RLO Design

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    RLO Design - Presentation Transcript

    1. Designing RLOs for Information Literacy: The BRUM Project Nancy Graham April 2009
    2. BRUM – Part One
      • Background and outline of project
      • What is a ‘learning object’?
      • What is ‘good’ design?
      • What about pedagogy?
      • How do we test our RLOs?
    3. BRUM – Part Two
      • What can we learn from good practice?
      • Creation vs. re-use
      • Sharing – time for a CoP?
      • Information about existing material
    4. Background to BRUM
      • B irmingham R e- U sable M aterials
      • Externally funded
      • 15 RLOs to support information literacy
      • Engagement with academics and students
    5. What we did 15 RLOs 3 x Captivate demos 3 x Turning Point quizzes 3 x audio guides 3 x audio/visual recordings 3 x Choose your own Adventure PowerPoint
    6. http://www.is2.bham.ac.uk/blasst/brum.htm
    7. What we did
      • 10-20 hours per RLO
      • Other librarians got involved
      • Steep learning curve!
      • Problems
    8. What the academics thought
      • Academic ‘buy-in’
      • Time – theirs and yours!
      • Role of librarians
      • Sage on the stage culture still pervades
    9. What the students thought
      • Pre and post questionnaires
      • Focus group
    10. “ I’ve been thinking for ages about how to get the best out of eLibrary and now I’ve seen these RLOs, I’ve learnt loads.” “ if it wasn’t for this meeting today I would never have found these, and wouldn’t have even imagined that this type of thing existed.” “ these need more promotion”
    11. What is a learning object?
    12.  
    13.  
    14.  
    15.  
    16. What makes a learning object ‘re-usable’?
    17. What is ‘good’ design?
      • Granularity
      • Generic and adaptable
      • Using familiar technology/software
      • Meaningful metadata
      • Flexible
    18. Granularity
    19. Generic and adaptable
    20. Using familiar technology/software
    21. Meaningful metadata
    22. Flexible
    23. Background to BRUM: SPIRE
      • Wikis
      • Communication tools (instant messaging, social networking)
      • Creating content (blogs)
    24. Background to BRUM: SPIRE
      • Organising information (Bloglines)
      • Keeping up to date (RSS)
      • Social tagging (del.icio.us)
    25. Design attributes of RLOs Can be aggregated Re-usable and re-purposable Self-paced, interactive Self-contained Flexible use RLOs
    26. Attributes that appeal to students “ Mash ups” Re-usable and re-purposable Self-paced, interactive Embeddable Accessibility – want to log on anytime, anywhere Students
    27. Pedagogy
      • Link to learning outcomes
      • Learning styles
      • To test or not to test?
      • Technology vs. pedagogy
    28. Text vs. interaction
    29. How do we test our designs?
      • Student assessment and feedback
      • Academic feedback
      • Colleague feedback
      • Objective peer review (Merlot)
    30.  
    31.  
    32. Where’s the good practice?
      • CILIP sub-group IL page – starting point
      • Merlot – evaluation criteria
      • Cardiff – excellent examples
      • NDLR – community of practice
      • SMILE – example of re-used material
    33. Creation vs. re-use
    34. Creation
      • Pros
      • Complete control and ownership
      • Specific to institution
      • Understand context
      • Cons
      • Can be time-consuming
      • Duplication
      • Silo working
    35. Re-use
      • Pros
      • Save time
      • Use existing good practice
      • Avoid duplication
      • Cons
      • Can be time-consuming!!
      • Nothing ‘fits’
      • No context
      • No or restricted persmissions
    36. Other re-use issues
      • Quality assurance
      • Metadata (discoverability and relevance)
      • Repositories vs. silos
      • Sustainability
      • IPR
    37. Sharing
      • Cultural changes
      • OER (JISC projects)
      • Common goals?
      • A community of practice?
    38. Further information
      • IL RLO Share wiki:
        • http://ilrloshare.wetpaint.com
      • Project blog:
        • http:// brumproject.blogspot.com
      • Project web-site
        • http://www.is2.bham.ac.uk/blasst/brum.htm
      • Nancy Graham [email_address]

    + University of BirminghamUniversity of Birmingham, 4 months ago

    custom

    110 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation given at the SUILCoP event on 29th Apr more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 110
      • 110 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories