and was approved. The data collection group then coordinated and conducted 13 interviews using a teleconference phone. All interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed. The data analysis group then examined the crisis plans from each university and the transcripts from the interviews using the technology model created. For this manuscript to be completed, one member of each group was designated as a leader. The leaders were responsible for writing the manuscript. My role as the professor was only to provide guidance and support. What follows in the rest of the paper is a description of the model and what the students learned in the process about text messaging, crises, and hurricane Katrina. Hurricane Katrina: How It Changed Crisis Plans Hurricane Katrina was one of the most socially and economically damaging hurricanes in American history; not to mention one of the deadliest as well. It was the sixth-strongest Atlantic hurricane and the third-strongest U.S. hurricane on record to make land fall. The Hurricane hit in late August of 2005, devastating much of the north- central Gulf Coast of the United States. Katrina took the lives of 1,836 or more, making it the deadliest U.S. hurricane since 1928. Moreover, Hurricane Katrina was a turning point for many organizations, colleges and university in their planning for crises, according to Lipka (2005): Many institutions simulate crises, running exercises to test their emergency systems and spot weaknesses in their plans. With Hurricane
  • S.O.S via SMS 4 Katrina as a live example of disaster response, officials at undamaged institutions have been watching closely — even as they offer various types of aid — to see how affected colleges' plans are holding up and to identify areas where their own plans could be strengthened (p. A29). Results of crisis situations like Hurricane Katrina and September 11th have made the importance of having a crisis management plan apparent to higher education administrators. In his article, Surviving a Crisis, in American School and University, Mike Kennedy (1999) states that colleges and universities are typically more complex systems because they are not only responsible for the classroom but residence halls, medical facilities, research laboratories, and sports arenas as well. In the same respect, colleges and universities are often the focal point of a city. Thus, any crisis or emergency situation that occurs on a college campus also affects the surrounding community. Because of their complex nature, Kennedy (1999) suggests that planning for any type of crisis that occurs, even if it is merely brief consideration, will be beneficial. In August 1990, five students were slain at the University of Florida. At that time, the university was not equipped with a crisis plan to deal with this type of issue. This incident led to the drafting of a plan for this crisis as well as a variety of others. Despite this tragedy, the crisis led to many positive improvements such as increased lighting and more police patrol. Every year since the deaths, the University of Florida reviews their crisis plans to determine if there is anything that has occurred over the past year that was not covered in the original plan and makes necessary adjustments. “You need to tailor your plan to your institution. You can’t predict. Stuff happens all the time. You’d better
  • S.O.S via SMS 5 be prepared to deal with it,” said Linda Gray Vice President and director of news and public affairs at the University of Florida (originally cited in Kennedy, 1999). Introduction to the Crisis Technology Model (CTM) A Crisis Technology Model was developed in response to the research gathered on the use of technology during crises and the role of technology in creating crisis management plans. This model categorizes five different levels of technology that can be divided into three layers. The higher the level of technology an organization has reached, the better equipped they are for communication. In other words, if an organization, such as a university, has identified the importance of all levels of the model, they are better prepared and more flexible in the process of managing a crisis. In our model the top level of communication is text messaging and short messaging systems (SMS). Once a university has incorporated these top levels of communication into their crisis plans, the members of the organization will be better prepared in the event of a crisis. An organization also needs to take employee training into consideration if it plans to implement text messaging into its crisis plan. If employees understand the technologies and are able to use them, they will be able to work more efficiently during a crisis situation. Furthermore, the more new media tactics the organization uses to engage publics in provocative decisions before, during, and after a crisis, the more effective two- way interaction is between the organization and its public. New media pertains to direct communication, instead of indirect communication, such as television, radio, or other types of mass media. The model also supports the idea that the greater use of multiple technological resources in crisis situations, the greater the opportunity for necessary information to
  • S.O.S via SMS 6 reach the primary affected public. Having a broader understanding of the technologies allows for the universities’ crisis management teams to better react in a crisis situation. In order to comprehend the model, the university needs to first have a basic understanding of what each layer entails. The first layer of the CTM is based on the two lowest, most traditional levels of communication. Television, radio, and external press releases make up level five, the lowest level of the model. The second level within this layer includes e-mail, web blogs, and internal news release. These tools do not guarantee a quick response, and a computer with internet connection is required. Layer two is composed of technologies in levels two and three; instant messaging cellular phone calling. Although these are more direct forms of communication, crisis victims may still experience problems caused by power- outages or the overcrowding of cellular airwaves. The third layer contains the highest level of the crisis technology model, text messaging and short message systems (SMS). In the event of a crisis, most specifically a situation like Hurricane Katrina, we have found through our research that flexibility is of utmost importance. Having a crisis management plan in place is a great way to handle a crisis, but you cannot always predict what is going to happen, according to the President of Ithaca College. Therefore, what our model provides is the ability to pass through layers in order to reach the most effective source of communication. Based on one’s natural reaction, it is his or her responsibility to decide the most appropriate layer of technology for any given situation. The model suggests that there are no boundaries between layers, and that although different levels of technology exist, certain crisis situations require a more advanced form of communication, rather than the traditional means of indirect, mass communication.
  • S.O.S via SMS 7 Therefore, we have identified more direct means of communication in layer two, such as instant messaging and cell phones, which are advancing every day. Both tools have proven to be extremely important forms of communication in our every day lives. However, problems regarding layer two still exist, and result in the “organic” development of the third layer1. Layer three was used as a last resort when cell providers were unable to permit the millions of phone calls being placed during the Hurricane Katrina crisis. Figure 1.1 visually represents this model as an escalator, portraying the layers of communication in order of significance. 1 The term organic was coined by an interviewee who is employed in a department of Risk Management.
  • S.O.S via SMS 8
  • S.O.S via SMS 9 Layer One Practices, technologies, and tools that are used in crisis communication have been categorized into three layers and applied to CMPs for natural disasters, such as Hurricane Katrina. Throughout our interviews with various university personnel who were highly involved in the formation of their respected crisis communications plans, we conclude that universities have implemented and used these communication tools to communicate their crisis plan before Hurricane Katrina made landfall. Common communicative practices in this layer consist of: press releases, TV/Radio broadcasts, flyers distributed over campus, and megaphone announcements. Press releases can be printed and distributed as a hard copy, published on the main web site of the university, or sent via e-mail. The technology used to make massive audio announcements by megaphone and speakerphone is utilized by Ithaca College, through placement of speakerphones on campus safety patrol vehicles. Loyola University places speakerphones within the dormitories. Regular e-mail systems that are used throughout the academic year can also be used in this particular layer of communication. The Vice President of Student Affairs and Campus Life of Ithaca College in New York stated that the college has been using “Intercom Alerts,” which are massive e-mails that announce any kind of incident that affects campus life. The Vice President also revealed that the college’s CMP is being constantly updated by a small core crisis decision team. Pasquini (2005) concedes that with most cellular and landline communications destroyed or at least temporarily down, those still with internet access use it to communicate with the outside world. Methods of communication include instant
  • S.O.S via SMS 10 messaging, VoIP (voice over internet protocol) calling, and message postings on a company’s Web site. According to a posting on the Freepress website, WMAH, a local television network in Mississippi, was “initially in desperate need of diesel fuel” to keep its generator running and stay on air in order to provide news and survival information (www.freepress.net). E-mail is a convenient and quick way for students and faculty to access and respond to messages, and can be updated with news and survival information in the event of a natural disaster. However, with little or no power, the internet is less reliable. During Hurricane Katrina, one of the main technologies used to communicate important messages was e-mail. Web interaction was essential to Loyola University’s CMP for distributing information across a massive audience. However, when the hurricane landed, the university lost a significant portion of their communication with constituencies because of the power outages, according to the President of Loyola University in New Orleans (Telephone interview, December 5th, 2006) Layer one communicative practices and technologies are the most basic forms of communication that can be used in any crisis, and were revealed to have been included in all the CMPs we investigated throughout our research. Upon failure of these practices, we suggest that crisis plans need to incorporate a second layer of practices. Layer Two The development of the second layer relied on new challenges that were faced regarding communication tactics in layer one. The technologies discussed in layer two include. The fact that more traditional forms of communication were not effective in
  • S.O.S via SMS 11 crisis situations sparked the realization that new forms of technology were needed: instant messaging and cell phone. These technologies encourage the use of direct communication. In the event of a crisis, direct communication is a two-way conversation between those experiencing the crisis and those trying to manage the crisis. Layer two technologies provide a quick response and real-time interaction. However, instant messaging requires a computer, the internet, and electricity. If these materials are not available, instant messaging would not be an effective way to communicate during a crisis (Davies, 2005). As a result, this model suggests cell phones as the next best tool for communication. Similar to instant messaging, cellular phones provide instantaneous communication and real-time interaction. During Hurricane Katrina, several people resorted to cell phones as their first choice of communication. Unfortunately, the abundance of phone calls overcrowded the airwaves, resulting in the service providers’ inability to manage every phone call. Cell phones within the Gulf Coast region became inoperable, and therefore useless for making or receiving calls (Lipka, 2005). Potential troubles may also arise from cell phone use during storms, such as high winds interfering with cell towers and radio waves not transmitting calls. Thus, calling via cell phone is not always a reliable source of communication during a crisis. Because cell phone calls were the last form of consistent communication, crisis management teams, as well as victims, must discover an available technology capable of maintaining communication with others. We have already witnessed the improvements made in organizations through the use of these communication technologies. Now, these technological improvements need
  • S.O.S via SMS 12 to be applied to crisis situations. Our model is an illustration of the best communication practices during a crisis (Seeger, 2006). In order to complete this illustration, we must explain the remaining layer in our communication model. The third layer incorporates text messaging, the “organic process”2 that occurred when victims were unable to make cell phones calls. Thus, these victims resorted to text messaging, a form of communication that can be passed much more easily through airwaves. Layer Three After analyzing various crisis communications plans and conducting numerous interviews with key figures within the area of crisis management, we were able to gather information on the lack of text messaging in crisis plans. Because of this lack of effective communication tactics, Hurricane Katrina forced many schools in the affected region to update their crisis plans. Of the schools we investigated, most had already implemented layers one and two of our theoretical framework. When examining the crisis plan specifically for Loyola University, layers one and two of the theoretical framework were exhausted due to the crisis at hand. The failure of layers one and two had a variety of causes, such as power outages, flooding, destruction of facilities, and system overloads. Therefore, these schools need to implement a new form of communication, which should be text messaging. SMS is a service provided on most digital mobile phones and many personal computer systems as a means of sending messages between mobile phones and other mobile communication devices. SMS stands for Short Messaging Service, most commonly known as text-messaging. Text-messaging is often an included feature, available without charge on most modern mobile phones. Text messaging allows 2 The term organic was coined by an interviewee who is employed in a department of Risk Management.
  • S.O.S via SMS 13 users to compose a message with a maximum of 160 characters, by typing letters using the number keypad on their phone, and send a message to any user nationally and internationally (Gupta, 2005). The most common form of SMS messaging is mobile to mobile, also known as point to point messaging, which is simply sending a message from one mobile phone to another. A user can also send a message via the Internet to a mobile phone user. Text messages can also be sent from a cell phone to an email address. Organizations can also use SMS to send mobile phone alerts to mass audiences (Hord, 2006). Text messaging has also become increasingly popular among the youth culture in the United States. However, the people in the U.S. have been behind in this new technology in comparison to many countries in Europe and Asia. A recent survey found that 80 percent of Americans aged 18 to 29 own a cell phone, and 65 percent of these cell phone users use text messaging on a regular basis (Breed, 2006). Benefits and drawbacks of text messaging SMS messages, according to Fawcett of Continuity Central, are less resource intensive than mobile voice calls, so networks can better cope with increased demand of use. This means the message has a better chance of getting through even with an inadequate signal (Fawcett, 2006). Text messaging is often favored in different crisis situations because it does not require continuous access to the network, and the path by which messages travel is reserved for data only, so it is less congested (Searcey, Ali, Latour, 2005). SMS is also part of a store and forward mechanism, so if the receiver is not available to receive the text message, it is saved and stored until the phone becomes available (Hord, 2006). Cingular, one of the top three wireless phone providers will store text messages until they can be successfully delivered
  • S.O.S via SMS 14 and received for up to 72 hours (Ulanoff, 2004). This reliable feature allows for simple messages to be sent quickly in a cost efficient manner to mass audiences with an increased confidence that the message will be received. Despite the better probability of getting through the network, there is no guarantee that a message will be received after it is sent. This is particularly the case when a message is being sent across networks. A user can track the receipt of the message by requesting a confirmation and error alert. However, the receipt does not allow for the sender to verify if the receiver has read the message or understood the information. Another drawback of text messaging through a SMS format is the size limitation. With only 160 characters available, an important message may not fit these constraints, thus requiring multiple messages to be sent (Fawcett, 2006). The more messages needed, the greater the probability that a receiver will not get a message or understand what the messages are telling them to do. This could be critical in a crisis or emergency situation. SMS Emergency Use The benefits and reliability of SMS technology have led to its wide use by organizations and individuals in emergency and crisis situations. SMS has proved to be a successful communication tool in the event of a crisis. Because it requires fewer resources to send and receive messages, people involved in a crisis or emergency situation have found text-messaging a reliable way to contact loved ones and emergency personnel. On September 11, 2001, when terrorist attacks devastated New York City and Washington D.C., cellular networks were flooded with calls which prevented many from actually getting a hold of anyone. Text messaging proved to be the most reliable form of
  • S.O.S via SMS 15 communication throughout the day. However, according to Harvey Fawcett of Continuity Central, at the time there was a low general awareness of text-messaging, which means a stronger knowledge of text-messaging could have provided better communication (Fawcett, 2006). Ashlee Vance, in an article in PC World Magazine (2001), reported that employers all over the country were using text messaging and other IP-based (Internet Protocol) systems to check on workers and loved ones on 9/11. Wireless Knowledge, a software company with an office in New York City sent a data message to all employees asking them to respond with their whereabouts via text message. “It was sort of a virtual role call”, said Jeff Ross, Director of Business Development at Wireless Knowledge (cited originally in Vance, 2001). In June 2005, when terrorists attacked the London underground railway system, residents were advised to use text messaging instead of placing cellular calls because cellular and land line phone systems had been congested for over three hours. The Wall Street Journal reported shortly after the attacks that this was an indication that British cell phone system operators may have not learned a lesson from September 11 in the United States in regards to telephone traffic (Searcey, Ali, Latour, 2005). Other areas of the world are currently adapting SMS as a means of communicating, possibly based on troubles caused by other crises. The war-torn areas of Israel are using text messaging to warn residents of incoming missiles. Cellact, an Israeli telecommunications company has introduced the service as a way to provide critical information when networks are down and timely warning and distribution is crucial. Text messaging has also been successful on much smaller scales but has saved the lives of individual users.
  • S.O.S via SMS 16 Most recently, in October 2006, in Memphis, Tennessee, a woman and her children were kidnapped by the woman’s ex-boyfriend and taken away by car. The woman was able to text message her friend using her cellular phone, and the friend notified the police. The police were able to locate and safely free the woman and children and arrest the kidnapper (Eyewitness News Memphis, 2006). Organizations and governments are increasingly convinced of the benefits that SMS and text messaging can have in emergency situations and beginning to implement plans and infrastructure to support this form of communication. SMS is being adapted by colleges and universities to provide emergency information. San Francisco is one of the first cities to consider text-messaging as a part of a citywide emergency alert system. The plan was announced on October 17, 2006 and allows residents to sign up for an alert that will be sent to their cell phone or mobile device to notify them of an earthquake or crisis situation. The messaging system will provide evacuation routes and information regarding severe weather to subscribers, but will also allow these users to notify the city of their location and any assistance they may require (Vega, 2006). On the national level, according to The Associated Press, the Department of Homeland Security will begin notifying Americans of impending disasters and emergencies using cellular phone text messages by the end of 2007. This will be the first revision to the national alert system since its inception in 1951. The current system, which can only be initiated by the president, uses radio and television broadcast to warn the nation of situations like terrorist attacks, natural disasters and other public hazards (Jordan, 2006).
  • S.O.S via SMS 17 Previous to Hurricane Katrina, Loyola University relied heavily on web technologies, such as e-mail systems and university websites. Other technologies such as PA systems, TV, radio, cell phones, and electronic printing supplies were also heavily relied on. However, because of power outages spanning over the entire New Orleans area, they were cut off from the use of those technologies. In regards to cell phone use, the large number of calls transmitted throughout the Gulf Coast area created a system overload, causing cell phone calls to become useless for one week. Thus, the use of text messaging emerged from the chaos caused by the power outages. In the chaotic situation, structure and order naturally emerged. For instance, when the power went out during Hurricane Katrina, university personnel resorted to text messages as an alternative form of communication. When we interviewed Rick Bell, the director of risk management, he mentioned how text messages were used in replacement of layers one and two of the theoretical framework; as a result, layer three was “organically” formed to include text messaging. The term “organic” in this instance refers to the emergence of text messaging when all other forms planned forms of communication have failed. Through a process of elimination, Rick Bell and other crisis team members discovered the solution of text- messaging out of necessity. Rick Bell explained in a telephone interview that text messaging was “one of the only ways we could talk”. Furthermore, Rick Bell noted that cell phone communication became useless immediately because of downed towers caused by Hurricane Katrina. The reason why text messaging prevailed over other forms of communication was because it had a lower bandwidth requirement than phone calls. Therefore, more text
  • S.O.S via SMS 18 messages were able to be sent and received compared to the phone calls made that created the system overload. Conclusion SMS should be used as an additional form of communication for crisis management. As of yet, Crisis communication plans are either excluding SMS or use it as a last resort. In terms of CMP procedures, the universities studied have shown that there is little or no knowledge of the possible uses and benefits of SMS in an emergency situation. The Generational Aspect of SMS In the event of a hurricane crisis, we have learned that the use of all communication tools is generational. SMS has not been considered as a viable communication tool because its use is more prevalent to generation Y or all college-aged students; a generation to young to have authority in the development of a CMP. In the event of a crisis, as our theoretical framework proposes, the more levels of communication that an organization uses, the better equipped they will be to communicate during a crisis. Not only is the model beneficial in regards to interoperability, but it also provides a variety of communication methods to better suit a set of constituents. In the structural breakdown caused by Hurricane Katrina, our research has shown that people use the form of communication that works and one they are most comfortable with. Students and other constituents on university campuses turned to SMS and text messaging.
  • S.O.S via SMS 19 Limitations While conducting research, it became apparent that SMS and its many uses is an area of technology that has not been thoroughly explored due to its recent adoption by the United States as a communication tool. Research has shown that text messaging is a technology limited in use to certain groups with specific demographical characteristics. Due to the fact that this project was created in the context of a crisis management class at Ithaca College, we were limited to the time span of one academic semester. This time constraint limited the number of colleges and universities we were able to study in depth. With more time, we would have been able to broaden the scope of our research, as well as include more subjects for our studies. Our findings are extensive, however not exhaustive. Another limitation to our research was our location in the central New York State region. We took into consideration that New York State is not a location prone to hurricane weather. Generally, we lack a personal understanding of hurricane experiences. The knowledge we gained in the process became meaningful after conducting interviews with administrators and officials from universities in hurricane areas. We were then able to compare these shared experiences with the information we gathered from our initial research. SMS is a fairly recent communication tool in the United States. While text messaging is considered a commonplace form of communication in foreign regions, the majority of the U.S. population is still unfamiliar with the tool. Even less is known about the use SMS in the event of a crisis. Most recently, within the last few years, organizations and cities are beginning to incorporate SMS based communication into
  • S.O.S via SMS 20 their CMPs. It is difficult to determine if SMS will continue to gain popularity and if usage will continue to increase in the United States or if it is a communication fad and soon be replaced by a newer more innovation tool. Recommended for further research In the aftermath of September 11 and Hurricane Katrina, the necessity for sustainable communication systems became clear to all. Cell phones, satellite phones, and walkie-talkie phones are useful, but only if the services are not overloaded, as they may be in an emergency. For this reason, many service carriers and organizations have completed considerable work to tighten their disaster recovery plans. While completing extensive research, we recognized several subjects related to the focus of our paper. The section below is a list of suggested topics for further in-depth research: • The effectiveness of SMS technology – advantages and disadvantages • Personal and social awareness, attitudes and perceptions towards the use of SMS technology • Personal communication preference/methods for communicating with colleagues, family members and friends not only during crisis situations but also in everyday life • Structural improvements on both corporate and governmental levels National carriers such as Sprint/Nextel, Cingular, T-Mobile, and Verizon, in preparation for future disaster situations, are expanding the scope of their emergency response teams in terms of technological security to help public-safety agencies coordinate communications during emergencies. Moreover, Sprint/Nextel is creating a
  • S.O.S via SMS 21 complex backup system that combines generator technology and fuel to provide a variety of communication tools, including satellite services and iDEN (Integrated Digital Enhanced Network), in case of a crisis situation.
  • S.O.S via SMS 22 References Breed, A. G. (2006, October 16). The two sides of texting. Associated Press. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from http://www.cbsnews.com. Davies, D. (2005, September 5). VoIP: Voice over internet protocol. Canadian Mining Journal. 126, 6, 9. Retrieved January 12th, 2007 from ABI/Inform database. Fawcett, H. (2006, September 22). Communicating in a crisis—which technologies can be relied upon? Retrieved September 22, 2006 from Community Central database. Gupta, P. (2005). Short messaging service: What, how, where? Wireless Developer Network. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from www.wirelessdvnet.com. Hord, J. (2006). How SMS works. How Stuff Works. Retrieved October 5, 2006, from http://www.howstuffworks.com/sms.htm. Jordan, L.J. (2006, July 11). Emergency alerts to ping cell phones, Internet. Associated Press. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from http://www.usatoday.com. Kennedy, M. (1999, October). Surviving a crisis. American School & University, 42 b-e Lipka, S. (2005, October 14). After Katrina, colleges nationwide take a fresh look at disaster plans. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52, 8, A28-30. Retrieved November 28, 2006, from Academic Search Premier database. Pasquini, J. (2005, November 18).Lessons Learned from Disaster: 2005 Hurricane Season Tests, Strains Business Continuity Plans. [Electronic version]. Processor, 27, 46, 31.
  • S.O.S via SMS 23 Searcey, D., Ali, S., & Latour, A. (2005, July 8). Amid crisis, phones jammed, but text messages worked. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from http://www.wsj.com. Seeger, M. W. (2006). Best practices in crisis communication: An expert panel process. [Electronic version]. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 3, 232- 244. Ulanoff, L. (2004, August 11). Messages can be forever. PCMagazine. [Electronic version]. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www.pcmag.com/article2/ 0,1759,1634544,00.asp. Vance, A. (2001, September). In crisis, companies turn to messaging: With cellular networks jammed, many used IP-based systems to check on coworkers and loved ones. PC World. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from http://www.pcworld.com. Vega, C. M. (2006, October 18). Text messaging plan for emergency alerts. The San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved October 31, 2006, from http://www.sfgate.com Additional Reading Allen, M., Jerome, A., White, A., Marston, S., Lamb, S., Pope, D. & Rawlins, C. (2002). The preparation of school psychologists for crisis intervention. Psychology in Schools, 39, 4, 427-439. Anonymous. (2006). It’s not the crisis that counts, it’s the way the crisis is handled. Strategic Direction, 22, 5, 20-22. Bacque, P. (2000, March 21). Statewide crisis team is urged: Local officials would get aid in emergencies. Richmond Times Dispatch (Virginia), B-1. Retrieved October 23, 2006 from LexisNexis Academic database.
  • S.O.S via SMS 24 Benjamin, M. (2005, September 9). Communications breakdown. Retrieved October 31, 2006, from http://dir.salon.com/‌story/‌news/‌feature/‌2005/‌09/‌09/‌comm_meltdown/‌index.html. Borgatti, S.P. (1999, September 7). Elements of a theoretical framework. Retrieved October 23, 2006. file:///E:/Theoretical%20Framework%20Articles/Elements . . . Bray, R. (2006, September 17). In case of an emergency: use satellite technology: Roger Bray on how companies can keep in touch with their employees during a crisis. The Financial Times Limited. Retrieved October 26, 2006, from LexisNexis Academic database. Brown, T. S. (2003, Winter). Powerful crisis communications lessons. Public Relations Quarterly, 48, 4, 31-34. Burnett, J. J. (1998). A strategic approach to managing crisis. Public Relations Review, 24, 4, 475-488. Burnham, G. (2006, Spring). Preventing disaster: Realizing vulnerabilities and looking forward. Harvard International Review, 28, 1, 83-84. Cai, G., Sharma, R., MacEachren, A. M. & Brewer, I. (2006). Human-GIS interaction issues in crisis response. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 6, 4/5/6, 388-407. Calit2 Unveils Wearable Communication System that Aids Emergency Response. (2006, July 20). Wireless News, p.1. Christen, C. T. (2005, June). The restructuring and reengineering of AT&T: Analysis of a public relations crisis using organization theory. Public Relations Review, 31, 2, 239-251. Retrieved October 17, 2006, from Science Direct database. Coombs, W. T. (n.d.). Information and compassion in crisis responses: A test of their effects.
  • S.O.S via SMS 25 Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 2, 1-13. Retrieved November 27, 2006 from EBSCOhost database. Cowen, S. S. (2006, May 20). Expect the unexpected: Graduation remarks presented at George Mason University. Retrieved October 26, 2006, from http://www2.tulane.edu/ president_gmu_2006.cfm. Division of Students Affairs. Loyola University New Orleans. (2006, August 25). Hurricane emergency plan. Retrieved November 27, 2006, from http://www.loyno.edu/ studentaffairs/hurricane.emer.plan.html. Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2004). Interpersonal communication after 9/11 via telephone and internet: A theory of channel complementarity.[Electronic version]. New Media & Society, 6, 5, 659-673. Dyer, S. C. (1995, Fall). Getting people into the crisis communication plan. Public Relations Quarterly, 38-41. Egelhoff, W. G. & Sen, F. (1992). An information processing model of crisis management. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 4, 443-484. Facella, J. (2006, July 1). Lessons from hurricane Katrina. Prism Business Media, Inc. Retrieved October 27, 2006, from LexisNexis Academic database. Fawcett, H. (2006, September 22). Communication in a crisis: Which technologies can be relied on? Continuity Central. Retrieved November 6, 2006, from Continuity Central database. Fearn-Banks, K. (2002). Crisis communications: A casebook approach. (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • S.O.S via SMS 26 Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2006, March 4). National situation update: The west remains active this weekend. Retrieved on March 4, 2006 from http:// www.fema.gov. Fields, C. (n.d.). Higher education in Katrina’s wake. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37, 6. Retrieved November 27, 2006 from ERIC database (ERIC Document No. 20051101). Fordahl, M., & Meyerson, B. (2005, September 13). Communication breakdown: From 9/‌11 to Katrina. Retrieved November 1, 2006, from http://www.livescience.com/‌technology/‌ap_050913_comm_breakdown.html. Gorman, B. (2006, June/July). Four crucial steps to setting up a crisis response plan. Strategic Communication Management, 10, 4, 14-17. Haines, M., Kernen, J., & Quick, B. (2005, September 14). Post Katrina analysis. [Electronic version]. Global News Wire. Retrieved August 25, 2006, from LexisNexis database. Hanly, B. (2006, December 3). Storm communication no big easy. Wired. Retrieved November 1, 2006, from http://www.wired.com/‌news/‌politics/‌1,71385-0.html. Harrison, R. (2006, July 2). Device allows for speedy communication in crisis: San Ramon: Company tries to help enable networks to be back up and running quickly in emergencies. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, 1. Retrieved October 18, 2006 from ProQuest database. Horsley, J. S. & Barker, R. T. (2002, October). Toward a synthesis model for crisis communication in the public sector. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16, 4, 406-440.
  • S.O.S via SMS 27 Huang, Y. (2006, June). Crisis situations, communication strategies, and media coverage: A multicase study revisiting the communicative response model. Communication Research, 33, 3, 180-225. Jackson, D. (2006, July). FCC seeks comments on Katrina panel recommendations. Mobile Radio Technology, 9. Jackson, D. (2005, November 1). Survivable communications: Much more than hardened radios. Mobile Radio Technology, 40. Retrieved October 27, 2006 from LexisNexis Academic database. Joch, A. (2005, December 5). Communications breakdown: First responders look for new ways to keep communications flowing in emergencies. FCW.Com. Retrieved November 1, 2006, from http://www.fcw.com/‌article91601-12-05-05-Print. Kapucu, N. & Van Wart, M. (2006, July). The evolving role of the public sector in managing catastrophic disasters: Lessons learned. Administration & Society, 38,3, 279-308. Knott, G. A. (2004, December 2). Case study: Maintaining wireless services during hurricane season. Wireless Business Forecast, 11, 24, 1. Retrieved October 25, 2006, from ProQuest database. Lerbinger, O. (1997). The crisis manager: Facing risk and responsibility. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Marshall, S. (2006, July 2). Device allows for speedy communication in crisis: San Ramon Company tries to help enable networks to be back up and running quickly in emergencies. [Electronic version]. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, 1. Retrieved October 18, 2006, from ProQuest database.
  • S.O.S via SMS 28 Marshall, S. (2006, July 2). Device allows for speedy communication in crisis: San Ramon: company tries to help enable networks to be back up and running quickly in emergencies. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, p.1. Meffert, G. (2006, September 8). Can our cities cope with crisis? Business Week Online, 2. Editorial retrieved October 13, 2006 from Business Source Premier database. Montandon, E. (2006, August 8). R U OK? Short message service can be a valuable tool in a crisis. Retrieved November 1, 2006, from http://www.emergencymgmt.com/‌ story.print.php?id=100486. Montgomery County Maryland. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from http://montgomerycountymd.gov. Myer, R. A. & Moore, H. B. (2006, Spring). Crisis in context theory: An ecological model. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84, 136-147. Nishida, S., Koiso, T., & Nakatani, M. (2004). Evaluation of organizational structure in emergency situation from the viewpoint of communication. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 17, 1, 25-42. O’Kane, T. (2006, June 30). The post-Katrina semester. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52, 43, C1. Retrieved November 10, 2006 from ProQuest database. Penn State creates newswire using e2Campus SMS text messaging. (2006, October 1). Tele-Service News. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from ProQuest database. Perry, D. C., Taylor, M. & Doerfel, M. L. (2003). Internet-based communication in crisis management. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 2, 206-232. Reinsch, N. L. Jr, & Turner, J. W. (2006, July). Ari, R U There? Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20, 3, 339-356.
  • S.O.S via SMS 29 Riley, S. (2006, October 24). Schools learning new ways to keep parents informed. Columbine spurs an upgrade. From crises to bad grades, text messages delivering urgent news more quickly. Investors Business Daily, 4. Ritchie, B. W. (2004). Chaos, crises and disasters: A strategic approach to crisis management in the tourism industry. [Electronic version]. Tourism Management, 25, 669-683. Roberts, P. S. (2006, June & July). FEMA after Katrina. Policy Review, 137, 15-33. Sellnow, T. L., Seeger, M. W., & Ulmer, R. R. (2002, November). Chaos theory, informational needs, and natural disasters. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 4, 269-292. Retrieved October 11, 2006 from EBSCOhost database. Shin, J., Cheng, I., Jin, Y., & Cameron, G. T. (2005). Going head to head: Content analysis of high profile conflicts as played out in the press. Public Relations Review, 31, 399-406. Stuver, P. (2006, May). Maximizing emergency communication. Risk Management, 53, 5, 30-34. Testa, B. M. (2006, August 28). The insider [Special section]. Workforce Management, 46, 46. Retrieved October 26th, 2006 from Lexis-Nexis database. Text messaging saves kidnapped woman. (2006, October 17). Eyewitness News Memphis. Retrieved October 31, 2006, from http://myeyewitnessnews.com/news/local. Travis-Scott, R. (2006, July 5). Emergency communication doesn’t include new technology. Time Picayune (New Orleans), 1. Retrieved October 26, 2006 from LexisNexis Academic database.