Relationship-based knowledge mobilization: systems-based KMb and consideration of risk perception for effective uptake_Poetz
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Relationship-based knowledge mobilization: systems-based KMb and consideration of risk perception for effective uptake_Poetz

on

  • 220 views

The field of Knowledge Translation (KT) needs to consider the importance of risk perception as a key barrier for uptake of research findings. This presentation outlines several domains for risk ...

The field of Knowledge Translation (KT) needs to consider the importance of risk perception as a key barrier for uptake of research findings. This presentation outlines several domains for risk perception identified as a result of case study/grounded theory methodology research on the restart of two nuclear generating stations in Ontario, Canada. Generalizable results for the field of KT, KMb are presented.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
220
Views on SlideShare
121
Embed Views
99

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

2 Embeds 99

http://neurodevnet.wordpress.com 97
https://neurodevnet.wordpress.com 2

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Relationship-based knowledge mobilization: systems-based KMb and consideration of risk perception for effective uptake_Poetz Relationship-based knowledge mobilization: systems-based KMb and consideration of risk perception for effective uptake_Poetz Presentation Transcript

  • Anneliese Poetz, PhD apoetz@yorku.ca Canadian Knowledge Mobilization Conference Monday June 9, 4:30 – 5:00p (Room Poplar) Saskatoon, Saskatchewan RELATIONSHIP-BASED KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION: SYSTEMS-BASED KMB AND CONSIDERATION OF RISK PERCEPTION FOR EFFECTIVE UPTAKE
  • OUTLINE • Context • Research objectives • What I did (methodology) • What I learned from the research • Why this is important for Knowledge Mobilization
  • CONTEXT
  • KINCARDINE, ON
  • BRUCE POWER (KINCARDINE)
  • PICKERING AND BRUCE RESTART • 1997, 7 reactors in Ontario shut down (NAOP) • 1997 new legislation Nuclear Safety and Control Act, replaces Atomic Energy Control Act/AECB and enacted CNSC (CEAA) which required EA • 2005 Bruce A 1&2 returned to service (a few years prior, Pickering A Unit 4 2001-03, then Unit 1, not 2&3)
  • RE-LICENSING PROCESS (STEPS) 1) NGS submits LOI & project description to CNSC 2) CNSC issues Draft EA guidelines 3) EA guidelines subject to public review 4) CNSC commission hearing on EA guidelines 5) CNSC issues final EA guidelines 6) NGS submits draft EA study to CNSC 7) NGS submits final EA study report to CNSC 8) CNSC issues draft screening report for public review 9) CNSC commission hearing on screening report 10) CNSC commission decision
  • RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
  • OBJECTIVES 1) To explore the importance of individual knowledge about risks 2) To investigate the manner in which information is exchanged and utilized 3) To explore the relationship between the public and the decision-making institutions which are entrusted with making decisions about risk
  • How can the current stakeholder consultation processes for decision making involving risks to public safety be improved?
  • METHODOLOGY
  • QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWS + DOCS
  • WHAT I LEARNED
  • GLOBAL SYSTEM
  • NATIONAL SYSTEM
  • LOCAL SYSTEM
  • RELATIONSHIP MODEL FOR STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT & KE Poetz, A. (2012) “Risk is a social thing, not just a mathematical thing” a model for stakeholder engagement in decision-making. Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy. Vol.3, Iss.2, Art.4: http://bit.ly/1nMJNIX
  • TYPES OF RISK PERCEPTIONS • Technical • Environmental • Political • Financial • Security
  • WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT FOR KM
  • KNOWLEDGE USE FOR DM • Industry preferred to conduct their own ongoing scientific analyses (context specific, security risks) • Academic studies not used because not context- specific, not relevant for EA (specific requirements) • Answer to shareholders (it’s a business)
  • WHAT I LEARNED… • Important to understand perception of risk for all stakeholders (not just the public) • Fluid process, and always changing depending on contingencies (external events that affect the system) • Good/trusting relationships, including transparency (where appropriate) is key • KEY: facilitated in-person consultations (semi-formal) • Build relationships before you need them, maintain them after (return to community to explain decision) so they will be there when you need them again
  • HOW DOES THIS TRANSLATE TO OTHER CONTEXTS • “invisible barriers” to uptake can include risk perceptions • Wrong/inadequate information being provided for uptake info needs to be tailored to needs of audience (policy, practice, public) • Seek out areas of misunderstanding and clarify before conflict occurs (def’n transparency, Fed vs Prov EA, roles) • Realize the information needed, the risk perceptions that might be a barrier to uptake, and roles of ppl, change as events/contingencies happen and impact the ‘system’
  • REMEMBER… Things constantly change: • Relationships • The system • Information needs • Risk perceptions
  • QUESTIONS? Anneliese Poetz, PhD apoetz@yorku.ca “All our knowledge has its origins in our perceptions” - Leonardo da Vinci “Risk is a social thing, not just a mathematical thing” a model for stakeholder engagement in decision-making: http://bit.ly/1nMJNIX A systems-view of decision-making for risky technologies: from global to local and local to global: http://bit.ly/1mgwDTe What’s your “position” on nuclear power? An exploration of conflict in stakeholder participation for decision-making about risky technologies: http://bit.ly/1gvBaDs
  • TECHNICAL RISK PERCEPTIONS
  • ENVIRONMENTAL RISK PERCEPTIONS
  • POLITICAL RISK PERCEPTIONS
  • FINANCIAL RISK PERCEPTIONS
  • SECURITY RISK & TRANSPARENCY
  • FAIRNESS OF PROCESS
  • DEMOCRACY OF PROCESS
  • FOR INDUSTRY: • Clearly explain mandates, processes and roles beforehand (including def’n of transparency) • Opportunities throughout and beyond decision-making processes be made available for informal, mediated discussions • Go back and explain the decision afterwards • More emphasis on relationship management (communication and conflict resolution, “attitudes”)
  • APPLICATION OF RELATIONSHIP MODEL • On-site academics to conduct environmental studies • Dependent upon relationship (trust/security clearance) • Arms-length/objective (off-site) vs. on-site ‘biased’ • Ongoing stakeholder consultation, before, during and after EA