Qualityteacher

367 views

Published on

Dr K Nachimuthu
Periyar University
Salem, TN, INDIA

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
367
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Qualityteacher

  1. 1. Need of Quality indicators in Teacher Education Programmes Dr.K.Nachimuthu Asst. Professor, Dept. of Education, Periyar University, Salem, TN [email_address] www. drknmuthu.com
  2. 2. INTRODUCTION <ul><li>The word “quality” comes from the Latin word “quails” which means, “what kind of”. </li></ul><ul><li>The British Standard Institution (1991) defines, as “the totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs . </li></ul>
  3. 3. DIFFERENT QUALITIES <ul><li>Quality has different ideas. </li></ul><ul><li>(i) quality as absolute ( eg. Taj Mahal Pic); </li></ul><ul><li>(ii) quality as relative (eg. IIT standards); </li></ul><ul><li>(iii) quality as a process (eg. HP printer); </li></ul><ul><li>(iv) quality as culture (eg. teaching process in Gnanamani Institutions). </li></ul>
  4. 4. QUALITY - TEACHER EDUCATION <ul><li>To identify the needs of our schools (Classroom, Infrastructure, Buildings, Playground, Electricity, Water facilities), </li></ul><ul><li>To identify the needs of our teachers and the teacher educators (teaching degree, skill of teaching, using technological devices) </li></ul><ul><li>To evolve a framework to provide a systematic recording tool for documentation of their quality development (Hostel, library, Internet) </li></ul>
  5. 5. NAAC CONCENTRATES ON - <ul><li>Impact on students; </li></ul><ul><li>Improving performance; </li></ul><ul><li>Policy importance; </li></ul><ul><li>Susceptibility to being influenced by the </li></ul><ul><li>school system and other agencies; </li></ul><ul><li>(v) Scientific soundness; </li></ul><ul><li>(vi) Face validity and Content validity and </li></ul><ul><li>(vii) Feasibility of any educational institution. </li></ul>
  6. 6. OBJECTIVES OF NAAC <ul><li>Grade institutions of teacher (higher) education and their programmes </li></ul><ul><li>Stimulate the academic environment and quality of teaching and research in these institutions </li></ul><ul><li>Help institutions realize their academic objectives </li></ul><ul><li>Promote necessary changes, innovations and reforms in all aspects of the institutions working for the above purpose; and </li></ul><ul><li>Encourage innovations, self- evaluation and accountability in teacher (higher) education </li></ul>
  7. 7. QUALITY OF TEACHING PROGRAMMES <ul><li>Accountability </li></ul><ul><li>Attractiveness of image </li></ul><ul><li>Brand maintenance </li></ul><ul><li>Competition </li></ul><ul><li>Improve responsibilities </li></ul><ul><li>Parents satisfaction </li></ul><ul><li>Standard maintenance </li></ul>
  8. 8. QUALITY ASSESSMENT <ul><li>We can check the (a) physical Infrastructures (building & equipments); (b) system efficiency (students); and (c) faculty recruitment (teach & non-teaching staff) through the five point quality scale with the rating of needs must attention, can do more; good; better and best levels . </li></ul>
  9. 9. CONLCUSION <ul><li>Today's students live in a global, knowledge-based age. </li></ul><ul><li>They deserve teachers whose practice embraces the best that technology can bring to learning. </li></ul><ul><li>Critical thinking, problem solving and decision-making as cognitive skills that children should be adept at. </li></ul><ul><li>Preparing teachers & giving the learner better opportunities to create new knowledge </li></ul>
  10. 10. <ul><li>( M)+91 09 84 27 26 987 </li></ul><ul><li>www.drknmuthu.com </li></ul>Thank you Teachers

×